Association between non-high-density lipoprotein to high-density lipoprotein ratio and reversion to normoglycemia in people with impaired fasting glucose: a 5-year retrospective cohort study

Table 6 Relationship between non-HDL-c/HDL-c ratio and the probability of reverting from IFG to normoglycemia in different sensitivity analyses

Exposure	Model a (HR, 95% CI, P)	Model b (HR, 95% CI, P)	Model c (HR, 95% CI, P)	Model d (HR, 95% CI, P)
Non-HDL-c/HDL-c ratio	0.71 (0.68, 0.74) < 0.0001	0.71 (0.69, 0.74) < 0.0001	0.71 (0.69, 0.74) < 0.0001	0.71 (0.69, 0.74) < 0.0001
Non-HDL-c/HDL-c ratio (Quartile)
Q1	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
Q2	0.81 (0.75, 0.87) < 0.0001	0.79 (0.73, 0.86) < 0.0001	0.81 (0.76, 0.87) < 0.0001	0.82 (0.76, 0.88) < 0.0001
Q3	0.57 (0.52, 0.62) < 0.0001	0.58 (0.53, 0.63) < 0.0001	0.58 (0.54, 0.63) < 0.0001	0.59 (0.54, 0.64) < 0.0001
Q4	0.45 (0.40, 0.50) < 0.0001	0.45 (0.41, 0.50) < 0.0001	0.45 (0.41, 0.49) < 0.0001	0.45 (0.41, 0.49) < 0.0001
P for trend	< 0.0001	< 0.0001	< 0.0001	< 0.0001

Model a was a sensitivity analysis performed on never smoker participants (N = 11170). We adjusted gender, age, BMI, SBP, DBP, FPG, BUN, Scr, TG, LDL-c, ALT, AST, family history of diabetes, and drinking status
Model b was a sensitivity analysis performed on never drinker participants (N = 12028). We adjusted gender, age, BMI, SBP, DBP, FPG, BUN, Scr, TG, LDL-c, ALT, AST, family history of diabetes, and smoking status
Model c was sensitivity analysis in participants without adjusting smoking and drinking status (N = 15224). We adjusted gender, age, BMI, SBP, DBP, FPG, BUN, Scr, TG, LDL-c, ALT, AST, family history of diabetes
Model d was sensitivity analysis in participants without family history of diabetes (N = 14830). We adjusted gender, age, BMI, SBP, DBP, FPG, BUN, Scr,TG, LDL-c, ALT, AST, smoking and drinking status
HR Hazard ratios, CI confidence, Ref reference

ISSN: 1758-5996