- Open Access
HOMA-IR is associated with significant angiographic coronary artery disease in non-diabetic, non-obese individuals: a cross-sectional study
© Mossmann et al. 2015
- Received: 21 May 2015
- Accepted: 6 October 2015
- Published: 14 November 2015
Insulin resistance is a major component of metabolic syndrome, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Although important in T2DM, its role as a predictor of CAD in non-diabetic patients is less studied. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the association of HOMA-IR with significant CAD, determined by coronary angiography in non-obese, non-T2DM patients. We also evaluate the association between 3 oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) based insulin sensitivity indexes (Matsuda, STUMVOLL-ISI and OGIS) and CAD. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 54 non-obese, non-diabetic individuals referred for coronary angiography due to suspected CAD. CAD was classified as the “anatomic burden score” corresponding to any stenosis equal or larger than 50 % in diameter on the coronary distribution. Patients without lesions were included in No-CAD group. Patients with at least 1 lesion were included in the CAD group. A 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with measurements of plasma glucose and serum insulin at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min was obtained to calculate insulin sensitivity parameters. HOMA-IR results were ranked and patients were also categorized into insulin resistant (IR) or non-insulin resistant (NIR) if they were respectively above or below the 75th percentile (HOMA-IR > 4.21). The insulin sensitivity tests results were also divided into IR and NIR, respectively below and above each 25th percentile. Chi square was used to study association. Poisson Regression Model was used to compare prevalence ratios between categorized CAD and IR groups. Results: Fifty-four patients were included in the study. There were 26 patients (48 %) with significant CAD. The presence of clinically significant CAD was significant associated with HOMA-IR above p75 (Chi square 4.103, p = 0.0428) and 71 % of patients with HOMA-IR above p75 had significant CAD. Subjects with CAD had increased prevalence ratio of HOMA-IR above p75 compared to subjects without CAD (PR 1.78; 95 % CI 1.079–2.95; p = 0.024). Matsuda index, Stumvoll-ISI and OGIS index were not associated with significant CAD. We concluded that, in patients without diabetes or obesity, in whom a coronary angiography study is indicated, a single determination of HOMA-IR above 4.21 indicates increased risk for clinical significant coronary disease. The same association was not seen with insulin sensitivity indexes such as Matsuda, Stunvoll-ISI or OGIS. These findings support the need for further longitudinal research using HOMA-IR as a predictor of cardiovascular disease.
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Coronary Angiography
- Oral Glucose Tolerant Test
- Coronary Artery Calcium Score
- Significant Coronary Artery Disease
Insulin resistance (IR) is a major component of several significant clinical conditions including metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease [1, 2]. In T2DM patients, IR is associated with endothelial dysfunction, a pro-inflammatory state and cardiovascular disease, being a central mechanism promoting atherosclerosis . The impact of IR in atherogenesis is classically attributed to the effects of hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia, both factors being difficult to be understood separately as predictors of coronary atherosclerosis. However, the association between IR and coronary artery disease may be independent from traditional risk factors . It has been described that, in healthy asymptomatic adults aged 60–72 years, high insulin levels can predict progression of coronary artery calcification as seen by coronary artery calcium score after 2 years. This was shown to be independent from risk factors such race, dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes, being a strong indicator that IR is an independent predictor of coronary artery progression .
There is great need of identification of practical surrogate markers of IR which could be useful for coronary risk stratification in patients at risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). IR has significant biological plausibility and some markers have been evaluated with variable results. In a previous study from our group, we observed that HOMA-IR could be an interesting candidate for a coronary disease marker in a mixed population of T2DM and non-diabetic patients submitted to coronary angiography. In that study, we observed an association between HOMA-IR and the presence of sub-clinical coronary atherosclerosis, although the results may have been impacted by the presence of a high number of T2DM patients and anti-hyperglycemic treatment .
In the present study our primary aim was to evaluate the association of HOMA-IR, a fasting IR marker, with significant coronary artery disease, defined by a coronary burden score obtained from coronary angiography in a non-obese, non-T2DM population, without anti-hyperglycemic treatment. We also intended to evaluate the same association with the insulin sensitivity indexes (Matsuda, Stumvoll-ISI and OGIS) which are based on glycemic and insulin determinations after an oral glucose load .
Study design and patients
Inclusion criteria were: age between 30–75 years and suspected coronary artery disease. Exclusion criteria were: a known history of diabetes; presence of class IV NYHA congestive heart failure; acute coronary syndrome in the last 30 days; glomerular filtration rate below 45 mL/min/1.73 m2; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; body mass index above 30 kg/m2; previous organ transplantation, current evaluation for transplantation; presence of rheumatic, endocrine or infectious chronic diseases such as arthritis, hypothyroidism, HIV infection, hepatitis, tuberculosis. We also excluded patients using any medication that could modify glucose-insulin metabolism such as: insulin, metformin, sulfonylureas and any other oral drug for diabetes. We also excluded patients taking corticosteroids, HIV anti-retrovirals, carbamazepine, phenytoin, drugs for cancer, immunosupressor drugs, nitrofurantoin, anti-malarics, lithium and anti-psycotic drugs.
In a maximum of 14 days (average 6 days) after the coronary angiography, patients were scheduled to return in 12-h fasting for a 75 g of oral glucose tolerant test (OGTT) with the determination of plasma glucose and serum human insulin at baseline and then at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after the glucose load. Serum ultra sensitive C-reactive protein, creatinine, lipid profile, and glycated hemoglobin were also measured. Physical examination including anthropometric measurements including height, weight, body mass index and abdominal circumference, was performed at the same time.
Coronary angiography analysis
Coronary angiographies were performed using the Axiom Artis Siemens equipment (Germany) in all patients. All angiographic measurements were made by two experienced interventional cardiologists who were blinded to insulin resistance status and other clinical variables. Angiographic analyses were made by visual (non-quantitative) estimates of luminal narrowing in at least two different orthogonal projections. Coronary artery disease burden was classified as the “anatomic burden score” created for the analysis of the “coronary anatomy versus ischemia” in the COURAGE trial . Briefly, it consists in a grading scale of 17 progressive degrees of severity starting from zero, which is the complete absence of coronary disease, to 17 which corresponds to trivascular disease including lesions at proximal left anterior descending artery, plus left circumflex artery and right coronary involvement. To meet criteria, each lesion must represent at least 50 % diameter stenosis on the coronary distribution. We defined patients into two groups: Those who failed to meet the 50 % diameter stenosis threshold were defined as “NO CAD” (anatomic burden score = 0) and those with anatomic burden score equal or above one, as CAD.
Insulin resistance analysis
We used HOMA-IR  as a fasting insulin-resistant test and three insulin sensitivity surrogate markers based on OGTT which were validated against the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp: OGIS, Stumvoll-ISI, and Matsuda index. Each test was calculated as follows:
Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR)
Stumvoll index (ISI)
Oral glucose insulin sensitivity index (OGIS)
OGIS is an index of insulin sensitivity calculated using a model derived principle from the OGTT glucose and insulin concentration, being equivalent to glucose clearance calculated and validated in the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp in patients with T2DM . It requires fasting, 90 and 120 min of both glucose and insulin concentrations during the OGTT. The calculation of OGIS is published elsewhere  and can be calculated at: http://webmet.pd.cnr.it/ogis/index.php.
Results for each insulin resistance marker were ranked and divided into percentiles. As HOMA-IR correlates directly with insulin resistance, we selected p75 as the best cut-off value (HOMA-IR value 4.21). Patients were categorized into insulin resistant (IR) group or Non-Insulin Resistant (NIR) group if they were respectively above and below 4.21. As Matsuda, Stumvoll ISI and OGIS indexes are indicators of insulin sensitivity, we used the p25 cut-off and defined IR and NIR respectively below and above the cut-off value. The results were compared in respect of the presence or absence of coronary artery disease burden score.
Characteristics of patients based on HOMA-IR above or below the 75th percentile
HOMA > p75
HOMA < p75
57.78 ± 5.16
58.37 ± 7.29
29.59 ± 5.23
25.94 ± 4.05
101.69 ± 10.47
90.67 ± 10.36
Systolic BP (mmHg)
134.57 ± 22.49
136.25 ± 20.17
Diastolic BP (mmHg)
78.00 ± 10.65
78.77 ± 13.77
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)
0.76 ± 0.26
0.75 ± 0.18
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)
97.35 ± 5.10
91.35 ± 9.22
2 h OGTT glucose (mg/dL)
127.50 ± 36.54
126.30 ± 26.59
21.07 ± 2.65
8.71 ± 3.37
2 h OGTT insulin (mUI/L)
180.13 ± 102.06
87.59 ± 58.52
5.06 ± 0.71
1.97 ± 0.81
5.67 ± 0.25
5.65 ± 0.35
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
190.21 ± 48.01
177.98 ± 48.55
42.36 ± 11.26
45.82 ± 10.89
168.14 ± 111.35
122.32 ± 76.55
US CRP (mg/dL)
3.60 ± 3.56
5.36 ± 6.21
Urinary albumin/creatinine (mg/g)
28.392 ± 41.58
25.93 ± 40.61
Previous MI (%)
Statin use (%)
Characteristics of patients divided by the presence of coronary artery disease
59.8 ± 5.86
56.5 ± 7.28
26.6 ± 4.56
27.2 ± 4.7
92.46 ± 11.4
94.3 ± 11.2
Systolic BP (mmHg)
134.5 ± 19.8
134.1 ± 18.2
Diastolic BP (mmHg)
76.5 ± 13.5
79.2 ± 9.16
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)
0.70 ± 0.17
0.81 ± 0.21
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)
93.1 ± 9.1
92.1 ± 8.5
2 h OGTT (mg/dL)
130.2 ± 26.2
121.3 ± 31.9
10.6 ± 5.0
13.3 ± 7.3
2 h OGTT insulin (mUI/L)
108.5 ± 92.4
110.5 ± 67.4
5.69 ± 0.35
5.58 ± 0.29
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
180.7 ± 52.1
183.3 ± 44.4
46.9 ± 11.4
43.5 ± 10.9
128.8 ± 88.3
141.9 ± 88.0
US CRP (mg/dL)
4.71 ± 5.53
5.03 ± 5.8
Urinary albumin/creatinine (mg/g)
23.4 ± 40.5
17.8 ± 30.8
Previous MI (%)
Statin use (%)
The flowchart of the sampling process is depicted in Fig. 1. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of included patients are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Fifty-four patients were analyzed and 26 (48 %) had significant CAD.
Prevalence ratio for HOMA-IR, Matsuda Index, Stumvoll-ISI and OGIS index in patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD)
95 % CI
The insulin sensitivity indexes Matsuda, Stumvoll-ISI and OGIS were not associated with significant CAD (Chi square: p = 0.29, 0.48 and 0.87, respectively). There was no significance in prevalence ratio for CAD when Matsuda, Stunvoll-ISI and OGIS were considered above and below each p25, respectively: PR 1.37, p = ns; PR 0.76, p = ns and PR 0.94, p = ns.
In this study, we found a significant association between IR represented by HOMA-IR above p75 and the presence of significant CAD in non-diabetic, non-obese patients referred for coronary angiography. A measurement of HOMA-IR above 4.21 had a positive predictive value of 71.4 % for the presence of 50 % or greater stenosis in at least one coronary artery. The same association was not found when using the insulin sensitivity tests derived from the oral glucose tolerance tests such as Matsuda, Stumvoll ISI and OGIS below the respective p25 cut-off.
These findings are in accordance with our previous study  in which HOMA-IR was associated to CAD, although in a population of both T2DM and non-DM patients. In that study, HOMA-IR above 6.0 was predictive for significant CAD (PPV 82.3 %). If cut-off value is reduced to 4.21, PPV would fall to 69.4 %. Thus, at the same cut off level, in the present study, HOMA-IR may be more predictive of CAD in non-diabetic patients. We presume that in part, this finding could be due to the more homogeneous population in the present study. The main point is that the present results reinforce the impact of HOMA-IR as an important cardiovascular risk predictor in non-diabetic population.
Few studies have previously evaluated HOMA-IR as a cardiovascular risk factor. Srinivasan et al. studied 61 T2DM who were submitted to coronary arteriography in a cross-sectional study. The log-HOMA-IR was positively associated with the severity of coronary risk . Similar results were obtained in the San Antonio Heart Study which found a significant association between HOMA-IR and risk of CVD after adjustment for multiple covariates . In a large observational study, Hedblad B et al.  studied normoglycemic individuals without previous cardiovascular events who were divided according to the presence or not of insulin-resistance on the basis of the 75th percentile of HOMA-IR and followed for 6 years. They found that individuals with HOMA-IR above the p75 had a twice increase in relative risk for cardiovascular events and death. Other indirect evidences also have linked insulin resistance to cardiovascular disease in normal individuals. HOMA-IR has been associated to increased heart rate in healthy sedentary males , while glycemia measured by A1C in the non-diabetic range has been shown to correlate with HOMA-IR, being independently related to sub-clinical coronary artery disease .
It is intriguing that, in the present study, Matsuda, Stumvoll ISI and OGIS indexes, which are isulin-sensitivity tests based in glycemia and insulinemia after an OGTT, were not associated with CAD. Recently, in a study by FızeI’ova , Matsuda index was identified as an important marker that could predict the incidence of type 2 diabetes and CVD events in non-diabetic and newly diagnosed diabetic patients (HR 1.14, p 0.021) . We could partially explain the lack of effect of these insulin sensitivity tests in our study because T2DM were intentionally excluded which substantially decreased the range of 2 h glucose after OGTT results to values below 200 mg/dL. Thus, the smaller range of 2 h glucose values may have decreased the power to detect differences.
An important strenght of this study was the use of the “anatomic burden score” of CAD, described by Mancini et al. , which is an independent predictor of death, myocardial infarction and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. There are evidences from recent studies demonstrating that minor degrees of coronary stenosis such as 20 % may be predictive of long-term mortality, when compared to the absence of any epicardial coronary stenosis. Maddox et al., analyzed 37,674 coronary angiographies with different levels of coronary artery disease and identified a significantly higher risk of myocardial infarction in patients with coronary stenosis of just above 20 %. . The coronary artery disease Burden score (CAD Burden), by this way, is of increased clinical relevance  because it considers patients with more than 50 % stenosis in which at least one coronary stenosis is necessary to define CAD. Although we have not studied the occurrence of clinical cardiovascular outcomes, the anatomic burden score is considered a strong surrogate for CAD events and, therefore, useful as a reference. Another important strength of this study was the highly homogeneous sample of individuals. This allowed conclusions to the impact of insulin resistance in a non-obese population with near-normal fasting plasma glucose.
The limitations of the present study were that, as a cross-sectional study, no cause-and-effect can be concluded as it may suffer impact of covariates that were not measured in the study. However, the aim of our study was mainly to describe the association between insulin resistance and CAD, which is well known to be associated with adverse cardiac outcomes.
We can conclude that, in patients without diabetes or obesity in whom a coronary angiography study is indicated, a single determination of HOMA-IR above 4.21 indicates increased risk for clinical significant coronary disease. The same association is not seen when using insulin sensitivity indexes such as Matsuda, Stunvoll-ISI or OGIS. Therefore, these findings support the need for further longitudinal research using HOMA-IR as a predictor of cardiovascular disease.
MM participated in data collection and organization, data analysis and also conducted the project; MVW participated in angiographic analysis, and conception of the study; SCG participated in angiographic data analysis, statistical analysis and also reviewed the manuscript: GLG, MS and FV collected and organized data; RVW,RM, RR and FGC collected data; MCB was the mentor of the study, analyzed data, wrote, reviewed and submitted the manuscript as well as raised funds for the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Bloomgarden Z. Insulin resistance concepts. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1320–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wallace TM, Matthews DR. The assessment of insulin resistance in man. Diabet Med. 2002;19:527–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikmal SIQS, Huri HZ, Vethakkan SR, Ahmad WAW. Potential biomarkers of insulin resistance and atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:698567. doi:10.1155/2013/698567 (Epub 2013 Oct 24).Google Scholar
- Balkau B. The DECODE Study: diabetes epidemiology—collaborative analysis of diagnostic criteria in Europe. Diabetes Metab. 2000;26:282–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee KK, Fortmann SP, Fair JM, Iribarren C, Rubin GD, Varady A, et al. Insulin resistance independently predicts the progression of coronary artery calcification. Am Heart J. 2009;157:939–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bertoluci MC, Quadros AS, Sarmento-Leite R, Schaan BD. Insulin resistance and triglyceride/hdlc index are strongly associated with coronary artery disease. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2010;3(2):11. doi:10.1186/1758-5996-2-11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Puente BA, Disse E, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Laville M, Capeau J, Bastard JP, et al. How can we measure insulin sensitivity/resistance? Diabetes Metab. 2011;37:179–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mancini GBJ, Hartigan PM, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Bates ER, et al. Predicting outcome in the COURAGE trial (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation)—coronary anatomy versus ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(2):195–201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsuda M, DeFronzo R. Insulin sensitivity indexes obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing, comparison with the euglycaemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1462–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stumvoll M, Mitrakou A, Pimenta W, Jenssen T, Yki-Järvinen H, Van Haeften T, et al. Use of the oral glucose tolerance test to assess insulin release and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:295–301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mari A, Pacini G, Murphy E, Ludvik B, Nolan JJ. A model-based method for assessing insulin sensitivity from the oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:539–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Srinivasan MP, Kamath PK, Manjrekar PA, Unnikrishnan B, Ullal A, Kotekar MF, Mahabala C. Correltion of severity of coronary artery disease with insulin resistance. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(10):611–4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hanley AJ, Williams K, Stern MP, Haffner SM. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance in relation to the incidence of cardiovascular disease. The San Antonio Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(7):1177–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hedblad B, Nilsson P, Engström G, Berglund G, Janzon L. Insulin resistance in non-diabetic subjects is associated with increased incidence of myocardial infarction and death. Diabet Med. 2014;19(6):470–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cherkas A, Abrahamovych O, Golota S, Nersesyan A, Pichler C, Serhienko V, Knasmuller S, Zarkovic N, Eckl P. The correlations of glycated hemoglobin and carbohydrate metabolism parameters with heart rate variability in apparently healthy sedentary young male subjects. Redox Biol. 2015;3(5):301–7. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2015.05.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chang Y, Yun KE, Jung HS, Kim CW, Kwon MJ, Sung E, Ryu S. A1c and coronary artery calcification in nondiabetic men and women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(8):2026–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- FízeI’ová M, Cederberg H, Stančáková A, Jauhiainen R, Vangipurapu J, Kuusisto J, Laakso M. Markers of tissue-specific insulin resistance predict the worsening of hyperglycemia, incident type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109772. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109772
- Maddox TM, Stanislawski MA, Grunwald GK, Bradley SM, Ho PM, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Nonobstructive coronary artery disease and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2014;312(17):1754–63. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.14681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar