Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of meta-analysis using different genetic models

From: Association of HNF1A gene variants and haplotypes with metabolic syndrome: a case–control study in the Tunisian population and a meta-analysis

SNP

Genetic model

Fixed effects model

Random effects model

Heterogeneity

OR (95% CI)

p-value

OR (95% CI)

p-value

P-value

I2 (%)

rs1169288

AC vs AA

1.27 (0.91–1.79)

0.15

1.42 (0.68–2.95)

0.33

0.047

74.47

A > C

CC vs AA

1.14 (0.68–1.90)

0.61

1.36 (0.46–3.99)

0.57

0.058

72.16

 

AC + CC vs AA

1.26 (0.91–1.73)

0.14

1.43 (0.64–3.20)

0.37

0.018

81.88

 

CC vs AC + AA

1.01 (0.19–0.63)

0.94

1.12 (0.52–2.41)

0.76

0.149

51.76

rs2464196

GA vs GG

1.21 (0.85–1.71)

0.28

1.28 (0.75–2.18)

0.35

0.164

48.13

G > A

AA vs GG

1.19 (0.75–1.88)

0.44

1.39 (0.42–4.55)

0.57

0.013

83.45

 

GA + AA vs GG

1.19 (0.86–1.66)

0.28

1.35 (0.65–2.82)

0.41

0.042

75.65

 

AA vs GA + GG

1.07 (0.71–1.61)

0.73

1.16 (0.49–2.78)

0.72

0.039

76.52

rs735396

TC vs TT

0.84 (0.58–1.21)

0.35

0.82 (0.52–1.28)

0.39

0.234

29.18

T > C

CC vs TT

0.81 (0.53–1.24)

0.34

0.81 (0.53–1.24)

0.34

0.958

0

 

TC + CC vs TT

0.83 (0.59–1.63)

0.28

0.83 (0.59–1.16)

0.28

0.389

0

 

CC vs TC + TT

0.89 (0.61–1.67)

0.53

0.89 (0.61–1.27)

0.53

0.548

0

  1. OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval