Skip to main content
Download PDF

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor associated with kidney function

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome volume 15, Article number: 16 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

We examined the relationship between brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

First, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 480 participants without known diabetes. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was administered after overnight fasting, and blood samples were collected at 0, 30, and 120 min. Second, a total of 3003 participants were enrolled for the case–control genetic analysis. After assigning them to a case or a control group based on age and CKD status, we investigated the association between BDNF gene variants and susceptibility to CKD.

Results

A higher fasting serum BDNF quartile was significantly associated with a lower prevalence of CKD (P value for trend  < 0.001). Based on the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the fasting BDNF level had a larger area under the curve for differentiating CKD (0.645, 95% CI 0.583‒0.707) than the BDNF levels at both 30 min (0.547, 95% CI 0.481‒0.612) and 120 min (0.598, 95% CI 0.536‒0.661). A significantly lower CKD prevalence (odds ratio = 0.30, 95% CI 0.12‒0.71) was observed in the highest quartile of fasting BDNF level than that in the lowest quartile, whereas no interquartile differences were observed for BDNF levels determined at 30 or 120 min during the OGTT. Furthermore, BDNF-associated variants, including rs12098908, rs12577517, and rs72891405, were significantly associated with CKD.

Conclusions

The BDNF level at fasting, but not at 30 and 120 min after glucose intake, was an independent indicator of CKD. In addition, significant associations were observed between three BDNF gene variants and CKD.

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with a high risk of mortality and disability [1, 2]. CKD has become a global health burden, and the assessment of its risk factors is important to prevent CKD-associated complications [2,3,4,5]. Dysregulation of energy homeostasis and insulin resistance play an important role in the development of CKD and are associated with further morbidity in CKD patients [6, 7]. Hyperglycemia leads to an extra energy expenditure to meet the demand of increased tubular reabsorption [8]. Accordingly, alterations in mitochondrial activity, as reported in primary human glomerular mesangial cells cultured in hyperglycemic conditions, have been shown to contribute to insulin resistance and CKD pathogenesis [9,10,11]. In turn, CKD can induce skeletal muscle wasting, which may prompt insulin resistance to further aggravate CKD [8, 12].

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a member of the neurotrophin family associated with energy homeostasis [13, 14]. Changes in serum BDNF levels in response to oral glucose intake were reported to be associated with body weight [15]. Huber et al. [16] reported that BDNF might be involved in renal tubulogenesis and that tyrosine kinase receptor B (TrkB), the BDNF receptor, is expressed during human kidney development. In a study involving a rodent model, BDNF prevented glomerular podocyte damage through TrkB signaling [17]. Of note, a low circulating BDNF level was reported to be a significant predictor of incident CKD in a longitudinal study [18]. An inverse correlation was established between CKD-related pro-inflammatory cytokine production and BDNF expression [6, 19]. However, the extent of the association between serum BDNF levels and the prevalence of CKD remains unclear.

A study in young healthy volunteers showed that insulin resistance induced by a intralipid/heparin infusion elicits a decrease in serum BDNF level [20]. BDNF has shown to protect endothelial function, and a decrease in serum BDNF might be associated with chronic inflammation and long-term mortality [19, 21]. The interplay between glucose regulation and BDNF is suggested by evidence that the serum BDNF levels measured during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is a better predictor of cardiovascular outcomes than the fasting BDNF level [22]. Insulin resistance indices derived from the OGTT are helpful for evaluating insulin sensitivity in patients with CKD but are not significantly associated with long-term mortality [23]. We therefore hypothesized that serum BDNF would be inversely associated with the prevalence of CKD. Interestingly, several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the BDNF gene were associated with muscle fiber composition and cardiovascular outcomes [24,25,26]. However, the potential impact of BDNF-associated SNP on CKD remains largely undetermined. Based on the above considerations, the present work includes two distinct analyses. First, we examined the correlation between serum BDNF levels, both at fasting and after oral glucose intake, and CKD prevalence. Second, we examined the potential relationship between BDNF SNPs and CKD.

Materials and methods

Part 1: analysis of the correlation between serum BDNF levels and CKD

Participants and study design

In this cross-sectional study, 480 adult participants without known diabetes mellitus (DM) were enrolled between January 01, 2011 and January 31, 2015. After anthropometric measurements, a 75-g OGTT was performed for 2 h. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taichung Veterans General Hospital and complies with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent when recruited.

Sample collection

Blood samples were collected at 0 (fasting status), 30, and 120 min during the OGTT. Fasting blood samples were used to measure BDNF, glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), creatinine, and the lipid profile. Blood samples at 30 and 120 min were used to measure BDNF, glucose, and insulin levels. The area under the curve (AUC) of BDNF, as well as glucose and insulin, was calculated based on the data at 0, 30, and 120 min. A morning urine sample was collected for the measurement of albumin and creatinine to calculate the urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR).

Biochemical assessments

Free BDNF in serum was measured by an immunoassay kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) with an intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) of 6.2% and an inter-assay CV of 8.1%. Plasma glucose was measured by the glucose oxidase–peroxidase method (Wako Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan). Insulin was measured using commercial kits (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index was calculated as fasting insulin (mU/L) × fasting glucose (mmol/L)/22.5 [27]. HbA1c levels were measured using boronate affinity high-performance liquid chromatography (NGSP certified, Primus Corp., Kansas City, MO, USA). C-reactive protein (CRP) was assessed using an immunochemical assay involving purified duck IgY (ΔFc) antibodies (Good Biotech Corp., Taichung, Taiwan). Serum levels of creatinine and lipids were measured by commercial kits (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, USA). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated as 186 × (serum creatinine [mg/dL])−1.154 × (age [years])−0.203 (× 0.742, if female) according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases equation [28]. CKD was defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Urinary albumin levels were assessed using the polyethylene glycol enhanced immunoturbidimetric method (Advia 1800, Siemens, New York, USA). The UACR was calculated as the ratio of urine albumin (mg) to urine creatinine (g) [28]. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure  ≥ 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure  ≥ 90 mmHg, or a history of antihypertensive medication use.

Part 2: genetic analysis of the association between BDNF SNPs and CKD

Subjects and study samples

We enrolled 3003 participants in the genetic study at Taichung Veterans General Hospital. Blood samples were collected for biochemical analyses and DNA preparation. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral leukocytes using a QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, USA). Genotyping was performed with the Illumina 200 K Metabochip following the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina, San Diego, USA) [29].

BDNF-associated SNPs

We selected five BDNF-associated SNPs ‒rs12098908, rs12577517, rs6265, rs77351929, and rs72891405‒ and examined the association between their genotypes and CKD. Genotyping was performed successfully for 2901 (96.6%) participants at rs12098908, 2995 (99.7%) participants at rs12577517, 2992 (99.6%) participants at rs6265, 2945 (98.1%) participants at rs77351929, and 2997 (99.8%) participants at rs72891405.

Definition of case and control groups

The decline in eGFR that occurs with normal aging correlates with a higher prevalence of CKD at an older age. Therefore, a participant might not have CKD at a young age but have CKD at an older age. To effectively investigate the association between BDNF gene variants and susceptibility to CKD, we grouped participants with CKD younger than 60 years of age into the case group and participants without CKD 60 years of age and older into the control group. Afterwards, we conducted logistic regression analyses of all 3003 participants to examine the effect of the risk alleles on CKD in dominant, recessive, and additive models.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as the mean (standard deviation), and categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentage). To assess differences between the participants with CKD and those without CKD, an independent t test was used to examine continuous variables, and the chi-squared test was used to examine categorical variables, including genotypes. The correlation coefficient between eGFR and BDNF was determined using Pearson’s correlation test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to differentiate CKD by BDNF profile levels during the OGTT.

To investigate whether there is a trend in CKD prevalence across different fasting BDNF levels, we divided all the enrolled participants into four quartiles according to their BDNF levels. To evaluate the relationship between fasting BDNF levels and CKD, we used logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of CKD and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the three higher fasting BDNF quartiles compared to the lowest fasting BDNF quartile after adjusting for different potential confounding variables. The same trend analysis was also used to evaluate differences across quartiles according to the participants’ BDNF levels at 30 min and at 120 min during the OGTT. In addition to the crude model, we included age (a continuous variable) and sex (a categorical variable) in Model 2 of the regression analyses. In Model 3, we included all the risk factors assessed to evaluate differences across BDNF quartiles. However, to avoid overadjustment, hypertension, but not systolic or diastolic blood pressure, was included in the regression analyses. Similarly, we did not include glucose or HDL cholesterol in the regression analyses because HbA1c, total cholesterol, and triglycerides were included.

In the genetic study, regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of BDNF gene alleles on the risk of CKD in dominant, recessive, and additive models. A two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. STATA 16.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) was used to conduct the statistical analyses.

Results

Part 1: analysis of the correlation between serum BDNF levels and CKD

Of the 480 enrolled participants, 87 (18.1%) were classified into the CKD group. The baseline characteristics of the participants grouped by their CKD status are shown in Table 1. The participants with CKD had a significantly lower eGFR than those without CKD. In addition, the participants with CKD were significantly older (69 ± 11 vs. 58 ± 11 years, P < 0.001) and had a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (83% vs. 64%, P < 0.001), a higher systolic blood pressure (132 ± 18 vs. 126 ± 18 mmHg, P = 0.002), and a higher CRP (3.3 ± 3.0 vs. 2.2 ± 2.2 mg/L) than the participants without CKD. The participants with CKD had significantly lower serum BDNF at fasting than those without CKD (21.1 ± 7.4 vs. 25.2 ± 8.8 ng/mL, P < 0.001). Fasting glucose and insulin levels and HOMA-IR were not significantly different between the participants with and without CKD. The distributions of sex, current smoker, body mass index (BMI), diastolic blood pressure, UACR, HbA1c, lipid profile, and the use of antihypertensive and antiplatelet drugs were not significantly different between the participants with and without CKD.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study participants by CKD status
Full size table

Measurements taken 30 min after glucose intake show that serum BDNF was not significantly different between the participants with and without CKD (P = 0.120). Likewise, at this time point glucose and insulin levels did not differ significantly between these two groups. Measurements taken 120 min after glucose intake show that the participants with CKD had significantly lower serum BDNF levels than those without CKD (15.4 ± 6.0 vs. 17.9 ± 7.6 ng/mL, P = 0.004), whereas the corresponding glucose and insulin levels did not differ significantly between these two groups. We calculated the AUC of BDNF, glucose, and insulin during the 120-min OGTT. The AUC of BDNF was significantly lower in participants with CKD than in those without CKD (35.0 ± 11.6 vs. 39.6 ± 13.8 mmol/L × hr, P = 0.004). However, the AUC values of glucose and insulin were still not significantly different between the participants with and without CKD. Table 2 shows that eGFR was significantly correlated with fasting BDNF and the AUC of BDNF but not with BDNF at 30 min or 120 min.

Table 2 Correlation between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) profile
Full size table

As shown in Fig. 1, the area under the ROC curve for differentiating CKD was largest using fasting BDNF (0.645, 95% CI: 0.583‒0.707) compared to BDNF at 30 min (0.547, 95% CI: 0.481‒0.612), BDNF at 120 min (0.598, 95% CI: 0.536‒0.661), and the AUC of BDNF (0.599, 95% CI: 0.537‒0.660). As shown in Table 3, participants in the higher quartile of fasting BDNF had the lower prevalence of CKD (P value for trend  < 0.001). Moreover, the participants in the lowest quartile of fasting BDNF were more likely to be older (P value for trend  < 0.001) and male (P value for trend = 0.023) and to have hypertension (P value for trend = 0.007), reduced BMI (P value for trend = 0.014), reduced diastolic blood pressure (P value for trend = 0.001), increased UACR (P value for trend = 0.009), increased CRP (P value for trend  < 0.001), decreased total cholesterol (P value for trend = 0.005), and decreased triglycerides (P value for trend  < 0.001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for differentiating CKD based on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels at fasting (fasting BDNF), 30 min (BDNF at 30 min), and 120 min (BDNF at 120 min), and for calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of BDNF during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

Full size image
Table 3 Baseline characteristics of the study participants by quartiles of fasting BDNF level
Full size table

Table 4 shows the OR of CKD in the three higher quartiles of fasting BDNF compared to the lowest quartile (reference group). The participants in the highest fasting BDNF quartile had a significantly lower CKD prevalence than those in the lowest quartile, with an OR of 0.30 (95% CI 0.12‒0.71) after adjusting for potential confounding variables (Additional file 1: Fig. S1a).

Table 4 Odds ratios (95% CI) for chronic kidney disease (CKD) by quartiles of fasting brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels
Full size table

The prevalence of CKD was not significantly associated with quartiles of BDNF levels at 30 min (P value for trend = 0.231, Additional file 2: Table S1). The OR of CKD in the highest quartile of BDNF levels at 30 min (1.03, 95% CI 0.47‒2.24) was not significantly different from that in the lowest quartile after adjusting for associated risk factors (Additional file 3: Table 2, Additional file 1: Fig. S1b). Although the prevalence of CKD was significantly associated with the quartiles of BDNF levels at 120 min (P value for trend = 0.004, Additional file 4: Table S3), the OR of CKD in the highest quartile of BDNF levels at 120 min (0.47, 95% CI 0.21‒1.06) was not significantly different from that in the lowest quartile after adjustment for associated risk factors (Additional file 5: Table S4, Additional file 1: Fig. S1c).

Part 2: genetic analysis of the association between BDNF SNPs and CKD

There were 167 participants aged < 60 years with CKD in the case group and 1105 participants aged  ≥ 60 years without CKD in the control group. Except for rs77351929, the genotype frequencies of the other four assessed SNPs were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in the case–control analyses. The SNPs including rs12098908, rs12577517, and rs72891405 were significantly associated with CKD (P < 0.01). Among all 3003 enrolled participants, all the risk SNPs detected in the case–control analysis were significantly associated with CKD in the dominant model, including rs12098908 with OR = 0.733 (95% CI 0.601‒0.895), rs12577517 with OR = 0.802 (95% CI 0.663‒0.969), and rs72891405 with OR = 0.800 (95% CI 0.662‒0.967), after adjusting for age and sex (Table 5).

Table 5 Genotype frequencies and effects of BDNF-associated variants on CKD
Full size table

Discussion

The main finding of our study was that a higher fasting serum BDNF level was associated with a significantly lower prevalence of CKD. The inverse association between fasting BDNF and CKD implies that BDNF might have a renoprotective effect in participants without known DM. Consistent with our results, Kurajoh et al. [18] reported that lower circulating BDNF was an independent predictor of incident CKD among patients at risk of cardiovascular disease in a longitudinal study.

Considering the known association between BDNF and energy homeostasis [30], the strength of our study is the comparison of the effect of serum BDNF after oral glucose intake on CKD with that of fasting serum BDNF. Our previous studies found that the AUC of serum BDNF levels during the OGTT was strongly associated with a reduction in central pulse pressure [31], and that it better predicted the development of cardiovascular events than fasting BDNF [22]. However, the results of the present study revealed that dynamic serum BDNF levels after oral glucose intake did not provide more information on CKD than fasting BDNF levels.

The mechanisms underlying the inverse association between BDNF levels and CKD prevalence have been investigated in several in vitro and animal studies. BDNF was reported to increase both the length and number of podocyte cell processes in an in vitro model, and exogenous BDNF administration was found to improve glomerular lesions and repair podocyte damage in an in vivo mouse model of adriamycin-induced nephropathy [17]. Additionally, endogenous BDNF has been reported to protect the kidney from endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis in a mouse study [32].

The expression of both BDNF and the TrkB receptor has been detected in the kidney [17, 33,34,35]. BDNF probably affects renal physiology through TrkB signaling, which has been suggested to play a key role in early renal mesenchymal cell differentiation [36]. Indeed, the importance of TrkB in kidney function and structure is supported by evidence that TrkB deficiency in mice is associated with overabundance of extraglomerular mesangial cells, decreased glomerular area, and absence of the macula densa [33].

Several lines of evidence indicate that circulating BDNF levels are inversely associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. A lower serum BDNF level predicted a greater cardiovascular risk [21], while several genotypic variants of BDNF were distinctly associated with ischemic stroke [24]. Although these results overall support a cardioprotective effect of BDNF [37], the authors did not characterize either renal function or CKD status in the study participants. Notably, serum BDNF level before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was found to correlate with the post-PCI reduction in renalase, predictive in turn of long-term cardiovascular events [38]. Therefore, BDNF might prevent cardiorenal syndrome [39, 40].

Interestingly, since TrkB inhibition was shown to induce podocyte dedifferentiation and a strong correlation was detected between mRNA levels of BDNF in the urine cells and various indicators of kidney injury in CKD patients, it was suggested that BDNF in urine cells could serve as a biomarker of CKD [41]. Compared with an age-matched control group, patients with end-stage renal disease had a significantly lower serum BDNF level due to higher inflammation and oxidative stress after dialysis [42]. Considering that both the incidence and prevalence of CKD are high in Taiwan and that CKD has become a serious public health burden [43, 44], the association between BDNF and CKD might be valuable evidence for developing future clinical and public health interventions.

Several studies reported the association between the rs6265 polymorphism, an exonic variant in the BDNF gene, and both neuropsychiatric disorders and cardiovascular disease [26, 45, 46]. However, investigations into the association between rs6265 and CKD are lacking. In the present study, the risk allele of rs6265 was not significantly prevalent in participants with susceptibility to CKD, defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 before 60 years of age compared to those with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 even after 60 years of age. On the other hand, several intronic BDNF variants, namely rs12098908, rs12577517, and rs72891405, were significantly more prevalent in cases who were susceptible to CKD than in controls without CKD. Among all participants included in the genetic assessments, these intronic BDNF variants provided a protective benefit with an OR of approximately 0.7–0.8 against CKD after adjusting for age and sex. In line with our findings, the intronic variants of BDNF were reported to be associated with disease severity presenting as proteinuria in patients with IgA nephropathy [47]. Of note, it has been reported that minor alleles of BDNF variants are associated with increased serum BDNF levels [21]. In this regard, a caveat of our study is that we did not compare serum BDNF levels between participants with different genotypes. Hence, further investigations on the link between BDNF polymorphisms and CKD are warranted.

There are several limitations in the present study. First, the clinical characteristics were collected only at the baseline measurement, and the results cannot ultimately determine causality because of the cross-sectional study design. Second, we did not directly investigate the molecular mechanisms linking BDNF to renal pathophysiology. Third, we did not assess the participants’ appetite in the present study. Stanek et al. [48] reported that serum BDNF might be inversely correlated with appetite. Further studies on the relationship between anorexigenic manifestations and postprandial BDNF levels in patients with CKD are thus needed. Fourth, this study was conducted in a single-hospital population, hence the results might not be widely generalizable. Finally, to make our analysis more efficient and minimize confounding, we excluded participants who had known DM. This decision was based on both DM being an important risk factor for CKD [49], and evidence of decreased circulating BDNF in patients with DM [50]. Therefore, our findings might not be applicable to the population with diabetes.

Conclusions

A higher fasting serum BDNF level is significantly associated with a lower prevalence of CKD in patients without known DM. BDNF gene SNPs were found to be associated with CKD. Future larger studies are warranted to further explore the underlying mechanism and the and the causal relationship between BDNF and CKD.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under the curve

BDNF:

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

CRP:

C-reactive protein

CV:

Coefficient of variation

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

HbA1c:

Hemoglobin A1c

HOMA-IR:

Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance

OGTT:

Oral glucose tolerance test

OR:

Odds ratio

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

SNPs:

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms

TrkB:

Tyrosine kinase receptor B

UACR:

Urine albumin-creatinine ratio

References

  1. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cockwell P, Fisher L-A. Collaboration GBDCKD: global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xie Y, Bowe B, Mokdad AH, Xian H, Yan Y, Li T, Maddukuri G, Tsai CY, Floyd T, Al-Aly Z. Analysis of the global burden of disease study highlights the global, regional, and national trends of chronic kidney disease epidemiology from 1990 to 2016. Kidney Int. 2018;94(3):567–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowe B, Xie Y, Li T, Mokdad AH, Xian H, Yan Y, Maddukuri G, Al-Aly Z. Changes in the US burden of chronic kidney disease from 2002 to 2016: an analysis of the global burden of disease study. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(7):e184412.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stenvinkel P, Ketteler M, Johnson RJ, Lindholm B, Pecoits-Filho R, Riella M, Heimburger O, Cederholm T, Girndt M. IL-10, IL-6, and TNF-alpha: central factors in the altered cytokine network of uremia–the good, the bad, and the ugly. Kidney Int. 2005;67(4):1216–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barreto Silva MI, Klein M, Cardoso ES, Costa MS, Martins CJM, Bregman R. Synergistic effect of inflammatory cytokines and body adiposity on insulin resistance and endothelial markers in patients with stages 3–5 chronic kidney disease. J Ren Nutr. 2020;30(1):36–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koppe L, Pelletier CC, Alix PM, Kalbacher E, Fouque D, Soulage CO, Guebre-Egziabher F. Insulin resistance in chronic kidney disease: new lessons from experimental models. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(9):1666–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carré JE, Affourtit C. Mitochondrial activity and skeletal muscle insulin resistance in kidney disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(11):2751.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Czajka A, Ajaz S, Gnudi L, Parsade CK, Jones P, Reid F, Malik AN. Altered mitochondrial function, mitochondrial DNA and reduced metabolic flexibility in patients with diabetic nephropathy. EBioMedicine. 2015;2(6):499–512.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stieger N, Worthmann K, Teng B, Engeli S, Das AM, Haller H, Schiffer M. Impact of high glucose and transforming growth factor-β on bioenergetic profiles in podocytes. Metabolism. 2012;61(8):1073–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Forbes JM, Thorburn DR. Mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(5):291–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang XH, Mitch WE, Price SR. Pathophysiological mechanisms leading to muscle loss in chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;18(3):138–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakagawa T, Tsuchida A, Itakura Y, Nonomura T, Ono M, Hirota F, Inoue T, Nakayama C, Taiji M, Noguchi H. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor regulates glucose metabolism by modulating energy balance in diabetic mice. Diabetes. 2000;49(3):436–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rothman SM, Griffioen KJ, Wan R, Mattson MP. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a regulator of systemic and brain energy metabolism and cardiovascular health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1264:49–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee IT, Wang JS, Fu CP, Lin SY, Sheu WH. Relationship between body weight and the increment in serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor after oral glucose challenge in men with obesity and metabolic syndrome: a prospective study. Med (Baltimore). 2016;95(43):e5260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huber LJ, Hempstead B, Donovan MJ. Neurotrophin and neurotrophin receptors in human fetal kidney. Dev Biol. 1996;179(2):369–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li M, Armelloni S, Zennaro C, Wei C, Corbelli A, Ikehata M, Berra S, Giardino L, Mattinzoli D, Watanabe S, et al. BDNF repairs podocyte damage by microRNA-mediated increase of actin polymerization. J Pathol. 2015;235(5):731–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurajoh M, Kadoya M, Morimoto A, Miyoshi A, Kanzaki A, Kakutani-Hatayama M, Hamamoto K, Shoji T, Moriwaki Y, Yamamoto T, et al. Plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentration is a predictor of chronic kidney disease in patients with cardiovascular risk factors—hyogo sleep cardio-autonomic atherosclerosis study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0178686.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee IT, Lee WJ, Tsai IC, Liang KW, Lin SY, Wan CJ, Fu CP, Sheu WH. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor not associated with metabolic syndrome but inversely correlated with vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in men without diabetes. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413(9–10):944–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karczewska-Kupczewska M, Kowalska I, Nikolajuk A, Adamska A, Zielinska M, Kaminska N, Otziomek E, Gorska M, Straczkowski M. Circulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentration is downregulated by intralipid/heparin infusion or high-fat meal in young healthy male subjects. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(2):358–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaess BM, Preis SR, Lieb W, Beiser AS, Yang Q, Chen TC, Hengstenberg C, Erdmann J, Schunkert H, Seshadri S, et al. Circulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations and the risk of cardiovascular disease in the community. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(3):e001544.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee IT, Li YH, Sheu WH. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor during oral glucose tolerance test predicts cardiovascular outcomes. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):5008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jia T, Huang X, Qureshi AR, Xu H, Arnlov J, Lindholm B, Cederholm T, Stenvinkel P, Riserus U, Carrero JJ. Validation of insulin sensitivity surrogate indices and prediction of clinical outcomes in individuals with and without impaired renal function. Kidney Int. 2014;86(2):383–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou J, Ma MM, Fang JH, Zhao L, Zhou MK, Guo J, He L. Differences in brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene polymorphisms between acute ischemic stroke patients and healthy controls in the Han population of southwest China. Neural Regen Res. 2019;14(8):1404–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guilherme JPLF, Semenova EA, Borisov OV, Kostryukova ES, Vepkhvadze TF, Lysenko EA, Andryushchenko ON, Andryushchenko LB, Lednev EM, Larin AK, et al. The BDNF-increasing allele is associated with increased proportion of fast-twitch muscle fibers, handgrip strength, and power athlete status. J Strength Cond Res. 2022;36(7):1884–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang R, Babyak MA, Brummett BH, Hauser ER, Shah SH, Becker RC, Siegler IC, Singh A, Haynes C, Chryst-Ladd M, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor rs6265 (Val66Met) polymorphism is associated with disease severity and incidence of cardiovascular events in a patient cohort. Am Heart J. 2017;190:40–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Inker LA, Astor BC, Fox CH, Isakova T, Lash JP, Peralta CA, Kurella Tamura M, Feldman HI. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(5):713–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuo JZ, Sheu WH, Assimes TL, Hung YJ, Absher D, Chiu YF, Mak J, Wang JS, Kwon S, Hsu CC, et al. Trans-ethnic fine mapping identifies a novel independent locus at the 3’ end of CDKAL1 and novel variants of several susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes in a Han Chinese population. Diabetologia. 2013;56(12):2619–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Noble EE, Billington CJ, Kotz CM, Wang C. The lighter side of BDNF. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011;300(5):R1053-1069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee IT, Chen CH, Wang JS, Fu CP, Lee WJ, Liang KW, Lin SY, Sheu WH. The association between brain-derived neurotrophic factor and central pulse pressure after an oral glucose tolerance test. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;476:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cirrik S, Hacioglu G, Ayyildiz SN, Tezcan B, Abidin I, Aydin-Abidin S, Noyan T. Renal response to tunicamycin-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress in BDNF heterozygous mice. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019;28(9):1161–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Garcia-Suarez O, Gonzalez-Martinez T, Germana A, Monjil DF, Torrecilla JR, Laura R, Silos-Santiago I, Guate JL, Vega JA. Expression of TrkB in the murine kidney. Microsc Res Tech. 2006;69(12):1014–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lommatzsch M, Braun A, Mannsfeldt A, Botchkarev VA, Botchkareva NV, Paus R, Fischer A, Lewin GR, Renz H. Abundant production of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by adult visceral epithelia. implications for paracrine and target-derived Neurotrophic functions. Am J Pathol. 1999;155(4):1183–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yamamoto M, Sobue G, Yamamoto K, Terao S, Mitsuma T. Expression of mRNAs for neurotrophic factors (NGF, BDNF, NT-3, and GDNF) and their receptors (p75NGFR, trkA, trkB, and trkC) in the adult human peripheral nervous system and nonneural tissues. Neurochem Res. 1996;21(8):929–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Durbeej M, Soderstrom S, Ebendal T, Birchmeier C, Ekblom P. Differential expression of neurotrophin receptors during renal development. Development. 1993;119(4):977–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pius-Sadowska E, Machalinski B. BDNF—a key player in cardiovascular system. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2017;110:54–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee IT, Sheu WH. Serum renalase levels are predicted by brain-derived neurotrophic factor and associated with cardiovascular events and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Clin Med. 2018;7(11):437. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7110437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kreusser MM, Buss SJ, Krebs J, Kinscherf R, Metz J, Katus HA, Haass M, Backs J. Differential expression of cardiac neurotrophic factors and sympathetic nerve ending abnormalities within the failing heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008;44(2):380–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ronco C, Haapio M, House AA, Anavekar N, Bellomo R. Cardiorenal syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(19):1527–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Endlich N, Lange T, Kuhn J, Klemm P, Kotb AM, Siegerist F, Kindt F, Lindenmeyer MT, Cohen CD, Kuss AW, et al. BDNF: mRNA expression in urine cells of patients with chronic kidney disease and its role in kidney function. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(11):5265–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zoladz JA, Smigielski M, Majerczak J, Nowak LR, Zapart-Bukowska J, Smolenski O, Kulpa J, Duda K, Drzewinska J, Bartosz G. Hemodialysis decreases serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentration in humans. Neurochem Res. 2012;37(12):2715–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hwang SJ, Tsai JC, Chen HC. Epidemiology, impact and preventive care of chronic kidney disease in Taiwan. Nephrol (Carlton). 2010;15(Suppl 2):3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tsai MH, Hsu CY, Lin MY, Yen MF, Chen HH, Chiu YH, Hwang SJ. Incidence, prevalence, and duration of chronic kidney disease in Taiwan: results from a community-based screening program of 106,094 individuals. Nephron. 2018;140(3):175–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tsai SJ. Critical issues in BDNF Val66Met genetic studies of neuropsychiatric disorders. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:156.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu X, Fang JC, Zhi XY, Yan QY, Zhu H, Xie J. The Influence of Val66Met polymorphism in brain-derived neurotrophic factor on stroke recovery outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021;35(6):550–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hahn WH, Suh JS, Cho BS. Linkage and association study of neurotrophins and their receptors as novel susceptibility genes for childhood IgA nephropathy. Pediatr Res. 2011;69(4):299–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Stanek K, Gunstad J, Leahey T, Glickman E, Alexander T, Spitznagel MB, Juvancic Heltzel J, Murray L. Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor is associated with reduced appetite in healthy older adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12(3):183–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kazancioglu R. Risk factors for chronic kidney disease: an update. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(4):368–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Krabbe KS, Nielsen AR, Krogh-Madsen R, Plomgaard P, Rasmussen P, Erikstrup C, Fischer CP, Lindegaard B, Petersen AM, Taudorf S, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2007;50(2):431–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Clinical Informatics Research & Development Center in Taichung Veterans General Hospital for the clinical database. Statistical analysis was performed by the Biostatistics Task Force of Taichung Veterans General Hospital.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (grant number MOST 110-2314-B-075A-004 -MY3) and Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan (grant numbers TCVGH-1113501C, TCVGH-1123501C, and TCVGH-NCHU1110119). The funders had no role in the decision to publish the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Education Department, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan

    Cheng-Yueh Hsu

  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11221, Taiwan

    Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu

  3. School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, 11221, Taiwan

    Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu & I-Te Lee

  4. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650 Taiwan Boulevard, Sect. 4, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan

    I-Te Lee

  5. School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, 40201, Taiwan

    I-Te Lee

Authors
  1. Cheng-Yueh Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I-Te Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CH, WS, and IL contributed to conception and design of the study. WS and IL collected the clinical data. CH organized the database. CH performed the statistical analysis. CH drafted the manuscript. WS and IL revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Te Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Both parts of this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taichung Veterans General Hospital and comply with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. In Part 1, all participants provided written informed consent when recruited. In Part 2, all data on patients were anonymously provided by the Clinical Informatics Research & Development Center in Taichung Veterans General Hospital. The requirement for informed consent was waived.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Odds ratios (95% CI) for chronic kidney disease by quartiles of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels at fasting (a), 30 min (b), and 120 min (c) during the OGTT after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, coronary artery disease, hypertension, current smoking, smoking, hemoglobin A1c, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, urine albumin-creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein, total cholesterol and, triglycerides. (OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test).

Additional file 2:

Table S1. Baseline characteristics of the study participants by quartiles of BDNF levels at 30 min.

Additional file 3:

Table S2. Odds ratios (95% CI) for chronic kidney disease (CKD) by quartiles of brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels at 30 min.

Additional file 4:

Table S3. Baseline characteristics of the study participants by quartiles of BDNF levels at 120 min.

Additional file 5:

Table S4. Odds ratios (95% CI) for chronic kidney disease (CKD) by quartiles of brain derived neurotrophic factor levels at 120 min.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsu, CY., Sheu, W.HH. & Lee, IT. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor associated with kidney function. Diabetol Metab Syndr 15, 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-023-00991-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-023-00991-5

Keywords

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome

ISSN: 1758-5996

Contact us