Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparisons of lipid profiles of the participants between and within the groups

From: Curcumin and zinc co-supplementation along with a loss-weight diet can improve lipid profiles in subjects with prediabetes: a multi-arm, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial

Variables

Groups

p-value

Adjusted

p-value*

Placebo

(N = 20)

Curcumin

(N = 21)

Zinc

(N = 21)

Zinc and curcumin

(N = 20)

Triglyceride (mg/dl)

 Pre-intervention

132.55 ± 25.96

131.48 ± 26.16

125.76 ± 25.74

126.1 ± 27.64

0.776

 Post-intervention

123.1 ± 18.6

107.48 ± 11.9

114.52 ± 16.93

111.6 ± 18.01

0.026

0.286

 P-value

0.001

 < 0.001

0.001

 < 0.001

 Change ▓

− 9.45 ± 10.51

− 24.0 ± 18.97 b

− 11.24 ± 13.821

− 14.50 ± 12.094

0.007

0.001

Total cholesterol (mg/dl)

 Pre-intervention

186.5 ± 24.91

188.95 ± 23.5

182.52 ± 26.11

181.35 ± 19.98

0.716

 Post-intervention

184.25 ± 24.4

175.71 ± 17.01

172.67 ± 21.34

170.95 ± 13.45

0.146

0.583

 P-value

0.103

 < 0.001

0.001

 < 0.001

 Change

− 2.25 ± 5.87

− 13.24 ± 11.52

− 9.86 ± 10.94

− 10.40 ± 9.98

0.005

0.15

LDL (mg/dl)

 Pre-intervention

111.74 ± 22.29

114.63 ± 20.22

110.81 ± 28.22

110.87 ± 20.53

0.944

 Post-intervention

109.48 ± 22.77

97.74 ± 18.9

94.86 ± 23.78

92.93 ± 15.65

0.057

0.378

 P-value

0.155

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 Change▓

− 2.26 ± 6.83

− 16.89 ± 11.68b

− 15.96 ± 14.82a

− 17.93 ± 10.06a

 < 0.001

0.035

HDL (mg/dl)

 Pre-intervention

48.25 ± 5.58

47 ± 6.39

47.14 ± 6.77

46 ± 6.37

0.734

 Post-intervention

50.15 ± 5.34

56.47 ± 6.14b

54.9 ± 6.8a

55.7 ± 6.3a

0.007

0.016

 P-value

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 Change▓

1.90 ± 1.41

9.48 ± 4.14c

7.76 ± 6.40c

9.70 ± 3.23 c

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Non-HDL (mg/dl)

 Pre-intervention

138.25 ± 26.47

141.95 ± 24.91

135.38 ± 26.47

135.35 ± 21.81

0.834

 Post-intervention

134.1 ± 26.47

119.24 ± 24.91

117.76 ± 31.79

115.25 ± 21.81

0.036

0.34

 P-value

0.009

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 Change▓

− 4.15 ± 6.42

− 22.71 ± 13.27c

− 17.62 ± 15.14a

− 20.10 ± 10.27a

 < 0.001

0.003

HDL to LDL ratio

 Pre-intervention

0.45 ± 0.13

0.42 ± 0.11

0.47 ± 0.21

0.43 ± 0.11

0.712

0.192

 Post-intervention

0.48 ± 0.14

0.6 ± 0.14

0.63 ± 0.23

0.62 ± 0.15

0.025

0.132

 P-value

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 Change▓

− 0.03 ± 0.04

− 0.18 ± 0.1c

− 0.16 ± 0.15b

− 0.19 ± 0.08c

 < 0.001

0.002

  1. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation
  2. HDL high‐density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL low-density lipoprotein, Non-HDL non-high‐density lipoprotein
  3. ▓The changes (pre-post intervention) calculated based on the difference of variables from the baseline (pre- intervention) to the end (post intervention) of the study
  4. P < 0.05 was considered significant difference
  5. P-value was calculated for the comparison variables within group using paired t-test
  6. P-value was calculated for the comparison variables between four groups using one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) with post hoc (LSD) analysis
  7. *Adjusted P-value was calculated using ANCOVA; Adjusted for PA levels at the baseline, changes in BMI and weight
  8. Significant changes with placebo group indicated by aadjusted p < 0.05, badjusted p ≤ 0.01, cadjusted p ≤ 0.001