Skip to main content
Download PDF

Non-insulin-based insulin resistance indexes in predicting severity for coronary artery disease

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome volume 14, Article number: 191 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Triglyceride and glucose (TyG) index, triglyceride glucose-body mass (TyG-BMI) index, triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio, and metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) are considered simple and reliable indicators of insulin resistance (IR). Although they have been associated with coronary artery disease (CAD), evidence supporting this is limited. Here, this is the first study to demonstrate the relationship between TyG-BMI index and CAD severity. The performance of the four non-insulin-based IR indexes in predicting CAD severity was explored.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 485 CAD patients between August 2020 and August 2021 in China, who were assigned into single- and multi-vessel CAD groups according to the coronary angiography (CAG) results. All patients were stratified into groups based on the tertiles of the TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, and METS-IR.

Results

Patients in the multi-vessel CAD group had significantly higher TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio and METS-IR than those in the single-vessel CAD group. After adjusting for confounding factors, these four indicators were significantly associated with the risk of multi-vessel CAD. Notably, the highest tertile of TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio and METS-IR were significantly associated with the risk of multi-vessel CAD compared to participants in the lowest tertile. We also constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, to assess CAD severity. The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC plots was 0.673 (95% CI 0.620–0.726; P < 0.001) for TyG index, while those for the TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, and METS-IR were 0.704 (95% CI 0.652–0.755; P < 0.001), 0.652 (95% CI 0.597–0.708; P < 0.001), and 0.726 (95% CI 0.677–0.775; P < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

TyG-BMI index is not only significantly associated with CAD severity, but is also an independent risk factor for multi-vessel CAD. The TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, and METS-IR could be valuable predictors of CAD severity. Among the four non-insulin-based IR indexes, METS-IR had the highest predictive value, followed by TyG-BMI index.

Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) causes a huge health and economic burden on medical systems around the world, with a high risk of death [1], a phenomenon that negatively impacts families. In recent years, the discovery and prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors has significantly reduced prevalence and mortality of CHD, but the number of with CHD patients is still relatively high [2]. Therefore, more sensitive and easier predictors need to be sought to identify the severity of CAD in advance and to accurately formulate early intervention strategies.

Rapid development of unhealthy lifestyles and diet cultures has gradually increased the incidence of insulin resistance (IR) in recent years [3]. IR, which refers to the reduction of tissue response to insulin stimulation, has been shown to cause an imbalance in glucose metabolism, chronic hyperglycemia, oxidative stress and inflammation reaction, thereby affecting cardiovascular damage [4]. Previous studies have shown that IR is not only significantly associated with development and progression of CAD, but also with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events [5,6,7]. Although previous measures of for controlling IR were based on insulin levels, the process was both complicated and costly. Consequently, researchers have adopted triglyceride and glucose (TyG) index [8], triglyceride glucose-body mass (TyG-BMI) index [9], triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio [10, 11], and metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) [12] as simple and reliable substitutes for IR. Previous studies have shown that TyG index, TG/HDL-C ratio and METS-IR are related to the severity of coronary lesions in CAD patient [2, 13, 14], with limited evidence. Further, TyG-BMI index was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke [15,16,17], to date, however, nothing is known regarding the relationship between TyG-BMI index and CAD severity.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between TyG-BMI index and CAD severity, and elucidate its predictive value. Furthermore, we sought to compare the value of TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio and METS-IR in predicting the severity of CAD.

Methods

Study population and selection criteria

This was a retrospective analysis, comprising 1187 CAD patients who visited the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, China between August 2020 and August 2021. Patients were excluded from the study if they; had incomplete clinical data; were pregnant or lactating mothers; had serious infections, vital organ dysfunction or mental disease; and were younger than 18 years old. Finally, 485 subjects were included, according to the inclusion process illustrated in Fig. 1. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to inclusion in the study prior to inclusion in the study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of patient recruitment. CAD, coronary artery disease; CAG, coronary angiography; BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Full size image

Data collection

Clinical data collected from each subject included their age, sex, height, weight, history of diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension, as well as smoking and drinking status. A medical professional also collected blood samples from each subject’s fasting venous blood, which was subsequently used to determine various parameters including fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), uric acid (UA), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and creatinine (Cr). Echocardiographic data, including left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVDd), left ventricular systolic diameter (LVDs), interventricular septal thickness (IVS), left posterior wall thickness (LVPW), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were collected.

The severity of CAD can be assessed by the patient's clinical symptoms and auxiliary examinations. CAG is the ‘gold standard’ for the diagnosis of CAD, and more than 50% stenosis is directly related to the occurrence of CAD. So CAD was defined in our study as luminal stenosis of ≥ 50% in at least one major coronary artery (left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries), and the number of diseased vessels with ≥ 50% stenosis indicated the severity of CAD in patients. Patients in which only one major coronary artery was involved were considered to have single-vessel CAD, whereas patients with involvement of two or more major coronary arteries were considered to have multivessel CAD. Those without vascular lesions, but with left main coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50% were considered as two lesions [13].

Definition of terms

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m2).

  • TyG = Ln [TG (mg/dL) × FPG (mg/dL) ÷ 2] [8]

  • TyG-BMI = TyG × BMI (kg/m2) [9]

  • TG/HDL-C = TG (mg/dl) ÷ HDL-C (mg/dl) [18]

  • METS-IR = Ln [(2 × FPG (mg/dl)) + TG (mg/dl)] × BMI (kg/m2) ÷ Ln [HDL-C (mg/dl)] [12].

Participants stratification

Study subjects were grouped based on tertiles as follows;

  • T1 group, TyG index < 8.777 (n = 161); T2 group, TyG index ≥ 8.777 to < 9.273 (n = 163), and T3 group, TyG index ≥ 9.273 (n = 161).

  • B1 group, TyG-BMI index < 216.014 (n = 161); B2 group, TyG-BMI index ≥ 216.014 to < 247.645 (n = 163), and B3 group, TyG-BMI index ≥ 247.645 (n = 161).

  • G1 group, TG/HDL-C ratio < 2.060; (n = 161); G2 group, TG/HDL-C ratio ≥ 2.060; to < 3.589 (n = 163), and G3 group, TG/HDL-C ratio ≥ 3.589 (n = 161).

  • M1 group, METS-IR < 38.405 (n = 161); M2 group, METS-IR ≥ 38.405 to < 44.658 (n = 163), and M3 group, METS-IR ≥ 44.658 (n = 161).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of all data was performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp, New York, NY, USA) at significance level of P ≤ 0.05. Continuous variables that conformed to normal distribution were expressed as means ± standard deviation (x ± s), and compared between groups using the t-test or analysis of variance. Continuous variables with non-normal distribution were expressed as medians (P25–P75) and compared between groups using either the Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis H tests. Categorical variables were presented as numbers (%), and compared between groups using the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for diagnostic value analysis.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics of all subjects, including 116 and 369 patients with single- and multi-vessel CAD, are shown in Table 1. Summarily, patients with multi-vessel CAD were significantly older and had higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension than their single-vessel counterparts (all P < 0.05). Moreover, subjects in the multi-vessel CAD group exhibited significantly higher HbA1c, FPG, TG, LAD, IVS, LVPW, BNP, TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio and METS-IR than their counterparts in the single-vessel group (all P < 0.05). However, patients in the multi-vessel CAD group had significantly lower HDL-C than those in the single-vessel CAD group (P < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population
Full size table

Correlations among TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, METS-IR and CAD severity

Taking the multi-vessel CAD as the dependent variable in the univariate logistic regression analysis, we found that DM, hypertension, BMI, HbA1c, FPG, TG, HDL-C UA, LAD, IVS, LVWP, TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio and MEST-IR were significantly associated with the risk of CAD (P < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2 Associations between CAD severity and risk factors
Full size table

Relationship between TyG index and CAD severity

Multi-vessel CAD was used as the dependent variable for logistic regression analysis, and there was no multicollinearity among the independent variables. We observed the correlation between IR-related indicators and multi-vessel CAD from the perspectives of continuous and classified variables by adjusting for different risk factors. One was not to adjust any risk factors; the second was to adjust the most common risk factors, age and gender; and the last was to adjust the risk factors screened by the univariate logistic regression. The results showed that TyG index was significantly correlated with multi-vessel CAD (P < 0.05). Then we grouped TyG index based on tertiles, the risk of multi-vessel CAD was higher in the T2 and T3 groups than in the T1 group, as shown in model 1 and model 2 (P < 0.05). The risk of multi-vessel CAD for patients in T3 was 2.985 times greater (95% CI 1.348–6.609; P = 0.007) than in patients with T1 group after adjusting for age, sex, DM, hypertension, HbA1c, BMI, HDL-C, UA, LAD, IVS, LVPW in model 3 (Table 3).

Table 3 Association between TyG index and CAD severity
Full size table

Association between TyG-BMI index and CAD severity

Next, we found that the TyG-BMI index was significantly associated with increased risk of multi-vessel CAD (P < 0.05) (Table 4). Then, the TyG-BMI index was divided into three groups according to tertile, with the B1 group as a reference, B2 and B3 groups had a higher risk of multi-vessel CAD in model 4 and model 5 (P < 0.05). Compared with the B1 group in model 6 that adjusted for age, sex, DM, hypertension, HbA1c, HDL-C, UA, LAD, IVS, LVPW, B3 showed a 4.588 increased risk of multi-vessel CAD (95% CI 2.221–9.477; P < 0.001) (Table 4).

Table 4 Association between TyG-BMI index and CAD severity
Full size table

Association between TG/HDL-C ratio and CAD severity

The TG/HDL-C ratio was an independent risk factor for multi-vessel CAD (P < 0.05) (Table 5). When the TG/HDL-C was divided into three groups, in models 7 and 8, the risk of multi-vessel CAD in group G3 was 3.668-fold higher (95% CI 2.052–6.556; P < 0.001) and 4.075-fold higher (95% CI 2.255–7.363; P < 0.001) than in G1 group, respectively. Patients in group G3 had a 3.953-fold higher risk of multi-vessel CAD (95% CI 2.025–7.717; P < 0.001) in model 9 compared with those in group G1 after adjusting for age, sex, DM, hypertension, HbA1c, FPG, BMI, UA, LAD, IVS and LVPW (Table 5).

Table 5 Association between TG/HDL-C ratio and CAD severity
Full size table

Association between METS-IR and CAD severity

Data shown in Table 6 indicated that the METS-IR was strongly associated with the risk of multi-vessel CAD (P < 0.05). Analysis of the METS-IR in three groups revealed that the risk of multi-vessel CAD for the model 10, model 11 and model 12 of M3 group were 12.725-fold (95% CI 5.591–28.965; P < 0.001), 16.320-fold (95% CI 6.983–38.142; P < 0.001), and 11.314-fold (95% CI 4.521–28.314; P < 0.001) higher than that of the M1 group (Table 6).

Table 6 Association between METS-IR and CAD severity
Full size table

The performance of TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, and METS-IR in predicting the risk of CAD

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for multi-vessel CAD and TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, METS-IR are shown in Fig. 2. The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC plots for the TyG index was 0.673 (95% CI 0.620–0.726; P < 0.001), 0.704 (95% CI 0.652–0.755; P < 0.001) for the TyG-BMI index, while those for TG/HDL-C ratio and METS-IR were 0.652 (95% CI 0.597–0.708; P < 0.001) and 0.726 (95% CI 0.677–0.775; P < 0.001), respectively (Table 7).

Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC curve for the use of TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, METS-IR in the detection of multi-vessel CAD. TyG index, triglyceride and glucose index; TyG-BMI index, triglyceride glucose-body mass index; TG/HDL-C ratio, triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio; METS-IR, metabolic score for insulin resistance

Full size image
Table 7 Comparison of the predictive value of the TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, and METS-IR for the presence of CAD
Full size table

Discussion

In the present study, we provide the first report of the relationship between TyG-BMI index and CAD severity in patients. Notably, this is also the first study comparing the value of TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, and METS-IR in predicting CAD severity.

Previous studies have associated the increase of obesity to the rise in the incidence and prevalence of IR as well as related CVD, and there is a mutually reinforcing effect [19]. IR has been shown to be an important risk factor for CAD, with its degree positively associated with CAD severity [20, 21]. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that patients with multi-vessel CAD have worse disease than their single-vessel CAD counterparts [22]. In the present study, we evaluated whether IR related indicators could predict CAD severity, with the aim of generating novel insights to guide early prevention of the disease, as well as reduce risk and improve patient prognosis. We employed the hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp technique to evaluate IR [23], although its clinical use is limited due to experimental complexity and high cost [24]. The evaluation indicators that are simpler, cheaper and can be widely carried out need to be found. Previous studies have demonstrated that TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, and METS-IR are not only effective indicators for evaluating IR [8,9,10,11,12], but may also be correlated with CAD severity [25,26,27,28].

Results of the present study showed that patients in the multi-vessel CAD group had significantly higher TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio and METS-IR than those in the control group. Notably, these four indicators were still independent risk factors for multi-vessel CAD even after adjusting for confounding factors. Next, we divided the patients into three groups, based on tertiles, and found that those with the highest tertile of TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio and METS-IR were significantly associated with the risk of multi-vessel CAD compared to those with the lowest tertile. Collectively, these results indicated that the increase of these four indicators was related to the significantly increased risk of multi vessel CAD.

TyG-BMI index is a simple, powerful and clinically useful alternative marker for early detection of IR [9]. Previous studies have associated TyG-BMI index with development of coronary atherosclerosis [26] as well as increased risk of cardiovascular ischemic stroke [29]. To date, however, nothing is known regarding the relationship between TyG-BMI index and CAD severity. In the present study, we focused on the relationship between TyG-BMI index and CAD severity, and found that TyG-BMI index was significantly associated with a high risk of multi-vessel CAD, with a good predictive value. Notably, an increase in the index resulted in a higher risk of multi-vessel CAD. Therefore, TyG-BMI index is expected to become a predictor of CAD severity and a key target of future clinical applications.

Several studies have shown that TyG index is also a simple method for detecting IR, thus a crucial factor for early identification of the high risk of cardiovascular events. Moreover, it is a robust marker for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome [30,31,32]. Results from a large-scale retrospective analysis conducted in South Korea revealed that the group with the highest TyG index had a higher risk of stroke and myocardial infarction [31]. On the other hand, Su et al. [13] demonstrated that TyG index was associated with CAD severity, while Wang et al. [2] showed that TyG index, as an indicator for evaluating IR, may be a valuable predictor of CAD severity. Our results were consistent with findings from the above-mentioned studies. Notably, it was evident that the TyG index was associated with CAD severity, with the highest tertile associated with a significantly higher risk compared to the lowest one.

High TG and low HDL-C, specific cardiometabolic features of atherosclerotic dyslipidemia, have been associated with both development of metabolic syndrome and the risk of CHD [33,34,35]. Several studies have shown that high TG/HDL-C significantly increases the risk of CVD [36, 37]. Wu et al. [14] also confirmed that TG/HDL-C ratio was an independent predictor for the existence of CAD, although this parameter exhibited no statistical significance in predicting the CAD severity after adjusting for confounding factors. This was in contrast to results from the present study, in which TG/HDL-C ratio was still an independent predictor of multi vessel CAD even after adjusting for confounding factors. The discrepancy in results between these studies may be due to differences in study regions.

In 2018, Bello-Chavolla et al. [12] proposed METS-IR as a promising new indicator for assessing cardiometabolic risk and screening insulin sensitivity. Results of a Korean population without DM revealed that higher METS-IR had better predictive value for ischemic heart disease than metabolic syndrome [28]. Results from a prospective cohort study also showed the elevated METS-IR was independently associated with CVD events [38]. To date, only one study has correlated METS-IR and CAD severity. Notably, this study showed that METS-IR could predict the severity of CAD, and had the highest predictive value compared with TyG index and TG/HDL-C ratio [14]. This is consistent with the results of the present study, which showed that METS-IR was not only an independent risk factor for multi-vessel CAD but also had the highest predictive value, affirming the association between METS-IR and CAD severity.

Previous studies have shown that drug interventions, such as hypoglycemic agents, antiplatelet drugs, lipid-lowering drugs and antihypertensive drugs, may affect the results [39, 40]. However, some studies also revealed that TyG index and METS-IR were still predictors of CAD after adjusting for the effect of drugs [2, 13, 14]. Medication history was not included in our study due to lack of detailed data. However, we excluded some factors that are closely related to drug use, such as blood lipids, blood glucose and blood pressure. This might weaken the effect of the drug on the results. In the future, we will expand the database and further observe the relationship between these indicators and CAD.

In the present study, we analyzed alternative IR indicators and found that all four indicators were significantly associated with CAD severity. ROC curves showed that METS-IR had the highest efficiency in predicting CAD severity, followed by TyG-BMI index. Moreover, TyG-BMI index had highest sensitivity and METS-IR had highest specificity, co-prediction of TyG-BMI index and METS-IR can make up for their respective defects and obtain more accurate results, which provided ideas for clinical judgment of patients' condition in the future.

Strengths and limitations

In terms of strength of our study is the first investigation to show a relationship between TyG-BMI index and CAD severity. In addition, this is the first study to compare the value of TyG index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, and METS-IR in predicting CAD severity. However, this study still had some limitations. Firstly, this was a single-center study, which might have potential bias. Secondly, we could not determine the existence of the causality due to the inherent limitations associated with studies with a retrospective design. Thirdly, the study had a relatively small sample size, which might have some influence on the results. And the application of TyG-BMI index was limited to CAD population. Therefore, we need to expand the scope of the study and conduct a larger sample size, multi-center and prospective research to verify our findings.

Conclusion

In summary, TyG-BMI index was significantly associated with both severity of CAD and occurrence of multi-vessel CAD, as evidenced by a strong relationship between the TyG index, TG/HDL-C ratio and METS-IR with CAD severity. Comparison of the four non-insulin-based IR indexes showed that the METS-IR had the highest predictive value, followed by TyG-BMI index. By conducting research in different groups from different angles, we can have a deeper understanding of these indicators, select the more valuable one for clinical application. These indicators are expected to be effective, simple and inexpensive predictors of CAD severity in clinical practice. Monitoring these indicators may help to assess the patient's condition in advance, and make more appropriate risk management and healthcare decisions.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CHD:

Coronary heart disease

IR:

Insulin resistance

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

CAG:

Coronary angiography

BMI:

Body mass index

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

FPG:

Fasting plasma glucose

HbA1c:

Glycated hemoglobin A1c

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglycerides

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

UA:

Uric acid

LAD:

Left atrial diameter

LVDd:

Left ventricular end diastolic diameter

LVDs:

Left ventricular systolic diameter

IVS:

Interventricular septal thickness

LVPW:

Left posterior wall thickness

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

BNP:

B-type natriuretic peptide

CRP:

C-reactive protein

Cr:

Creatinine

TyG index:

Triglyceride and glucose index

TyG-BMI index:

Triglyceride glucose-body mass index

TG/HDL-C ratio:

Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio

METS-IR:

Metabolic score for insulin resistance

OR:

Odds ratios

CI:

Confidence interval

β:

Regression coefficient

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

AUC:

Area under the curve

References

  1. Malakar AK, Choudhury D, Halder B, Paul P, Uddin A, Chakraborty S. A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors, and therapeutics. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(10):16812–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang X, Xu W, Song Q, Zhao Z, Meng X, Xia C, et al. Association between the triglyceride-glucose index and severity of coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Saklayen MG. the global epidemic of the metabolic syndrome. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20(2):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ormazabal V, Nair S, Elfeky O, Aguayo C, Salomon C, Zuñiga FA. Association between insulin resistance and the development of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho YR, Ann SH, Won KB, Park GM, Kim YG, Yang DH, et al. Association between insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and coronary artery disease according to the presence of diabetes. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. An X, Yu D, Zhang R, Zhu J, Du R, Shi Y, et al. Insulin resistance predicts progression of de novo atherosclerotic plaques in patients with coronary heart disease: a one-year follow-up study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012;11:71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Uetani T, Amano T, Harada K, Kitagawa K, Kunimura A, Shimbo Y, et al. Impact of insulin resistance on post-procedural myocardial injury and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent elective coronary interventions with drug-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(11):1159–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guerrero-Romero F, Simental-Mendía LE, González-Ortiz M, Martínez-Abundis E, Ramos-Zavala MG, Hernández-González SO, et al. The product of triglycerides and glucose, a simple measure of insulin sensitivity. Comparison with the euglycemic–hyperinsulinemic clamp. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(7):3347–51.

  9. Er LK, Wu S, Chou HH, Hsu LA, Teng MS, Sun YC, et al. Triglyceride glucose-body mass index is a simple and clinically useful surrogate marker for insulin resistance in nondiabetic individuals. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0149731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Uruska A, Zozulinska-Ziolkiewicz D, Niedzwiecki P, Pietrzak M, Wierusz-Wysocka B. TG/HDL-C ratio and visceral adiposity index may be useful in assessment of insulin resistance in adults with type 1 diabetes in clinical practice. J Clin Lipidol. 2018;12(3):734–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Iwani NA, Jalaludin MY, Zin RM, Fuziah MZ, Hong JY, Abqariyah Y, et al. Triglyceride to HDL-C ratio is associated with insulin resistance in overweight and obese children. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bello-Chavolla OY, Almeda-Valdes P, Gomez-Velasco D, Viveros-Ruiz T, Cruz-Bautista I, Romo-Romo A, et al. METS-IR, a novel score to evaluate insulin sensitivity, is predictive of visceral adiposity and incident type 2 diabetes. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178(5):533–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Su J, Li Z, Huang M, Wang Y, Yang T, Ma M, et al. Triglyceride glucose index for the detection of the severity of coronary artery disease in different glucose metabolic states in patients with coronary heart disease: a RCSCD-TCM study in China. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu Z, Cui H, Li W, Zhang Y, Liu L, Liu Z, et al. Comparison of three non-insulin-based insulin resistance indexes in predicting the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:918359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang YC, Huang JC, Lin CI, Chien HH, Lin YY, Wang CL, et al. Comparison of innovative and traditional cardiometabolic indices in estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in adults. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;11(4):1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao Y, Zhang J, Chen C, Qin P, Zhang M, Shi X, et al. Comparison of six surrogate insulin resistance indexes for predicting the risk of incident stroke: The Rural Chinese Cohort Study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2022;2022:e3567.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou L, Mai J, Li Y, Guo M, Wu Y, Gao X, et al. Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in a Chinese population. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;30(10):1706–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Abbasi F, Reaven GM. Comparison of two methods using plasma triglyceride concentration as a surrogate estimate of insulin action in nondiabetic subjects: triglycerides × glucose versus triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Metab Clin Exp. 2011;60(12):1673–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hill MA, Yang Y, Zhang L, Sun Z, Jia G, Parrish AR, et al. Insulin resistance, cardiovascular stiffening and cardiovascular disease. Metab Clin Exp. 2021;119:154766.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanley AJ, Williams K, Stern MP, Haffner SM. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance in relation to the incidence of cardiovascular disease: the San Antonio Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(7):1177–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bressler P, Bailey SR, Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin resistance and coronary artery disease. Diabetologia. 1996;39(11):1345–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sorajja P, Gersh BJ, Cox DA, McLaughlin MG, Zimetbaum P, Costantini C, et al. Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(14):1709–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bergman RN, Finegood DT, Ader M. Assessment of insulin sensitivity in vivo. Endocr Rev. 1985;6(1):45–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pacini G, Mari A. Methods for clinical assessment of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;17(3):305–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Barzegar N, Tohidi M, Hasheminia M, Azizi F, Hadaegh F. The impact of triglyceride-glucose index on incident cardiovascular events during 16 years of follow-up: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cho YK, Lee J, Kim HS, Kim EH, Lee MJ, Yang DH, et al. Triglyceride glucose-waist circumference better predicts coronary calcium progression compared with other indices of insulin resistance: a longitudinal observational study. J Clin Med. 2020;10(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee HR, Kim JK, Kim JH, Chung TH. Compared to serum triglyceride alone, the association between serum triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk as determined by Framingham risk scores in a large Korean cohort. Clin Chim Acta Int J Clin Chem. 2021;520:29–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoon J, Jung D, Lee Y, Park B. The metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) as a predictor of incident ischemic heart disease: a longitudinal study among Korean without diabetes. J Person Med. 2021;11(8):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Du Z, Xing L, Lin M, Sun Y. Estimate of prevalent ischemic stroke from triglyceride glucose-body mass index in the general population. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20(1):483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Khan SH, Sobia F, Niazi NK, Manzoor SM, Fazal N, Ahmad F. Metabolic clustering of risk factors: evaluation of triglyceride-glucose index (TyG index) for evaluation of insulin resistance. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2018;10:74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hong S, Han K, Park CY. The triglyceride glucose index is a simple and low-cost marker associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a population-based study. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sánchez-Íñigo L, Navarro-González D, Fernández-Montero A, Pastrana-Delgado J, Martínez JA. The TyG index may predict the development of cardiovascular events. Eur J Clin Invest. 2016;46(2):189–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Murguía-Romero M, Jiménez-Flores JR, Sigrist-Flores SC, Espinoza-Camacho MA, Jiménez-Morales M, Piña E, et al. Plasma triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol ratio, insulin resistance, and cardiometabolic risk in young adults. J Lipid Res. 2013;54(10):2795–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen Z, Chen G, Qin H, Cai Z, Huang J, Chen H, et al. Higher triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio increases cardiovascular risk: 10-year prospective study in a cohort of Chinese adults. J Diabet Invest. 2020;11(2):475–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Caselli C, De Caterina R, Smit JM, Campolo J, El Mahdiui M, Ragusa R, et al. Triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol predict coronary heart disease risk in patients with stable angina. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Eeg-Olofsson K, Gudbjörnsdottir S, Eliasson B, Zethelius B, Cederholm J. The triglycerides-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio and cardiovascular disease risk in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR). Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;106(1):136–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Farrell SW, Finley CE, Barlow CE, Willis BL, DeFina LF, Haskell WL, et al. Moderate to high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness attenuate the effects of triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio on coronary heart disease mortality in men. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(12):1763–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu Z, Cui H, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhang W, Xiong W, et al. The impact of the metabolic score for insulin resistance on cardiovascular disease: a 10-year follow-up cohort study. J Endocrinol Invest. 2022;1:1.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(6):580–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the subjects who participated in the study.

Funding

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81370903).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China

    Yu Zhang, Ruiling Wang, Xuelian Fu & Haiyan Song

Authors
  1. Yu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruiling Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xuelian Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Haiyan Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YZ and HS designed the research, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. YZ, RW and XF collected the data and performed statistical analysis. HS and XF critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiyan Song.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Wang, R., Fu, X. et al. Non-insulin-based insulin resistance indexes in predicting severity for coronary artery disease. Diabetol Metab Syndr 14, 191 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00967-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00967-x

Keywords

  • Coronary artery disease
  • Triglyceride and glucose index
  • Triglyceride glucose-body mass index
  • Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio
  • Metabolic score for insulin resistance

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome

ISSN: 1758-5996

Contact us