- Open Access
New clinical score to diagnose nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in obese patients
© Pulzi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 15 May 2010
- Accepted: 23 February 2011
- Published: 23 February 2011
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most frequent disease associated with abnormal liver tests that is characterized by a wide spectrum of liver damage, ranging from simple macro vesicular steatosis to steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis or liver carcinoma. Liver biopsy is the most precise test to differentiate NASH from other stages of NAFLD, but it is an invasive and expensive method. This study aimed to create a clinical laboratory score capable of identify individual with NASH in severely obese patients submitted to bariatric surgery.
The medical records from 66 patients submitted to gastroplasty were reviewed. Their chemistry profile, abdominal ultrasound (US) and liver biopsy done during the surgical procedure were analyzed. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to liver biopsy: Non-NASH group - those patients without NAFLD or with grade I, II or III steatosis; and NASH group - those with steatohepatitis or fibrosis. The t-test was used to compare each variable with normal distribution between NASH and Non-NASH groups. When comparing proportions of categorical variables, we used chi-square or z-test, where appropriate. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
83% of patients with obesity grades II or III showed NAFLD, and the majority was asymptomatic. Total Cholesterol (TC)≥200 mg/dL, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥30, AST/ALT ratio (AAR)≤ 1, gammaglutaril-transferase (γGT)≥30 U/L and abdominal US, compatible with steatosis, showed association with NASH group. We proposed 2 scores: Complete score (TC, ALT, AAR, γGT and US) and the simplified score, where US was not included. The combination of biochemical and imaging results improved accuracy to 84.4% the recognition of NASH (sensitivity 70%, specificity 88.6%, NPV 91.2%, PPV 63. 6%).
Alterations in TC, ALT, AAR, γGT and US are related to the most risk for NASH. The combination of biochemical and imaging results improved accuracy to 84.4% the recognition of NASH. Additionally, negative final scores exclude the presence of an advanced illness. Using this score, the severity of fatty liver infiltration would be predicted without the risks associated with hepatic biopsy.
- Liver Biopsy
- Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
- Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
- NAFLD Patient
- NASH Patient
With the increased incidence of obesity worldwide, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become a growing problem. NAFLD is a common and emergent condition now recognized as the most frequent cause of abnormal liver tests, especially in obese individuals [1, 2]. It is characterized by a wide spectrum of liver damage, ranging from simple macro vesicular steatosis to steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis or liver carcinoma [2–5]. In the general population, the estimated prevalence ranges from 3% to 24%, with most estimates in the 6% to 14% range. NAFLD is extremely common among patients undergoing bariatric surgery, ranging from 84% to 96%, these patients, 25% to 55% have NASH, 34% to 47% have fibrosis, and 2% to 12% have bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis .
Since the majority of NAFLD patients are asymptomatic, investigation usually begins after detection of abnormal liver enzymes on routine evaluation . Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and, more commonly, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) show mild to moderate elevation. The correlation with gammaglutaril-transferase (γGT) remains uncertain. Therefore, there is no overall correlation between the degree of liver enzyme elevation and the level of damage observed on histopathological analysis, beyond most of the patients with NAFLD show normal liver chemistries.
NAFLD appears to be most strongly associated with obesity and insulin resistance. There is some correlation between the severity of NAFLD and other features of metabolic syndrome, such as high triglycerides and low HDL, suggesting that NAFLD is an hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome [6–9].
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which is the most severe histological form of NAFLD, is emerging as the most common clinically important form of liver disease in diabetes, obese patients and metabolic syndrome [6, 10]. NASH has been associated with slight elevation of liver enzymes (mostly ALT and γ-GT) .
The "gold standard" for the diagnosis of NASH is liver biopsy, which allows us to differentiate simple bland steatosis from NASH [3, 11]. However, liver biopsy is an expensive and invasive method associated with a low, but important procedure risk. Ultrasound (US), computerized tomography (CT), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H MRS) are noninvasive methods and should be preferred. One limitation being that US does not provide reliable quantitative information . Both the CT and MRI techniques are nonspecific and can be affected by processes such as excessive glycogen storage, edema and inflammation .
The aim of our study was to create a clinical laboratory score capable of identify individual with most risk for NASH in severely obese patients submitted to bariatric surgery. Using this score, the severity of fatty liver infiltration would be predicted without the risks associated with hepatic biopsy.
We reviewed the medical records of all patients submitted to gastroplasty at the Hospital da Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de São Paulo, between March 2004 and April 2006 and who had intra-operative liver biopsies at the time of Roux-en-Y distal gastric bypass. The inclusion criteria for the study were: patients with BMI ≥ 35 Kg/m2 that underwent the surgical treatment without any other adventitious causes of hepatopathy as alcoholism or viral hepatitis. The exclusion criteria were the ingestion of more than 20 g of alcohol per day or regular ingestion of drugs known to produce steatosis (glucocorticoids, tamoxifen, amiodarone) or any other condition with concomitant liver disease (viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, hemochromatosis or Wilson's disease). According to these criteria, 66 patients were selected for the study. The following data were evaluated: preoperative conditions, gender, age, body mass index (BMI), presence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, chemistry profile including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gammaglutaril-transferase (γGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides, fasting glucose (FG) and abdominal US.
The diagnosis of metabolic syndrome followed the criteria established by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) 2005 .
NAFLD was diagnosed by ultrasonography using an abdominal probe at 2-5 MHz. Longitudinal, sub costal, ascending, and oblique scans were performed. The ultrasonographic criteria that were used to diagnose fatty liver included liver and kidney echo discrepancy, presence of increase liver echogenicity (bright), echo penetration into the deep portion of the liver, and clarity of liver blood vessel structures.
Classification into 2 groups according to liver biopsy: NASH and Non-NASH
The t-test was used to compare each variable with normal distribution between NASH and Non-NASH groups. When comparing proportions of categorical variables, we used chi-square or z-test, where appropriate. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In order to propose a score system that is simple to use, we aimed to define cut-off levels for variables that would improve the model. We evaluated all continuous variables with p < 0.300 in the group comparisons using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) curve analysis, to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of cut-off levels. We included in our models all variables that presented the average of sensitivity and specificity of 60% or above.
If both AST/ALT ratio (AAR) and one of the enzymes that compose the index were to be included in the models, a kappa statistics (agreement) above 70% would indicate that only one would be necessary for the model.
These variables and cut-off levels were employed to classify patient's results and used to perform chi-square tests. We used 2 × 2 tables to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values. We used SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, USA) and MS-Excel 2003 (Microsoft, USA) to perform calculations.
We evaluated 66 individuals (11 males), with mean (SD) of 40.7(10.9) years of age and BMI of 46.4(6.5) kg/m2. Metabolic syndrome was present in 37 patients and type 2 DM in 10 subjects (7 women).
Males presented higher BMI (51.2 ± 5.3 kg/m2) than women (45.6 ± 6.3, p = 0.009, t-test), and similar age (males 38.8 y ± 9.3; women: 41.1 ± 11, p = 0.484, t-test). The proportion of cases with metabolic syndrome was also similar (males 7/11 cases; women 30/44 cases, p = 0.775, chi-square test).
Clinical, Laboratory and Imaging characteristics of the groups.
AVG (± SD)
AVG (± SD)
Gender: % women
Age ( years)
39.8 (± 10.4)
44.6 (± 12.5)
BMI ( Kg/m2)
46.3 (± 6.45)
47.0 (± 6.72)
HAS (% positive)
DM (% positive)
195.4 (± 37.28)
210.2 (± 22.3)
120 (± 35)
125.8 (± 22)
141.3 (± 57.5)
163 (± 111)
49.0 (± 11.9)
48.9 (± 7.9)
103.2 (± 23.9)
100.5 (± 11.6)
23.6 (± 9.2)
31.6 (± 22.4)
24.5 (± 13.1)
44.8 (± 45)
170.2 (± 79.7)
159.6 (± 56.5)
SM (% positive)
US (% abnormal)
Cut-off and ROC curve analysis of each marker that was included in the score systems.
AUC (95% interval)
(51.2 - 81%)
(52 - 86%)
(53 - 87%)
(49 - 82%)
An abdominal US was available for 62 patients, presenting normal (or non-steatosis) more frequently in Non-NASH (26/49) than in NASH (3/13; p = 0.048, chi-square). Abdominal US presented sensitivity and specificity of 76.9% and 46.9%, respectively, to identify NASH.
Both age and AST were not included in the model for failing to present a cut-off level with average of sensitivity and specificity of 60% or greater. Age of 36.5 years provided the best discrimination with sensitivity of 69.2% and specificity of 43.4%. The best cut-off for AST was 17 IU/L with sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 22.2%.
Low accuracy prevents the use of each test alone. Therefore, we decided to evaluate two score systems (with and without US, as complete and simplified scores). In the complete score, we assigned 1 point for each of the following parameters: TC ≥200 mg/dL; AAR ≤ 1; ALT ≥30 IU/L; γGT ≥30 U/L and steatosis at abdominal US, with a total of 5 possible points. In the simplified score, US were not evaluated; therefore, a total of 4 points was possible.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy to identify NASH at liver biopsy.
≥3 out of 4 points (simplified score)
(n = 52)
4 out of 4 points (simplified score)
≥ 4 out of 5 points (complete score)
(n = 51)
5 out of 5 points (complete score)
Despite the high prevalence and severity of hepatic illness, NAFLD remains underdiagnosed. This is in part because of limitations in clinical diagnosis as a consequence of few symptoms, lack of accurate laboratory markers and restrictive indication of hepatic biopsy [1–3].
Thus, identifying noninvasive approaches for distinguishing simple hepatic steatosis from NASH in patients with NAFLD is critical given the increasing incidence and prevalence of this disease in our society.
Liver biopsy is the only way to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of NASH [3, 11], giving valuable information regarding staging, prognosis and progress of this pathologic condition. However, serious complications have been communicated in percutaneous liver biopsy, they included retroperitoneal bleeding, and bile leak and, as many as one third of patients experiment strong pain [14, 15]. The major contraindication to percutaneous liver biopsy is significant coagulopathy and relative contraindication to this procedure is obesity. Therefore, these kinds of liver biopsies not only incur increased risk to the patient, but also it is not possible to perform liver biopsies in all patients with NAFLD to exclude the severe form of this disease. Recent developments of laparoscopy bariatric surgery for obesity have increased the number of intraoperative liver biopsies.
Our study demonstrated that 83% of patients with obesity grades II or III showed NAFLD, and the majority was asymptomatic.
Some studies have shown that obesity is a metabolic illness closely associated with both steatosis and NASH, and the severity of the hepatic illness is related to the increase of BMI. In disagreement with this statement of Dixon et al , Beymer et al  showed that BMI did not differ between groups with and without NASH in morbidly obese patients, and that insulin resistance, hypertension, and elevated ALT were independently predicted the presence of NASH. In our study BMI did not differ between groups with and without NASH.
Serum liver enzyme abnormalities are primarily restricted to elevations of ALT. The majority of elevations are mild (< 5× the upper normal limit), and exist in all degrees of NAFLD. However, there isn't correlation between the degree of liver enzyme elevation and the level of damage observed on histopathological analysis, as has been seeing in most of the patients with NAFLD that present normal laboratory values, being not useful as a differential marker. Our study ALT was correlated to the severity of the hepatic damage.
In contrast to patients with alcohol-induced liver disease, the AST/ALT ratio (AAR) among NAFLD patients is usually less than 1 . In our study, we confirmed this finding. Evidence that this ratio may reverse with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis has been reported [3, 11, 15]. AAR greater than 1 can be an independent risk factor for advanced fibrosis among patients with biopsy-proven NASH according some studies [18, 19].
The role of γGT, as a molecular marker for disease severity and diagnostics is still obscure in NAFLD. Nevertheless, Sakugawa's  data showed that was a significant difference between γGT level and the severity of liver fibrosis. Our results show that γGT ≥ 30 IU/L is an adequate marker of NASH.
Thus, considering the markers of liver damage, γGT, ALT and AAR were correlated to the severity of the hepatic damage. We believe that aminotransferases abnormalities probably occur at an earlier stage, different from γGT that would require a greater hepatic damage to be altered.
High fasting glucose levels and lipid alterations, such as hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL are laboratory markers of insulin resistance [21, 22]. In our study, these markers presented no correlation with the severity of the liver disease.
The sensitivity and specificity of US is considered reasonable for detecting liver steatosis. However, the sensitivity of US might be lower in mild fat infiltration and is difficult in the morbidly obese patient because of excessive fat which might take us to an unreliable result . Liang et al  disagree with the above, since they have shown that US use may be acceptable in the morbidly obese patients. We would argue that as US depends of the equipment available, the software used for analysis and the operator, satisfaction with the obtained results can vary between different centers. Our analysis did not consider the degree of hepatic alteration, but simply showed whether steatosis was present. US alone was able to detect 76.9% of the cases but presented a low specificity (46.9%), however, when associated with other parameters, such as the 5-points (complete) score, its sensitivity increased to 88.6% while maintaining reasonable sensitivity (70%) for the more serious cases. Therefore, in severely obese patients, in whom US specificity is lower, the inclusion of the score significantly improved the identification of these cases. Other scores have been described aiming at the correlation between isolated laboratory findings, in the attempt of improving the non-invasive diagnosis of NAFLD.
Palekar  proposed a diagnostic model using both clinical and laboratory data to enhance distinguishing patients with simple steatosis from those with NASH. Patients with three or more of the following characteristics are more likely to have NASH than simple steatosis: female gender, age ≥ 50 years, AST > 45 IU/L, BMI ≥ 30 Kg/m2, AAR ≥ 0.8 and hyaluronic acid ≥ 55 mcg/L. ROC curve analysis showed accuracy of 0.763. The presence of three or more factors showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 73.7%, 65.7%, 68.2% e 71.4%, respectively.
Sakugawa  showed that type VI collagen 7S domain ≥ 5.0 ng/mL and hyaluronic acid ≥ 43 ng/mL were markers of liver fibrosis that had a high positive predictive value ( 86% and 92%, respectively) and high negative predictive value ( 84% and 78%, respectively).
Angulo  identified independent predictors of liver fibrosis: age > 45 years, the presence of obesity or type 2 diabetes mellitus, and AST/ALT ratio > 1.
In this study we propose a diagnostic model using clinical, laboratory and imaging data to improve the differential diagnosis of patients who belong to the Non-NASH group from those are part of NASH group. Patients with three or more of the following characteristics are more likely to have NASH (sensitivity 70%, specificity 75%, NPV 90%, PPV 43.8%): TC ≥ 200 mg/dL, ALT ≥ 30 IU/L, γGT ≥ 30 IU/L and AAR ≤ 1. If we add the US, and the patient shows four or more of the five criteria, the sensitivity is 70%, specificity is 88.6%, NPV 91.2% and PPV 63.6%. This composite index seems to be a good discriminator to identify the NAFLD patients with more severe disease.
As can be seen here, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV obtained by the measurements we propose in this study are better than the ones previously reported.
All patients from NASH group presented at least one point in the simplified score and complete score, suggesting very low risk of an advanced hepatic illness in negative scores.
Identifying patients at risk may assist physicians in planning the diagnosis and treatment, selecting those patients who really need liver biopsy. Furthermore, additional stratification for advanced NAFLD may be helpful to identify those patients who are at risk for disease progression and could benefit from future medical therapy or enrollment in clinical trials.
The score system suggested by this study can be easily applied. It routine biochemical tests (TC, ALT, AAR and γGT) in its simplified version, or it can be accompanied by US in the complete version. It is highly sensitive for advanced hepatic illnesses and can provide the practitioner with information to offer a more adequate treatment.
The present study provided evidence of applying a score test to evaluated non alcoholic liver disease in obese patients. However, our study presents some limitations such as, the reduced number of patients. We also studied subjects with obesity grade III, and some of them are metabolic healthy, meaning that they don't have any component of metabolic syndrome. Future study introducing an independent test group in order to validate the proposed score test would improved the present study.
In conclusion, alterations in TC, ALT, AAR, γGT and US are related to a higher risk for NASH. The combination of biochemical and imaging results improved accuracy to 84.4% the recognition of NASH (sensitivity 70%, specificity 88.6%, NPV 91.2%, PPV 63. 6%). Additionally, negative final scores exclude the presence of an advanced illness. Although not essential, US is simple, non-invasive and a low-cost method, which can improve the score system in the can diagnosis of NASH or in the recognition of co-morbidities. Using this score, the severity of fatty liver infiltration would be predicted without the risks associated with hepatic biopsy.
We express our thanks to Dra Mabel Tatty de Medeiros Fracassi for her assistance in revise this paper.
- Festi D, Colecchia A, Sacco T, Bondi M, Roda E, Marchesini G: Hepatic steatosis in obese patients: clinical aspests and prognostic significance. Obesity Reviews. 2004, 5 (1): 27-42. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2004.00126.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kowdley KV, Caldwell S: Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. A Twenty-First Century Epidemic?. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006, 40 (Suppl 1): S2-S4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adams LA, Talwalkar JA: Diagnostic Evaluation of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006, 40: S34-S38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark JM: The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adults. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006, 40 (Suppl 1): S5-10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raman M, Allard J: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a clinical approach and review. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006, 20 (5): 345-349.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi S, Diehl AM: Role of inflammation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005, 21 (6): 702-707. 10.1097/01.mog.0000182863.96421.47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collantes RS, Ong JP, Younossi ZM: The metabolic syndrome and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Panminerva Med. 2006, 48 (1): 41-48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mofrad P, Contos MJ, Haque M, Sargeant C, Fisher RA, Luketic VA, Sterling RK, Shiffman ML, Stravitz RT, Sanyal AJ: Clinical and histologic spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease associated with normal ALT values. Hepatology. 2003, 37 (6): 1286-92. 10.1053/jhep.2003.50229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ratziu V, Giral P, Charlotte F, Bruckert E, Thibault V, Theodoru I, Khalil L, Turpin G, Oplon P, Poynard T: Liver fibrosis on overweight patients. Gastroenterology. 2000, 118 (6): 1117-23. 10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70364-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bayard M, Holt J, Boroughs E: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am Fam Physician. 2006, 73 (11): 1961-68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sass DA, Chang P, Chopra KB: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A clinical review. Dig Dis Sci. 2005, 50 (1): 171-80. 10.1007/s10620-005-1267-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ford ES: Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by the International Diabetes Federation among adults in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2005, 28 (11): 2745-49. 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2745.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999, 94 (9): 2467-74. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01377.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsochatzis E, Deutsch M, Zaphyropoulou R, Koskinas J, Manesis E: Acute ischemic injury due to a giant intrahepatic hematoma: A complication of percutaneous liver biopsy. European J Inter Med. 2007, 18 (4): 339-41. 10.1016/j.ejim.2006.11.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Piccinio F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, Ginsli G: Complications followig percutaneus liver biopsy. A multicentre retrospective study on 68.276 biopsies. J Hepatology. 1986, 2: 165-10.1016/S0168-8278(86)80075-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dixon JB, Bhathal PS, O'Brien PE: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis in the severely obese. Gastroenterology. 2001, 121 (1): 91-100. 10.1053/gast.2001.25540.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beymer C, Kowdley KV, Larson A, Edmonson P, Dellinger EP, Flum DR: Prevalence and predictors of asymptomatic liver disease in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Arch Surg. 2003, 38 (11): 1240-44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Angulo P, Keach JC, Batts KP, Lindor KD: Independent predictors of liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 1999, 30 (6): 1356-62. 10.1002/hep.510300604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palekar NA, Naus R, Larson SP, Ward J, Harrison SA: Clinical model for distinguishing nonalcoholic steatohepatitis from simple steatosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver International. 2006, 26: 151-156. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01209.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakugawa H, Nakayoshi T, Kobashigawa K, Yamashiro T, Maeshiro T, Miyaga S, Shiroma J, Toyama A, Nakayoshi T, Kinjo F, Saito A: Clinical usefulness of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2005, 11 (2): 255-259.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farrell GC, Larter CZ: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2006, 43 (Suppl 1): S99-S112. 10.1002/hep.20973.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garg A, Misra A: Editorial: Hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, and adipose tissue disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 87 (7): 3019-22. 10.1210/jc.87.7.3019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liang RJ, Wang HH, Liew PL, Lin JT, Wu MS: Diagnostic value of ultrasonography examination for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2007, 17 (1): 45-56. 10.1007/s11695-007-9005-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.