Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between the different subgroups for UfRBP4, Ualb and KIM-1

From: Exploration of a panel of urine biomarkers of kidney disease in two paediatric cohorts with Type 1 diabetes mellitus of differing duration

 

Male (n = 46)

Female (n = 34)

p

HbA1c target ≤ 59 mmol/mol (n = 35)

HbA1c target > 59 mmol/mol (n = 19)

p

T1DM- complications (n = 16)

No T1DM-Complications (n = 38)

p

Hyper-filtration (n = 11)

No Hyper-filtration (n = 40)

p

UfRBP4 (µg/mmol)

1.1 (0.5, 1.5)

1.1 (0.6, 2.4)

0.3

1.2 (0.8, 2.0)

1.1 (0.6, 1.6)

0.3

1.1 (0.7, 1.8)

1.2 (0.6, 1.9)

0.9

1.0 (0.6, 1.6)

1.2 (0.7, 1.2)

0.3

Ualb

(mg/mmol)

0.5 (0.4, 0.9)

0.7 (0.4, 1.4)

0.1

0.6 (0.4, 0.8)

0.4 (0.3, 1.0)

0.6

0.7 ± 0.5

0.8 ± 0.6

0.7

0.7 ± 0.6

0.9 ± 0.7

0.3

KIM-1 (ng/mL)

0.07 (0.04,0.11)

0.06 (0.04,0.15)

0.7

0.06 (0.04,0.11)

0.13 (0.05,0.15)

0.1

0.06 (0.04,0.12)

0.06 (0.04,0.10)

0.7

0.07 (0.05,0.16)

0.08 (0.04,0.13)

0.5

  1. aDefinition of Hyperfiltration: eGFR that exceeds two standard deviations above mean GFR of an age-matched normal (i.e., without evidence of renal disease) population, where glomerular filtration rate was determined by inulin clearance [26]. Notably, the prevalence of hyperfiltration was not significantly different between SD and LD-group (p = 0.8)
  2. p = p-value