Skip to main content

Table 2 The baseline information of studies included for assessment of association between SNP + 276 (rs1501299) and risk of type 2 diabetes

From: Adiponectin gene polymorphisms and risk of type 2 diabetes: an updated evidence for meta-analysis

Author's name

Country

Study design

Sex ratio of case (M/F)

Genotyping

method

Ethnicity

Target population

Sample size (Diabetes)

Sample size (Control)

Case

  

Control

  

P-value for HWE

NOS score

          

TT

GT

GG

TT

GT

GG

 

Hara et al. [18]

Japan

Case–control

267/117

SNaPshot ddNTP

Asian

Japanese

384

480

18

142

224

41

203

236

0.08

8

Menzaghi et al. [40]

Italy

Case–control

167/143

PCR-hydridization

Caucasian

Italian Caucasian

310

304

28

124

158

27

117

160

0.7

8

Populaire et al. [39]

Japan

Case–control

82/82

PCR–RFLP

Asian

Japanese

164

177

22

55

87

18

80

79

0.12

9

Gu et al. [20]

Sweden

Case–control

56/50

DASH

Caucasian

Swedish Caucasians

106

497

101

46

50

42

206

249

0.004

8

Fumeron et al. [41]

France

Cohort

150/79

fluorogenic

Caucasian

French Caucasian

229

3072

15

64

97

305

1773

2419

0.67

7

Hu et al. [21]

USA

Nested Case–control

642F

TaqMan

Caucasian

Caucasians

642

995

54

266

322

73

399

523

0.07

9

Gibson et al. [22]

UK

Case–control

390/422

Ampli-Fluor

Caucasian

French Caucasian

701

893

51

276

374

75

368

450

0.0003

7

de Courten et al. [42]

USA

Cohort

496/584

PCR–RFLP

Indian

Pima Indians

1080

1080

26

200

371

24

133

249

1.2

7

Lee et al. [43]

Korea

Case–control

237/256

SNaPshot ddNTP

Korean

Korean population

493

427

38

231

224

35

167

225

0.26

6

Sanchez et al. [44]

Finland

Cross-sectional

356/391

PCR-SnaPshot

Spanish

Spanish

747

747

5

35

24

39

231

260

1.61

6

Vasseur et al. [23]

France

Case–control

115/329

LightCycler technology

Caucasians

French Caucasians

444

535

23

89

97

23

93

132

0.34

8

Tso et al. [24]

Hong Kong

Cohort

76/82

PCR–RFLP

Chinese

Chinese

137

125

17

59

82

15

40

49

2

7

Gable et al. [26]

UK

Cohort

169 M

TaqMan

Caucasians

European Caucasian

169

2767

10

59

87

175

1015

1470

0.92

6

Yang et al. [45]

China

Case–control

75/137

SEQUENOM genotyping system

Chinese

Chinese

637

801

42

206

191

661

408

499

2.04

8

Hivert et al. [29]

USA

Cohort

515/580

Mass spectroscopy

White

White

282

1448

15

61

100

111

641

864

0.28

7

Magdalena et al. [46]

Poland

Case–control

217/278

PCR–RFLP

Caucasian

Polish Caucasian

495

435

11

131

353

11

150

274

0.024

9

Mohammadzadeh et al. [47]

Iran

Case–control

26/24

PCR–RFLP

Iranian

Iranian

50

52

2

19

29

4

21

27

0.41

8

Wang et al. [32]

China

Case–control

394/591

TaqMan

Han

Han Chinese

985

1050

66

397

451

72

398

496

0.41

7

Chiodini et al. [33]

Italy

Cohort

285/218

TaqMan

Italians

Italians

503

503

52

206

245

66

198

239

0.02

9

Alimi et al. [11]

Iran

Case–control

57/43

Tetra ARMS-PCR

Iranian

Iranian

100

110

8

45

47

8

44

58

0.3

6