Skip to main content

Table 2 changes in clinical and paraclinical tests

From: The effect of crocin supplementation on glycemic control, insulin resistance and active AMPK levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study

Variables

Group

Before

After

Mean changes (95% CIs)

P valuea

P valueb

SBP (mmHg)

Crocin

133.86 ± 12.83

123.06 ± 17.12

− 10.8 (− 16.79, − 4.58)

0.002

0.092

Control

128.27 ± 18.49

126.06 ± 19.64

− 2.2 (− 6.21, 1.47)

0.298

DBP (mmHg)

Crocin

79.92 ± 8.22

77.2 1± 10.55

− 2.7 (− 6.59, 1.52)

0.149

0.750

Control

78.95 ± 14.64

77.25 ± 12.44

− 1.7 (− 6.97, 3.19)

0.758

FBS (mg/dL)

Crocin

148.73 ± 30.07

129.26 ± 29.31

− 19.47 (− 30.23, − 8.32)

0.002

0.015

Control

157.18 ± 63.29

160.18 ± 57.34

3 (− 22.19, 23.55)

0.249

Insulin (mU/L)

Crocin

17.27 ± 7.14

13.51 ± 4.62

− 3.75 (− 6.16, − 1.33)

0.021

0.046

Control

14.95 ± 5.52

15.2 5± 5.04

0.29 (− 1.28, 2.29)

0.931

QUICKI

Crocin

0.12 ± 0.008

0.13 ± 0.007

0.006 (0.003, 0.009)

0.001

0.001

Control

0.13 ± 0.007

0.13 ± 0.007

− 0.0009 (− 0.003, 0.001)

0.433

HOMA−IR

Crocin

6.33 ± 2.85

4.34 ± 1.95

− 1.99 (−2.95, −1.07)

0.001

0.001

Control

5.74 ± 2.85

5.86 ± 2.43

0.11 (− 0.64, 0.85)

0.858

HOMA−β

Crocin

81.75 ± 42.49

92.99 ± 70.92

11.24 (− 13.98, 39)

0.330

0.930

Control

81.67 ± 60.54

88.45 ± 91.08

6.77 (− 12.07, 27.63)

0.910

HbA1c

Crocin

7.80 ± 1..29

7.36 ± 1.47

− 0.44 (− 0.90, − 0.02)

0.071

0.045

Control

7.61 ± 1.62

7.86 ± 1.75

0.25 (− 0.22, 0.71)

0.303

pAMPK (pg/mg protein)

Crocin

34.55 ± 53.52

18.20 ± 7.69

− 16.34 (− 40.64, 0.56)

0.378

0.433

Control

27.72 ± 20.57

20.14 ± 10.81

− 7.57 (− 18.5, 1.74)

0.131

  1. SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, FBS fasting blood sugar, QUICKI quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance, HOMA-β homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function, HbA1c hemoglobin A1c, pAMPK phospho-adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase
  2. aBased on paired t test for within group comparison
  3. bBased on ANCOVA model that regressed changes from baseline on treatment group, baseline value of the outcome and height