Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup analysis for diabetic retinopathy risk

From: Association between homocysteine level and the risk of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Group

OR and 95% CI

p value

Heterogeneity (%)

p value for heterogeneity

Ratio between subgroups

Publication year

 Before 2005

1.89 (1.26–2.81)

0.002

31.0

0.203

1.29 (0.80–2.07)/0.300

 2005 or after

1.47 (1.14–1.90)

0.003

66.2

0.019

Country

 Eastern

2.26 (1.24–4.13)

0.008

81.4

0.001

1.73 (0.93–3.21)/0.085

 Western

1.31 (1.12–1.52)

0.001

1.3

0.415

Sample size

 ≥ 100

1.66 (1.21–2.29)

0.002

66.9

0.006

0.99 (0.52–1.88)/0.971

 < 100

1.68 (0.96–2.92)

0.067

42.9

0.154

Mean age (years)

 ≥ 60.0

1.47 (1.05–2.05)

0.025

50.6

0.088

0.77 (0.45–1.32)/0.350

 < 60.0

1.90 (1.25–2.90)

0.003

68.2

0.008

Percentage male (%)

 ≥ 55.0

1.51 (1.04–2.21)

0.032

52.3

0.099

0.87 (0.52–1.48)/0.612

 < 55.0

1.73 (1.20–2.50)

0.003

65.7

0.008

BMI (kg/m2)

 ≥ 25.0

1.35 (1.10–1.67)

0.004

45.1

0.105

0.75 (0.48–1.17)/0.211

 < 25.0

1.79 (1.21–2.64)

0.004

0.0

0.488

DM types

 1

1.27 (0.93–1.75)

0.134

17.3

0.305

0.79 (0.50–1.24)/0.306a

 2

1.61 (1.16–2.23)

0.005

59.7

0.042

 Both

2.71 (1.70–4.30)

< 0.001

0.0

0.917

Study quality

 High

1.70 (1.24–2.33)

0.001

66.0

0.007

1.06 (0.56–2.03)/0.854

 Low

1.60 (0.91–2.82)

0.106

45.9

0.136

  1. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, BMI body mass index, DM diabetes mellitus
  2. aCompared between type 1 and 2 DM