Effect of glycemic control and glucose fluctuation on in-hospital adverse outcomes after on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes: a retrospective study

Table 2 Association of glycemic control levels with the composite endpoint in diabetic patients undergoing CABG with CPB

Glycemic control	Crude Odd Ratio	95% Confidence Interval	p-value	Model 1	95% confidence Interval	P-value	Model 2	95% confidence Interval	p-Value
The composite end point
Moderate control	References
Strict control	2.18	1.18–4.02	0.01	2.13	1.15–3.95	0.02	2.22	1.18–4.15	0.01
Liberal control	1.16	0.78–1.74	0.74	1.15	0.77–1.73	0.49	1.14	0.76–1.72	0.53
In-hospital mortality
Moderate control	References
Strict control	6.81	2.90–15.98	< 0.01	6.31	2.65–15.01	< 0.001	7.57	2.89–19.87	< 0.01
Liberal control	0.86	0.33–2.23	0.75	0.82	0.31–2.15	0.68	0.84	0.31–2.27	0.73
Major vascular complications
Moderate control	References
Strict control	1.88	0.98–3.60	0.06	1.89	0.99–3.59	0.05	1.95	1.01–3.77	0.049
Liberal control	1.20	0.80–1.80	0.38	1.20	0.80–1.81	0.37	1.77	0.77–1.77	0.46

Adjusted odds ratios for the relationships between glucose control and in-hospital mortality and major complications. The multivariable logistic regression regression model 1 for odds ratios included adjustments for age and gender. The multivariable logistic regression regression model 2 for odds ratios included adjustments for age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin, chronic renal failure, congestive heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, previous peripheral vascular disease

ISSN: 1758-5996