- Short report
- Open Access
The effectiveness of lixisenatide as an add on therapy to basal insulin in diabetic type 2 patients previously treated with different insulin regimes: a multi-center observational study
- Tomislav Božek1,
- Ines Bilić-Ćurčić2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Maja Cigrovski Berković3,
- Marina Gradišer4,
- Tina Tićinović Kurir5,
- Sanja Klobučar Majanović6 and
- Srećko Marušić7
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-018-0321-x
© The Author(s) 2018
Received: 19 December 2017
Accepted: 8 March 2018
Published: 13 March 2018
Abstract
Introduction
This observational study aimed to assess the effectiveness of lixisenatide as add on therapy to basal insulin in diabetic type 2 patients previously treated with different insulin regimes.
Methods
Patients with diabetes type 2, prescribed with lixisenatide and basal insulin were divided in three groups (premixed insulin, basal bolus insulin and basal oral therapy (BOT). Difference in mean change in HbA1c, body mass index, total insulin doses, fasting blood glucose (FPG) and prandial blood glucose (PPG) were assessed after 3–6-months of follow-up.
Results
The primary outcomes were assessed in 111 patients. Lixisenatide added to basal insulin, reduced HbA1c and body weight significantly in all three groups of patients (p < 0.001 for all), with the most prominent reduction in the basal bolus group of patients which had the highest baseline HbA1c compared to premix and BOT treatment groups. Regarding a difference in total insulin dose the reduction was statistically significant in the basal bolus (p = 0.006) and premix group (p < 0.001). FPG and PPG were also significantly reduced over time in all three groups (p < 0.001 for all). A composite outcome (reduction of HbA1c below 7% (53 mmol/mol) with any weight loss) was achieved in 27% of total patients included in the study, reduction of HbA1c below 7% was observed in 30% of patients, while 90% of patients experienced weight reduction.
Conclusion
These results indicate that lixisenatide add on basal insulin treatment (BIT) can improve glycemic control in a population with long-standing type 2 diabetes and previously uncontrolled on other insulin therapy.
Keywords
Introduction
Type 2 diabetes is designated by a chronic progressive course and a subsequent need for a long-term insulin therapy to achieve optimal glucose control. Still, a substantial number of T2DM patients do not achieve optimal glucose control despite intensive insulin treatment [1, 2].
Strong rationale exists for the usage of basal insulin in combination with treatments that address postprandial glucose, in order to achieve target HbA1c. In comparison to the previous options, when the basal insulin regime was intensified by adding short-acting insulin, today adding GLP-1 RA to basal insulin represents alternative to adding prandial insulin [3–5].
Although lixisenatide as add on therapy to basal insulin has demonstrated equal efficacy as basal bolus insulin therapy in a head-to-head clinical trial [6], real-world evidence of comparative effectiveness is lacking. The aim of this observational study was to assess the effectiveness of lixisenatide as an add on therapy to basal insulin in diabetic type 2 patients previously treated with different insulin regimes in real world setting.
Patients and methods
Patients
This was a multicenter observational study conducted at five tertiary and secondary hospital centers in Croatia (Zagreb, Osijek, Split and Čakovec). Patients were recruited from diabetes outpatient clinics and data from electronic medical records were taken retrospectively and analyzed starting from 2014 until 2017 since lixisenatide has become available in Croatia in May 2014. The study included 111 patients (43 male, 68 female), diagnosed with type 2 diabetes aged 20–80 years, inadequately controlled (HbA1c level ≥ 7 (53 mmol/mol) and ≤ 11% (97 mmol/mol)) on different insulin regimes; premix insulin analogues (45%), basal-bolus regimen (13.5%) or basal supported oral therapy (41.4%). All subjects were GLP 1 RA naïve and consequently prescribed lixisenatide and basal insulin for at least 3–6 months.
This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committees. Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.
Clinical measurements
The following data were collected at baseline and follow up visits (after 3–6 months); age, duration of diabetes, sex, diabetic medications, HbA1c, weight, height, BMI, fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels. Changes in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, weight, BMI, were assessed and analyzed. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of participants achieving HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and/or body weight reduction. Secondary endpoint included changes in insulin doses, FPG and PPG.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics was used to describe baseline characteristics of the study sample (proportions for categorical data, and mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed continuous variables). Categorical variables of composite outcomes (reduction in weight gain and HbA1c) between three groups according to regimen were analyzed with Chi square test. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA were used to determine change in given parameters over follow-up period, regarding three groups of patients (with Scheffe’s post hoc test, and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons). All statistical comparisons are two-tailed and they were considered significant at the p < 0.05.
Results
The primary outcome was assessed in 111 patients, 43 (38.7%) males and 68 (61.3%) females.
Comparison of data obtained at baseline and after 3–6 months of follow up in all three groups of patients
Type of insulin regime (n) | Parameters | Baseline | Control visit | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
Premix (50) | Weight (kg) | 104 ± 14 | 99 ± 13 | 0.003 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 38.1 ± 3.1 | 36.0 ± 3.1 | 0.039 | |
Total daily insulin (IU) | 53 ± 21 | 41 ± 12 | < 0.001 | |
Hba1c (%) | 8.4 ± 1.2 | 7.6 ± 0.9 | < 0.001 | |
FBG (mmol/l) | 10.1 ± 2.4 | 7.7 ± 1.8 | < 0.001 | |
PPG (mmol/l) | 10.8 ± 2.5 | 8.7 ± 2 | < 0.001 | |
Basal oral (46) | Weight (kg) | 109 ± 12 | 104 ± 11 | 0.003 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 38.7 ± 3.3 | 38.6 ± 10 | NS | |
Total daily insulin (IU) | 35 ± 14 | 37 ± 11 | NS | |
Hba1c (%) | 8.5 ± 0.9 | 7.6 ± 0.7 | < 0.001 | |
FBG (mmol/l) | 8.3 ± 2.4 | 7.2 ± 1.6 | 0.009 | |
PPG (mmol/l) | 11.4 ± 2.1 | 8.4 ± 1.7 | < 0.001 | |
Basal bolus (15) | Weight (kg) | 107 ± 19 | 98 ± 14 | < 0.001 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 36.0 ± 1 | 33.8 ± 1.1 | 0.039 | |
Total daily insulin (IU) | 71 ± 27 | 50 ± 24 | 0.006 | |
Hba1c (%) | 9.6 ± 1.8 | 7.5 ± 0.9 | < 0.001 | |
FBG (mmol/l) | 10.3 ± 3 | 7.6 ± 1.4 | < 0.001 | |
PPG (mmol/l) | 12.4 ± 2.9 | 9.2 ± 2.5 | < 0.001 |
In the group of patients previously treated with premix insulins average age of patients was 67.4 years with average duration of diabetes 12.6 years as opposed to basal bolus and basal oral therapy with average age of patients 58.5 and 59.4 years and average duration of diabetes 6.8 and 7.8 years respectively.
Change of HbA1c and body weight over a follow up period of 3–6 months
The average body weight of the subjects significantly decreased over time (p < 0.001) in all three groups. The greatest decrease occurred in the basal bolus group with smaller decline in the other two groups (p = 0.003) Fig. 1.
Regarding a difference in total insulin dose the reduction was statistically significant in the basal bolus (p = 0.006) and premix group (p < 0.001), but not in the basal oral therapy group where a slight increase in the average dose of basal insulin was noted. Dose of basal insulin did not change significantly from baseline to follow up visit.
FPG and PPG were also significantly reduced over time in all three groups (p < 0.001 for all). Smallest reduction in FPG occurred in the basal oral therapy group (p = 0.009), while there were no significant differences in PPG reduction between groups.
Assesment of outcomes according to groups and total number of patients
Type of insulin regime | Outcome | n | % | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Premix | Decrease in both BMI and HbA1c < 7% | 15 | 13.5 | |
Decrease in body weight | 45 | 40.9 | NS | |
Decrease in HbA1c < 7 | 16 | 14.5 | ||
Basal | Decrease in both BMI and HbA1c < 7% | 10 | 9 | |
Decrease in body weight | 39 | 35.5 | NS | |
Decrease in HbA1c < 7 | 13 | 11.8 | ||
Basal bolus | Decrease in both BMI and HbA1c < 7% | 5 | 4.5 | |
Decrease in body weight | 15 | 13.5 | NS | |
Decrease in HbA1c < 7 | 5 | 4.5 |
Discussion
Meta-analysis of 15 studies demonstrated that the combination of GLP-1 RA and basal insulin, in comparison with other anti-diabetic treatments, can enable achievement of robust glycemic control, without increased risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain [7].
Our results are in agreement with GetGoal-L and GG-Duo1 randomized clinical trials (RCT) [8, 9]. In both studies lixisenatide led to a significant decrease in HbA1c up to − 0.7%, lowered body weight and was associated with lower insulin dose. In conclusion, lixisenatide could be considered as an alternative to prandial insulin in T2DM patients sub-optimally controlled on basal insulin which is now supported with real life data.
The GetGoal Duo 2 study is the first trial to directly compare lixisenatide with prandial insulin in combination with basal insulin [6]. The results of the study showed that lixisenatide brings the combined benefit of HbA1c management in line with bolus insulins but with weight reduction as opposed to the usual weight gain and with lower risk of hypoglycemia and lower total insulin dose. Similarly, results of the LIRA-ADD2BASAL study where liraglutide was added to preexisting basal insulin, showed significantly more patients within glycemic targets with addition of this long acting GLP1-RA, and also higher proportion of patients reaching composite end-points, with additional weight reduction and low hypoglycemia risk [10]. Recently published data on DUAL VII RCT showed superior results of fixed combination of IDegLira compared to basal-bolus insulin regimen in risk of hypoglycemia and weight at comparable glycemic control [11], bringing the combination of GLP1-RA and basal insulin in the spot light of treatment intensification of T2DM.
In our real-life study, we have provided evidence of additional benefits besides weight reduction and decrease in total insulin doses such as significant reduction in HbA1c in majority of patients. Furthermore, this combination is interesting also due to the pathophysiological background of DMT2, while beta-cell function is severely impaired in progressed DMT2, and short acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) has a pronounced effect on GIT motility [12].
It is evident that insulin initiation is delayed with multiple oral antidiabetic (OAD) combinations, but one of the biggest challenge in clinical practice especially in Croatia are sub-optimally regulated premix and basal bolus patients who often come with the problems of hypoglycemia and weight gain. In addition, health reimbursement restrictions for GLP1-RA in Croatia (BMI > 35) reduces the pool of potential patients for GLP1 therapy [13]. However, according to our data those patients with BMI over 35 kg/m2 treated with different insulin regimes regardless of baseline HbA1c level and duration of diabetes could benefit from this specific combination with regard to not only weight and hypoglycemia reduction, but also HbA1c improvement. The biggest success of this change in treatment was noted in patients treated with premix insulins.
The main limitation of this study is non-interventional observational design and availability of only routine data. Also, some clinical events such as hypoglycemic episodes were omitted or underreported which disabled analysis of those data. The strength lays in the uniqueness of data presented since no real life data exist regarding lixisenatide in combination with basal insulin, especially not in previously insulin treated patients.
Conclusion
Our results indicate and confirm RCT data that lixisenatide add on basal insulin treatment can improve glycemic control in a population with long-standing type 2 diabetes and previously uncontrolled on other insulin therapeutic modalities.
Declarations
Authors’ contributions
TB and IBC conceived and designed this study and drafted the manuscript. MG, TTK, SKB, SM collected data, MBC drafted the manuscript and gave final approval. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2013. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Funding
None.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- de Pablos-Velasco P, Parhofer KG, Bradley C, Eschwège E, Gönder-Frederick L, Maheux P, et al. Current level of glycaemic control and its associated factors in patients with type 2 diabetes across Europe: data from the PANORAMA study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014;80(1):47–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liebl A, Mata M, Eschwège E. Evaluation of risk factors for development of complications in type II diabetes in Europe. Diabetologia. 2002;45(7):23–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fonseca VA, Alvarado-Ruiz R, Raccah D, Boka G, Miossec P, Gerich JE, EFC6018 GetGoal-Mono Study Investigators. Efficacy and safety of the once-daily receptor agonist lixisenatide in monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes (GetGoal-Mono). Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1225–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fineman MS, Cirincione BB, Maggs D, Diamant M. GLP-1 based therapies: differential effects on fasting and postprandial glucose. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(8):675–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riddle MC, Aronson R, Home P, Marre M, Niemoeller E, Miossec P, et al. Adding once-daily lixisenatide for type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by established basal insulin: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison (GetGoal-L). Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2489–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rosenstock J, Guerci B, Hanefeld M, Gentile S, Aronson R, Tinahones FJ, et al. Prandial options to advance basal insulin glargine therapy: testing lixisenatide plus basal insulin versus insulin glulisine either as basal-plus or basal-bolus in type 2 diabetes: the GetGoal Duo-2 trial. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(8):1318–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eng C, Kramer CK, Zinman B, Retnakaran R. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and basal insulin combination treatment for the management of type 2 diabetes: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:2228–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riddle MC, Aronson R, Home P, Marre M, Niemoeller E, Miossec P, et al. Adding once-daily lixisenatide for type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by established basal insulin: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison (GetGoal-L). Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2489–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Riddle MC, Forst T, Aronson R, Sauque-Reyna L, Souhami E, Silvestre L, et al. Adding once-daily lixisenatide for type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with newly initiated and continuously titrated basal insulin glargine: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study (GetGoal-Duo 1). Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2497–503.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lahtela J, Ahmann A, Rodbard H, et al. Efficacy and safety of liraglutide vs placebo when added to basal insulin analogues in subjects with type 2 diabetes (LIRA-ADD2BASAL): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2014;57(Suppl. 1):37 (abstract).Google Scholar
- Billings LK, Doshi A, Gouet D, Oviedo A, Rodbard HW, Tentolouris N, Grøn R, Halladin N, Jodar E. Efficacy and safety of IDegLira versus basal-bolus insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin and basal insulin; dual VII randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kapitza C, Forst T, Coester HV, Poitiers F, Ruus P, Hincelin-Mery A. Pharmacodynamic characteristics of lixisenatide once daily versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type diabetes insufficiently controlled on metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:642–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cigrovski Berković M, Herman Mahečić D, Gradišer M, Bilić-Ćurčić I. Impact of health policy and practice on finding the best fit for patients with type 2 diabetes after metformin failure: croatian pilot study. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11(3):265–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
