Skip to main content
Download PDF

Changes of bile acids and resting energy expenditure after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in type 2 diabetes patients: a prospective study

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome volume 14, Article number: 108 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

We aimed to investigate changes of bile acids and resting energy expenditure (REE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and the role in metabolic homeostasis.

Methods

From December 2019 to December 2021, a total of 77 T2DM patients with gallbladder polyps were included in our study. Among them, 40 patients who underwent LC were enrolled into the cholecystectomy group, and 37 patients who did not undergo LC were enrolled into the control group. Preoperative and 6-months postoperative demographic data, body weight, food intake, effects on diabetes control, and biomedical variables were recorded and compared.

Results

The mean level of total bile acids (TBA) was higher than that in the control group (P = 0.033) and increased significantly after LC compared to baseline (P = 0.029). The REE level in the cholecystectomy group was higher than that in the control group (P = 0.032) and increased compared to the baseline (P = 0.011). The utilization of carbohydrates increased significantly after LC (P < 0.001) while the utilization of fat decreased (P < 0.001). The mean level of fasting plasma glucose (P = 0.004), hemoglobin A1C (P < 0.001), and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (P = 0.045) decreased after LC. The mean level of total cholesterol (P = 0.003) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly decreased (P = 0.021), whereas the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The level of REE and TBA increased after LC in patients with T2DM, and the glucose and lipid metabolism improved.

Trial registration This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on November 30, 2018, registered number: ChiCTR1900027823.

Introduction

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the commonly performed procedure for the surgical treatment of patients with gallbladder disease [1]. Currently, the gallbladder is not considered just as storage of bile, previous researches demonstrated that gallbladder removal can lead to numerous metabolic changes [2, 3]. Studies reported bile acids (BAs) level was increased after cholecystectomy in mice [4, 5], and circulated faster by continuously secreting into the duodenum [6], thereby increasing basal metabolic rate through G-protein coupled bile acids receptor-dependent mechanisms. While, studies also showed that BAs level remained unchanged after cholecystectomy [6, 7], or decreased [8] may be due to the increased bile loss in feces [9]. Therefore, the changes in BAs after cholecystectomy were still controversial.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is currently a global health crisis that leads to a decrease in quality of life for patients and a heavy economic burden on society [10, 11]. Over decades, researchers have devoted themselves to exploring the pathogenesis of diabetes, and looking for effective predictors and ways to improve diabetes and its complications. While T2DM is a complex whole-body metabolic abnormality, macroscopically involving age, obesity, diets, and lifestyle, also genetic architecture, signaling pathways, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and iron overload in microscopic [12]. To date, there is not a single approach to cure or even remit diabetes, a “cocktail therapy” is still the mainstream treatment. Therefore, a whole and in-depth understanding of pathogenesis and metabolic characteristics in diabetes are conducive to developing effective treatments.

Currently, most studies focus on reducing sugar intake and accelerating blood glucose conversion, but there are few studies on whether increased energy consumption can help reduce blood glucose in diabetics. Since a study in humans showed resting energy expenditure (REE) increased after LC [13]. Increased energy expenditure may decrease the glucose level since blood glucose is the main source of energy in the body. While this human study was a short-term study (within 3 postoperative days), the results were inevitably affected by the postoperative stress response and inflammation. Therefore, the REE in long-term effects remains unclear, and these changes in patients with T2DM have been even less reported. We aimed to investigate the long-term effects of LC on total bile acids (TBA) and REE in patients with T2DM and the role in metabolic homeostasis.

Patients and methods

Patients

This study included T2DM patients with asymptomatic gallbladder polyps in the department of general surgery at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH, Beijing, China) from December 2019 to December 2021. A total of 104 consecutive outpatients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 77 (74%) agreed to participate in the study. Then patient preference design randomized controlled trial was used to minimize the selection bias [14]. Patients with surgical indications of gallbladder polyps who have a clear preference for surgical treatment were enrolled into the experimental group. The rest of the patients with indications cannot decide whether to perform a surgery or not, they were randomized and enrolled into the experimental group or control group. During the same period, T2DM patients in outpatient service without indications of gallbladder polyps matched for gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) were enrolled into the control group. We estimated that approximately 36 patients in each group would be needed to demonstrate statistically significant changes in the glucose profile. T2DM was diagnosed according to guidelines from the American Diabetes Association: (1) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7 mmol/L (126 mg/dL); or (2) random plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/l (200 mg/dl); or 3) 2-h plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) during an oral glucose tolerating test; or 4) hemoglobin A1C (A1C) ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) [15].

Cholecystolithiasis patients who underwent LC were excluded because there is an association between gallstone disease and metabolic syndromes [16] and the inflammation involved in cholecystitis might affect glucose metabolism [17]. Other exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) coexisting malignant diseases; (2) gallbladder polyps confirmed as malignant; (3) complications such as fistula, bile duct injury, and infection; (4) debilitating disease, unresolved psychiatric illness, pregnancy, or substance abuse, which might affect metabolism and follow-up work; (5) lipid-lowering agents or changing dietary habits after surgery; (6) patients who dropped out of the study.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of PUMCH at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registered number: ChiCTR1900027823. Informed consents were obtained after a detailed explanation of the study.

Methods

Preoperative and 6-months postoperative data regarding sex, age, height (to within 0.1 cm), body weight (to within 0.1 kg), BMI, food intake, comorbidities, operation details, and diabetes mellitus, including disease duration and medication use, were recorded and analyzed. The change in food intake amount was assessed using the 2005 Block Food Frequency Questionnaire, which has been used in numerous previous weight-loss intervention trials, including the Diabetes Prevention Program [18].

Resting energy expenditure (REE)

The REE and energy substrate (carbohydrates and fat) consumption were measured with a Metabolism Testing Equipment (COSMED Quark PFT Ergo, Italy). After fasting for 12 h, the patients were tested at an ambient temperature of 25 degrees centigrade. The patient lay flat on the test bed without any activity, after 5 min of adaptation, the oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide output were obtained from a shield covering the head, thereby the REE was calculated. The whole procedure took approximately 20 min.

Biomedical parameters

Biomedical parameters obtained included TBA, FPG, A1C, insulin, c-peptide, total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. The homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated using the formulas: HOMA-IR = FPG (mmol/L) × insulin (mIU/ml) / 22.5, homeostasis model assessment—beta cell function (HOMA-β) was calculated as follow: HOMA-β = 20 × insulin (mIU/ml) / [FPG (mmol/L) – 3.5] [19].

Definition of remission in T2DM

Enrolled patients with T2DM controlled their glucose with either subcutaneous insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents which included metformin, acarbose, glimepiride, pioglitazone, and gliquidone. The usage of antidiabetic medication was considered a reduction if the amount is reduced compared to that before. At the end of the study patients who had A1C of < 6.0% without any antidiabetic drugs were defined as “in remission”, patients who had A1C of < 6.0% with a reduction of antidiabetic medication were defined as “improved”, patients with an A1C concentration > 6.0% or without a reduction of antidiabetic medication was defined to “unimproved” [19, 20].

Statistical analysis

We conducted the statistical analysis using SPSS Statistics software (version 24.0, IBM, USA) and drafted histograms using the GraphPad software (version 7.0, GraphPad Prism, USA). Quantitative data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation, and differences in continuous variables before and after surgery were assessed by repeated-measures ANOVA. The multivariate analysis and chi-square test were used to compare each variable between the cholecystectomy and the control group. All statistics were 2-tailed, and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients

From December 2019 to December 2021, a total of 77 T2DM patients were included in this study, 40 of them underwent surgical treatment and enrolled in the cholecystectomy group, and 37 patients without surgical indications were enrolled into the control group. The preoperative clinical characteristics of both groups in age, sex, BMI, duration of diabetes, and other biochemical indicators were compared in Table 1. There were no subjects who dropped out throughout the study.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes in both groups
Full size table

Operation details

All included patients in the cholecystectomy group were admitted to the hospital and successfully underwent LC without postoperative complications. The postoperative pathological results verified that all specimens were benign polyps, including 33 cases with single polyps and 7 cases with multiple polyps. The duration of the operation was 22.6 ± 10.6 min, intraoperative blood loss was 45.4 ± 17.6 ml, and the duration of hospital stay was 2.6 ± 0.9 days. All patients were followed up for at least 6 months.

Bodyweight and food intake

There was no significant difference in BMI between groups at the baseline (Table 1) and 6 months after surgery (Table 2), and there were no differences in the before-after analysis of body weight in the cholecystectomy group and control group (Table 2). Food intake was estimated by questionnaires or telephone interviews, and the composition did not change much at 6 months after surgery. The daily food intake amounts between groups did not change at baseline (Table 1) and 6 months after surgery (Table 2), nor were that before and after in the cholecystectomy group and control group (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of variables before and after for each group, and between groups at 6 months after surgery
Full size table

Changes of TBA

The mean level of TBA in the cholecystectomy group was higher than that in the control group (P = 0.033) (Table 2), and it was increased significantly 6 months after LC compared to the baseline (P = 0.029) (Fig. 1A). TBA level in the control group did not change in the before-after analysis (P = 0.654) (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Characteristic changes in the metabolism of energy, glucose, and lipid in cholecystectomy group after LC. The level of TBA (A) and REE (B) increased after surgery, and consumption of carbohydrates increased (C) while fat consumption decreased (D). The level of FPG (E), A1C (F), and HOMA-IR (G) decreased 6 months after LC. For lipid metabolism (H), TC and LDL-C levels decreased after surgery, and HDL-C level increased. PRE, preoperative; POST, postoperative; TBA, total bile acids; REE, resting energy expenditure; CHO, carbohydrate; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; A1C, hemoglobin A1c; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Data are shown as the mean ± SD, * indicates P < 0.05, ** indicates P < 0.01, compared between preoperative and postoperative

Full size image

Effect on energy metabolism

The REE level in the cholecystectomy group was higher than that in the control group at 6 months after LC (P = 0.032) and increased significantly compared to the baseline (P = 0.011) (Fig 1B). Carbohydrates and fat, the main sources of body energy [21], showed opposite changes. The utilization of carbohydrates was higher in the cholecystectomy group (P = 0.036) (Table 2) and increased significantly compared to baseline (P < 0.001) (Fig 1C) while the utilization of fat in the cholecystectomy group was lower than that in the control group (P = 0.032) (Table 2) and decreased compared to baseline (P < 0.001) (Fig 1D). The REE level (P = 0.263) and utilization of carbohydrate (P = 0.201) and fat (P = 0.194) in the control group did not change compared to its baseline (Table 2).

Effect on glucose metabolism

Glucose metabolism in T2DM patients improved after LC. According to the definitions, 5 patients (12.5%) were “in remission”, 13 (32.5%) were at an “improved” status 6 months after surgery. While the dosage of antidiabetic drugs used in the control group did not change.

The biomedical indicators compared between groups after surgery were showing in Table 2. The mean level of FPG was lower than that in the control group 6 months after surgery (P = 0.047) and decreased compared to the baseline (P = 0.004) (Fig 1e). The A1C level was also lower compared to the baseline (P < 0.001) (Fig 1F) and control group (P = 0.008). Additionally, the average value of HOMA-IR was lower than that in the control group (P = 0.043) and baseline (P = 0.045) (Fig 1G). There was no significant difference in the HOMA-β value compared to the baseline (P = 0.059) and control group (P = 0.126). All the glucose metabolic variables in the control group did not change in comparison with their baseline values (Table 2).

Effect on lipid metabolism

The metabolic changes of lipid in the cholecystectomy group after LC were shown in Fig 1H. The mean level of TC (P = 0.002) and LDL-C (P = 0.028) were significantly decreased compared to their baseline at 6 months after surgery. While the average level of HDL-C increased significantly compared to the baseline (P < 0.001). Compared to the control group, the TC level in the cholecystectomy group was lower (P = 0.040) (Table 2), while the HDL-C level was higher (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the TG level compared to the baseline (P = 0.957) and control group (P = 0.475). All the lipid metabolic variables of the control group in comparison with its baseline values were shown in Table 2.

Discussion

The changes in TBA and REE after cholecystectomy in patients with T2DM have been less reported. Our study showed that the level of TBA and REE increased significantly after LC in patients with T2DM, and the utilization of carbohydrates elevated while that of fat decreased.

BAs played an important role in the elimination of cholesterol and the absorption of vitamins and fats [22]. It was synthesized from cholesterol in the liver, accounting for catabolism of approximately 50% of the daily cholesterol output. BAs are stored in the gallbladder and secreted into the intestine when a meal is ingested, yet 95% of BAs are reabsorbed and transported back to the liver via the portal vein, escaped BAs were converted to secondary BAs by intestinal microbiota and excreted in the feces. This system is known as enterohepatic circulation [23]. The rhythmic filling and emptying of the gallbladder control the flow of bile into the intestine and thereby the enterohepatic circulation. Normally, the pool and circulation of BAs maintain a dynamic balance, while it would be disrupted by biliary intervention or in pathological conditions.

The gallbladder was considered merely to concentrate and store bile by absorbing water and ions previously, while recent studies showed that cholecystectomy would affect the metabolism of BAs. Several studies have demonstrated that TBA levels increase markedly after cholecystectomy [5, 24], while other studies showed BAs remained unchanged [6] or decreased [8]. In our study TBA level increased significantly after LC, but the underlying mechanism was still not elucidated. Removal of the gallbladder leads BAs to continuously secret into the duodenum, theoretically faster circulated BAs would inhibit the cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase in the liver, the rate-limiting enzyme for bile formation, thereby reducing the bile synthesis. However, increased TBA levels were observed in most studies or at least unchanged. Increased bile loss in feces due to the enhanced enterohepatic circling after cholecystectomy has been demonstrated [9], thereby the bile synthesis compensatory increased. We suspected massive loss of bile led to an excessive bile synthesis, it may play a predominant role in the bile synthesis, but further studies still needed to be performed.

In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the role of BAs as a signaling molecular, that regulates various hormones and receptors and modulates whole-body metabolic homeostasis [25]. The most widely studied receptors are the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and the membrane G protein-coupled BA receptors (GPBAR1/TGR5) [26]. FXR stimulates the secretion of fibroblast growth factor 19 into the portal circulation and activates its fibroblast growth factor 4 liver receptor, leading to decreased gluconeogenesis glycemia and improved insulin sensitivity and glucose and lipid metabolism in diabetes [27, 28]. BAs activate TGR5, which is expressed in enteroendocrine L cells and stimulates the secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1, thereby improving liver and pancreatic function, stimulating insulin secretion from β-cells, increasing insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance [29].

Moreover, BAs are also involved in energy expenditure, in line with previous studies, we found REE increased after cholecystectomy [4, 13]. The activation of TGR5 by BAs induces thyroid hormone deiodinase type 2, which converts the inactive thyroid hormone thyroxine to active triiodothyronine thereby increasing energy expenditure [30]. Moreover, plasm BAs can directly promote heat production in brown adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, which were two important organs for thermogenesis [31, 32]. Energy expenditure is also influenced by an interplay of BAs and intestinal microbiota. The level and composition of TBA affect the gut microbial community abundance and composition [33]. The gut microbiota can digest complex food components and produce signaling molecules, including short-chain fatty acids, lipopolysaccharides, peptidoglycan, etc. Such signaling molecules promoted energy intake, use, and expenditure [34].

Although studies reported glucose deterioration in normal patients after LC [3, 35], this may not be applied to the patients with T2DM due to the damaged metabolic regulation. Our study showed that glucose improved in patients with T2DM after LC, the level of FPG and A1C decreased compared to baseline. While there were no significant changes in food intake and body weight. Therefore, these improvements were unrelated to food intake and weight loss. Increased BAs may be responsible for glucose improvement, according to the abovementioned mechanism, BAs can directly or indirectly activate several gut hormones, thereby improving insulin resistance which was also confirmed by the estimation of HOMA-IR in the present study. Moreover, the proportion of carbohydrates in the REE increased after LC while that of fat decreased. Carbohydrates are the most important source of energy, and approximately 50–70% of the energy used in the body comes from the breakdown of blood glucose. Therefore, a decrease in glucose level is also related to the increased REE level.

With the improvement in glucose metabolism, dyslipidemia was also alleviated, HDL-C levels were elevated after surgery, while TC and LDL-C concentrations were significantly decreased. Dyslipidemia is an important component of diabetes and has received much attention in recent years, but the underlying pathophysiology is complex and still not well understood [36]. Insulin resistance is believed to be the main trigger for diabetic dyslipidemia. Insulin is involved in the synthesis and secretion of lipoprotein, suppresses lipolysis in adipose tissues, regulates the amount of circulating free fatty acids, and inhibits the transcription of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein in the liver, which mediates the transfer of triglycerides to nascent apolipoprotein B, the predominant surface protein of very-low-density lipoprotein. A reduction in insulin resistance positively regulates this process, helping lower the lipoprotein. Therefore, the reduction in insulin resistance may lead to the improvement of dyslipidemia which was confirmed in our study. Additionally, beneficial changes in lipids metabolism were more likely to occur in the dyslipidemic patients after biliary interventions, this had also been proved in several previous studies [9, 37], but these effects were not found in patients with normal lipids metabolism. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanism of this difference between dyslipidemic and non-dyslipidemic patients was still unclear.

There are a few limitations of this study. A randomized study needed to be performed to confirm our results, and the effects on gut hormones also need to be investigated. Nevertheless, the results of our study show that the level of TBA and REE increased after cholecystectomy in patients with T2DM, and indicate the possible role of the BAs and REE in remission of T2DM which may be a potential possibility for the treatment of metabolic diseases. Moreover, considering the improvement of glucose after cholecystectomy in patients with T2DM, we may adopt a positive surgical attitude to these T2DM patients with gallbladder disease in the clinic, either to avoid the higher risk of emergency surgery or maximally control the progress of T2DM and its complications.

Conclusions

The level of REE and TBA increased after LC in patients with T2DM, the glucose and lipid metabolism improved.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to personal data protection legislation but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

LC:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BAs:

Bile acids

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

REE:

Resting energy expenditure

TBA:

Total bile acids

BMI:

Body mass index

FPG:

Fasting plasma glucose

A1C:

Hemoglobin A1C

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglyceride

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

HOMA-IR:

Homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance

HOMA-β:

Homeostasis model assessment – beta-cell function

FXR:

Farnesoid X receptor

GPBAR1/TGR5:

Membrane G protein-coupled BA receptors

References

  1. Lammert F, Gurusamy K, Ko CW, et al. Gallstones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16024. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shim P, Choi D, Park Y. Association of blood fatty acid composition and dietary pattern with the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients who underwent cholecystectomy. Ann Nutr Metab. 2017;70(4):303–11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000475605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen C, Wu X, Xu C, et al. Association of cholecystectomy with metabolic syndrome in a Chinese population. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2): e88189. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cortés V, Amigo L, Zanlungo S, et al. Metabolic effects of cholecystectomy: gallbladder ablation increases basal metabolic rate through G-protein coupled bile acid receptor Gpbar1-dependent mechanisms in mice. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3): e0118478. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrera F, Azócar L, Molina H, et al. Effect of cholecystectomy on bile acid synthesis and circulating levels of fibroblast growth factor 19. Ann Hepatol. 2015;14(5):710–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Amigo L, Husche C, Zanlungo S, et al. Cholecystectomy increases hepatic triglyceride content and very-low-density lipoproteins production in mice. Liver Int. 2011;31(1):52–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02361.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kullak-Ublick GA, Paumgartner G, Berr F. Long-term effects of cholecystectomy on bile acid metabolism. Hepatology. 1995;21(1):41–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840210109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang F, Qin H, Zhao Y, et al. Effect of cholecystectomy on bile acids as well as relevant enzymes and transporters in mice: Implication for pharmacokinetic changes of rifampicin. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;96:141–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2016.09.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sergeev I, Keren N, Naftali T, et al. Cholecystectomy and biliary sphincterotomy increase fecal bile loss and improve lipid profile in dyslipidemia[J]. Dig Dis Sci. 2020,65(4):1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05823-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuzaka T, Shimano H. A new perspective on type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Diabetes Investig. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Shrestha SS, Honeycutt AA, Yang W, et al. Economic costs attributable to diabetes in each U.S. State. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(12):2526–34. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luo K, Li JS, Li LT, et al. Operative stress response and energy metabolism after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to open surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9(4):847–50. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.847.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell AJ, Bagley A, Van Heest A, et al. Challenges of randomized controlled surgical trials. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41(2):145–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2009.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S62-69. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-S062.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ata N, Kucukazman M, Yavuz B, et al. The metabolic syndrome is associated with complicated gallstone disease. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25(5):274–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/356761.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yudkin JS, Juhan-Vague I, Hawe E, et al. Low-grade inflammation may play a role in the etiology of the metabolic syndrome in patients with coronary heart disease: the HIFMECH study. Metabolism. 2004;53(7):852–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2004.02.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(12):2165–71. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.12.2165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zachariah PJ, Chen CY, Lee WJ, et al. Compared to sleeve gastrectomy, duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy gives better glycemic control in T2DM patients, with a lower β-Cell response and similar appetite sensations: mixed-meal study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):2862–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2205-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Buse JB, Caprio S, Cefalu WT, et al. How do we define cure of diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2009;32(11):2133–5. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-9036.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hargreaves M, Spriet LL. Exercise metabolism: fuels for the fire. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a029744.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Monte MJ, Marin JJ, Antelo A, et al. Bile acids: chemistry, physiology, and pathophysiology. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(7):804–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fan M, Wang X, Xu G, et al. Bile acid signaling and liver regeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1849(2):196–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.05.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang F, Duan Y, Xi L, et al. The influences of cholecystectomy on the circadian rhythms of bile acids as well as the enterohepatic transporters and enzymes systems in mice. Chronobiol Int. 2018;35(5):673–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2018.1426596.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li T, Chiang JY. Bile acid signaling in metabolic disease and drug therapy. Pharmacol Rev. 2014;66(4):948–83. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.113.008201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rajani C, Jia W. Bile acids and their effects on diabetes. Front Med. 2018;12(6):608–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-018-0644-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang Y, Lee FY, Barrera G, et al. Activation of the nuclear receptor FXR improves hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia in diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(4):1006–11. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506982103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. DePaoli AM, Zhou M, Kaplan DD, et al. FGF19 analog as a surgical factor mimetic that contributes to metabolic effects beyond glucose homeostasis. Diabetes. 2019;68(6):1315–28. https://doi.org/10.2337/db18-1305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ding L, Sousa KM, Jin L, et al. Vertical sleeve gastrectomy activates GPBAR-1/TGR5 to sustain weight loss, improve fatty liver, and remit insulin resistance in mice. Hepatology. 2016;64(3):760–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Watanabe M, Houten SM, Mataki C, et al. Bile acids induce energy expenditure by promoting intracellular thyroid hormone activation. Nature. 2006;439(7075):484–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Contreras C, Nogueiras R, Diéguez C, et al. Hypothalamus and thermogenesis: heating the BAT, browning the WAT. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;438:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2016.08.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Broeders EP, Nascimento EB, Havekes B, et al. The bile acid chenodeoxycholic acid increases human brown adipose tissue activity. Cell Metab. 2015;22(3):418–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.07.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Staley C, Weingarden AR, Khoruts A, et al. Interaction of gut microbiota with bile acid metabolism and its influence on disease states. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101(1):47–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-8006-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nieuwdorp M, Gilijamse PW, Pai N, et al. Role of the microbiome in energy regulation and metabolism. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(6):1525–33. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.02.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sonne DP, Hare KJ, Martens P, et al. Postprandial gut hormone responses and glucose metabolism in cholecystectomized patients. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2013;304(4):G413-419. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00435.2012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu L, Parhofer KG. Diabetic dyslipidemia. Metabolism. 2014;63(12):1469–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2014.08.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Malik AA, Wani ML, Tak SI, et al. Association of dyslipidaemia with cholilithiasis and effect of cholecystectomy on the same. Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):641–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the American Journal Experts for polishing the language.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81970763), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS, 2017-I2M-4–003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hepato-pancreato-biliary Center, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, People’s Republic of China

    Haixin Yin & Jianping Zeng

  2. Department of General Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences& Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People’s Republic of China

    Weijie Chen & Xiaodong He

Authors
  1. Haixin Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weijie Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaodong He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jianping Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZJP and HXD conceived and designed the experiments, YHX analyzed the data and wrote the original draft, CWJ revised the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianping Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of PUMCH at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants for this manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, H., Chen, W., He, X. et al. Changes of bile acids and resting energy expenditure after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in type 2 diabetes patients: a prospective study. Diabetol Metab Syndr 14, 108 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00880-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00880-3

Keywords

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome

ISSN: 1758-5996

Contact us