Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between GLP-1R gene polymorphisms and gestational diabetes mellitus susceptibility

From: Genetic variants of the GLP-1R gene affect the susceptibility and glucose metabolism of gestational diabetes mellitus: a two-center nested case‒control study

SNPs

Genotypes

NGT (n = 200)

GDM (n = 200)

Codominant

Dominant

Recessive

Overdominant

Log-additive

Allele

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

rs3765468

GG

133

121

1.00

 

1.30 (0.86–1.95)

0.213

1.67 (0.68–4.12)

0.267

1.18 (0.77–1.80)

0.450

1.28 (0.91–1.79)

0.150

1.29 (0.92–1.82)

0.140

G > A

GA

59

66

1.23 (0.80–1.89)

0.345

          
 

AA

8

13

1.79 (0.72–4.46)

0.214

          

rs3765467

GG

124

120

1.00

 

1.09 (0.73–1.63)

0.682

1.60 (0.61–4.23)

0.339

1.00 (0.66–1.51)

1.00

1.13 (0.80–1.58)

0.490

1.12 (0.80–1.57)

0.493

G > A

GA

69

69

1.03 (0.68–1.57)

0.878

          
 

AA

7

11

1.62 (0.61–4.33)

0.332

          

rs1042044

AA

49

39

1.00

 

1.34 (0.83–2.16)

0.228

1.07 (0.70–1.65)

0.743

1.15 (0.78–1.70)

0.484

0.88 (0.67–1.16)

0.360

1.14 (0.86–1.51)

0.357

A > C

AC

93

100

1.35 (0.81–2.24)

0.244

          
 

CC

58

61

1.32 (0.76–2.30)

0.324

          

rs10305478

CC

157

165

1.00

 

0.77 (0.47–1.27)

0.313

0.25 (0.03–2.22)

0.212

0.85 (0.51–1.41)

0.518

0.75 (0.47–1.18)

0.210

0.74 (0.47–1.17)

0.203

C > T

CT

39

34

0.83 (0.50–1.38)

0.472

          
 

TT

4

1

0.24 (0.03–2.15)

0.201

          

rs6458093

AA

76

57

1.00

 

1.54 (1.012.34)

0.044

1.21 (0.74–1.97)

0.454

1.30 (0.88–1.93)

0.193

1.28 (0.97–1.68)

0.080

1.29 (0.98–1.71)

0.075

A > G

AG

87

100

1.53 (0.98–2.40)

0.062

1.53 (1.002.34)a

0.049a

        
 

GG

37

43

1.55 (0.89–2.71)

0.124

          
  1. GDM gestational diabetes mellitus, NGT normal glucose tolerance, GLP-1R glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor
  2. aAdjusted for age, first-trimester BMI and systolic blood pressure. The unmarked p and OR values were crude. The p and OR values were calculated using unconditional binary logistic regression. Variables with statistical significance are shown in boldface. Codominant: mutant homozygous genotype vs heterozygous genotype vs wild homozygous genotype; Dominant: heterozygous genotype + mutant homozygous genotype vs wild homozygous genotype; Recessive: mutant homozygous genotype vs wild homozygous genotype + heterozygous genotype; Overdominant: heterozygous genotype vs wild homozygous genotype + mutant homozygous genotype; Log-additive: additive effects of risk allele