Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics and mortality associated with NAFLD in lean individuals

From: NAFLD in normal weight individuals

Study

Country

Agea

BMI

ALT (U/L)a

AST (U/L)a

Metabolic profile and related characteristicsb

Mortality

F/Uc

European/North American

 Younossi et al. [26]

USA

41.9 ± 1.2

22.2 ± 0.16

18.0 ± 0.16

21.5 ± 0.16

Younger, female predominance, lower ALT, AST, HOMA score, platelet count, lower frequency of visceral obesity, insulin resistance, T2D, hypercholesteremia, and hypertension

–

–

 Margariti et al. [29]

Greece

44 ± 16

NA

92 (17–164)

45 (18–121)

Higher ALT and AST, less comorbidities, smaller waist circumference, lower liver stiffness measures

–

–

 Cruz et al. [142]

USA

NA

23.1 ± 1.7

NA

NA

Male predominance, non-Caucasian, lower ALT levels and HOMA, lower prevalence of T2D, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low-HDL-C, central obesity, and metabolic syndrome, lower degree of steatosis and less advanced fibrosis, more severe lobular inflammation

Higher overall mortality than non-lean NAFLD patients

11.1 ± 6.8

 Feldman et al. [28]

Austria

61 (12)d

23.6 (1.8)d

21.0 (14.0)d

22.0 (10.5)d

Waist circumference, ALT, GGT, TG, HDL-C, FPG, adiponectin levels, and HOMA-IR intermediate between lean healthy and NAFLD with obesity

–

–

 Fracanzani et al. [30]

Italy

46 ± 13

23 ± 2

64 ± 42

41 ± 27

Less prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, NASH, fibrosis of F2 or higher, carotid plaques and significantly thinner carotid intima-media

–

–

 Denkmayr et al. [31]

Austria

48.7 ± 14.8

23.1 ± 1.5

60.0 ± 36.4

43.0 ± 26.9

Less components of metabolic syndrome, higher rate of cirrhosis

–

–

 Bernhardt et al. [161]

Germany

NA

23.8 (23.0–24.7)

26.0 ± 7.1

26.4 ± 3.0

Higher serum ferritin, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, lower levels of soluble transferrin receptor, high HOMA-IR, TC, LDL-C, and TG, comparable to NAFLD patients with obesity

–

–

 Hagstrom et al. [36]

Sweden

51.4 ± 13.4

23.1 ± 2.7

72 ± 47

44 ± 25

Older, lower transaminase levels, lower stages of fibrosis, and lower prevalence of NASH at baseline; increased risk for severe liver disease

Similar overall mortality as non-lean NAFLD patients

19.9

 Golabi et al. [37]

USA

50.9 ± 1.3

NA

NA

NA

Older, more likely to be Hispanic, had lower income, and had reported poorer health and more comorbiditiese

Higher risk for all cause and CV mortality compared to lean controls

17.8

 Feldman et al. [162]

Austria

47.6 ± 14.5

23.0 ± 1.5

54.6 ± 35.5

47.6 ± 24.8

Higher likelihood of dying from liver-related causes compared NAFLD patients with overweight or obesity; higher proportion with cirrhosis; less features of metabolic syndrome

Similar overall mortality as NAFLD patients with obesity

8.4

 Ahmed et al. [27]

USA

51.5 ± 18.0

22.5 ± 2.0

NA

NA

Female predominance, higher proportion of Asian and African Americans, lower risk of metabolic comorbidities; same risk of cirrhosis and decompensation, malignancy, and cardiovascular events as non-lean NAFLD patients

Higher risk for all-cause mortality compared to NAFLD patients with obesity

6.4

 Younes et al. [33]

USA

45 (36, 55)d

29.8 (26.5, 34.5)d

59 (41, 88)d

38 (28, 54)d

Younger, male predominance, less steatosis, lobular inflammation, ballooning and advanced liver fibrosis

Same mortality risk as non-lean NAFLD patients

7.7

Middle Eastern

 Akyuz et al. [144]

Turkey

41.2 ± 11.8

23.6 ± 1.3

82 ± 46

49 ± 38

Younger, lower blood pressure, higher hemoglobin, lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome, and less severe hepatic fibrosis

–

–

 Lankarani et al. [145]

Iran

49.8 ± 13.9

NA

NA

NA

Lower waist circumference, TG levels, and prevalence of metabolic syndrome

–

–

South Asian

 Kumar et al. [147]

India

38 ± 15.4

21.3 ± 1.9

45 (11–217)

38 (23–180)

Similar metabolic profile as overweight group, but lower than obese group, lower prevalence of fibrosis in lean individuals, but similar prevalence of NASH

–

–

 Bhat et al. [148]

India

39.9 ± 7.4

21.7 ± 1.3

69.9 ± 29.8

NA

Lower HOMA-IR, similar levels of fasting and 2 h glucose and lipid levels

–

–

 Niriella et al. [108]

Sri Lanka

35.6 ± 6.4

NA

NA

NA

Male predominance, lower prevalence of hypertension and central obesity, similar prevalence of other metabolic comorbidities as non-lean group

–

–

 Choudhary et al. [152]

India

33.5 ± 10.4

21.3 ± 1.2

33.4 ± 11.7

26.6 ± 7.5

Younger age, lower ALT, TGs, fasting glucose, LDL-C, higher HDL-C than non-lean group

–

–

East Asian

 Kim et al. [14]

Korea

51.6 ± 9.7

23.4 ± 1.3

31.9 ± 19.0

23.5 ± 7.7

Male predominance, higher BMI, WC, WHR, uric acid, fasting blood glucose, insulin, ASP, ALT, HOMA-IR compared to lean controls; no differences in metabolic variables compared to overweight group

–

–

 Feng et al. [155]

China

48.2 ± 10.5

22.7 ± 1.1

21.6 ± 11.9

21.1 ± 9.3

Male predominance, higher BMI and blood pressure, and greater likelihood of having diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and hypertension compared to lean controls; lower levels of blood glucose, blood pressure, hyperlipidemia, IR, blood cell count and HGB than non-lean NAFLD patients

–

–

 Fukuda [156]

Japan

42.6 ± 7.6

21.8 ± 0.9

25 (19, 36)

19 (15, 23)

Male predominance, higher incidence of T2D, ALT, AST, HbA1c, FPG, and TG compared to overweight group without NAFLD and lean control group

–

12.8

 Wang et al. [157]

China

43 (32–58)

21.6 (20.2–22.8)

16.1 ± 12.3

20.3 ± 8.0

Male predominance

–

–

 Yoshitaka et al. [158]

Japan

50.0 ± 7.9

22.0 ± 0.7

30.2 ± 15.9

21.1 ± 6.1

Higher blood pressure, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, uric acid, ALT, AST, and GGT, lower HDL-C, higher risk of incident CVD relative to lean controls

–

–

 Shao et al. [159]

China

44.7 ± 11.9

21.6 ± 1.2

24 (19, 35)

25 (20, 32)

Lower WC, WHR, blood pressure, ALT, AST, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, atherosclerosis index, liver fat content, and liver stiffness compared to nonlean group with NAFLD

  

 Wang [160]

Japan

45.6 ± 8.3

21.7 ± 1.1

16.2 ± 11.5

17.2 ± 8.4

Male predominance, older age, higher BMI, WC, smoking status, FPG, HbA1c, TG, blood pressure, hepatic transaminases, and risk of incident T2D, and lower HDL-C compared to lean control group

  

Meta-analyses

 Sookoian and Pirola [34]

Multi

NA

NA

NA

NA

Lower fibrosis score, less risk for NASH, and lower NAFLD activity compared to NAFLD patients with obesity

–

–

  1. BMI: < 25 kg/m2 for non-Asians; < 23 kg/m2 for Asians
  2. NA information not available
  3. aMean (standard deviation) unless indicated otherwise
  4. bCompared to NAFLD patients with obesity, unless noted otherwise
  5. cAverage follow-up in years
  6. dMedian (interquartile rang [IQR])
  7. eCompared to lean non-NAFLD controls