Skip to main content

Table 3 Baseline and post-training body composition

From: Insulin resistance, lipids and body composition in patients with coronary artery disease after combined aerobic training and resistance training: a randomised, controlled trial

Body composition measure

N

Baseline

Post-training

2-way ANOVA/ANCOVA

Time effect/effect of baseline

Interaction/post-training difference

Body mass (kg)

AT

19

90.94 (19.04)

90.49 (17.87)

p = 0.187

η2 = 0.031

p = 0.974

η2 = 0.001

LL-RT

19

81.46 (13.37)

80.91 (13.90)

HL-RT

21

84.15 (12.56)

83.47 (13.48)

Fat (%)

AT

19

28.2 (9.2)

29.2 (8.7)

p = 0.500

η2 = 0.008

p = 0.138

η2 = 0.070

LL-RT

19

22.3 (4.7)

22.0 (5.2)

HL-RT

20

24.9 (8.4)

24.7 (7.6)

Fat (kg)

AT

19

26.0 (11.0)

26.7 (10.3)

p < 0.001

η2 = 0.900

p = 0.095

η2 = 0.083

LL-RT

19

17.8 (3.3)

17.6 (4.5)

HL-RT

20

21.0 (8.3)

20.5 (7.5)

Lean (%)

AT

19

71.8 (9.2)

70.8 (8.7)

p = 0.497

η2 = 0.008

p = 0.139

η2 = 0.069

LL-RT

19

77.7 (4.7)

78.0 (5.2)

HL-RT

20

75.1 (8.4)

75.3 (7.6)

Lean (kg)

AT

19

64.9 (13.6)

63.9 (13.1)

p = 0.002

η2 = 0.166

p = 0.354

η2 = 0.037

LL-RT

19

63.6 (12.5)

63.3 (12.4)

HL-RT

20

63.4 (11.7)

62.4 (11.5)

  1. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation) or as median (first quartile, third quartile). Text in bold presents ANCOVA results
  2. LL-RT low load resistance training, HL-RT high load resistance training, AT aerobic training, ANOVA analysis of variance, ANCOVA analysis of covariance, η2 partial eta squared (effect size)