Skip to main content
Download PDF

Age- and sex-specific differences in the association of serum osteocalcin and cardiometabolic risk factors in type 2 diabetes

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome volume 15, Article number: 48 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Serum osteocalcin levels are closely related to metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between serum osteocalcin levels and cardiometabolic risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) according to age and sex.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 1500 patients with T2D (991 men and 509 women) aged ≥ 18 years old. The age- and sex-specific disparities in glycemic and lipid control, as well as cardiometabolic risk factors were evaluated.

Results

The levels of serum osteocalcin were significantly higher in women aged > 50 years compared with women aged ≤ 50 years (15.6 ± 6.5 ng/mL vs. 11.3 ± 4.5 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). However, this was lower in men aged > 50 years than men aged ≤ 50 years (12.2 ± 4.2 ng/mL vs. 12.9 ± 4.3 ng/mL, p = 0.0081). We performed correlation analyses of serum osteocalcin and cardiometabolic parameters. Serum osteocalcin concentrations were negative associated with FBG and HbA1c levels in women and men ≤ 50 years old, but not in men aged > 50 years old. Serum osteocalcin were negatively correlated with TG and positively correlated with HDL-C and LDL-C only in men aged ≤ 50 years. In binary logistic regression analysis, serum osteocalcin levels were associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, as follows: overweight/obese (odds ratio [OR], 0.944; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9–0.991, p = 0.02) in men aged > 50 years; high HbA1C and high FBG in women and men aged ≤ 50 years, but not in men aged > 50 years; after adjustment for confounding factors, high TG (OR, 0.905; 95% CI 0.865–0.947, p < 0.0001), metabolic syndrome (OR, 0.914; 95% CI 0.874–0.956, p < 0.0001), and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR, 0.933; 95% CI, 0.893–0.975, p = 0.002) were seen in men aged ≤ 50 years only.

Conclusions

Serum osteocalcin level has significant relationships with cardiometabolic risk factors and several age- and sex-related differences in patients with T2D. Decreased serum osteocalcin levels are associated with a worse cardiometabolic risk profile.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are the two most common cardiometabolic disorders worldwide and are closely linked in the potential of pathophysiology mechanisms [1, 2]. The risk of developing CVD is two-fold higher in subjects with T2D, and CVD is the leading cause of mortality in T2D populations [3]. A cluster of cardiometabolic risk factors, including obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome (MetS), appear to be potential causal factor for both diseases [4]. According to recent studies, bone is an endocrine organ that can affect multiple physiological processes through the secretion of bone-derived hormones [5]. The complex crosstalk between the bone and other metabolic and cardiovascular tissues has been demonstrated [6].

Osteocalcin, a marker of bone formation, is predominantly produced by osteoblasts. Many studies have demonstrated that osteocalcin, as a bone-derived hormone, is involved in multiple biological processes, including energy metabolism, glucose and lipid homeostasis, cardiovascular health, and stress response [6, 7]. Both carboxylated osteocalcin and undercarboxylated osteocalcin are found in the circulation, the levels of serum total osteocalcin are used as a biomarker of bone turnover [8]. Previous studies suggested that serum osteocalcin concentrations are positively associated with markers of insulin sensitivity and negatively associated with fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin resistance, body mass index (BMI), fat mass, and MetS [9, 10]. Subjects with T2D or MetS had lower serum osteocalcin levels compared with healthy subjects [11, 12]. Furthermore, osteocalcin levels were decreased in overweight or obese populations [13]. In previous follow up studies, serum osteocalcin was inversely associated with the risk of diabetes, MetS, and mortality due to cardiovascular disease [12, 14]. However, in another study involving elderly or postmenopausal women, no association was found between osteocalcin and glycemic control and cardiometabolic risk [15]. Thus, there are some discrepancies among the results of different studies that need to be explained.

In humans, bone turnover rate varies according to individual variables, among which age and sex are the most important variables determining bone remodeling [16]. Given that the circulating levels of osteocalcin differ by sexes and change with age, the relationship of serum osteocalcin levels with glucose and lipid homeostasis may also differ according to these variables [17]. Furthermore, there are sex differences in cardiometabolic risk profiles [18]. This variability in circulating osteocalcin levels may account for the inconsistent data observed in previous studies regarding the relationships of circulating osteocalcin levels with glucose homeostasis and cardiometabolic risk factors.

The present study aimed to investigate the age- and sex-related differences in the associations of serum osteocalcin concentrations with cardiometabolic risk factors, such as markers of glycemic control, HbA1C, FBG, lipid profiles, obesity, and MetS in patients with T2D.

Methods

Study populations

The cross-sectional study populations were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2018 and December 2020. Subjects were excluded if they had any known infection, malignant tumors, or were taking medicine that may influence the level of serum osteocalcin. Finally, 1500 patients with T2DM were enrolled. Questionnaires were used to identify the history of medical conditions, family history of disease, CVD history, and other lifestyle factors. BMI was calculated by using the following formula: body weight (kg) divided by height square (m2). Subjects were categorized into three groups according to BMI based on the World Health Organization criteria, as follows: normal (BMI < 25 kg/m2), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Broad of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.

Biochemical measurements

Venous blood samples were collected in the morning after fasting overnight. An auto-biochemical analyzer (Roche Diagnostic GmbH) was used to determine the fasting blood glucose (FBG) and serum concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), serum uric acid (UA), fasting plasma insulin, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography. Serum total osteocalcin level was measured by electrical chemiluminescent immunoassay using a modular E170 analyser (Roche Diagnostics).

Cardiometabolic risk factor

Systolic blood pressures (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) were measured using an automatic blood-pressure meter after sitting for at least 10 min. The average of three measurements was recorded for further analysis. Hypertension was defined as SBP ≥ 130 mmHg and DBP ≥ 85 mmHg or treatment with antihypertensive medication. For cholesterol-related traits, we defined high TC as ≥ 6.21 mmol/L. High TG was defined as ≥ 1.7 mmol/L. High LDL-C was defined as ≥ 4.16 mmol/L. Low HDL-C was defined as < 1.3 mmol/L for women or < 1.03 mmol/L for men. Hyperuricemia was defined as serum uric acid ≥ 420 μmol/L in men and ≥ 360 μmol/L in women. Insulin resistance was estimated based on the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) by using the following formula: fasting insulin (mU/L) × FBG (mmol/L)/22.5. Insufficient glycemic control was defined as HbA1c ≥ 7% or FBG ≥ 6.5 mmol/L. An index of overall cardiometabolic risk was calculated by obtaining a summary of the following risk factors: overweight/obesity, hypertension, hyperuricemia, insufficient glycemic control, high TC, high TG, low HDL-C, and high LDL-C. Then, participants were categorized as having low (0–1), medium (2–3), or high (≥ 4) CVD risk status [19, 20].

Definition of MetS

We used the definition of MetS according to the NCEPATP III criteria [21]. Subjects were classified as MetS when ≥ 3 of the following criteria were met: diabetes; blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg; TG ≥ 1.7 mmol/L; HDL-C < 1.03 mmol/L for men and < 1.30 mmol/L for women; and waist circumference > 102 cm for men and > 88 cm for women.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± SD, whereas categorical variables were represented by percentage. Differences in anthropometric and biochemical variables between participants of each sex were evaluated using a Mann–Whitney U test or the χ2-test as appropriate. Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the association between serum osteocalcin level and metabolic variables, such as anthropometric indices and glucose and lipid metabolism-related parameters. Binary logistics regression analysis was used to determine the association of osteocalcin levels with cardiometabolic risk factors according to age and sex after adjusting for various confounders. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 26.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA). We considered p < 0.05 to be statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of study population

The anthropometric and biochemical variables related to glucose homeostasis and cardiometabolic risk in both sex groups are shown in Table 1. The average BMI was higher in men than in women (26.7 ± 4.4 kg/m2 vs. 25.4 ± 4.1 kg/m2, p < 0.0001), and the prevalence of overweight/obesity was significantly higher in men than in women (62.2% vs. 45.6%, p < 0.0001). FBG levels tended to be higher in men than in women (8.5 ± 3.6 mmol/L vs. 8.4 ± 3.3 mmol/L, p = 0.004). However, fasting insulin concentration and HOMA-IR were not significantly different between the two groups. Serum TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels were higher in women than in men. The prevalence of MetS was significantly higher in men than in women (69.9% vs. 60.9%, p < 0.0001). However, there are no difference in the use of lipid-lowering drugs or anti-diabetic drugs (mainly insulin) between two groups.

Table 1 Study population characteristics according to sex
Full size table

Serum osteocalcin levels between different age and sex groups

Between the sexes, serum osteocalcin levels were significantly higher in women than in men (14.7 ± 6.5 ng/mL vs. 12.6 ± 4.2 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). Considering the trend of serum osteocalcin levels according to sex, we further divided the participants into four groups by age and sex. Serum osteocalcin levels according to age in men and women are shown in Fig. 1. The serum osteocalcin level was significantly higher in women > 50 years of age compared with women ≤ 50 years of age (15.6 ± 6.5 ng/mL vs. 11.3 ± 4.5 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). Interestingly, this was lower in men > 50 years of age than in men ≤ 50 years of age (12.2 ± 4.2 ng/mL vs. 12.9 ± 4.3 ng/mL, p = 0.0081). By contrast, the serum osteocalcin levels were significantly lower in women aged ≤ 50 years than in men aged ≤ 50 years but were higher in women aged > 50 years than in men aged > 50 years (p < 0.0001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Serum osteocalcin levels according to age, and sex. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001

Full size image

Relationships of serum osteocalcin levels with other variables

To assess the correlations between serum osteocalcin levels and other variables, spearman correlation analyses were conducted separately for the four groups (Table 2). Serum osteocalcin levels were significantly associated with glucose metabolism parameters, including HbA1c and FBG, except for men aged > 50 years, whereas there was no correlation between serum osteocalcin levels and HOMA-IR in all groups. Serum osteocalcin levels were positively correlated with insulin levels in men aged ≤ 50 years (r = 0.131, p = 0.024) and women aged > 50 years (r = 0.212, p = 0.006). No correlation was found between osteocalcin levels and BMI except in men aged > 50 years (r = ‒0.151, p = 0.002). In addition, the levels of osteocalcin were negatively correlated with TG (r = − 0.191, p < 0.0001) and positively correlated with HDL-C (r = 0.104, p = 0.014) and LDL-C (r = 0.133, p = 0.002) only in men ≤ 50 years of age.

Table 2 Correlation of serum osteocalcin levels with other variables according to sex and age group
Full size table

Association of serum levels of osteocalcin with cardiometabolic risk factors

To identify the independent associations of serum osteocalcin concentrations with cardiometabolic risk factors, binary logistics regression analyses were conducted. We adjusted for clinical and biochemical variables, including age, drinking, smoking status, duration of diabetes, CVD history, and BMI. The data demonstrated that serum osteocalcin levels were significantly associated with high HbA1C and high FBG risk in all age and sex groups, except for men aged > 50 years old. The serum osteocalcin levels were also significantly associated with overweight/obesity risk in men aged > 50 years old and inversely correlated with high TG, low HDL-C, and MetS risk in men aged ≤ 50 years old (Table 3). After classifying the participants as having low, medium, or high risk, serum osteocalcin levels were compared according to cardiometabolic risk status. We found that serum osteocalcin levels were significantly lower in those with high cardiometabolic risk status compared with those with low or medium risk status in ≤ 50 years old groups regardless of sex (Fig. 2a, c).

Table 3 Association between serum osteocalcin level and cardiometabolic risk factors according to the age and sex
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Serum osteocalcin levels in different cardiometabolic risk status according to age and sex. a Women ≤ 50 years, b Women > 50 years, c Men ≤ 50 years, d Men > 50 years. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001

Full size image

Discussion

In the present cross-sectional study, which included 1500 patients ≥ 18 years of age with T2D, the serum osteocalcin level was significantly higher in women aged > 50 years compared with women aged ≤ 50 years. However, this was lower in men > 50 years old compared with men ≤ 50 years old. The circulating levels of osteocalcin were negatively associated with FBG and HbA1C in women and men aged ≤ 50 years, positively associated with fasting insulin levels in men aged ≤ 50 years and women aged > 50 old, and negatively related to TG levels only in men aged ≤ 50 years. In the binary logistic regression analysis, we suggested that serum osteocalcin levels were associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors according to age and sex, including overweight/obesity, high HbA1C, high FBG, high TG, MetS, and LDL-C, after adjusting for potential confounding variables.

Osteocalcin is a marker of bone turnover, and its circulating concentration varies with age according to the rate of bone turnover [22]. In our current study, the serum levels of osteocalcin changed with age in men and women, but there were some differences, as follows. Serum osteocalcin levels were inversely correlated with age in men (r = − 0.142, p < 0.0001) but positively correlated with age in women (r = 0.279, p < 0.0001, data not shown). Furthermore, the average levels of serum osteocalcin were significantly higher in men than in women. By contrast, the serum osteocalcin levels were significantly lower in women ≤ 50 years of age than in men ≤ 50 years of age, but these were higher in women > 50 years of age than in men > 50 years of age. Thus, consistent with previous observations, variables in bone turnover rate lead to age- and sex-specific differences in circulating osteocalcin concentration [15, 23].

Considering the influence of bone metabolism on glucose homeostasis, it could be speculated that serum osteocalcin is associated with glucose metabolism [7, 24]. Some recent studies have suggested that serum osteocalcin levels correlate with glucose metabolism markers, but the results were inconsistent [25, 26]. In the present study, there were significant associations between circulating concentrations of osteocalcin and glucose control in men and women. The data revealed that serum osteocalcin levels are negatively associated with HbA1c and FBG and positively related to serum insulin levels. However, other clinical studies have shown no associations between circulating osteocalcin and markers of glucose metabolism [26, 27]. In most previous studies that explored the association between osteocalcin and glucose metabolism, the investigations were conducted in specific populations, such as older men or postmenopausal women [28]. The differences in bone turnover rates among specific individuals may affect the relation between circulating osteocalcin and glucose homeostasis.

A negative correlation was found between serum osteocalcin levels and BMI and the prevalence of overweight/obese only in men aged > 50 years old, in accordance with previous studies, but these associations disappeared in women aged > 50 years whose bone turnover rate increased and serum osteocalcin levels markedly elevated [17, 29]. Bone formation and resorption occur continuously throughout life, and the bone turnover rate varies according to age and sex. In women, this rate is maintained at a relatively stable level (low level) until menopause. Then, it dramatically increases with increased bone loss [30]. However, the pattern is obviously different in men. Bone turnover rate increases at 20 years of age to reach a peak bone mass and declines slightly after age 50 in men. Thereafter, the serum osteocalcin concentrations remain at a stable level in older men [31]. Thus, the serum osteocalcin level in men do not show dramatic changes at older ages as they do in women at age 50.

Previous study suggested that no relationship exists between osteocalcin and lipid metabolism in T2D [32]. In the present study, the serum osteocalcin levels showed a negative correlation with high TG and low HDL-C risk in men aged ≤ 50 years after adjusting for the other variables. Recent animal study demonstrated that osteocalcin administration ameliorated dyslipidemia and attenuated hepatic steatosis by inhibiting hepatic lipogenesis and promoting fatty-acid β-oxidation [33]. In addition, serum osteocalcin levels showed a negative correlation with MetS risk only in men ≤ 50 years of age. However, these associations disappeared in women and men aged > 50 years. The significant relationship between serum osteocalcin levels and dyslipidemia and MetS risk in men aged ≤ 50 years is a finding that differs from the results of previous studies [28]. The results confirmed the influence of serum osteocalcin on lipid metabolism through a sex-specific approach. Given these discrepant findings, we can speculate that the serum osteocalcin levels in postmenopausal women are more influenced by bone turnover rate than other factors [28]. This finding should be considered when evaluating the association of serum osteocalcin and lipid metabolism. Previous study suggest that a lower proportion of undercarboxylated osteocalcin was associated with better metabolic parameters and lower MetS risk in older man [8]. Further research is need to determine which form of osteocalcin are suitable biomarkers for cardiometabolic risk.

Bone is an endocrine organ that can affect multiple physiological processes through the secretion of hormones [34]. Accumulating evidence supports the idea that osteocalcin has a protective role in cardiometabolic health, and decreased serum osteocalcin contributes to the development of cardiometabolic diseases, partly due to its involvement in glucose and lipid homeostasis [8, 35]. Decreased osteocalcin levels are associated with impaired glucose and lipid metabolism [33, 36]. Furthermore, the present study suggested that lower serum osteocalcin levels were significantly associated with high cardiometabolic risk status in individuals aged ≤ 50 years, regardless of sex. Thus, serum osteocalcin levels were associated with glucose and lipid homeostasis, and cardiometabolic risk should be interpreted according to age and sex. Recent researches have showed complex crosstalks between bone and other metabolic and cardiovascular tissues [6, 37]. However, the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of serum osteocalcin on cardiometabolic health still need to be further explored.

This study has several strengths. We investigated the association between serum osteocalcin and cardiometabolic risk factors in a large number of participants according to age and sex difference. Furthermore, our present study suggested that serum osteocalcin levels were associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors according to age and sex, including overweight/obesity, high HbA1C, high FBG, high TG, MetS, and LDL-C, after adjusting for potential confounding variables. Remind that the age and sex difference in bone turnover rates should be considered when evaluating the association between circulating osteocalcin levels and cardiometabolic risk.

However, several potential limitations exist in our study. This is a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate associations but not causality, and thus additional studies in larger longitudinal data are recommended to further investigate the age and sex differences in T2DM. The adherence to prescription is objectively documented, but the adherence of the patient to medications is self-reported and might be overestimated. Third, we measured total serum osteocalcin levels only. Previous studies suggest that carboxylation of osteocalcin is important for its biological function.

Conclusions

Serum osteocalcin level show a significant relationship with cardiometabolic risk factors and several age- and sex-related differences in patients with T2D. Decreased serum osteocalcin levels lead to a worse cardiometabolic risk profile, including hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia, even after accounting for covariates.

Availability of data and materials

The data reported in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Einarson TR, Acs A, Ludwig C, Panton UH. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in 2007–2017. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. International Hypoglycaemia Study G. Hypoglycaemia cardiovascular disease, and mortality in diabetes: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(5):385–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Strain WD, Paldanius PM. Diabetes, cardiovascular disease and the microcirculation. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sattar N, Gill JMR, Alazawi W. Improving prevention strategies for cardiometabolic disease. Nat Med. 2020;26(3):320–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Severinsen MCK, Pedersen BK. Muscle-organ crosstalk: the emerging roles of myokines. Endocr Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnaa016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin X, Onda DA, Yang CH, Lewis JR, Levinger I, Loh K. Roles of bone-derived hormones in type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular pathophysiology. Mol Metab. 2020;40: 101040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dirckx N, Moorer MC, Clemens TL, Riddle RC. The role of osteoblasts in energy homeostasis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(11):651–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu X, Yeap BB, Brock KE, Levinger I, Golledge J, Flicker L, et al. Associations of osteocalcin forms with metabolic syndrome and its individual components in older men: the health in men study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(9):e3506–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang JH. Association of serum osteocalcin with insulin resistance and coronary atherosclerosis. J Bone Metab. 2016;23(4):183–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Levinger I, Brennan-Speranza TC, Zulli A, Parker L, Lin X, Lewis JR, et al. Multifaceted interaction of bone, muscle, lifestyle interventions and metabolic and cardiovascular disease: role of osteocalcin. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(8):2265–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bador KM, Wee LD, Halim SA, Fadi MF, Santhiran P, Rosli NF, et al. Serum osteocalcin in subjects with metabolic syndrome and central obesity. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2016;10(1 Suppl 1):S42–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang YC, Kang M, Cho IJ, Jeong IK, Ahn KJ, Chung HY, et al. Association between the circulating total osteocalcin level and the development of cardiovascular disease in middle-aged men: a mean 8.7-year longitudinal follow-up study. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2015;22(2):136–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kord-Varkaneh H, Djafarian K, Khorshidi M, Shab-Bidar S. Association between serum osteocalcin and body mass index: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2017;58(1):24–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeap BB, Chubb SA, Flicker L, McCaul KA, Ebeling PR, Hankey GJ, et al. Associations of total osteocalcin with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in older men. The health in men study. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(2):599–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Luo Y, Ma X, Hao Y, Xiong Q, Xu Y, Pan X, et al. Relationship between serum osteocalcin level and carotid intima-media thickness in a metabolically healthy Chinese population. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Eastell R, Szulc P. Use of bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(11):908–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung KY, Kim KM, Ku EJ, Kim YJ, Lee DH, Choi SH, et al. Age- and sex-specific association of circulating osteocalcin with dynamic measures of glucose homeostasis. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(3):1021–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goossens GH, Jocken JWE, Blaak EE. Sexual dimorphism in cardiometabolic health: the role of adipose tissue, muscle and liver. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;17(1):47–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kautzky-Willer A, Stich K, Hintersteiner J, Kautzky A, Kamyar MR, Saukel J, et al. Sex-specific-differences in cardiometabolic risk in type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013;12:78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Isasi CR, Parrinello CM, Ayala GX, Delamater AM, Perreira KM, Daviglus ML, et al. Sex differences in cardiometabolic risk factors among Hispanic/Latino youth. J Pediatr. 2016;176: 121–7 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin L, Zhang J, Jiang L, Du R, Hu C, Lu J, et al. Transition of metabolic phenotypes and risk of subclinical atherosclerosis according to BMI: a prospective study. Diabetologia. 2020;63(7):1312–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Diemar SS, Mollehave LT, Quardon N, Lylloff L, Thuesen BH, Linneberg A, et al. Effects of age and sex on osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase-reference intervals and confounders for two bone formation markers. Arch Osteoporos. 2020;15(1):26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sheng L, Cao W, Cha B, Chen Z, Wang F, Liu J. Serum osteocalcin level and its association with carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013;12:22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cipriani C, Colangelo L, Santori R, Renella M, Mastrantonio M, Minisola S, et al. The interplay between bone and glucose metabolism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Neumann T, Lodes S, Kastner B, Franke S, Kiehntopf M, Lehmann T, et al. Osteocalcin, adipokines and their associations with glucose metabolism in type 1 diabetes. Bone. 2016;82:50–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yeap BB, Davis WA, Peters K, Hamilton EJ, Rakic V, Paul Chubb SA, et al. Circulating osteocalcin is unrelated to glucose homoeostasis in adults with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2017;31(6):948–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu C, Ivaska KK, Alen M, Wang Q, Tormakangas T, Xu L, et al. Serum osteocalcin is not associated with glucose but is inversely associated with leptin across generations of nondiabetic women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(11):4106–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen L, Li Q, Yang Z, Ye Z, Huang Y, He M, et al. Osteocalcin, glucose metabolism, lipid profile and chronic low-grade inflammation in middle-aged and elderly Chinese. Diabet Med. 2013;30(3):309–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xifra G, Moreno-Navarrete JM, Moreno M, Ricart W, Fernandez-Real JM. Obesity status influences the relationship among serum osteocalcin, iron stores and insulin sensitivity. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(6 Pt A):2091–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Eastell R, O’Neill TW, Hofbauer LC, Langdahl B, Reid IR, Gold DT, et al. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Naylor K, Eastell R. Bone turnover markers: use in osteoporosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(7):379–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ma XY, Chen FQ, Hong H, Lv XJ, Dong M, Wang QY. The relationship between serum osteocalcin concentration and glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus—the role of osteocalcin in energy metabolism. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(2–3):110–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang XL, Wang YN, Ma LY, Liu ZS, Ye F, Yang JH. Uncarboxylated osteocalcin ameliorates hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism in KKAy mice via activating insulin signaling pathway. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020;41(3):383–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou H, Seibel MJ. Bone: Osteoblasts and global energy metabolism—beyond osteocalcin. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(5):261–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu WW, Ke YH, He JW, Fu WZ, Liu YJ, Chen D, et al. Serum osteocalcin levels are inversely associated with plasma glucose and body mass index in healthy Chinese women. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2014;35(12):1521–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wei J, Ferron M, Clarke CJ, Hannun YA, Jiang H, Blaner WS, et al. Bone-specific insulin resistance disrupts whole-body glucose homeostasis via decreased osteocalcin activation. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(4):1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Han Y, You X, Xing W, Zhang Z, Zou W. Paracrine and endocrine actions of bone-the functions of secretory proteins from osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts. Bone Res. 2018;6:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the subjects who participated in this study.

Funding

WL is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82000831).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, NO. 1, Jianshe East Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China

    Wei Li, Xiaojun Liu & Shengyun Liu

  2. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, NO. 1, Jianshe East Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China

    Yan Wang

  3. Pediatrics Research Institute of Hunan Province, Hunan Children’s Hospital, Changsha, 410000, Hunan, China

    Jie Dong

  4. Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, NO. 1, Jianshe East Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China

    Ruiqing Di

Authors
  1. Wei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jie Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ruiqing Di
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaojun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shengyun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WL, YW, and SYL contributed to the conception and design of the study. WL, SYL, and RQD recruited the subjects and supervised the study. WL, YW, and JD analyzed the data. WL, JD, and SYL wrote the initial draft of the paper. WL, RQD, and SYL contributed to the writing, reviewing, and revising of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Li or Shengyun Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Broad of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Wang, Y., Dong, J. et al. Age- and sex-specific differences in the association of serum osteocalcin and cardiometabolic risk factors in type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr 15, 48 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-023-01021-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-023-01021-0

Keywords

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome

ISSN: 1758-5996

Contact us