Skip to main content

Table 5 Adherence to treatment plans and glycaemic control in sub-Saharan Africa

From: Glycaemic control among type 2 diabetes patients in sub-Saharan Africa from 2012 to 2022: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author name

Year

Study design

Study setting

Study population

Sample size

Measurement of glycemic control

Definition of glycemic control

Generic factor

Specific factors

Measure of association

Point estimate

Lower bound

Upper bound

Association with glycemic control

Yigazu [85]

2017

Cross-sectional

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes; 18–80 years

174

FBG

Controlled (average FBG: 80–130 mg/dL); Uncontrolled (average FBG > 130 or < 70 mg/dL)

Adherence to follow-up

Adherence to regular follow-up

Odds Ratio

2.42

1.08

5.44

Adherence to regular follow-up was associated with good glycaemic control

Kefale [49]

2019

Case–control

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes; ≥ 18 years

169

FBS

glycemic control (FBS ≤ 130 mg/dl in all these most three recent measurements)

Having regular diabetic care of ˃ 1 month

Odds Ratio

0.4

0.2

0.9

Having regular diabetic care follow up of every > 1 month was negatively associated with poor glycaemic control

Abebe [89]

2022

Cross-sectional

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes;  > 18 years

138

FBG

Good control (mean FBG:80–130 mg/dl); poor control (FBG < 80 mg/dl or > 130 mg/dl)

Adherence to treatment

Drug adherence

Odds Ratio

3.08

1.22

7.08

Absence of drug adherence was significantly associated with poor glycaemic control

Demoz [34]

2019

Cross-sectional

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes; ≥ 18 years

357

HbA1c and FBG

Adequate control ( average fasting blood glucose 70–130 mg/dL or HbA1c < 7%); Poor control (average fasting blood glucose > 130 or < 70 mg/dL or HbA1c > 7%)

Low medication adherence

Odds Ratio

5.10

1.18

6.55

Low adherence was significanty associated with poor glycaemic control

Kamuhabwa [47]

2014

Cross-sectional

Tanzania

Type 2 diabetes; ≥ 18 years

469

FBG

Good control (FBG ≤ 130 mg/dL or 7.2 mmol/L); poor control (FBG > 130 mg/dL or 7.2 mmol/L)

Low medication adherence

Odds Ratio

2.084

1.069

4.060

Low medication adherence was significantly associated with poor glycaemic control

Kassahun [48]

2016

Cross-sectional

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes; ≥ 18 years

309

FBG

Poor control (mean FBG > 130 mg/dl)

Low medication adherence

Odds Ratio

5.08

2.02

12.79

Low adherence was significantly associated with poor glycaemic control

Medium medication adherence

3.49

1.72

7.09

Medium adherence was significantly associated with poor glycaemic control

Yimam [86]

2020

Cross-sectional

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes with hypertension; ≥ 18 years

300

FBG

Good control (mean FBG:80–130 mg/dl); poor control (FBG < 80 mg/dl or > 130 mg/dl)

Low medication adherence

Odds Ratio

4.26

1.70

10.65

Low adherence to treatment was significantly associated with poor glycaemic control

Medium medication adherence

2.43

0.97

6.07

Medium adherence to medication was not associated with glycaemic control

Mamo [53]

2019

Case–control

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes with poor glycemic control (cases) and without good glycemic control (controls); > 18 years

410

FBG

Good control (average fasting blood glucose of 80–130 mg/dL); poor control (average fasting blood glucose of > 130 mg/dL)

No adherence to medication

Odds Ratio

0.67

0.26

1.69

No adherence to antidiabetic medication was not associated with glycaemic control

Fseha [40]

2017

Cross-sectional

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes; 22–60 years

200

FBS

Good (FBS 70–130 mg/dl), Poor (FBS > 130 mg/dl)

Good medication adherence

Odds Ratio

2.033

1.025

4.034

Medical adherence was associated with good glycaemic control (p:0.001)

Shimels [75]

2018

Cross-sectional

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes;  ≥ 18 years

361

FPG

glycemic control (FPG: 100–130 mg/dl)

Good medication adherence

Odds Ratio

1.38

0.62

3.09

Good medical adherence was not associated with glycaemic control

Tefera [77]

2020

Cross-sectional

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes; ≥ 18 years

400

FPG

Controlled (FPG:80–130 mg/dl)

Good medication adherence

Odds Ratio

1.61

1.04

4.79

Good adherence level was significantly associated with good glycaemic control

Intermediate adherence

0.19

0.06

0.59

Intermediate adherence was not associated with glycaemic control

Teklay [79]

2013

Cross-sectional

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes; ≥ 18 years

267

FBG

Controlled (average FBG: 70–130 mg/dl), Uncontrolled (average FBG > 130 mg/dl)

Good medication adherence

 

1.469

0.732

2.949

Poor glycaemic control was not associated with adherence to treatment (p:0.280)

Id [44]

2021

Cross-sectional

Ethiopia

Type 2 diabetes;  > 18 years

394

FBS

Good blood glucose control (< 154 mg/dl); Poor blood glucose control (≥ 154 mg/dl)

Practice of recommendations

Poor level of practice

Odds Ratio

1.693

1.126

2.545

Poor level of practice was significantly associated with poor glycaemic control