Skip to main content

Table 3 Medication adherence and HAPA constructs among patients with type 2 diabetes before and after the intervention

From: The effectiveness of an intervention designed based on health action process approach on diet and medication adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

Variable

Group

Baseline mean  ±  SD

1-month follow-up

Mean  ±  SD

6-month follow-up

mean  ±  SD

p valuea

Medication adherence

Intervention

34.1 ± 20.6

80.5 ± 8.4

89.1 ± 6.8

p  < 0.001

Control

37.3 ± 18.5

42.2 ± 15.8

41.5 ± 13.5

Intention

Intervention

72.7 ± 16

83.9 ± 11.5

95.4 ± 6.9

p  < 0.001

Control

76.8 ± 15.7

76.8 ± 15.5

76.3 ± 15.4

Task self-efficacy

Intervention

55.3 ± 26.4

76.7 ± 17.2

86.9 ± 11.7

p  < 0.001

Control

56.8 ± 23.9

58.3 ± 23.1

59.1 ± 22.5

Coping self-efficacy

Intervention

56.2 ± 28.9

79.1 ± 19.4

88.8 ± 12.1

p  < 0.001

Control

55.7 ± 24.8

58 ± 23.6

58.3 ± 23.1

Recovery self-efficacy

Intervention

48.3 ± 30.2

65.6 ± 20.8

73.5 ± 19.1

p < 0.001

Control

46.5 ± 30.8

46.4 ± 30.7

45.3 ± 30.6

Action planning

Intervention

46.2 ± 28.7

70.8 ± 19.1

80 ± 16.7

p  < 0.001

Control

46.9 ± 29.4

46.8 ± 29.4

44.8 ± 29.2

Coping planning

Intervention

53.9 ± 27.9

79.8 ± 16.3

87.5 ± 10.9

p  < 0.001

Control

53.9 ± 26

56.9 ± 23.8

56.3 ± 23.1

Barriers to medication adherence

Intervention

70.5 ± 19.1

52.3 ± 17.6

41.4 ± 16.2

p  < 0.001

Control

67.8 ± 16.5

68.5 ± 16.1

68.6 ± 15.5

Benefits of medication adherence

Intervention

60 ± 20.9

72.6 ± 16.4

79.8 ± 15.1

p  < 0.001

Control

60.8 ± 17.8

62.5 ± 16.5

60.1 ± 16.1

Social support

Intervention

33.1 ± 16

46.8 ± 15.5

52.9 ± 14.2

p  < 0.001

Control

34.4 ± 15.4

35.4 ± 14.9

35.2 ± 14.9

  1. SD standard deviation
  2. aInteraction analysis of time and groups within a linear mixed model