Skip to main content

Table 2 The association of TyG index with CMM

From: Relationship of triglyceride-glucose index with cardiometabolic multi-morbidity in China: evidence from a national survey

TyG index

Total N

No. of events

(Incident rate#)

Model 1

 

Model 2

 

Model 3

 

 HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

Continues

        

Per 1.0 increase

7970

638 (11.63)

1.76 (1.60–1.94)

< 0.001

1.51 (1.34–1.69)

< 0.001

1.54 (1.29–1.84)

< 0.001

Quartiles

        

Q1 (≤ 8.22)

1992

84 (6.17)

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

Q2 (> 8.22 to 8.59)

1993

122 (8.87)

1.44 (1.09–1.90)

0.010

1.39 (1.03–1.88)

0.031

1.30 (0.96–1.77)

0.095

Q3 (> 8.59 to 9.03)

1993

175 (12.75)

2.08 (1.60–2.70)

< 0.001

1.57 (1.18–2.10)

0.002

1.41 (1.05–1.90)

0.024

Q4 (> 9.03)

1992

257 (18.91)

3.13 (2.44-4.00)

< 0.001

2.07 (1.56–2.74)

< 0.001

1.61 (1.18–2.20)

0.003

P for trend

   

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

 

0.028

  1. Model 1: unadjusted
  2. Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, SBP, DBP, BMI, alcohol consumption and smoking status
  3. Model 3: model 2 + further adjusted for marital status, education, rural residence, heart rate, BUN, serum creatinine, UA, hemoglobin, TC, LDL, stroke, heart disease, and DM
  4. BMI, body mass index; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CI, confidence interval; CMM, cardiometabolic multimorbidity; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; HR, hazard ratio; LDL, low density lipoprotein; Q, quartile; Ref, reference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; UA, uric acid
  5. #Incident rate was presented as per 1000 person-years of follow-up