Skip to main content

Table 2 Compared the changes of body composition such as body mass index, body fat and muscle mass in each group before and after intervention

From: Microecological preparation combined with an modified low-carbon diet improves glucolipid metabolism and cardiovascular complication in obese patients

 

Group A (N = 23, M/F = 13/10)

Group B (N = 23, M/F = 10/13)

Group C (N = 20, M/F = 9/11)

Group D (N = 20, M/F = 9/11)

 

Before intervene

After intervenes

Before intervene

After intervenes

Before intervene

After intervenes

Before intervene

After intervenes

BMI (Kg/M2)

31.232 ± 1.10DD

26.793 ± 0.972ddc**

29.85 ± 0.77DD

27.06 ± 0.75dd*

30.30 ± 0.53DD

29.60 ± 0.51dd

22.57 ± 1.42

22.12 ± 0.32

WHR (W/H)

93.43 ± 1.88D

88.74 ± 1.72dc**

93.32 ± 1.37D

88.36 ± 1.31dc**

93.34 ± 1.03D

91.66 ± 1.25d

87.20 ± 0.88

86.44 ± 1.00

Fat Mass (kg)

32.30 ± 2.22DD

22.40 ± 1.90cc**

31.13 ± 1.74DD

24.90 ± 1.75ccdd*

31.05 ± 1.51DD

29.63 ± 1.49dd

16.00 ± 0.82

15.61 ± 0.78

Muscle Mass (kg)

51.22 ± 2.42DD

50.57 ± 2.34d

46.83 ± 1.87

45.27 ± 1.79

46.48 ± 1.95

46.04 ± 1.96

43.19 ± 1.60

42.40 ± 1.65

TG (mmol/L)

2.03 ± 0.31D

1.16 ± 0.11c*

2.09 ± 0.34D

1.34 ± 0.17*

2.22 ± 0.36DD

1.83 ± 0.27dd

1.06 ± 0.09

1.05 ± 0.06

TC (mmol/L)

6.25 ± 0.14DD

4.86 ± 0.14ddcc**

6.17 ± 0.12DD

5.21 ± 0.10ddcc**

6.33 ± 0.14 DD

6.00 ± 0.12dd

4.30 ± 0.12

4.18 ± 0.10

HDLc (mmol/L)

1.44 ± 0.09

1.52 ± 0.07

1.42 ± 0.10

1.50 ± 0.07

1.39 ± 0.05

1.47 ± 0.10

1.42 ± 0.09

1.50 ± 0.09

LDLc (mmol/L)

4.41 ± 0.17DD

3.13 ± 0.13dbcc**

4.32 ± 0.13DD

3.47 ± 0.08ddcc**

4.55 ± 0.20DD

4.15 ± 0.13dd

2.76 ± 0.14

2.62 ± 0.10

  1. The measurement data were tested by t test, and P < 0.05 was considered as significant difference. ** comparison before and after intervention, P < 0.01, * comparison before and after intervention, P < 0.05; DD was compared with group D before intervention (P < 0.01), and D was compared with group D before intervention (P < 0.05).Compared with group C before intervention, P < 0.05; Dd was compared with group D after intervention (P < 0.01), and D was compared with group D after intervention (P < 0.05). Cc was compared with group C after intervention (P < 0.01), and C was compared with group C after intervention (P < 0.05)