Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of the weighted approach mediation analysis based on the counterfactual framework

From: Effect of income level on stroke incidence and the mediated effect of simultaneous diagnosis of metabolic syndrome diseases; a nationwide cohort study in South Korea

Income level

Model A

Model B

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

Mediation proportion (%)

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

Mediation proportion (%)

High income

Reference

 

Reference

 

Middle income: natural direct effect

1.14 (1.09–1.18)

 

1.13 (1.09–1.18)

 

Low income: natural direct effect

1.18 (1.13–1.22)

 

1.16 (1.11–1.21)

 

Medical Aid beneficiaries: natural direct effect

1.56 (1.48–1.64)

 

1.59 (1.51–1.67)

 

Middle income: natural indirect effect

1.02 (0.98–1.06)

 

1.02 (0.98–1.06)

 

Low income: natural indirect effect

1.03 (0.99–1.07)

 

1.04 (1.00–1.08)

 

Medical Aid beneficiaries: natural indirect effect

1.13 (1.08–1.18)

26.6

1.10 (1.05–1.15)

21.1

  1. Model A: for diagnosis of two or more Metabolic Syndrome diseases
  2. Model B: for diagnosis of three Metabolic Syndrome diseases
  3. Each model was adjusted for age, sex, residential area, Charlson Comorbidity Index, physical disability status, diagnosis of ischemic heart disease, and diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease (except stroke)
  4. HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval