Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of muscle and IMAT magnetic-resonance parameters and muscle fat components

From: Aerobic exercise and metformin on intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT): insights from multimodal MRI and histological changes in prediabetic rats

Parameter

CON

PRE

MET

EXE

EMA

EMC

IMAT

 T2 (ms)

98.71 ± 2.05bce

127.9 ± 1.90adf

126.1 ± 1.31adf

107.5 ± 3.48bce

122.1 ± 2.17adf

106.3 ± 1.82bce

 ADC (10–3 mm2/s)

0.67 ± 0.03bce

0.95 ± 0.09adf

0.86 ± 0.02adf

0.56 ± 0.02bce

0.88 ± 0.05adf

0.56 ± 0.03bce

 FA

0.35 ± 0.02

0.26 ± 0.02df

0.28 ± 0.01df

0.44 ± 0.03bce

0.32 ± 0.04df

0.50 ± 0.05bce

Muscle

 T2 (ms)

34.26 ± 0.13b

37.85 ± 0.37acdef

36.19 ± 0.19bdf

35.21 ± 0.25bc

35.48 ± 0.12bc

35.18 ± 0.24bc

 ADC (10–3 mm2/s)

1.47 ± 0.02b

1.62 ± 0.03acdf

1.52 ± 0.02bdf

1.41 ± 0.01bce

1.56 ± 0.03bf

1.43 ± 0.02bce

 FA

0.26 ± 0.03

0.20 ± 0.01df

0.22 ± 0.02df

0.30 ± 0.04bc

0.23 ± 0.01

0.32 ± 0.03bc

 IMCL/Cr

8.79 ± 1.57b

32.60 ± 9.98a

26.58 ± 13.53

16.62 ± 11.68

14.77 ± 4.14

14.92 ± 5.26

  1. Data are expressed as the means ± standard error of the mean (n = 6/group)
  2. ADC apparent-diffusion coefficient, CON control group, Cr creatine, EMA combined therapies + compound-c group, EMC combined therapies group, EXE moderate exercise group, FA fractional anisotropy, IMAT intermuscular adipose tissue, IMCL intra-myocellular lipid, MET metformin group, PRE prediabetes group, T2 transverse-relaxation time 2
  3. ap < 0.05, significantly different from the CON. Group
  4. bp < 0.05, significantly different from the PRE group
  5. cp < 0.05, significantly different from the MET group
  6. dp < 0.05, significantly different from the EXE group
  7. ep < 0.05, significantly different from the EMA group
  8. fp < 0.05, significantly different from the EMC group