Skip to main content

Metformin: an old but still the best treatment for type 2 diabetes


The management of T2DM requires aggressive treatment to achieve glycemic and cardiovascular risk factor goals. In this setting, metformin, an old and widely accepted first line agent, stands out not only for its antihyperglycemic properties but also for its effects beyond glycemic control such as improvements in endothelial dysfunction, hemostasis and oxidative stress, insulin resistance, lipid profiles, and fat redistribution. These properties may have contributed to the decrease of adverse cardiovascular outcomes otherwise not attributable to metformin’s mere antihyperglycemic effects. Several other classes of oral antidiabetic agents have been recently launched, introducing the need to evaluate the role of metformin as initial therapy and in combination with these newer drugs. There is increasing evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies supporting its anti-proliferative role in cancer and possibly a neuroprotective effect. Metformin’s negligible risk of hypoglycemia in monotherapy and few drug interactions of clinical relevance give this drug a high safety profile. The tolerability of metformin may be improved by using an appropiate dose titration, starting with low doses, so that side-effects can be minimized or by switching to an extended release form. We reviewed the role of metformin in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and describe the additional benefits beyond its glycemic effect. We also discuss its potential role for a variety of insulin resistant and pre-diabetic states, obesity, metabolic abnormalities associated with HIV disease, gestational diabetes, cancer, and neuroprotection.


The discovery of metformin began with the synthesis of galegine-like compounds derived from Gallega officinalis, a plant traditionally employed in Europe as a drug for diabetes treatment for centuries [1]. In 1950, Stern et al. discovered the clinical usefulness of metformin while working in Paris. They observed that the dose–response of metformin was related to its glucose lowering capacity and that metformin toxicity also displayed a wide security margin [1].

Metformin acts primarily at the liver by reducing glucose output and, secondarily, by augmenting glucose uptake in the peripheral tissues, chiefly muscle. These effects are mediated by the activation of an upstream kinase, liver kinase B1 (LKB-1), which in turn regulates the downstream kinase adenosine monophosphatase protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK phosphorylates a transcriptional co-activator, transducer of regulated CREB protein 2 (TORC2), resulting in its inactivation which consequently downregulates transcriptional events that promote synthesis of gluconeogenic enzymes [2]. Inhibition of mitochondrial respiration has also been proposed to contribute to the reduction of gluconeogenesis since it reduces the energy supply required for this process [3].

Metformin’s efficacy, security profile, benefic cardiovascular and metabolic effects, and its capacity to be associated with other antidiabetic agents makes this drug the first glucose lowering agent of choice when treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (TDM2).

Metformin and pre-diabetes

In 2000, an estimated 171 million people in the world had diabetes, and the numbers are projected to double by 2030. Interventions to prevent type 2 diabetes, therefore, have an important role in future health policies. Developing countries are expected to shoulder the majority of the burden of diabetes [4]. One of the main contributing factors to this burden is the Western lifestyle which promotes obesity and sedentarism [5].

Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) statuses are associated with increased and varying risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. IGT has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and may determine an increased mortality risk. The association of IFG with cardiovascular events, however, has not been well established [6].

When lifestyle interventions fail or are not feasible, pharmacological therapy may be an important resource to prevent type 2 diabetes. Several different drug classes have been studied for this purpose.

In their systematic review, Gillies et al. found that lifestyle and pharmacological interventions reduced the rate of progression to type 2 diabetes in people with IGT and that these interventions seem to be as effective as pharmacological treatment. Although compliance was high, treatment effect was not sustained after treatment was stopped. According to the results of their meta-analysis, lifestyle interventions may be more important in those with higher mean baseline body mass index BMI [5].

The best evidence for a potential role for metformin in the prevention of type 2 diabetes comes from The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) trial. Lifestyle intervention and metformin reduced diabetes incidence by 58% and 31%, respectively, when compared with placebo [7].

At the end of the DPP study, patients were observed for a one to two week wash out period. Diabetes incidence increased from 25.2 to 30.6% in the metformin group and from 33.4 to 36.7% in the placebo group. Even after including the wash out period in the overall analysis, metformin still significantly decreased diabetes incidence (risk ratio 0.75, p = 0.005) compared with placebo [8]. These data suggest that, at least in the short-term, metformin may help delay the onset of diabetes. The benefits of metformin were primarily observed in patients <60 years old (RR 0.66) and in patients with a BMI greater than 35 kg/m2 (RR 0.47) [7] (Table 1).

Table 1 Effectiveness of metformin in diabetes prevention of patients with impaired glucose tolerance

Metformin significantly reduced the risk of developing diabetes in an Indian population of subjects with IGT. The relative risk reduction was 28.5% with lifestyle modification (p = 0.018), 26.4% with metformin (p = 0.029), and 28.2% with lifestyle modification plus metformin (p = 0.022), as compared with the control group [9] (Table 1).

In a Chinese study, subjects with IGT randomly assigned to receive either low-dose metformin (750 mg/day) or acarbose (150 mg/day) in addition to lifestyle intervention were compared to a control group that only received life style intervention. Treatment with metformin or acarbose produced large, significant, and similar risk reductions for new onset of T2DM of 77% and 88%, respectively; these reductions were larger than that of lifestyle intervention alone [10].

The persistence of the long-term effects obtained through DPP interventions were evaluated at an additional follow-up after a median of 5.7 years. Individuals were divided in 3 groups: lifestyle, metformin, and placebo. Diabetes incidence rates were similar between treatment groups: 5.9 per 100 person-years (5.1–6.8) for lifestyle, 4.9 (4.2–5.7) for metformin, and 5.6 (4.8–6.5) for placebo. Diabetes incidence 10 years since DPP randomization was reduced by 34% and 18% in the lifestyle and metformin group, respectively [11] (Table 1).

The prevalence of pre-diabetes as well as the progression rate to diabetes may differ between different populations, making the application of results from certain studies of different ethnical groups inappropriate. IGT is highly prevalent in native Asian Indians. This population has several unique features such as a young age of diabetes onset and lower BMI along with high rates of insulin resistance and lower thresholds for diabetic risk factors [12]. Chinese individuals have a lower prevalence of diabetes and are less insulin resistant than Indians, so the results of the Chinese study may not be applicable to Asian Indian individuals [13].

In a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Salpeter et al. reported a reduction of 40% in the incidence of new-onset diabetes with an absolute risk reduction of 6% (95% CI, 4–8) during a mean trial duration of 1.8 years [14].

Lily and Godwin reported a decreased rate of conversion from pre-diabetes to diabetes in individuals with IGT or IFG in their systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. This effect was seen at both a higher metformin dosage (850 mg twice daily) and lower metformin dosage (250 mg twice or 3 times daily) in people of varied ethnicity [15].

Metformin in the management of adult diabetic patients

Current guidelines from the American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ADA/EASD) and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology (AACE/ACE) recommend early initiation of metformin as a first-line drug for monotherapy and combination therapy for patients with T2DM. This recommendation is based primarily on metformin’s glucose-lowering effects, relatively low cost, and generally low level of side effects, including the absence of weight gain [16, 17].

Metformin’s first-line position was strengthened by the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) observation that the metformin-treated group had risk reductions of 32% (p = 0.002) for any diabetes-related endpoint, 42% for diabetes-related death (p = 0.017), and 36% for all-cause mortality (p = 0.011) compared with the control group. The UKPDS demonstrated that metformin is as effective as sulfonylurea in controlling blood glucose levels of obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [18]. Metformin has been also been shown to be effective in normal weight patients [19].

Metformin in combination therapy

Although monotherapy with an oral hypoglycemic agent is often initially effective, glycemic control deteriorates in most patients which requires the addition of a second agent. Currently, marketed oral therapies are associated with high secondary failure rates [20]. Combinations of metformin and insulin secretagogue can reduce HbA1c between 1.5% to 2.2% in patients sub-optimally controlled by diet and exercise [21].

The optimal second-line drug when metformin monotherapy fails is not clear. All noninsulin antidiabetic drugs when added to maximal metformin therapy are associated with similar HbA1c reduction but with varying degrees of weight gain and hypoglycemia risk. A meta-analysis of 27 randomized trials showed that thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, and glinides were associated with weight gain; glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, glucosidase inhibitors, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were associated with weight loss or no weight change. Sulfonylureas and glinides were associated with higher rates of hypoglycemia than with placebo. When combined with metformin, sulfonylureas and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors show a similar efficacy on HbA1c [22].

Metformin and sulfonylureas

The combination of metformin and sulfonylurea (SU) is one of the most commonly used and can attain a greater reduction in HbA1c (0.8–1.5%) than either drug alone [23, 24]. The glimepiride/metformin combination results in a lower HbA1c concentration and fewer hypoglycemic events when compared to the glibenclamide/metformin combination [25]. The use of metformin was associated with reduced all-cause mortality and reduced cardiovascular mortality. Metformin and sulfonylurea combination therapy was also associated with reduced all-cause mortality [26].

Epidemiological investigations suggest that patients on SUs have a higher cardiovascular disease event rate than those on metformin. Patients who started SUs first and added metformin also had higher rates of cardiovascular disease events compared with those who started metformin first and added SUs. These investigations are potentially affected by unmeasured confounding variables [27].

Metformin and insulin

Metformin as added to insulin-based regimens has been shown to improve glycemic control, limit changes in body weight, reduce hypoglycemia incidence, and to reduce insulin requirements (sparing effect), allowing a 15–25% reduction in total insulin dosage [28, 29].

The addition of metformin to insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes is also associated with reductions in insulin-dose requirement and HbA1c levels [30, 31].

Metformin and thiazolinediones

The addition of rosiglitazone to metformin in a 24-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study significantly decreased HbA1c concentration and improved insulin sensitivity and HOMA ß cell function [32]. However, in spite of preventing diabetes incidence, the natural course of declining insulin resistance may not be modified by a low dose of the metformin-rosiglitazone combination [33].

The ADOPT study (A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial) assessed the efficacy of rosiglitazone, as compared to metformin or glibenclamide, in maintaining long-term glycemic control in patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Rosiglitazone was associated with more weight gain, edema, and greater durability of glycemic control; metformin was associated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal events and glibenclamide with a higher risk of hypoglycaemia. [34].

Metformin and glifozins

Dapagliflozin, a highly selective inhibitor of SGLT2, has demonstrated efficacy, alone or in combination with metformin, in reducing hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes [35, 36]. Studies are in development for assessing the safety and efficacy of this combination.

Metformin and α glicosidase inhibitor

Acarbose reduces the bioavailability of metformin [37]. However, it has been reported that the association of acarbose to metformin in sub-optimally controlled patients reduced HbA1c by about 0.8-1.0% [38].

Metformin and incretin-based therapies

DDPIV prolongs the duration of active glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) by inhibiting DPPIV peptidase, an enzyme which cleaves the active form of the peptide. This action results in an improvement of insulin secretion as a physiological response to feeding. The mechanism of DPPIV inhibitors is complementary to that of metformin which improves insulin sensitivity and reduces hepatic glucose production, making this combination very useful for achieving adequate glycemic control [39]. Metformin has also been found to increase plasma GLP-1 levels, probably by either direct inhibition of DPPIV or by increased secretion, leading to reduced food intake and weight loss [40].

Saxagliptin added to metformin led to clinically and statistically significant reductions in HbA1c from baseline versus metformin/placebo in a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Saxagliptin at doses of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg plus metformin decreased A1 by 0.59%, 0.69%, and 0.58%, respectively, in comparison to an increase in the metformin plus placebo group (+0.13%); p < 0.0001 for all comparisons [41].

A meta-analysis of 21 studies examined incretin-based therapy as an add-on to metformin in patients with T2DM for 16–30 weeks; 7 studies used a short-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist (exenatide BID), 7 used longer acting GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide or exenatide LAR), and 14 examined DPP-IV inhibitors. Long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced HbA1c and fasting glucose levels to a greater extent than the other therapies [42].

Metformin and pregnancy

Metformin is known to cross the placenta and concerns regarding potential adverse effects on both the mother and the fetus have limited its use in pregnancy [43]. The use of metformin during pregnancy is still a matter of controversy.

Two meta-analyses of observational studies, one of women using metformin and/or sulfonylureas and one of women using metformin alone during the first trimester, did not show an increase in congenital malformations or neonatal deaths [44, 45].

The Metformin in Gestational Diabetes (MiG) trial, found no significant difference in the composite fetal outcome (composite of neonatal hypoglycemia, respiratory distress, need for phototherapy, birth trauma, 5-minute Apgar score <7, or prematurity) between metformin and insulin. Women assigned to metformin had more preterm births and less weight gain compared to those in the insulin group [46]. Another randomized trial also found similar results [47].

Results of the MiG TOFU reported that infants of diabetic mothers exposed to metformin in utero and examined at 2 years of age may present a reduction in insulin resistance, probably related to an increase in subcutaneous fat [48].

Longer follow-up studies will be required to determine metformin’s impact on the development of obesity and metabolic syndrome in offspring.

Metformin use in childhood and adolescence

Type 2 diabetes mellitus has dramatically increased in children and adolescents worldwide to the extent that has been labeled an epidemic [49]. Before 1990, it was a rare condition in the pediatric population; by 1999, the incidence varied from 8% to 45%, depending on geographic location, and was disproportionally represented among minority groups [50]. There are few studies of metformin use in the pediatric population. Most of them are of short duration and heterogeneous designs.

The beneficial role of metformin in young patients with type 2 diabetes has been demonstrated in a randomized, controlled trial which showed a significant decrease in fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, weight, and total cholesterol. The most frequently reported adverse events were abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and headaches. There were no cases of clinical hypoglycemia, lactic acidosis, or clinically significant changes in physical examinations [51]. When compared to glimepiride (1–8 mg once daily), metformin (500–1000 mg twice daily) lowered HbA1c to <7%, similar to glimepiride, but was associated with significantly less weight gain. A total of 42.4% and 48.1% of subjects in the glimepiride and metformin groups, respectively, in the intent-to-treat population achieved A1C levels of <7.0% at week 24 [52].

There is some evidence that suggests improvement in metabolic control of poorly controlled adolescents with type 1 diabetes when metformin is added to insulin therapy. Metformin has been shown to reduce insulin dose requirement (5.7–10.1 U/day), HbA1c (0.6–0.9%), weight (1.7–6.0 kg), and total cholesterol (0.3–0.41 mmol/l) [30]. A previous review showed similar results in HbA1 reduction and insulin requirement, however no improvements in insulin sensitivity, body composition, or serum lipids were documented [31].

Metformin indications for management of obesity, insulin resistance, and non-alcoholic fatty liver in children and adolescents

Insulin resistance in obese children and adolescents should be appropriately and aggressively addressed once it is linked to known cardiovascular risks such as IGT, T2DM, dyslipidemia, and hypertension [53, 54]. Non-alcoholic fatty (NAFLD) disease, a frequent cause of chronic liver disease in obese adults, is also associated with a higher risk of developing diabetes and of progression to fibrosis and cirrhosis [55] with an increased relative risk of cardiovascular events or death [56]. The true prevalence of NAFLD in children is underestimated. The prevalence of steatosis in obese children was estimated to be 38% in a large retrospective autopsy study [57].

Currently, the best supported therapy for NAFLD is gradual weight loss through exercise and nutritional support [58]. Metformin is associated with short-term weight loss, improvement of insulin sensitivity, and decreased visceral fat [59]. A reduction in ALT, GGT, and fatty liver incidence and severity has also been described with metformin use [60].

Metformin has been used increasingly in obese children with hyperinsulinemia although there are no strong evidence-based studies supporting its use for this clinical condition. A moderate improvement in body muscular index (BMI) and insulin sensitivity has been reported with the use of metformin [61, 62]. Heart rate recovery (HRR) may also improve due to improved parasympathetic tone, paralleling improvements in BMI, insulin levels, and insulin sensitivity [61]. HRR has been considered a predictor of mortality and cardiovascular disease in otherwise healthy subjects [63]. A poor HRR has also been linked to insulin resistance [64] and to a higher risk for developing T2DM [65].

Metformin may not be as effective as behavioral interventions in reducing BMI and when compared with drugs that are licensed for obesity, its effects are moderate [66].

Effects of metformin on vascular protection

Effects on cardiovascular mortality

Diabetic patients are at high risk of cardiovascular events, particularly of coronary heart disease by about 3-fold [67, 68]. It has been stated that type 2 diabetic patients without a previous history of myocardial infarction have the same risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) as non-diabetic subjects with a history of myocardial infarction [69]. This has led the National Cholesterol Education Program to consider diabetes as a coronary heart disease risk equivalent [70]. Although there is no doubt that there is an increased risk of CAD events in diabetic patients, there is still some uncertainty as to whether the cardiovascular risk conferred by diabetes is truly equivalent to that of a previous myocardial infarction [71].

In 1980, Scambato et al. reported that, in a 3-year observational study of 310 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, patients treated with metformin had reduced rates of re-infarction, occurrence of angina pectoris, acute coronary events other than acute myocardial infarction, and death in patients [72]. The largest effect was seen in re-infarction rates; a post hoc analysis showed that this effect was significant (p = 0.003). After this study, the UKPDS, the largest randomized clinical trial in the newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetic population largely free of prior major vascular events, randomly assigned treatment with metformin to a subgroup of overweight individuals (>120% of ideal body weight). In 1990, another subgroup of patients (n = 537), who were receiving the maximum allowed dosage of sulfonylurea, were randomized either to continue sulfonylurea therapy or to allow an early addition of metformin [18].

Metformin provided greater protection against the development of macrovascular complications than would be expected from its effects upon glycemic control alone. It had statistically significant reductions in the risk of all-cause mortality, diabetes-related mortality (p = 0.017), and any end-point related to diabetes (p = 0.002), but not in myocardial infarction (p = 0.052) [18]. The UKPDS pos-trial reported significant and persistent risk reductions for any diabetes-related end point (21%, p = 0.01), myocardial infarction (33%, p = 0.005), and death from any cause (27%, p = 0.002) [73].

Following UKPDS, other studies have reported significant improvement of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (Table 2). A retrospective analysis of patients databases in Saskatchewan, Canada reported significant reductions for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality of 40% and 36%, respectively [26]. The PRESTO trial showed significant reductions of any clinical event (28%), myocardial infarction (69%), and all-cause mortality (61%) [74]. The HOME trial reported a decreased risk of developing macrovascular disease [75]. In non-diabetic subjects with normal coronary arteriography but also with two consecutive positive (ST depression > 1 mm) exercise tolerance test, an 8-week period on metformin improved maximal ST-segment depression, Duke score, and chest pain incidence compared with placebo [76]. A recent meta-analysis suggested that the cardiovascular effects of metformin could be smaller than had been hypothesized on the basis of the UKPDS; however, its results must be interpreted with caution given the low number of randomized controlled trials included [77].

Table 2 Metformin effects on vasculoprotection

Metformin and heart failure

The risk of developing cardiac heart failure (CHF) in diabetic individuals nearly doubles as the population ages [77]. DM and hyperglycemia are strongly implicated as a cause for the progression from asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction to symptomatic HF, increased hospitalizations for HF, and an overall increased mortality risk in patients with chronic HF [78]. Despite all its benefits, metformin is contraindicated in patients with heart failure due to the potential risk of developing lactic acidosis, a rare but potentially fatal metabolic condition resulting from severe tissue hypoperfusion [79]. The US Food and Drug Administration removed the heart failure contraindication from the packaging of metformin although a strong warning for the cautious use of metformin in this population still exists [80].

Several retrospective studies in patients with CHF and diabetes reported lower risk of death from any cause [8183], lower hospital readmissions for CHF [81], and hospitalizations for any cause [81, 82]. A recent review concluded that CHF could not be considered an absolute contraindication for metformin use and also suggest its protective effect in reducing the incidence of CHF and mortality in T2DM [83]. This protective effect may due to AMPK activation and decrease in cardiac fibrosis [83].

In a prospective 4-year study, 393 metformin-treated patients with elevated serum creatinine between 1.5–2.5 mg/dL and coronary artery disease, CHF, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were randomized into two groups. One group continued metformin therapy while the other was instructed to discontinue metformin. Patients with CHF had either New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or Class IV CHF and were receiving diuretic and vasodilatation drugs. There were no differences between groups in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, rate of myocardial infarction, or rate of cardiovascular events [84].

Patients with DM and advanced, systolic HF (n = 401) were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of metformin therapy. The cohort had a mean age of 56 ± 11 years and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 24 ± 7% with 42% and 45% being NYHA III and NYHA IV, respectively. Twenty-five percent (n = 99) were treated with metformin therapy. Metformin-treated patients had a higher BMI, lower creatinine, and were less often on insulin. One-year survival in metformin-treated and non-metformin-treated patients was 91% and 76%, respectively (p = 0.007). After a multivariate adjustment for demographics, cardiac function, renal function, and HF medications, metformin therapy was associated with a non-significant trend of improved survival [85].

Many different mechanisms, beyond glycemic control, have been implicated in vascular protection induced by metformin such as improvements in the inflammatory pathway [86], coagulation [87], oxidative stress and glycation [8892], endothelial dysfunction [8890], haemostasis [88, 9193], insulin resistance improvement [94], lipid profiles [95, 96], and fat redistribution [97, 98]. Some of these mechanisms are described below.

Beyond glycemic control

The UKPDS recruited patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and demonstrated that tight glycemic control has beneficial effects on microvascular end points. However, it failed to show improvements in macrovascular outcomes. The improved cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in overweight diabetic patients treated with metformin was attributed to its effects extending beyond glycemic control [18].

Effects on the inflammatory pathway

The benefits of metformin on macrovascular complications of diabetes, separate from its conventional hypoglycemic effects, may be partially explained by actions beyond glycemic control, particularly by actions associated with inflammatory and atherothrombotic processes [86]. Metformin can act as an inhibitor of pro-inflammatory responses through direct inhibition of NF-kB by blocking the PI3K–Akt pathway. This effect may partially explain the apparent clinical reduction of cardiovascular events not fully attributable to metformin’s anti-hyperglycemic action [86].

Some studies also point to a modest effect on inflammatory markers in subjects with IGT in T2DM [87] while others have found no effect at all [88].

Effects on oxidative stress

Oxidative stress is believed to contribute to a wide range of clinical conditions such as inflammation, ischaemia-reperfusion injury, diabetes, atherosclerosis, neurodegeneration, and tumor formation [99].

Metformin has antioxidant properties which are not fully characterized. It reduces reactive oxygen species (ROS) by inhibiting mitochondrial respiration [100] and decreases advanced glycosylation end product (AGE) indirectly through reduction of hyperglycemia and directly through an insulin-dependent mechanism [101].

There is some evidence that metformin also has a beneficial effect on some components of the antioxidant defense system. It can upregulate uncoupled proteins 2 (UCP2) in adipose tissue [102] and can also cause an increase in reduced glutathione [100].

Metformin has been proposed to cause a mild and transient inhibition of mitochondrial complex I which decreases ATP levels and activates AMPK-dependent catabolic pathways [100], increasing lipolysis and ß-oxidation in white adipose tissue [102] and reducing neoglucogenesis [2]. The resultant reduction in triglycerides and glucose levels could decrease metylglyoxal (MG) production through lipoxidation and glycoxidation, respectively [99, 101].

Recently a study described a putative mechanism relating metformin action and inhibition of oxidative stress, inflammatory, and proapoptotic markers [103]. In this study, treatment of bovine capillary endothelial cells incubated in hyperglycemic medium with metformin was able to decrease the activity of NF-kB and others intracellular proteins related to cellular metabolic memory. The authors suggested that this action could be mediated by histone deacetylase sirtuin 1 (SIRT-1), a multifunctional protein involved in many intracellular pathways related to metabolism, stress response, cell cycle, and aging [103].

Effects on endothelial function

Type 2 diabetes is associated with a progressive and generalized impairment of endothelial function that affects the regulation of vasomotor tone, leucocyte adhesion, hemostasis, and fibrinolysis. These effects are probably direct and not related to decreases in hyperglycemia [88].

Contradictory effects of metformin on endothelial function have been described, however [89, 90]. Mather et al. reported that metformin has no effect on endothelium dependent blood flow but has a significant effect on endothelium independent blood flow and insulin resistance reduction [89]. Conversely, Vitale et al. found significant improvement of endothelium dependent flow without a significant effect on endothelium independent response [90]. Further studies are necessary to establish the effect of metformin on endothelial function.

Effects on body weight

Metformin may have a neutral effect on body weight of patients with T2DM when compared to diet [18] or may limit or decrease the weight gain experienced with sulfonylureas [18], TDZ [104], insulin [29, 75], HAART [97], and antipsychotics drugs [94].

Modest weight loss with metformin has been observed in subjects with IGT [15, 18]. However, a meta-analysis of overweight and obese non-diabetic subjects, found no significant weight loss as either a primary or as secondary outcome [105].

The mechanisms by which metformin contributes to weight loss may be explained through the reduction in gastrointestinal absorption of carbohydrates and insulin resistance [95], reduction of leptin [95] and ghrelin levels after glucose overload [96], and by induction of a lipolitic and anoretic effect by acting on glucagon–like peptide 1 [40].

Effects on lipid profile

Metformin is associated with improvements in lipoprotein metabolism, including decreases in LDL-C [95], fasting and postprandial TGs, and free fatty acids [106].

Effects on blood pressure

The hypertension associated with diabetes has an unclear pathogenesis that may involve insulin resistance. Insulin resistance is related to hypertension in both diabetic and non-diabetic individuals and may contribute to hypertension by increasing sympathetic activity, peripheral vascular resistance, renal sodium retention [107], and vascular smooth muscle tone and proliferation [108, 109].

Data of the effects of metformin on BP are variable, with neutral effects or small decreases in SBP and DBP [110]. In the BIGPRO1 trial carried out in upper-body obese non-diabetic subjects with no cardiovascular diseases or contraindications to metformin, blood pressure decreased significantly more in the IFG/IGT subgroup treated with metformin compared to the placebo group (p < 0.03) [111].

Effects on thyroid function

Metformin decreases serum levels of thyrotropin (TSH) to subnormal levels in hypothyroid patients that use levothyroxin (LT4) on a regular basis [112]. A significant decrease in TSH (P < 0.001) without reciprocal changes in any thyroid function parameter in diabetic patients had also been reported but only in hypothyroid subjects, not in euthyroid ones [113].

The mechanism of the drop in TSH is unclear at this time. Some of the proposed explanations for this effect are enhanced inhibitory modulation of thyroid hormones on central TSH secretion, improved thyroid reserve in patients with hypothyroidism [113], changes in the affinity or the number of thyroid hormone receptors, increased dopaminergic tone, or induced constituent activation of the TSH receptor [112].

Metformin and HIV lypodystrofy

Antiretroviral therapy has been associated with an increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance among HIV-infected patients [114]. Lipodystrophy, characterized by morphological (peripheral lipoatrophy, localized fat accumulation) and metabolic changes (hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance and hyperglycemia), is highly prevalent in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), occurring in 40% to 80% of patients [115].

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), particularly thymidine analogues (zidovudine and stavudine), have been associated with morphological changes, particularly extremity fat loss [116], while protease inhibitors (PIs) have been associated with biochemical derangements of glucose and lipids as well as with localized accumulation of fat [117].

Lifestyle modifications such as diet and exercise and switching antiretroviral therapies seems to be of limited value in reducing visceral abdominal fat (VAT). Metformin has been shown to reduce VAT [97, 98] but at the expense of accelerating peripheral fat loss [118]. Favorable effects on insulin levels [98], insulin sensitivity [119], weight [97], flow-mediated vasodilation [119], and lipid profiles [98, 119] have also been described.

Effects on hemostasis

Therapeutic doses of metformin in type 2 diabetic patients lower circulating levels of several coagulation factors such as plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), von Williebrand Factor (vWF), tissue type plasminogen activator [88], factor VII [91]. It has also direct effects on fibrin structure and function by decreasing factor XIII activity and changing fibrin structure [92].

Furthermore, plasma levels of PAI-1 and vWF, which are secreted mainly by the impaired endothelium, have been shown to decrease with metformin therapy in non-diabetic subjects [93].

Metformin and neuroprotection

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases, has been termed type 3 diabetes. It is a brain specific form of diabetes characterized by impaired insulin actions and neuronal insulin resistance [120] that leads to excessive generation and accumulation of amyloid oligomers, a key factor in the development of AD [121].

The mechanisms of cerebral metabolism are still unclear. A network of different factors is most likely responsible for its maintenance. The activated protein kinase (AMPK) forms a molecular hub for cellular metabolic control [122]. Recent studies of neuronal models are pointing to possible AMPK roles beyond energy sensing with some reporting protective effects [123] while others report detrimental effects, particularly under extreme energy depletion [124].

AMPK is activated in the brain by metabolic stresses that inhibit ATP production such as ischemia, hypoxia, glucose deprivation, metabolic inhibitors (metformin), as well as catabolic and ATP consuming processes [122].

The human brain is characterized by an elevated oxidative metabolism and low antioxidants enzymes, which increases the brain’s vulnerability to oxidative stress [125]. Oxidative stress has been implicated in a variety of neurological diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease [126]. Mitochondrial dysfunction has a pivotal role in oxidative stress. In this setting, the permeability transition pore (PTP) acts as a regulator of the apoptotic cascade under stress conditions, triggering the release of apoptotic proteins and subsequent cell death [127]. It was reported that metformin prevents PTP opening and subsequent cell death in various endothelial cell types exposed to high glucose levels [128]. Metformin could interrupt the apoptotic cascade in a model of ectoposide-induced cell death by inhibiting PTP opening and blocking the release of cytochrome-c. These events together with other factors from the mitochondrial intermembrane space are critical processes in the apoptotic cascade [125].

Insulin has been shown to regulate a wide range of processes in the central nervous system such as food intake, energy homeostasis, reproduction, sympathetic activity, learning and memory [129], as well as neuronal proliferation, apoptosis, and synaptic transmission [130].

With regard to ß amyloid, a report has shown that metformin increases ß amyloid in cells through an AMPK-dependent mechanism, independent of insulin signaling and glucose metabolism. This effect is mediated by a transcriptional upregulation of ß secretase (BACE 1) which leads to an increase of ß amyloid [131]. However, when insulin is added to metformin, it potentiates insulin’s effects on amyloid reduction, improves neuronal insulin resistance, and impairs glucose uptake and AD-associated neuropathological characteristics by activating the insulin signaling pathway [129].

Metformin has been shown to promote rodent and human neurogenesis in culture by activating a protein kinase C-CREB binding protein (PKC-CBP) pathway, recruiting neural stem cells and enhancing neural function, particularly spatial memory function. It is noteworthy that neural stem cells can be recruited in an attempt of endogeneously repairing the injured or regenerating brain [132]. In the context of metformin’s potential neuroprotective effect in vivo, the capacity of the drug to cross the blood brain barrier needs to be further elucidated. Provided that this crossing could occur, metformin may become a therapeutic agent not only in peripheral and diabetes-associated vascular neuropathy but also in neurodegenerative diseases.

Metformin and cancer

Patients with type 2 diabetes have increased risks of various types of cancer, particularly liver, pancreas, endometrium, colon, rectum, breast, and bladder cancer. Cancer mortality is also increased [133, 134]. Many studies showed reduced incidence of different types of cancer in patients as well a reduced cancer-related mortality in patients using metformin (Table 3).

Table 3 Reduced incidence and cancer-related mortality in metformin treated patients

The underlying mechanisms of tumorigenesis in T2DM seem to be related to insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, elevated levels of IGF-1 [140142], and hyperglycemia with the latter driving ATP production in cancer cells through the glycolytic pathway, a mechanism known as the Warburg effect [142].

Metformin significantly reduces tumorigenesis and cancer cell growth although how it does it is not well understood. It may be due to its effects on insulin reduction and hyperinsulinemia, and consequently on IGF-1 levels, which have mitogenic actions enhancing cellular proliferation,but may also involve specific AMPK-mediated pathways [133].

Activation of AMPK leads to inhibition of mTOR through phosphorylaton and subsequent activation of the tumor suppressor tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2). The mTOR is a key integrator of growth factor and nutrient signals as well as a critical mediator of the PI3K/PKB/Akt pathway, one of the most frequently disregulated signaling pathways in human cancer [144]. Metformin may have additional anticancer properties independent of AMPK, liver kinase 1 (LKB1), and TSC2. This may be related, in part, to the inhibition of Rag GTPase-mediated activation of mTOR [145].

Patients with type 2 diabetes who are prescribed metformin had a lower risk of cancer compared to patients who did not take it. The reduced risk of cancer and cancer mortality observed in these studies has been consistently in the range of 25% to 30% [135139, 145147]. An observational cohort study with type 2 diabetics who were new metformin users found a significant decrease in cancer incidence among metformin users (7.3%) compared to controls (11.6%). The unadjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for cancer was 0.46 (0.40–0.53). The authors suggested a dose-related response [136]. In an observational study of women with type 2 diabetes, a decreased risk of breast cancer among metformin users was only seen with long-term use [137].

Metformin use is associated with lower cancer-related mortality. A prospective study (median follow-up time of 9.6 years) found that metformin use at baseline was associated with lower cancer-related mortality and that this association appeared to be dose dependent [138]. Diabetic patients with colorectal cancer who were treated with metformin had lower mortality than those not receiving metformin [139]. Patients with type 2 diabetes exposed to sulfonylureas and exogenous insulin had a significantly increased risk of cancer-related mortality compared with patients exposed to metformin. However, whether this increased risk is related to a deleterious effect of sulfonylurea and insulin or a protective effect of metformin or due to some unmeasured effect related to both choice of therapy and cancer risk is not known [147].

The proposed mechanisms of metformin anti-cancer properties are not fully understood. Most are mainly mediated through AMPK activation which requires LKB1, a well-known tumor suppressor [2]. Some of these mechanisms may be through inhibition of cell growth [148], IGF-1 signaling [149], inhibition of the mTOR pathway [150], reduction of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER-2) expression (a major driver of proliferation in breast cancer) [151], inhibition of angiogenesis and inflammation [152], induction of apoptosis and protein 53 (p53) activation [153], cell cycle arrest [137, 154], and enhancement of cluster of differenciation 8 (CD8) T cell memory [155].

Future roles for metformin in cancer therapy

In vitro and in vivo studies strongly suggest that metformin may be a valuable adjuvant in cancer treatment. Some of the proposed future roles yet to be defined through further research are outlined as follows:

Tumor prevention

When compared to those on other treatments, metformin users had a lower risk of cancer. A dose-relationship has been reported [138, 144, 145].

Adjunct in chemotherapy

Type 2 diabetic patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer as well as metformin were more likely to have pathologic complete response (pCR) than patients not receiving it. However, despite the increase in pCR, metformin did not significantly improve the estimated 3-year relapse-free survival rate [156].

Tumor relapse prevention

Cancer stem cells may be resistant to chemotherapeutic drugs, therefore regenerating the various tumor cell types and promoting disease relapse. Low doses of metformin inhibited cellular transformation and selectively killed cancer stem cells in four genetically different types of breast cancer in a mouse xenograft model. The association of metformin and doxorubicin killed both cancer stem cells and non-stem cancer cells in culture. This may reduce tumor mass and prevent relapse more effectively than either drug used as monotherapy [157].

Metformin contraindications

Metformin is contraindicated in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis or diabetic precoma, renal failure or renal dysfunction, and acute conditions which have the potential for altering renal function such as: dehydration, severe infection, shock or intravascular administration of iodinated contrast agents, acute or chronic disease which may cause tissue hypoxia (cardiac or respiratory failure, recent myocardial infarction or shock), hepatic insufficiency, and acute alcohol intoxication in the case of alcoholism and in lactating women [158]. Several reports in literature related an increased risk of lactic acidosis with biguanides, mostly phenformin, with an event rate of 40–64 per 100,000 patients years [159] whereas the reported incidence with metformin is 6.3 per 100,000 patients years [160].

Structural and pharmacokinetic differences in metformin such as poor adherence to the mitochondrial membrane, lack of interference with lactate turnover, unchanged excretion, and inhibition of electron transport and glucose oxidation may account for such differences [161].

Despite the use of metformin in cases where it is contraindicated, the incidence of lactic acidosis has not increased. Most patients with case reports relating metformin to lactic acidosis had at least one or more predisposing conditions for lactic acidosis [161].

Renal dysfunction is the most common risk factor associated with lactic acidosis but so far there is no clear evidence indicating at which level of renal dysfunction metformin should be discontinued or contraindicated in order to prevent lactic acidosis. Some authors have suggested discontinuing its use when serum creatinine is above 1.5 mg/dL in men and 1.4 mg/dL in women [103] while others suggested a cut-off of 2.2 mg/dL and continuous use even in the case of ischaemic cardiopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cardiac failure [84].

As serum creatinine can underestimate renal dysfunction, particularly in elderly patients and women, the use of estimated GFR (eGFR) has been advocated. The recommended eGFR thresholds are generally consistent with the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines in the U.K. and those endorsed by the Canadian Diabetes Association and the Australian Diabetes Society. Metformin may be continued or initiated with an eGFR of 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 but renal function should be monitored closely (every 3–6 months). The dose of metformin should be reviewed and reduced (e.g. by 50% or to half-maximal dose) in those with an eGFR of 45 mL/min per 1.73 m2, and renal function should be monitored closely (every 3 months). Metformin should not be initiated in patients at this eGFR [162]. The drug should be stopped once eGFR falls to 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Frid et al. supports these recommendations through findings that above 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 metformin levels rarely goes above 20 mmol/l, which seems to be a safe level [163].

Another clinical condition associated with lactic acidosis in patients using metformin is heart failure [79].

Adverse effects

Gastrointestinal intolerance occurs quite frequently in the form of abdominal pain, flatulence, and diarrhea [164]. Most of these effects are transient and subside once the dose is reduced or when administered with meals. However, as much as 5% of patients do not tolerate even the lowest dose [165].

About 10–30% of patients who are prescribed metformin have evidence of reduced vitamin B12 absorption due to calcium-dependent ileal membrane antagonism, an effect that can be reversed with supplemental calcium [166]. This vitamin B12 deficiency is rarely associated with megaloblastic anemia [167].

A multicentric study reported a mean decrease of 19% and 5% in vitamin B12 and folate concentration, respectively [168]. Vitamin B12 deficiency has been related with dose and duration of metformin use and occurs more frequently among patients that use it for more than 3 years and in higher doses [169].

Other adverse reactions are sporadic, such as leucocytoclastic vasculitis, allergic pneumonitis [170], cholestatic jaundice [171], and hemolytic anaemia [172].

Hypoglycemia is very uncommon with metformin monotherapy [173] but has been reported in combination regimens [174], likely due to metformin potentiating other therapeutic agents.

Drug interactions

Clinically significant drug interactions involving metformin are rare. Some cationic agents such as amiloride, digoxin, morphine, procainamide, quinidine, quinine, ranitidine, triamterene, trimethoprim, and vancomycin that are eliminated by renal tubular secretion may compete with metformin for elimination. Concomitant administration of cimetidine, furosemide, or nifedipine may also increase the concentration of metformin. Patients receiving metformin in association with these agents should be monitored for potential toxicity. Metformin should be discontinued at least 48 hours prior to the administration of iodinated contrast media which can produce acute renal failure and should only be restarted if renal function is normal [175].


Gastrointestinal side-effects are common with the use of metformin of standard release and are usually associated with rapid titration and high-dose initiation of metformin.

These effects are generally transient, arise early in the course of treatment, and tend to subside over time [176]. The gastrointestinal side-effects can be addressed by taking the agent with meals, reducing the rate of dose escalation, or transferring to a prolonged-release formulation [177].

Some studies point to a dose-related relationship of the incidence of side-effects [178] whereas other evidence gives no support for a dose-related effect of metformin on the gastrointestinal system [179].

Metformin XR

The metformin XR formulation releases the active drug through hydrated polymers which expand after uptake of fluid, prolonging gastric residence time which leads to slower drug absorption in the upper gastrointestinal tract and allows once-daily administration [180].

A prospective open label study assessed metformin XR effectiveness on three cardiovascular risk factors: blood glucose (HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and postprandial blood glucose); total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol; and triglycerides and blood pressure. No significant differences were observed by any anthropometric, clinical, or laboratory measures except for plasma triglycerides which were lower in the group switched to metformin XR [181]. Metformin tolerability as well as patient acceptance was greater in the group switched to metformin XR. Other studies have found good to excellent glycemic control with metformin XR in type 2 diabetic patients who did not have well-controlled diet and exercise alone [182]. Metformin XR has been associated with improved tolerability [182] and increased compliance [183].


In recent years, metformin has become the first-line therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. Thus far, metformin is the only antidiabetic agent which has shown reduced macrovascular outcomes which is likely explained by its effects beyond glycemic control. It has also been employed as an adjunct to lifestyle modifications in pre-diabetes and insulin-resistant states. A large amount of evidence in literature supports its use even in cases where it would be contra-indicated mainly due to the fear of lactic acidosis which has been over-emphasized as the available data suggest that lactate levels and risk of lactic acidosis do not differ appreciably in patients taking this drug versus other glucose-lowering agents. It has also recently gained attention as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease.

Authors’ information

Lilian Beatriz Aguayo Rojas is post graduate student at the State University of Rio de Janeiro, Diabetes Unit, Internal Medicine Department.

Marilia Brito Gomes is an Associate Professor at the State University of Rio de Janeiro, Diabetes Unit, Internal Medicine Department.



Angiotensin converting enzyme


Alzheimeir disease


Advanced glycosilation end product


Adenosine monophosfatase protein kinase


Beta-amyloid cleaving enzyme- 1


Body muscular index


Blood pressure


Coronary artery disease


Cyclin dependent kinase


Cardiac heart failure


Complete pathologic response


cAMP responsive element binding protein


Cyclosporin A


Cardiovascular disease


Dipeptidyl peptidase IV


Diabetes mellitus


Mitochondrial membrane potential


Fasting plasma glucose


Gestacional diabetes mellitus


Glomerular filtration rate


Estimated glomerular filtration rate


Glucagon like peptide 1


Highly active antiretroviral therapy


HIV associated lipodystrophy syndrome


Human imunodeficiency virus


Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2


Heart failure


Homeostatic model assessment – insulin resistance


Impaired fasting glucose


Impaired glucose tolerance


Liver kinase 1


Lifestyle modification






Mammalian target of rapamycin


Nuclear factor kappa beta


Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors


Oral glucose tolerance test


Plasminogen activator inhibitor


Policystic ovary syndrome


Protease inhibitors


Permeability transition pore


Reactive oxigen species


Sirtuin 1


Type 2 diabetes mellitus


Tuberous sclerosis complex 2


Transducer of regulated CREB protein 2




Uncoupled proteins


Vascular endothelial growth factor


Von Williebrand fator.


  1. Godarzi MO, Brier-Ash M: Metformin revisited: re-evaluation of its properties and role in the pharmacopoeia of modern antidiabetic agents. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2005, 5: 654-665.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaw RJ, Lamia KA, Vasquez D: The kinase LKB1 mediates glucose homeostasis in liver and therapeutic effects of metformin. Science. 2005, 310: 1642-1646. 10.1126/science.1120781.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Mir MY, Nogueira V, Fontaine E: Dimethylbiguanide inhibits cell respiration via an indirect effect targeted on the respiratory chain complex I. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 223-228. 10.1074/jbc.275.1.223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H: Global prevalence of diabetes. Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 1047-1053. 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guillies C, Abram KR, Lambert PC, Cooper NJ, Sutton AJ: Pharmacological and lifestyle interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007, 334: 299-10.1136/bmj.39063.689375.55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Petersen J, Mc Guire D: Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose – a review of diagnosis, clinical implications and management. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res. 2005, 2 (1): 9-15. 10.3132/dvdr.2005.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group: Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346: 393-403.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group: Effects of withdrawal from metformin on the development of diabetes in the diabetes prevention program. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26 (4): 977-980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Mukesh M: Indian diabetes prevention programme (IDPP). the Indian diabetes prevention programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia. 2006, 49: 289-297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang W, Lin L, Qi J: The preventive effect of acarbose and metformin on the IGT population from becoming diabetes mellitus: a 3-year multicentral prospective study. Chin J Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 17: 131-134.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group: 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet. 2009, 374 (9702): 1677-1686. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61457-4.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Vijay V: Low risk threshold for acquired diabetogenic factors in Asian Indians. Diab Res Clin Pract. 2004, 65: 189-195. 10.1016/j.diabres.2004.03.012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH: Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance: The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 1997, 20: 537-544. 10.2337/diacare.20.4.537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Salpeter SR, Buckley NS, Kahn JA: Meta-analysis: metformin treatment in persons at risk for diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 2008, 121: 149-157. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.09.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lily M, Godwin M: Treating prediabetes with metformin systematic review and meta-analysis. Can Fam Physician. 2009, 55: 363-369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. American Diabetes Association: Summary of revisions to the 2011 clinical practice recommendations. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34 (Suppl 1): S3-

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rodbard HW, Jellinger PS, Davidson JA: Statement by an American association of clinical endocrinologists/American college of endocrinology consensus panel on type 2 diabetes mellitus. An algorithm for glycemic control. Endocr Pract. 2009, 15 (6): 540-559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group: Effect of intensive blood glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998, 352 (9131): 854-865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ito H, Ishida H, Takeuchi Y: Long-term effect of metformin on blood glucose control in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab. 2010, 7: 83-10.1186/1743-7075-7-83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, Holman RR: Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). JAMA. 1999, 281: 2005-2012. 10.1001/jama.281.21.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gerich J, Raskin P, Jean-Louis L: PRESERVE-beta: two-year efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with nateglinide or glyburide plus metformin. Diabetes Care. 2005, 28: 2093-2099. 10.2337/diacare.28.9.2093.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Phung OJ, Scholle JM, Talwar M, Coleman CI: Effect of noninsulin Antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2010, 303 (14): 1410-1418. 10.1001/jama.2010.405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Charbonnel B, Shernthaner G, Brunetti P: Long-term efficacy and tolerability of add-on piogçitazone therapy to faliling monotherapy compared with addition of glicazide or metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2005, 48: 1093-1104. 10.1007/s00125-005-1751-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hanefeld M, Brunetti P, Schhernthaner GH: One year glycemic control with sulphonylurea plus pioglitazone versus sulphonylurea plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 141-147. 10.2337/diacare.27.1.141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. González-Ortiza M, Guerrero-Romero J, Violante-Ortiz R: Efficacy of glimepiride/metformin combination versus glibenclamide/metformin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 2009, 23: 376-379. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson JA, Majumdar SR, Simpson SH: Decreased mortality associated with the use of metformin compared with sulfonylurea Monotherapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002, 25: 2244-2248. 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Evans JM, Ogston SA, Emslie-Smith A, Morris AD: Risk of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of patients treated with sulfonylureas and metformin. Diabetologia. 2006, 49: 930-936. 10.1007/s00125-006-0176-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Giugliano D, Quatraro A, Consoli G: Metformin for obese, insulin-treated diabetic patients: improvement in glycaemic control and reduction of metabolic risk factors. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993, 44: 107-112. 10.1007/BF00315466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lund SS, Tarnow L, Frandsen M: Combining insulin with metformin or an insulin secretagogue in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 12 month, randomised, double blind trial. BJ. 2009, 339: b4324-10.1136/bmj.b4324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vella S, Buetow L, Royle P: The use of metformin in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review of efficacy. Diabetologia. 2010, 53 (5): 809-820. 10.1007/s00125-009-1636-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Abdelghaffar S, Attia AM: Metformin added to insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus in adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, CD006691-Issue 1

  32. Bailey CJ, Bagdonas A, Rubes J: Rosiglitazone-metformin fixed-dose combination compared with uptritrated metformin alone in type diabetes mellitus:a 24 week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Clin Ther. 2005, 27: 1548-1561. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.10.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Harris SB, Hanley AJ, Zinman B: Changes over time in glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function in response to low-dose metformin and thiazolidinedione combination therapy in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34 (7): 1601-1604. 10.2337/dc11-0046.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Scheen AJ: ADOPT study: which first-line glucose-lowering oral medication in type 2 diabetes?. Rev Med Liege. 2007, 62 (1): 48-52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Komoroski B, Vachharajani N, Feng Y, Li L, Kornhauser D, Pfister M: Dapagliflozin, a novel, selective SGLT2 inhibitor, improved glycemic control over 2 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009, 85: 513-519. 10.1038/clpt.2008.250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. List JF, Woo V, Morales E, Tang W, Fiedorek FT: Sodium-glucose cotransport inhibition with dapagliflozin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 650-657. 10.2337/dc08-1863.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Scheen AJ, de Magalhanes AC, Salvatore T: Reduction of the acute bioavailability of metformin by the α glycosidase inhibitor acarbose in normal man. Eur J Clin Invest. 1994, 24 (Suppl3): 50-54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenstok J, Brown A, Fischer J: Efficacy and safety of acarbose in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998, 21: 2050-2055. 10.2337/diacare.21.12.2050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Richter B, Bandeira-Echtler E, Bergerhoff K, Lerch CL: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008, CD006739-2

  40. Mannucci E, Ognibene A, Cremasco F: Effect of metformin on glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and leptin levels in obese nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes Care. 2001, 24: 489-494. 10.2337/diacare.24.3.489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. DeFronzo RA, Hissa MN, Garber AJ, for Saxagliptin Study Group: The efficacy and safety of saxagliptin when added to metformin therapy in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes with metformin alone. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32 (9): 1649-1655. 10.2337/dc08-1984.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Deacon CF, Mannucci E, Ahrén B: Glycaemic efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as add-on therapy to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes-a review and meta analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012, 14 (8): 762-767. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01603.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Charles B, Norris R, Xiao X, Hague W: Population pharmacokinetics of metformin in late pregnancy. Ther Drug Monit. 2006, 28: 67-72. 10.1097/01.ftd.0000184161.52573.0e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gutzin SJ, Kozer E, Magee LA, Feig DS, Koren G: The safety of oral hypoglycemic agents in the first trimester of pregnancy. a meta-analysis. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2003, 10: 179-183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gilbert C, Valois M, Koren G: Pregnancy outcome after first-trimester exposure to metformin: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2006, 86: 658-663. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, Battin MR, Moore MP: MiG trial investigators. Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008, 358: 2003-2015. 10.1056/NEJMoa0707193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Moore LE, Briery CM, Clokey D: Metformin and insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: preliminary results of a comparison. J Reprod Med. 2007, 52: 1011-1015.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rowan JA, Rush EC, Obolonkin V, Battin M, Wouldes T, Hague WM: Metformin in gestational diabetes: the offspring follow-up (MiG TOFU): body composition at 2 years of age. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34: 2279-2284. 10.2337/dc11-0660.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wiegand S, Maikowski U, Blankenstein O, Bierbermann H, Tarnow P, Grutes A: Type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in European children and adolescents with obesity- a problem that is no longer restrited to minority groups. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004, 151: 199-206. 10.1530/eje.0.1510199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Pinhas-Hamiel O, Zeitler P: Clinical presentation and treatment of type 2 diabetes in children. Pediatr Diabetes. 2007, 8 (Suppl. 9): 16-27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Jones KL, Arslanian S, Peterokova VA, Park JS, Tomlinson MJ: Effect of metformin in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2002, 25: 89-94. 10.2337/diacare.25.1.89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gottschalk M, Danne T, Vlajnic A, Cara J: Glimepiride Versus Metformin as Monotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.A randomized, single-blind comparative study. DiabetesCare. 2007, 30: 790-794.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Gungor N, Thompson T, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Janosky J, Arslanian S: Early signs of cardiovascular disease in youth with obesityand type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005, 28 (5): 1219-1221. 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1219.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Freedman DS, Khan LK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS: Relationship of childhood obesity to coronary heart disease risk factors in adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 2001, 108 (3): 712-718. 10.1542/peds.108.3.712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rashid M, Roberts EA: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000, 30: 48-53. 10.1097/00005176-200001000-00017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Targher G, Bertolini L, Poli F: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of future cardiovascular events among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2005, 54: 3541-3546. 10.2337/diabetes.54.12.3541.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Carnethon MR, Gidding SS, Nehgme R, Sidney S: Cardiorespiratory fitness in young adulthood and the development of cardiovascular disease risk factors. JAMA. 2003, 290: 3092-3100. 10.1001/jama.290.23.3092.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Schwimmer JB, Deutsch R, Kahen T, Lavine JE, Stanley C, Behling C: Prevalence of fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2006, 118: 1388-1393. 10.1542/peds.2006-1212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Reinehr T, Kiess W, Kappellen T, Andler W: Insulin sensitivity among obese children and adolescents, according to degree of weight loss. Pediatrics. 2004, 114: 1569-1573. 10.1542/peds.2003-0649-F.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tock L, Dˆamaso A, de Piano A, Carnier J: Long-TermEffects of metformin and lifestyle modification on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease obese adolescents. J Obes. 2010, 831901: 6-Article ID 831901

    Google Scholar 

  61. Burgert TS, Duran EJ, Goldberg-Gell R, Dziura J, Yeckel CW, Katz S, Tamborlane WV, Caprio S: Short-term metabolic and cardiovascular effects of metformin in markedly obese adolescents with normal glucose tolerance. Pediatr Diabetes. 2008, 9: 567-576. 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00434.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Park M, Kinra S, Ward K, White B, Viner R: Metformin for obesity in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 1743-1745. 10.2337/dc09-0258.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Cole CR, Foody JM, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS: Heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise testing asa predictor of mortality in a cardiovascularly healthy cohort. Ann Intern Med. 2000, 132: 552-555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lind L, Andren B: Heart rate recovery after exercise is related to the insulin resistance syndrome and heart rate variability in elderly men. Am Heart J. 2002, 144: 666-672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nadeau KJ, Ehlers LB, Zeitler PS, Love-Osborne K: Treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with metformin versus lifestyle intervention in insulin-resistant adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009, 10: 5-13. 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00450.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Oude Luttikhuis H, Baur L, Jansen H, Shrewsbury VA, O’Malley C, Stolk RP, Summerbell CD: Interventions for treating obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, CD001872-1

  67. Kannel WB, McGee DL: Diabetes and glucose tolerance as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. Diabetes Care. 1979, 2: 120-126. 10.2337/diacare.2.2.120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor E: NationalDiabetes Data Group. Diabetes in America. Heart disease and diabetes. 1995, Washington, D.C: GPO, 429-48. NIH publication no.95-1468, 2

    Google Scholar 

  69. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M: Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998, 339: 229-234. 10.1056/NEJM199807233390404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Krempf M, Parhofer KG, Steg G: National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel onDetection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).Third Report of the NationalCholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection. Circulation. 2002, 106: 3143-3421.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Bulugahapitiya U, Siyambalapitiya S, Sithole J, Idris I: Is diabetes a coronary risk equivalent? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2009, 26: 142-148. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02640.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sgambato S, Varricchio M, Tesauro P, Passariello N, Carbone L: Use of metformin in ischemic cardiopathy. Clin Ther. 1980, 94: 77-85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA: 10-year follow up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359: 1577-1589. 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kao J, Tobis J, Mc Clelland RL: Relation of metformin treatment to clinical events in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2004, 93: 1347-1350. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.02.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Kooy A, de Jager J, Lehert P: Long-term effects of metformin on metabolism and microvascular and macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2009, 169: 616-625. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Jadhav S, Ferrell W, Greer IA, Petrie JR, Cobbe SM, Sattar N: Effects of metformin on microvascular function and exercise tolerance in women with angina and normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006, 48: 956-963. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Boussageon R, Supper I, Bejan-Angoulvant T: Reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2012, 9 (4): e1001204-10.1371/journal.pmed.1001204.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. MacDonald MR, Petrie MC, Hawkins NM: Diabetes, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2008, 10: 1224-1240. 10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.09.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Hulisz DT, Bonfiglio MF, Murray RD: Metformin-associated lactic acidosis. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1998, 11: 233-236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Food and Drug Administration. Product label approval: metformin. 2006,,

  81. Masoudi FA, Inzucchi SE, Wang Y, Havranek EP, Foody JM, Krumholz HM: Thiazolinediones, metformin, and outcomes in older patients with diabetes and heart failure. Circulation. 2005, 111: 583-590. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154542.13412.B1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Eurich DT, Majumdar SR, McAlister FA, Tsuyuki RT, Johnson JA: Improved clinical outcomes associated with metformin in patients with diabetes and heart failure. Diabetes Care. 2005, 28: 2345-2351. 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Papanas N, Maltezos E, Mikhailidis DP: Metformin and heart failure: never say never again. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012, 1: 1-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Rachmani R, Slavachevski I, Levi Z, Zadok B, Kedar Y, Ravid M: Metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: reconsideration of traditional contraindications. Eur J Intern Med. 2002, 13: 428-433. 10.1016/S0953-6205(02)00131-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Shah DD, Fonarow GC, Horwich TB: Metformin Therapy and Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Systolic Heart Failure and Diabetes. J Card Fail. 2010, 16 (3): 200-206. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.10.022.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Isoda K, Young J, Zirlik A: Metformin inhibits Proinflammatory Responses and Nuclear Factor ĸß in Human Vascular Wall Cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006, 26: 611-617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group Intensive: Lifestyle Intervention or Metformin on Inflammation and Coagulation in Participants With Impaired Glucose Tolerance. Diabetes. 2005, 54 (5): 1566-1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. De Jager J, Kooy A, Lehert P: Effects of short-term treatment with metformin on markers of endothelial function and inflammatory activity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Intern Med. 2004, 256: 1-14. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01328.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Mather KJ, Verma S, Anderson TJ: Improved endothelial function with metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001, 37 (5): 1344-1350. 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01129-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Vitale C, Mercuro G, Cornoldi A, Fini M: Metformin improves endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome. J Intern Med. 2005, 258: 250-256. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01531.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Grant PJ: Beneficial effects of metformin on haemostasis and vascular function in man. Diabetes Metab. 2003, 29 (6S): 44-52.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Standeven KF, Ariens RA, Whitaker P: The effect of dimethylbiguanide on thrombin activity, FXIII activation, fibrin polymerization, and fibrin clot formation. Diabetes. 2002, 51: 189-197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Charles MA, Morange P, Eschwege E: Effect of weight change and metformin on fibrinolysis and the von Willebrand factor in obese nondiabetic subjects: the BIGPRO1 Study. Biguanides and the Prevention of the Risk of Obesity. Diabetes Care. 1998, 21: 1967-1972. 10.2337/diacare.21.11.1967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Wu RR, Zhao JP, Jin H: Lifestyle Intervention and Metformin for Treatment of Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2008, 299 (2): 185-193. 10.1001/jama.2007.56-b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Glueck CJ, Fontaine RN, Wang P: Metformin reduces weight, centripetalobesity, insulin, leptin, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in nondiabetic, morbidly obese subjects with body mass index greater than 30. Metabolism. 2001, 50: 856-861. 10.1053/meta.2001.24192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Kusaka I, Nagasaka S, Horie H, Ishibashi S: Metformin, but not pioglitazone, decreases postchallenge plasma ghrelin levels in type 2 diabetic patients: a possible role in weight stability?. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008, 10: 1039-1046. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00857.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Hadigan C, Corcoran C, Basgoz N: Metformin in the Treatment of HIV Lipodystrophy Syndrome A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2000, 284: 472-477. 10.1001/jama.284.4.472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Sheth S, Larson L: The efficacy and safety of insulin-sensitizing drugs in HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMC Infect Dis. 2010, 10: 183-10.1186/1471-2334-10-183.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Bailey CJ, Turner RC: Metformin. N Engl J Med. 1996, 334: 574-579. 10.1056/NEJM199602293340906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Faure P, Rossini E, Wiernsperger N: An insulin sensitizer improves the free radical defense system potential and insulin sensitivity in high fructose-fed rats. Diabetes. 1999, 48: 353-357. 10.2337/diabetes.48.2.353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Beisswenger P, Rugiero-Lopez D: Metformin inhibition of glycation processes. Diabetes Metab. 2003, 29 (6S): 95-103.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Anedda A, Rial E, Gonzalez Barroso : Metformin induces oxidative stress in white adipocytes and raises uncoupling proten levels. J Endocrinol. 2008, 199: 33-40. 10.1677/JOE-08-0278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Zheng Z, Chen H, Li J, Li T, Zheng B, Zheng Y, Jin H, He Y, Gu Q, Xun X: Sirtuin 1-mediated cellular metabolic memory of high glucose via the LKB1/AMPK/ROS pathway and therapeutic effects of metformin. Diabetes. 2012, 61 (1): 217-228. 10.2337/db11-0416.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA: Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355: 2427-2443. 10.1056/NEJMoa066224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Desilets AR, Dhakal-Karki S, Dunican KC: Role of metformin for weight management in patients without type 2 diabetes. Ann Pharmacother. 2008, 42: 817-826. 10.1345/aph.1K656.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Eleftheriadou I, Grigoropoulou P, Katsilambros N, Tentolouris N: The effects of medications used for the management of diabetes and obesity on postprandial lipid metabolism. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2008, 4: 340-356. 10.2174/157339908786241133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Wulffelé MG, Kooy A, Lehert P, Bets D, Donker A, Stehouwer C: Does metformin decrease blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes intensively treated with insulin?. Diabet Med. 2005, 22: 907-10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01554.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Tack CJ, Smits P, Willemsen JJ, Lenders JW, Thien T, Lutterman JA: Effects of insulin on vascular tone and sympathetic nervous system in NIDDM. Diabetes. 1996, 45: 15-22. 10.2337/diabetes.45.1.15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Sechi LA, Bartoli E: Molecular mechanisms of insulin resistance in arterial hypertension. Blood Press Suppl. 1996, 1: 47-54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Granberry MC, Fonseca VA: Cardiovascular risk factors associated with insulin resistance: effects of oral antidiabetic agents. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005, 5: 201-209. 10.2165/00129784-200505030-00006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Fontbonne A, Diouf I, Baccara-Dinet M, Eschwege E, Charles A: Effects of 1-year treatment with metformin on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in non-diabetic upper-body obese subjects with mild glucose anomalies: a post-hoc analysis of the BIGPRO1 trial. Diabetes Metab. 2009, 35: 385-391. 10.1016/j.diabet.2009.03.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Vigersky R, Filmore-Nassar A, Allan R: Thyrotropin Suppression by Metformin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006, 91: 225-227. 10.1210/jc.2005-1210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Capelli C, Rotondi M, Pirola I, Agosti B, Gandossi E: TSH-lowering effect of metformin in type 2 diabetic patients differences between euthyroid, untreated hypothyroid, and euthyroid on L-T4 therapy patients. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 1589-1590. 10.2337/dc09-0273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Triant VA, Lee H, Hadigan C, Grinspoon SK: Increased acute myocardial infarction rates and cardiovascular risk factors among patients with HIV disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007, 92: 2506-2512. 10.1210/jc.2006-2190.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Kinlaw WB, Marsh B: Adiponectin and HIV-lipodystrophy:taking HAART. Endocrinology. 2004, 145: 484-486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Moyle GJ, Sabin CA, Cartledge J: A randomized comparative trial of tenofovir DF or abacavir as replacement for a thymidine analogue in persons with lipoatrophy. Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006, 20: 2043-2050.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Behrens G, Dejam A, Schmidt H: Impaired glucose tolerance, b cell function and lipid metabolism in HIV patients under treatment with protease inhibitors. Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999, 13: F63-F70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Kohli R, Shevitz A, Gorbach S, Wanke C: A randomized placebo-controlled trial of metformin for the treatment of HIV lipodystrophy. HIV Med. 2007, 8: 420-426. 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2007.00488.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. van Wijk , de Koning E, Castro M: Comparison of Rosiglitazone and Metformin for treating HIV Lipodistrophy. Ann Inter Med. 2005, 143: 337-346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Spasic MR, Callaerts P, Norga KK: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) Molecular Crossroad for Metabolic Control and Survival of Neurons. Neuroscientist. 2009, 15 (4): 309-316. 10.1177/1073858408327805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Culmsee C, Monnig J, Kemp BE, Mattson MP: AMPactivated protein kinase is highly expressed in neurons in the developing rat brain and promotes neuronal survival following glucose deprivation. J Mol Neurosci. 2001, 17: 45-58. 10.1385/JMN:17:1:45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Santomauro Júnior AC, Ugolini MR, Santomauro AT, Souto RP: Metformina e AMPK: Um Antigo Fármaco e Uma Nova Enzima no Contexto da Síndrome Metabólica. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2008, 52 (1): 120-125. 10.1590/S0004-27302008000100017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. El-Mir MY, Detaille D, Villanueva G: Neuroprotective Role of Antidiabetic Drug Metformin Against Apoptotic Cell Death in Primary Cortical Neurons. J Mol Neurosci. 2008, 34 (1): 77-87. 10.1007/s12031-007-9002-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Andersen JK: Oxidative stress in neurodegeneration: Cause or consequence?. Nat Med. 2004, 10: S18-S25. 10.1038/nrn1434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Kroemer G, Reed JC: Mitochondrial control of cell death. Nat Med. 2000, 6: 513-519. 10.1038/74994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Detaille D, Guigas B, Chauvin C: Metformin prevents high glucose-induced endothelial cell death through a mitochondrial permeability transition-dependent process. Diabetes. 2005, 54: 2179-2187. 10.2337/diabetes.54.7.2179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Plum L, Schubert M, Bruning JC: The role of insulin receptor signaling in the brain. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 16: 59-65. 10.1016/j.tem.2005.01.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. van der Heide LP, Ramakers GM, Smidt MP: Insulin signaling in the central nervous system: learning to survive. Prog Neurobiol. 2006, 79: 205-221. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.06.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Gupta A, Bisht B, Dey CS: Peripheral insulin-sensitizer drug metformin ameliorates neuronal insulin resistance and Alzheimer’s-like change. Neuropharmacology. 2011, 60: 910-920. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.01.033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Selkoe DJ: The cell biology of ßamyloid precursor protein and presenilin in Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Cell Biol. 1998, 8: 447-453. 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01363-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Chen Y, Zhoua K, Wanga R, Liua Y: Antidiabetic drug metformin (GlucophageR) increases biogenesis of Alzheimer’s amyloid peptides via up-regulating BACE1 transcription. PNAS. 2009, 106 (10): 3907-3912. 10.1073/pnas.0807991106.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Wang J, Gallagher D, De Vito L: Metformin activates an atypical PKC-CBP pathway to promote neurogenesis and enhance spatial memory formation. Cell Stem Cell. 2012, 11: 23-35. 10.1016/j.stem.2012.03.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Papanas N, Maltezos E, Mikhailidis DP: Metformin and cancer: licence to heal?. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2010, 19: 913-917. 10.1517/13543784.2010.499122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A: Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Canc Ins. 2005, 97: 1679-1687. 10.1093/jnci/dji375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Li D, Yeung SJ, Hassan MM, Konopleva M, Abbruzzese JL: Anti-diabetic therapies affect risk of pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2009, 137 (2): 482-488. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.013.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Donadon V, Balbi M, Valent F, Avogaro A: Glycated hemoglobin and antidiabetic strategies as risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010, 16 (24): 3025-3032. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i24.3025.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Libby G, Donnelly LA, Donnan PT: New users of metformin area at low risk of incident cancer: a cohort study among people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 1620-1625. 10.2337/dc08-2175.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Landman GW, Kleefstra N, van Hateren KJ: Metformin associated with lower cancer mortality in type 2 diabetes ZODIAC-16. Diabetes Care. 2010, 33: 322-326. 10.2337/dc09-1380.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Lee JH, Kim TI, Jeon SM: The effects of metformin on the survival of colorectal cancer patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Cancer. 2011, 12: 1-24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Inoue M, Iwasaki M, Otami T: Diabetes mellitus and the risk of cancer. Results from a large-scale population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2006, 166: 1871-1877. 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Grimberg A, Cohen P: Role of insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in growth control and carcinogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 2000, 183: 1-9. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200004)183:1<1::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-J.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Smith U, Gale EAU: Cancer and diabetes: are we ready for prime time?. Diabetologia. 2010, 53: 1541-1544. 10.1007/s00125-010-1815-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Markman B, Atzori F, Perez-Garcia J, Tabernero J, Baselga J: Status of PI3K inhibition and biomarker development in cancer therapeutics. Ann Oncol. 2010, 21: 683-691. 10.1093/annonc/mdp347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Kalender A, Selvaraj A, Kim SY: Metformin, independent of AMPK, inhibits mTORC1 in a rag GTPasedependent manner. Cell Metab. 2010, 11: 390-401. 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.014.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Evans J, Donelly L, Emslie A: Metformin and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients. BMJ. 2005, 330 (7503): 1304-1305. 10.1136/bmj.38415.708634.F7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Bodmer M, Meier C, Krähenbühl S: Long-term metformin Use is associated with decreased risk of breast cancer. Diabetes Care. 2010, 33: 1304-1308. 10.2337/dc09-1791.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Bowker SL, Majumdar SR, Veugelers P, Johnson JA: Increased cancer-related mortality for patients with type 2 diabetes who usesulfonylureas or insulin. Diabetes Care. 2006, 29: 254-258. 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Ben Sahra I, Laurent K, Loubat A: The antidiabetic drug metformin exerts an antitumoral effect in vitro and in vivo through a decrease of cyclin D1 level. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 3576-3586. 10.1038/sj.onc.1211024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Pollak M: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8: 915-928. 10.1038/nrc2536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Zakikhani M, Dowling R, Fantus IG, Sonenberg N, Pollak M: Metformin is an AMP kinase-dependent growth inhibitor for breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 10269-10273. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Vazquez-Martin A, Oliveras-Ferraros C, Menendez JA: The antidiabetic drug metformin suppresses HER2 (erbB-2) oncoprotein overexpression via inhibition of the mTOR effector p70S6K1 in human breast carcinoma cells. Cell Cycle. 2009, 8: 88-96. 10.4161/cc.8.1.7499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Lund SS, Tarnow L, Stehouwer CD: Impact of metformin versus repaglinide on non-glycaemic cardiovascular risk markers related to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008, 158: 631-641. 10.1530/EJE-07-0815.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Thoreen CC, Sabatini DM: AMPK and p53 help cells through lean times. Cell Metab. 2005, 1: 287-288. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.04.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Zhuang Y, Miskimins W: Cell cycle arrest in Metformin treated breast cancer cells involves activation of AMPK, downregulation of cyclin D1, and requires p27Kip1 or p21Cip1. J Mol Signal. 2008, 3: 18-10.1186/1750-2187-3-18.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Pearce EL, Walsh MC, Cejas PJ: Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature. 2009, 460: 103-107. 10.1038/nature08097.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Jiralerspong S, Palla S, Giordano S: Metformin and Pathologic Complete Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Diabetic Patients With Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 3297-3302. 10.1200/JCO.2009.19.6410.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Hirsh H, Iliopoulos D, Tsichlis P, Stuh K: Metformin selectively targets cancer stem cells, and acts together with chemotherapy to block tumor growth and prolong remission. Cancer Res. 2009, 69 (19): 7507-7511. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Scarpello J, Howlett H: Metformin therapy and clinical uses. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res. 2008, 5: 157-167. 10.3132/dvdr.2008.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Rosand J, Friedberg J, Yang J: Fatal phenformin-associated lactic acidosis. Ann Intern Med. 1997, 127: 170-

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Salpeter SR, Greyber E, Pasternak GA, Salpeter EE: Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, 1: CD002967-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Tahrani AA, Varghese GI, Scarpello JH, Hanna FWF: Metformin, heart failure and lactic acidosis: is Metformin absolutely contraindicated?. BMJ. 2007, 355: 508-512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. Lipska KJ, Bailey CJ, Inzucchi SE: Use of metformin in the setting of mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34 (6): 1431-1437. 10.2337/dc10-2361.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Frid A, Sterner GN, Londahl M: Novel assay of metformin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and varying levels of renal function. Diabetes Care. 2010, 33: 1291-1293. 10.2337/dc09-1284.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Metformin LS: Metformin: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use. Diabetes Metab. 1979, 5: 233-245.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Cusi K, DeFronzo RA: Metformin: a review of its metabolic effects. Diabetes Rev. 1998, 6: 89-131.

    Google Scholar 

  166. Bauman WA, Shaw S, Jayatilleke E: Increased intake of calcium reverses vitamin B12 malabsorption induced by metformin. Diabetes Care. 2000, 23: 1227-1231. 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Callaghan TS, Hadden DR, Tomkin GH: Megaloblastic anemia due to vitamin B12 malaborsption associated with long-term metformin treatment. Br Med J. 1980, 280: 1214-1215. 10.1136/bmj.280.6225.1214.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Jager J, Kooy A, Lehert P, Wulffelé M: Long term treatment with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and risk of vitamin B-12 deficiency: randomized placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 2010, 340: c2181-10.1136/bmj.c2181.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Wei Ting RZ, Szeto CC, Chan M, Ma K: Risk Factors of Vitamin B12 Deficiency in Patients Receiving Metformin. Arch Intern Med. 2006, 166: 1975-1979. 10.1001/archinte.166.18.1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Klapholz L, Leitersdorf E, Weinrauch L: Leucocytoclastic vasculitis and pneumonitis induced by metformin. BMJ. 1986, 293: 483-

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Desilets DJ, Shorr AF, Moran KA, Holtzmuller KC: Cholestatic jaundice associated with the use of metformin. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001, 96: 2257-2258. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03972.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Kashyap AS, Kashyap S: Haemolytic anaemia due to metformin. Postgrad Med J. 2000, 76: 125-126. 10.1136/pmj.76.892.125.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Giugliano D, De Rosa N, Di Maro G: Metformin improves glucose, lipid metabolism, and reduces blood pressure in hypertensive, obese women. Diabetes Care. 1993, 16: 1387-1390. 10.2337/diacare.16.10.1387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group: Relative efficacy of randomly allocated diet, sulphonylurea, insulin, or metformin in patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes followed for three years (UKPDS 13). BMJ. 1995, 310: 83-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Glucophage® and Glucophage XRproduct information. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. 2003, Available at:

  176. Haupt E, Knick B, Koschinsky T, Liebermeister H, Schneider J, Hirche H: Oral antidiabetic combination therapy with sulphonylureas and metformin. Diabete Metab. 1991, 17: 224-231.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB: Management of hyperglycaemiain type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006, 49: 1711-1721. 10.1007/s00125-006-0316-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Grant P: The effects of high- and medium-dose metformin therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1996, 19: 64-66. 10.2337/diacare.19.1.64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Garber AJ, Duncan TG, Goodman AM, Millus DJ, Rohlf JL: Efficacy of metformin in type 2 diabetes: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose–response trial. Am J Med. 1997, 103: 491-497. 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00254-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Donahue S, Marathe P, Guld T, Meeker J: The phamacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of extended-release metformin tablets vs immediate-release metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002, 51 (Suppl 2): A468-

    Google Scholar 

  181. Levy J, Cobas RA, Gomes MB: Assessment of efficacy and tolerability of oncedaily extended release metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2010, 2: 16-10.1186/1758-5996-2-16.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  182. Raz I, Delaet I, Goyvaerts H: Safety and efficacy of novel extended-release formulation of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2000, 49 (Suppl 1): A363-

    Google Scholar 

  183. Donnelly LA, Morris AD, Pearson ER: Adherence in patients transferred from immediate release metformin to a sustained release formulation: a population-based study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009, 11: 338-342. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00973.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lilian Beatriz Aguayo Rojas or Marilia Brito Gomes.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Lilian Beatiz Aguayo Rojas drafted the manuscript and Marilia Brito Gomes reviewed and edited the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rojas, L.B.A., Gomes, M.B. Metformin: an old but still the best treatment for type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr 5, 6 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Metformin
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Insulin
  • Resistance