Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Glucose metabolism tests and recurrent pregnancy loss: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis

1st author

Year

Country

Study type

Participants (n)

Time interval

Mean age

Combinable outcomes

RPL definition

Quality

Craig [8]

2002

USA

Single center, case-controlled, prospective study

RPL (74), Control (74)

April 2000–January 2001

Case group: 32.7 ± 5.4/Control group: 32.8 ± 6.0/P = 0.92

FBS, FI, FG/FI, HOMA-IR > 4.5

2 or more

Good

Zolghadri [19]

2007

Iran

Prospective control clinical trial

RPL (164), Control (74)

August 2003–June 2005

 

Not combinable

3 or more

Fair

Kotanaie [20]

2012

Iran

Prospective case–control study

RPL (50), Control (50)

March 2007–March 2008

Case group: 28.02 ± 4.57/Control group: 28.28 ± 4.77/p = 0/5715

FBS, FI, FG/FI

3 or more

Fair

Diejomaoh [15]

2007

Kuwait

Cross-sectional study

RPL (35), Control (30)

October 2002–June 2004

study group: 28.6 ± 4.3/Control group: 27.5 ± 4.6

FBS, FI, HOMA-IR, HOMA-IR > 4.5, FG/FI

3 or more

Fair

Wang [18]

2011

China

Cross-sectional study

RPL (97), Control (52)

June 2008–September 2010

patient group: 30.81 ± 4.01/control group: 29.15 ± 4.62

FBS, FI, HOMA-IR > 4.5,

2 or more

Fair

Edugbe [16]

2020

Nigeria

Multicenter cross-sectional study

RPL (80), Control (80)

NR

Case: 28.09 ± 6.14/Control: 28.10 ± 6.21

FBS, FI, HOMA-IR, HOMA-IR > 4.5,

2 ore more

Good

Habets [17]

2022

Netherlands

Retrospective case–control study

Case group: 123 women with either a history of low-order RPL (2–3 pregnancy losses) (65 patients) or high-order RPL (≥ 4 pregnancy losses) (58 patients)/ Control group: 20 healthy women with a history of at least one previous uncomplicated pregnancy

2015–2019

Group of RPL = 2 + 3: 32.8[29.5–35.4]/Group of RPL ≥ 4: 33.7[30.4–36.5]/control: 32[29.5–38]/p = 0.390

FBS, FI

2 or more

Good

Ispasoiu [9]

2013

Romania

Single center, case–control study

65 patients in case group and 53 patients in control

2011–2012

Case: 30.12 (4.904)

Control: 29.36 (5.274)

FBS, FI, HOMA-IR

2 or more

Fair

Wani [21]

2017

Pakistan

Single center, case-controlled

Case: 75 Non pregnant with history of 2 or more recurrent pregnancy losses

Control: 75 non pregnant women with no RPL with at least one live birth

2014–2015

Case: 28.4 (2.37)

Control: 29.1(2.7)

FBS, FI, HOMA-IR, HOMA-IR > 4.5, FG/FI, FG/FI < 4.5

2 or more

Fair

  1. RPL recurrent pregnancy loss