Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of frailty, physical performance, and chronic kidney disease on mortality in older patients with diabetes : a retrospective longitudinal cohort study

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome volume 15, Article number: 7 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Declined renal function is associated with physical function impairment and frailty in a graded fashion. This study aimed to examine the relationship between renal function, frailty and physical performance with mortality in older patients with diabetes, while also determining their combined effects on patient outcome.

Methods

A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted in elderly patients with diabetes. Kidney disease staging was based on clinical practice guidelines of the International Society of Nephrology, and chronic kiney disease (CKD) was defined as urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) > 30 mg/g, persistent reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or both. The modified Rockwood frailty index (RFI) was composed of cumulative health deficits, and physical function was determined by handgrip strength (HGS). Additionally, a timed up and go (TUG) test was assessed at baseline. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to analyze the association between CKD, frailty, physical function and mortality.

Results

For the 921 enrolled patients, their mean age was 82.0 ± 6.7 years. After a median 2.92 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.06–4.43) year follow-up, the survival rate was 67.6% and 85.5% in patients with and without CKD, respectively. The mortality hazard ratio (crude HR) with CKD was 5.92 for those with an RFI higher than 0.313 (95% CI 3.44–10.18), 2.50 for a TUG time longer than 21 s (95% CI 1.22–5.13), and 2.67 for an HGS lower than 10.57 kg in females or 20.4 kg in males (95% CI 1.12–6.37). After multivariate adjustment, the mortality hazard ratio for an RFI ≥ 0.313 was 5.34 (95% CI 2.23–12.80) in CKD patients, but not in patients without CKD. In subgroup analysis, patients experiencing CKD and frailty, or physical function impairment, had the lowest survival proportion followed by only frailty/declined physical function, only CKD, without CKD, and non-frailty/non-physical impairment.

Conclusion

CKD, frailty and physical function impairment were all associated with an increased mortality risk in older patients with diabetes, while the combined effects of these 3 factors were seen on patient outcome.

Introduction

Over the past years, mortality and the incidence of cardiovascular outcomes have declined substantially amongst persons with diabetes; however, the health and economic burden surrounding chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with diabetes remains high [1, 2]. Diabetes continues to be the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide, being the cause of ESRD in 24–55% of patients [3, 4]. Importantly, older patients with diabetes have a faster decline in eGFR per year, along with an increase in death risk [5]. In addition to CKD, older adults with diabetes are also at a greater risk of geriatric syndromes, including physical disability, cognitive impairment, frailty, falls, polypharmacy, and others [6]. Frailty is broadly accepted as a multidimensional syndrome manifesting as a decrease in physiological reserve, as well as increased susceptibility to numerous adverse outcomes [7]. In patients with diabetes associated with frailty, a higher risk of disability, hospitalization, and mortality has been seen [8, 9]. Additionally, several epidemiologic studies have reported that physical disability associated with diabetes may profoundly affect both qualities of life in the older population with diabetes as well as the disease prognosis [10].

Patients diagnosed with CKD are more likely to advance to the frailty stage due to chronic inflammation, insulin resistance and vascular calcification, resulting in a loss of musculoskeletal mass [11]. Furthermore, greater renal function decline is associated with more severe frailty and physical function impairment, which as a consequence contributes to adverse health events in patients with CKD, regardless of whether they are receiving dialysis or not [12, 13]. As both CKD and frailty are associated with diabetes, their effects and outcomes are important in patients with diabetes. However, there have been few previous studies which focused on combined CKD and frailty when predicting mortality in older people with diabetes. The aim of the present study was two-fold. First, we investigated whether CKD and frailty, along with physical performance parameters, were independent predictors of mortality in elderly adults with diabetes. And secondly, we explored the combined associations of these factors on mortality.

Materials and methods

Assembly of the cohort, study population, and the follow-up procedure

This was a hospital-based retrospective longitudinal cohort study, and we enrolled 2057 patients ≥ 65 years from the case management care system of the Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH) with a study duration from Jan 2009 to June 2018. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) was determined by the International Classification of Disease 9th version, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code of 250.x during outpatient visits, or at least once during in-patient care. The patients with age < 65 years, severe neurologic disorders, < 30 days of CKD diagnosis, death within 30 days or an inadequate follow-up length of < 6 months were excluded. Finally, 921 patients with DM were enrolled (Fig. 1). In this study, kidney disease staging is according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline [14,15,16] with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) category (G1–G5; G1, eGFR ≥ 90; G2, eGFR 60–89; G3a, eGFR 45–59; G3b, eGFR 30–44; G4, eGFR 15–29; G5, eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m2), albuminuria category with albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) > 30 mg/g (A1–A3; A1, albuminuria < 30 mg/g; A2, albuminuria 30-300 mg/g; A3, albuminuria > 300 mg/g) [14], and a urine protein/creatinine (PC) ratio > 0.2 mg/g [15]. The diagnosis of CKD was defined by the following criteria: urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) > 30 mg/g, persistent reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, or both, for at least 3 months. Besides, in this study, CKD was also diagnosed with the ICD-9-CM code of 585.x that had been validated. Afterward, there were 560 diabetic subjects classified with CKD and 361 diabetic subjects without CKD with index dates defined as the day of receiving comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for all participants. The enrolled subjects were generally followed up at the outpatient department and/or by telephone calls every 3 to 6 months until June 19, 2018. The patients with frailty were evaluated every 6 months; in the non-frail group, they were evaluated once a year. The retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of TCVGH (No. CE20293A, CF13015, CF13015-1, CF13015A-2, CF13015A-3) which approved the waiver for informed consent. All methods in this study were carried out by our institutional guidelines and regulations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart presenting the selected participants. Five hundred sixty (560) patients had diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), while 361 subjects had diabetes only, no CKD. MNA-SF mini-nutritional assessment-short form, TUG timed up-and-go test, HGS handgrip strength, 6 MW 6-meter walking

Full size image

Study variables

Clinical data, including demography, self-reported comorbidities (dementia, hypertension and hyperlipidemia), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, ICD-9-CM codes of 491.X, 492.X, 493.22 and 496) [17], as well as chronic heart failure (CHF, ICD-9-CM codes of 428.0-428.9 and 402.91) were all validated by the ICD-9-CM codes. Additionally, a 2D echocardiogram and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were obtained to diagnose and differentiate HF with preserved and reduced ejection fraction under a standard protocol (American Society of Echocardiography [ASE] or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging [EACVI] protocol) [18]. In addition, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index and laboratory tests were measured during visits to the in-patient and out-patient departments on the index date. Diabetic severity was measured using both serum glycated hemoglobin and fasting glucose. Diabetes medication, including oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) (α-glucosidase inhibitors, biguanides, meglitinide, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 [DPP4] inhibitors and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 [SGLT-2] inhibitors), insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists were documented during the study period according to pharmacological and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification.

Geriatric assessment

Cognitive function using the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) was assessed through the Chinese version of the questionnaire. Patient nutritional status was evaluated by the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) [19]. Trunk balance and core activity were measured by the timed up and go (TUG) test using a 46-cm-height armchair and involved regular footwear, any mobility aids, walking a straight line for 3 m, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down [18, 20, 21]. Mobility and slowness were determined by the 6-meter walking (6 MW) test in which patients were instructed to walk at their self-selected usual pace on a smooth, horizontal walkway [22]. Handgrip strength (HGS) involving the dominant hand was measured and recorded three times, with the maximum value determined by a dynamometer (Smedley’s Dynamometer, TTM, Tokyo, Japan). Rather than using traditional parameters for physical functionality [23, 24], categorized cutoff points were used to define the frailty parameters, including TUG, HGS and the 6-meter walking test (6 MW) [18, 20, 25]. TUG values were separated into tertiles (T1, 0 ~ < 14 s; T2, ≥ 14 ~ < 21 s; T3, ≥ 21 s), while the Chi-square test was used to determine the appropriateness of 21 s. The HGS values were divided into fifth (F1, 0 ~ 15.47 kg; F2, > 15.47 ~ < 20.4 kg; F3, ≥ 20.4 ~ 22.73 kg; F4, > 22.73 ~ 26.9 kg; F5 > 26.9 ~ 48.87 kg in men; F1, 0 ~ < 10.57 kg; F2, ≥ 10.57 ~ < 12.5 kg; F3, ≥ 12.5 ~ 14.83 kg; F4, > 14.83 ~ 17.43 kg; F5, > 17.43 ~ 24.1 kg in women), with abnormal HGS being defined as less than the cut-off points of 20.4 kg for men and 10.57 kg for women.

Abnormal values of 6 MW were separately calculated as quartiles (Q1, 0 ~ 8.95 s; Q2, > 8.95 ~ 12.7 s; Q3, ≥ 12.7 ~ 16.6 s; Q4, > 16.6 ~ 52.0 s in men; Q1, 0 ~ < 8.0 s; Q2, ≥ 8.0 ~ 11.8 s; Q3, > 11.8 ~ 17.51 s; Q4, > 17.51 ~ 50.0 s in women), with cutoff points of > 8.95 s for men and > 17.51 s for women, due to men and women walking at different speeds because of different leg lengths.

Calculation of frailty

Both the Fried phenotypic model [26] and the Rockwood frailty index [27] are currently used to define frailty according to the Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines [23]. Cumulative health deficits have examined the association between frailties, as defined by the Rockwood frailty index [27]. A modified Rockwood frailty index (RFI) defining cross-cutting risk factors was used to measure frailty by utilizing cumulative multi-dimensional health deficits collected in health assessments, including four items of CGA (MNA-SF, TUG, HGS, and 6 MW), 20 chronic diseases except for DM and CKD, and 19 abnormal laboratory data. Categorization of the modified RFI was determined according to established cutoffs in community-dwelling cohorts to match the Fried physical phenotype: non-frail (0–0.1), pre-frail (> 0.1–0.21), and frail (> 0.21) [28]; however, these categories were not good enough to predict the outcome. Therefore, a Rockwood frailty index ≥ 0.313 for outcome prediction was assessed by Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) under the nonparametric assumption with 68.8% accuracy, 25.4% positive predictive values and 95.0% negative predictive values.

Study outcome, ascertainment of OAD use, and follow-up

The primary outcome of this study was all-cause mortality. All-cause death was determined based on the Clinical Information Research and Development Center, TCVGH, with the accuracy of death being validated by Taiwan’s National Death Registry, according to either ICD-9 (ICD9 001.x-999.x) or ICD10 (A00.x-Z99.x). The index date was the date of DM and CKD diagnosis. CGA was completed around the time of DM diagnosis. Ascertainment of OAD exposure was defined as the cumulative use of at least one type of medicine for ≥ 90 days before and after the index date; a strategy utilized by other pharmacoepidemiology studies [29]. All participants were followed up until either death or June 19, 2018 to prevent lead-time bias.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows version 22.0 (SPSS Institute Inc., Chicago, USA). For continuous variables in the baseline characteristics, we used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to determine the normality of sample distributions. Continuous variables were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U tests, generating the median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables, presented as numbers and percentages, were tested by Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, followed by Bonferroni post hoc analysis for multiple testing. During the follow-up period, we used Kaplan-Meier analyses to examine cumulative survival, with a comparison made between with and without CKD groups using the log-rank test. Subgroup analyses in the Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots were generated to compare various cumulative survival rates in different subgroups by the log-rank (Mantel-Cox), as well as pairwise comparisons to evaluate the effect of CKD, frailty and different physical function on long-term mortality. The combined assessment of a previously defined high RFI, CKD or not, and high or low functioning status was delineated between KM analyses and Cox proportional hazard models for predicting clinical outcomes in older adults with diabetes. In addition, Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the effects of CKD, frailty, nutrition, TUG, 6 MW and HGS on long-term mortality, independent of the roles exerted by age, gender and the Charlson comorbidity index. P values for nonlinearity were calculated using the null hypothesis test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Baseline characteristics of patients

For the 921 elderly DM patients, the mean (SD) age was 82.0 ± 6.7 years. Compared with the DM patients without CKD (n = 361), the CKD patients (n = 560) were predominantly male and had a high percentage of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, COPD, low serum hemoglobin (HgB) and low eGFR (Table 1). We found a prevalence of 79.3% frailty and 18.4% pre-frailty in all subjects with diabetes (see Additional file 1: Table S1). Individuals with CKD had a significantly longer TUG test of ≥ 21 s (35.2% vs. 24.8%, P = 0.035), higher RFI (median [quartiles] = 0.31 [0.25–0.38] vs. 0.24 [0.17–0.29], P < 0.001), a higher percentage of RFI ≥ 0.313 (49.6% vs. 18.8%, P < 0.001), and a higher prevalence of frailty (87.3% vs. 59.8%, P < 0.001), when compared to DM patients without CKD (Table 1, Additional file 2: Table S2).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of older patients with diabetes without and with chronic kidney disease
Full size table

Comparison between survivors and deceased older patients with diabetes mellitus (DM)

In terms of the clinical characteristics seen in DM survivors and non-survivors, deceased patients with diabetes had a higher percentage of CKD, higher levels of CKD stages 4 and 5, higher COPD rate, a relatively longer TUG, significantly abnormal HGS, and a significantly higher RFI (median [quartiles] = 0.37 [0.31–0.44] vs. 0.27 [0.21–0.33], Table 2, Additional file 3: Table S3). Additionally, deceased patients with diabetes also had lower levels of HgB, serum albumin and eGFR, but higher levels of fasting glucose and proteinuria. Furthermore, deceased patients with diabetes had significantly poor overall data from the geriatric assessment, including MNA-SF, TUG test, poor HGS, prolonged 6 MW and cumulative health deficits for RFI (Table 2, Additional file 3: Table S3).

Table 2 Comparison between survivors and deceased older patients with diabetes with and without chronic kidney disease
Full size table

Risk for mortality among DM patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD)

During the follow-up period (median [quartiles] = 2.92 [1.06–4.43] years), a univariate Cox regression model showed that CKD (crude hazard ratio [cHR] = 1.92, 95% CI 1.25–2.95), displayed high Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (cHR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00–1.37), poor nutrition (cHR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.23), high categorized values of RFI (≥ 0.313) (cHR = 5.88, 95% CI 3.86–8.96), longer TUG (cHR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.18–4.22) and abnormal HGS (cHR = 2.66, 95% CI 1.28–5.53) were all significantly associated with all-cause mortality. After adjusting for the other confounders, CCI remained a significant mortality risk factor (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 4.64, 95% CI 1.09–19.82) (Additional file 4: Table S4).

In those patients without CKD, a high CCI (cHR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.09–1.90), poor nutrition (cHR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.04–1.30), RFI ≥ 0.313 (cHR = 5.28, 95% CI 2.47–11.26) and high fasting glucose (cHR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.003–1.01) were all significantly associated with all-cause mortality (simple model 1, Table 3). However, high serum albumin and eGFR significantly reduced all-cause mortality (simple model, Table 3). After adjustment for confounders, low serum albumin and high fasting glucose remained a significant risk for all-cause mortality in those patients with DM and without CKD (multiple model 1, Table 3).

Table 3 Predictors of all-cause mortality in older patients with diabetes with and without chronic kidney disease
Full size table

Among older adults with diabetes and CKD, poor nutrition (cHR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.10–1.25), RFI ≥ 0.313 (cHR = 5.92, 95% CI 3.44–10.18), longer TUG (cHR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.22–5.13), abnormal HGS (cHR = 2.67, 95% CI 1.12–6.37) and proteinuria (cHR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.04–1.26) were all significantly associated with all-cause death (simple model 2, Table 3). However, high HgB, serum albumin and eGFR significantly reduced all-cause mortality (simple model 2, Table 3). After adjustment, high HgB (adjusted HR [aHR] = 0.75, 95% CI 0.64–0.87) and RFI ≥ 0.313 (aHR = 5.34, 95% CI 2.23–12.80) were still significantly associated with all-cause death (multiple model 4, Table 3).

Survival curves in subgroup analyses of CKD, frailty, and different levels of handgrip strength (HGS) and timed up and go (TUG) in elderly DM patients

In patients with diabetes and an RFI ≥ 0.313, the survival proportion was 42.7%, lower than the 91.9% seen in patients with an RFI < 0.313 (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, the combined impact of an RFI ≥ 0.313 and a prolonged TUG ≥ 21 s resulted in the poorest survival rate (60.5%), followed by TUG < 21 s and RFI ≥ 0.313 (67.9%), TUG ≥ 21 s and RFI < 0.313 (85.2%), and TUG < 21 s and RFI < 0.313 (95.8%) (P < 0.001, Fig. 2B). DM older adults with fair HGS but an RFI ≥ 0.313 had the poorest survival rate (70.6%), followed by poor HGS and RFI ≥ 0.313 (80.2%), fair HGS and RFI < 0.313 (88.6%), and poor HGS but RFI < 0.313 (91.5%) (P < 0.001, Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2
figure 2

 A Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mortality stratified by different levels of the Rockwood frailty index. B Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mortality stratified by the short or long TUG and different levels of frailty in DM older adults. C Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mortality stratified by fair or poor HGS and different levels of frailty in DM older adults. DM diabetes mellitus, CKD chronic kidney disease, RFI Rockwood frailty index, TUG timed up and go test, HGS handgrip strength. Poor HGS in women < 10.57 kg and men < 20.4 kg; Fair HGS in women ≥ 10.57 kg and men ≥ 20.4 kg. **P < 0.01

Full size image

We found that elderly DM patients with CKD experienced a lower cumulative survival rate (67.6%) than those without CKD (85.5%) after an approximately 9-year follow-up period (P = 0.002, Fig. 3A). In consideration of CKD and RFI, elderly DM patients with CKD and an RFI ≥ 0.313 had the poorest survival rate (38.4%), followed by without CKD and RFI ≥ 0.313 (51.2%), CKD and RFI < 0.313 (91.3%), and without CKD and RFI < 0.313 (92.7%) (P < 0.001, Fig. 3B). Regarding CKD and TUG, the older adults with diabetes and CKD and a TUG period ≥ 21 s had the poorest survival rate (34.7%), followed by CKD and TUG < 21 s (87.9%), without CKD and TUG < 21 s (93.4%), and without CKD and TUG ≥ 21 s (93.8%) (P = 0.016, Fig. 3C). Finally, elderly DM patients with CKD and a poor handgrip strength (women < 10.57 kg and men < 20.4 kg) experienced the poorest survival rate (77.7%), followed by without CKD and poor HGS (86.1%), CKD and fair HGS (87.7%), and without CKD and fair HGS (92.5%) (P = 0.045, Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3
figure 3

 A Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mortality stratified by the presence and absence of CKD. B Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mortality stratified by the presence or absence of CKD and different levels of frailty in DM older adults. C Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mortality stratified by the presence or absence of CKD with a short or long TUG test in DM older adults. D Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mortality stratified by the presence or absence of CKD with fair or poor HGS in DM older adults. DM diabetes mellitus, CKD chronic kidney disease, RFI Rockwood frailty index, TUG timed up and go test, HGS handgrip strength. Poor HGS in women < 10.57 kg and men < 20.4 kg; Fair HGS in women ≥ 10.57 kg and men ≥ 20.4 kg. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Full size image

Discussion

The main finding of this study was that older patients with diabetes and CKD experienced a higher prevalence of frailty. In addition, sub-analysis revealed that mortality is significantly associated with CKD, higher Rockwood frailty scores and TUG values, and lower HGS. Furthermore, it was shown that in older patients with diabetes there were additive effects between CKD, frailty, poor HGS and longer TUG concerning survival.

Frailty prevalence is higher in patients with diabetes than it is in nondiabetics [7]. Possible mechanisms for this include neuropathic and inflammatory mechanisms, lower activity of anabolic hormones, as well as resistance to insulin by skeletal muscles, and hyperglycemia, which may accelerate muscle loss and sarcopenia, and in turn, physical function [30, 31]. In addition to micro and macrovascular complications, diabetes may also have an impact on physical, cognitive and functional consequences, thus possibly contributing to the development of frailty [31]. In our study, among the participants with CKD, poor HGS and prolonged TUG values were seen when compared to those without CKD. This finding was in line with several previous studies and showed the association between frailty, physical performance and worsening kidney function [12, 13, 32]. It was proposed that along with a decline in renal function, insulin resistance, chronic inflammation and vascular calcification can all lead to a loss of musculoskeletal mass, and consequently mobility limitation [12, 13, 32].

Traditionally, in patients with diabetes, death is attributed to many classical risk factors, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking and cardiovascular disease in approximately 60% of the patients [1]. On the other hand, a previous study reported that frailty is also a prognostic factor for mortality, albeit independent of diabetes-related complications, and is now considered an important predictor of vital prognosis [9]. In patients with diabetes experiencing frailty, it has been proposed that a combination of factors, such as falls, severe hypoglycemia and higher hospitalization rates, together contribute to the relationship of frailty with mortality. Furthermore, several studies have reported that CKD associated with physical function decline can further worsen mortality in CKD patients [12, 13, 32]. In our study, the HR regarding mortality in those patients with diabetes and a higher Rockwood frailty index was higher. Moreover, in patients with a lower frailty index, even with CKD, their length of survival was not different from that of patients without CKD (Additional file 5: Table S5). It was determined that those with CKD and an increased frailty index experienced the highest mortality rate. This finding was compatible with previous studies which had reported that frailty increases the risk of all-cause mortality in CKD patients [12, 13]. CKD patients, due to their having reduced protein reserves and body energy, experience an increased risk of frailty and a decrease in strength, which in turn can lead to difficulties in their self-care abilities. In addition, a higher frailty index may represent more cumulative deficits in various domains of health (e.g., multimorbidity), which is common in patients with diabetes [33]. Overall, based on many reasons; mortality risk can be amplified by frailty in elderly patients with diabetes, particularly when it is combined with CKD. Further research is still required to better determine the exact mechanisms by which frailty increases mortality risk in DM patients with CKD.

Previous studies have shown that TUG predicts all-cause mortality in older adults [34]. Additionally, it has also been shown in CKD patients that each 1-second increase in TUG is associated with an 8% higher risk for death [35]. A poor TUG performance has been linked to recurrent falls, impaired physical and cognitive function, poor quality of life, dementia and frailty [36]. Additionally, CKD patients experienced a higher prevalence of clinical and subclinical multisystem comorbidities and vascular dysfunction. Thus, a slow walking speed may reflect the cumulative multisystem comorbid burden associated with CKD and mortality risk. In our study, abnormal TUG results were associated with higher all-cause mortality in older patients with diabetes and CKD than those without CKD. Those with CKD and slower TUG results experienced the highest mortality rate. These findings suggest that CKD and physical performance in older adults with diabetes may share common risk factors and disease mechanisms. This present analysis also showed that greater handgrip strength (HGS) is associated with a significantly lower incidence of death; results that were compatible with a previous study of patients with diabetes [37,38,39]. Furthermore, the association between HGS and mortality persisted after an adjustment for confounders, including kidney function and other diabetic complications. Those patients with CKD and lower HGS experienced the highest mortality rate, and there are a variety of possible explanations which may account for the relationship between HGS and outcomes. Most obviously, individuals with higher HGS may be healthier overall than those participants with lower HGS, possibly due to regularly scheduled small resistance training and leisure time physical activity [39].

Based on our findings, early frailty screening, in addition to the evaluation of diabetic vascular complications, is considered an important aspect of the comprehensive care of patients with diabetes [40]. Exercise training, as well as adequate protein and calorie intake, are all necessary for both maintaining and increasing muscle mass [41]. However, there were limitations in our study that warrant consideration. First, the association between kidney function and prevalent frailty was cross-sectional, and causality could not be established as hypertension and heart failure may be mediators. Second, our study focused on older adults in hospitals, whereas previously mentioned studies were on community-dwelling older individuals. Generalization with regards to the other groups is hence uncertain. Additionally, we examined the incidence of all-cause mortality, and detailed analysis surrounding the cause of death was not analyzed. Third, once measured eGFR may not exactly account for some of the observed associations between renal function and frailty. Finally, several factors relevant to frailty, including serum vitamin D levels and vitamin D intake, body composition, sarcopenia, falls and fractures, as well as socioeconomic status, were not assessed in this study. Further prospective studies remain necessary to better elucidate the exact longitudinal relationship between renal function, physical performance and risk of mortality in elderly patients with diabetes.

Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrated that in hospital-based older adults with diabetes, a diminished eGFR was associated with a higher frailty index, coinciding with diminished walking speed and handgrip strength. Furthermore, we determined that renal function and physical performance were associated with incidents of all-cause mortality, and the combined effects of these factors can be seen in patient outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of both considering and assessing the possibility of frailty in older adults with diabetes and CKD. Diabetes-related mortality and incidents of disability may be reduced through early intervention involving frailty diagnosis, and subsequently working in conjunction with CKD prevention.

Availability of data and materials

The full data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Abbreviations

CGA:

Comprehensive geriatric assessment

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ESRD:

End-stage renal disease

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

ICD-9-CM:

International Classification of Disease 9th version, Clinical Modification

ACR:

Albumin/creatinine ratio

PC:

Protein/creatinine

CHF:

Chronic heart failure

HF:

Heart failure

NT-proBNP:

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide

ATC:

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical

OADs:

Oral antidiabetic agents

DPP4:

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4

SGLT-2:

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2

MMSE:

Mini-mental state examination

MNA:

Mini Nutritional Assessment

TUG:

Timed up and go

6 MW:

6-meter walking

HGS:

Handgrip strength

RFI:

Rockwood frailty index

ROC:

Receiver Operating Characteristic

AUC:

Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve

KM:

Kaplan-Meier

References

  1. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, Eliasson B, Svensson AM, Miftaraj M, et al. Mortality and cardiovascular disease in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1407–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gregg EW, Williams DE, Geiss L. Changes in diabetes-related complications in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(3):286–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stel VS, Awadhpersad R, Pippias M, Ferrer-Alamar M, Finne P, Fraser SD, et al. International comparison of trends in patients commencing renal replacement therapy by primary renal disease. Nephrol (Carlton). 2019;24(10):1064–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1238–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alicic RZ, Rooney MT, Tuttle KR. Diabetic kidney disease: challenges, progress, and possibilities. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(2):2032–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. American Diabetes Association. 12. Older adults: standards of medical care in diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Suppl 1):S152-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Castro-Rodríguez M, Carnicero JA, Garcia-Garcia FJ, Walter S, Morley JE, Rodríguez-Artalejo F, et al. Frailty as a major factor in the increased risk of death and disability in older people with diabetes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(10):949–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ida S, Kaneko R, Imataka K, Murata K. Relationship between frailty and mortality, hospitalization, and cardiovascular diseases in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong E, Backholer K, Gearon E, Harding J, Freak-Poli R, Stevenson C, et al. Diabetes and risk of physical disability in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1(2):106–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kooman JP, Dekker MJ, Usvyat LA, Kotanko P, van der Sande FM, Schalkwijk CG, et al. Inflammation and premature aging in advanced chronic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2017;313(4):F938–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roshanravan B, Gamboa J, Wilund K. Exercise. and CKD: Skeletal muscle dysfunction and practical application of exercise to prevent and treat physical impairments in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(6):837–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mei F, Gao Q, Chen F, Zhao L, Shang Y, Hu K, et al. Frailty as a predictor of negative health outcomes in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22(3):535–43.e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weaver RG, James MT, Ravani P, Weaver CGW, Lamb EJ, Tonelli M, et al. Estimating urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio from protein-to-creatinine ratio: development of equations using same-day measurements. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(3):591–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaminska J, Dymicka-Piekarska V, Tomaszewska J, Matowicka-Karna J, Koper-Lenkiewicz OM. Diagnostic utility of protein to creatinine ratio (P/C ratio) in spot urine sample within routine clinical practice. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020;57(5):345–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rovin BH, Adler SG, Barratt J, Bridoux F, Burdge KA, Chan TM, Cook HT, Fervenza FC, Gibson KL, Glassock RJ, Jayne DR. KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of glomerular diseases. Kidney Int. 2021;100(4S):1–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein BD, Bautista A, Schumock GT, Lee TA, Charbeneau JT, Lauderdale DS, et al. The validity of international classification of diseases, ninth revision, clinical modification diagnosis codes for identifying patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbations. Chest. 2012;141(1):87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weng SC, Chen YC, Hsu CY, Lin CS, Tarng DC, Lin SY. Impacts of heart failure and physical performance on long-term mortality in old patients with chronic kidney disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:680098.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly: the Mini Nutritional Assessment as part of the geriatric evaluation. Nutr Rev. 1996;54(1 Pt 2):59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weng SC, Lin CS, Tarng DC, Lin SY. Physical frailty and long-term mortality in older people with chronic heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: a retrospective longitudinal study. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Y, Zou Y, Wang S, Li J, Jing X, Yang M, et al. A pilot study of the FRAIL scale on predicting outcomes in chinese elderly people with type 2 diabetes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(8):714.e7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saez de Asteasu ML, Martinez-Velilla N, Zambom-Ferraresi F, Casas-Herrero Á, Cadore EL, Galbete A, et al. Assessing the impact of physical exercise on cognitive function in older medical patients during acute hospitalization: secondary analysis of a randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2019;16(7):e1002852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dent E, Lien C, Lim WS, Wong WC, Wong CH, Ng TP, et al. The Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines for the management of frailty. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(7):564–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang PF, Yang HJ, Peng YC, Chen HY. Motor dual-task timed up & go test better identifies prefrailty individuals than single-task timed up & go test. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(2):204–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Son DH, Yoo JW, Cho MR, Lee YJ. Relationship between handgrip strength and pulmonary function in apparently healthy older women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(7):1367–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Peña FG, Theou O, Wallace L, Brothers TD, Gill TM, Gahbauer EA, et al. Comparison of alternate scoring of variables on the performance of the frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Orkaby AR, Lunetta KL, Sun FJ, Driver JA, Benjamin EJ, Hamburg NM, et al. Cross-sectional association of frailty and arterial stiffness in community-dwelling older adults: the Framingham Heart Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74(3):373–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chao CT, Wang J, Huang JW, Chan DC, Chien KL. Frailty predicts an increased risk of end-stage renal disease with risk competition by mortality among 165,461 diabetic kidney disease patients. Aging Dis. 2019;10(6):1270–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinclair AJ, Abdelhafiz AH, Rodriguez-Manas L. Frailty and sarcopenia - newly emerging and high impact complications of diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2017;31(9):1465–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sinclair AJ, Rodriguez-Manas L. Diabetes and frailty: two converging conditions? Can J Diabetes. 2016;40(1):77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilkinson TJ, Miksza J, Yates T, Lightfoot CJ, Baker LA, Watson EL, et al. Association of sarcopenia with mortality and end-stage renal disease in those with chronic kidney disease: a UK Biobank study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021;12(3):586–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chiang JI, Jani BD, Mair FS, Nicholl BI, Furler J, O’Neal D, et al. Associations between multimorbidity, all-cause mortality and glycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(12):e0209585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Son KY, Shin DW, Lee JE, Kim SH, Yun JM, Cho B. Association of timed up and go test outcomes with future incidence of cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults aged 66 years: korean national representative longitudinal study over 5.7 years. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roshanravan B, Robinson-Cohen C, Patel KV, Ayers E, Littman AJ, de Boer IH, et al. Association between physical performance and all-cause mortality in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(5):822–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheong CY, Yap P, Gwee X, Chua DQL, Wee SL, Yap KB, et al. Physical and functional measures predicting long-term mortality in community-dwelling older adults: a comparative evaluation in the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Study. Aging. 2021;13(23):25038–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Cohen DD, Gómez-Arbeláez D, Bosch J, Dyal L, Yusuf S, et al. Association of handgrip strength to cardiovascular mortality in pre-diabetic and diabetic patients: a subanalysis of the ORIGIN trial. Int J Cardiol. 2014;174(2):458–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Celis-Morales CA, Petermann F, Hui L, Lyall DM, Iliodromiti S, McLaren J, et al. Associations between diabetes and both cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality are modified by grip strength: evidence from UK Biobank, a prospective population-based cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(12):1710–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hamasaki H, Kawashima Y, Katsuyama H, Sako A, Goto A, Yanai H. Association of handgrip strength with hospitalization, cardiovascular events, and mortality in japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rodriguez-Manas L, Fried LP. Frailty in the clinical scenario. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):e7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Takahashi F, Hashimoto Y, Kaji A, Sakai R, Okamura T, Kitagawa N, et al. Sarcopenia is associated with a risk of mortality in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:783363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Biostatistics Task Force and the Clinical Information Research & Development Center of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C., for assistance in statistics analysis. The authors also sincerely appreciate the assistance given by the Center for Translational Medicine of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Funding

We are deeply indebted to Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung for providing the grants for this study (TCVGH-1088201B, TCVGH-YM1080103, TCVGH-1098201B, TCVGH-YM1090105, TCVGH-1108201B, TCVGH-1118202 C, TCVGH-1128201 C, TCVGH-NCHU1110114 and TCVGH-NCHU1127616). This study was also supported by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 106-2314-B-075 A-003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Shuo-Chun Weng

  2. Research Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Shuo-Chun Weng, Cheng-Fu Lin & Shih-Yi Lin

  3. Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    Shuo-Chun Weng & Cheng-Fu Lin

  4. Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Shuo-Chun Weng, Cheng-Fu Lin & Shih-Yi Lin

  5. Division of Occupational Medicine, Department of Emergency, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    Cheng-Fu Lin

  6. Biostatistics Task Force of Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    Chiann-Yi Hsu

  7. Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    Shih-Yi Lin

Authors
  1. Shuo-Chun Weng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cheng-Fu Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chiann-Yi Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shih-Yi Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SCW, CFL, CYH, and SYL conceived the idea and designed the study. SCW, CFL, CYH, and SYL carried out the analyses. SCW and SYL wrote and revised the manuscript. SYL supervised the implementation of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shih-Yi Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was not required from the enrolled subjects, and the study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki as reflected in a priori approval by the Institutional Review Board of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH, No. CE20293A, CF13015, CF13015-1, CF13015A-2, CF13015A-3). Those data were accessed anonymously.

Consent for publication

All authors have read the paper and agree that it can be published.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty each year in older adults with diabetes.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Baseline characteristics of older patients with diabetes with and without chronic kidney disease.

Additional file 3: Table S3.

Comparison between survivors and deceased older patients with diabetes with and without chronic kidney disease.

Additional file 4: Table S4.

Predictors of all-cause mortality in older patients with diabetes.

Additional file 5: Table S5.

Comparison between survivors and deceased older patients with diabetes without and with chronic kidney disease.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weng, SC., Lin, CF., Hsu, CY. et al. Effect of frailty, physical performance, and chronic kidney disease on mortality in older patients with diabetes : a retrospective longitudinal cohort study. Diabetol Metab Syndr 15, 7 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00972-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00972-0

Keywords

  • Comprehensive geriatric assessment
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Diabetes
  • Frailty
  • Handgrip strength
  • Mortality
  • Timed up and go test

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome

ISSN: 1758-5996

Contact us