Skip to main content

Table 4 Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) in included randomized controlled trials

From: Effects of time-restricted eating with different eating windows on human metabolic health: pooled analysis of existing cohorts

Outcomes

Participants (studies)

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Publication bias

Overall quality of evidence

Weight

1518 (27 studies)

no serious risk of bias

serious1

serious2

no serious imprecision

reporting bias strongly suspected3

LOW1,2,3

due to inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias, dose-response gradient

HDL

1352 (23 studies)

no serious risk of bias

no serious inconsistency1

no serious indirectness

no serious imprecision

undetected

HIGH

LDL

1283 (22 studies)

no serious risk of bias

serious1

no serious indirectness

no serious imprecision

reporting bias strongly suspected3

LOW1.3

due to inconsistency

TG

549 (23 studies)

no serious risk of bias

serious1

no serious indirectness

no serious imprecision

undetected

MODERATE1

due to inconsistency

Fasting insulin

935 (20 studies)

no serious risk of bias

very serious1

no serious indirectness

no serious imprecision

undetected

LOW1

due to inconsistency

Fasting glucose

1086 (19 studies)

no serious risk of bias

serious1

no serious indirectness

no serious imprecision

undetected

MODERATE1

due to inconsistency

  1. 1 The effect sizes varied between studies, rated down by one level for high I2
  2. 2 There is a statistical difference between the direct comparison group and the final result (P<0.05)
  3. 3 Less eating time helps with weight loss
  4. 4 Inspection of funnel plot suggest publication bias