Skip to main content

Table 4 Odd ratios and 95% CIs for MetS and its components across tertiles of the MIND diet score

From: Associations between adherence to MIND diet and metabolic syndrome and general and abdominal obesity: a cross-sectional study

 

MIND diet score

P value*

T1 (< 6) (n = 294)

T2 (6.5–7.5) (n = 278)

T3 (8<) (n = 264)

 

OR (CI)

 

MetS

 Crude

1

0.94 (0.67–1.32)

0.88 (0.62–1.24)

0.77

 Model1

1

0.92 (0.64–1.33)

0.83 (0.57–1.21)

0.64

 Model2

1

0.91 (0.63–1.31)

0.83 (0.57–1.20)

0.63

 Model3

1

0.86 (0.55–1.16)

0.80 (0.55–1.16)

0.50

Reduced serum HDL

 Crude

1

0.60 (0.43–0.84)

0.59 (0.42–0.83)

0.002

 Model1

1

0.62 (0.43–0.89)

0.59 (0.41–0.86)

0.008

 Model2

1

0.62 (0.43–0.90)

0.59 (0.41–0.86)

0.009

 Model3

1

0.62 (0.43–0.89)

0.59 (0.41–0.85)

0.008

Elevated BP

 Crude

1

1.04 (0.74–1.47)

0.91 (0.64–1.29)

0.73

 Model1

1

0.85 (0.57–1.26)

0.79 (0.53–1.19)

0.51

 Model2

1

0.83 (0.56–1.24)

0.79 (0.53–1.18)

0.49

 Model3

1

0.79 (0.53–1.18)

0.76 (0.51–1.15)

0.37

Elevated FBS

 Crude

1

0.82 (0.59–1.14)

1.04 (0.75–1.46)

0.32

 Model1

1

0.80 (0.56–1.13)

0.98 (0.69–1.38)

0.40

 Model2

1

0.80 (0.56–1.13)

0.98 (0.69–1.38)

0.40

 Model3

1

0.79 (0.56–1.12)

0.97 (0.68–1.37)

0.37

Increased serum TG

 Crude

1

0.94 (0.67–1.32)

1.02 (0.72–1.44)

0.88

 Model1

1

0.97 (0.69–1.38)

1.02 (0.72–1.44)

0.97

 Model2

1

0.96 (0.68–1.36)

1.01 (0.71–1.44)

0.95

 Model3

1

0.97 (0.68–1.37)

1.02 (0.72–1.45)

0.96

Abdominal obesity

 Crude

1

1.30 (0.93–1.81)

1.01 (0.72–1.41)

0.21

 Model1

1

1.29 (0.88–1.88)

0.93 (0.64–1.36)

0.22

 Model2

1

1.27 (0.87–1.86)

0.93 (0.63–1.36)

0.25

 Model3

1

1.17 (0.78–1.76)

0.84 (0.56–1.26)

0.29

General obesity

 Crude

1

1.69 (1.17–2.44)

1.24 (0.85–1.82)

0.01

 Model1

1

1.71 (1.16–2.52)

1.20 (0.80–1.79)

0.02

 Model2

1

1.69 (1.14–2.49)

1.19 (0.80–1.78)

0.02

  1. Data are presented as odds ratio (95% CI)
  2. Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, marital status, physical activity, educations status, occupation and smoking
  3. Model 2: additionally, adjusted for energy intake
  4. Model 3: further adjustment was made for BMI
  5. MIND diet score Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay, MetS metabolic syndrome, WC waist circumference, FBS fasting blood glucose, TG triglyceride, HDL high-density lipoprotein, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure
  6. *Obtained by binary logistic regression
Back to article page

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome

ISSN: 1758-5996

Contact us