Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical features between participants absent and present DR

From: Combined effect of glycemic and blood pressure control on diabetic retinopathy among Chinese with type-2 diabetes mellitus

Characteristics

Absent (n = 719)

Present (n = 158)

OR (95% CI)

P*

Age

68.00 ± 8.24

66.47 ± 8.37

0.98 (0.96–1.00)

0.04

BMI

24.36 ± 3.09

23.96 ± 2.84

0.96 (0.9–1.01)

0.14

Sex

 Male

309 (43.0%)

78 (49.4%)

1.00 (ref)

 

 Female

410 (57.0%)

80 (50.6%)

0.77 (0.55–1.09)

0.14

Education

 High school and below

621 (86.4%)

136 (86.1%)

1.00 (ref)

 

 University and above

98 (13.6%)

22 (13.9%)

1.03 (0.63–1.70)

0.90

Live alone

 No

655 (91.1%)

142 (89.9%)

1.00 (ref)

 

 Yes

64 (8.9%)

16 (10.1%)

1.17 (0.66–2.09)

0.59

Regular tea consumption

 No

353 (49.1%)

65 (41.1%)

1.00 (ref)

 

 Yes

366 (50.9%)

93 (58.9%)

1.38 (0.97–1.95)

0.07

Smoking

 No

581 (80.8%)

119 (75.3%)

1.00 (ref)

 

 Yes

138 (19.2%)

39 (24.7%)

1.39 (0.93–2.09)

0.11

Alcohol drinking

 No

645 (89.7%)

141 (89.2%)

1.00 (ref)

 

 Yes

74 (10.3%)

17 (10.8%)

1.07 (0.61–1.86)

0.82

Nephrosis

 Absent

617 (87.2%)

133 (86.9%)

1.00 (ref)

 

 Present

92 (12.8%)

20 (13.1%)

1.09 (0.97–1.23)

0.14

Heart disease

 Absent

507 (70.5%)

113 (71.5%)

1.00 (ref)

 

 Present

212 (29.5%)

45 (28.5%)

0.95 (0.65–1.39)

0.79

Systolic pressure (mmHg)

142.65 ± 18.83

143.75 ± 19.22

1.00 (0.99–1.01)

0.51

Diastolic pressure (mmHg)

79.8 ± 10.43

80.2 ± 9.93

1.00 (0.99–1.02)

0.66

Diabetes duration (years)

10.3 ± 6.98

11.45 ± 7.50

1.02 (1.00–1.05)

0.07

HbA1C (%)

7.09 ± 1.27

7.49 ± 1.57

1.22 (1.08–1.38)

0.001

Hypertension

 Absent

226 (31.4%)

51 (32.3%)

1.00 (ref)

 

 Present

493 (68.6%)

107 (67.7%)

0.96 (0.67–1.39)

0.84

Stroke

 No

695 (96.7%)

151 (95.6%)

1.00 (ref)

 

 Yes

24 (3.3%)

7 (4.4%)

1.34 (0.57–3.17)

0.50

Hyperlipidemia

 Absent

517 (71.9%)

114 (72.2%)

1.00 (ref)

 

 Present

202 (28.1%)

44 (27.8%)

0.99 (0.67–1.45)

0.94

  1. DR diabetic retinopathy
  2. * P values were got from logistic regression