Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies which assessed diagnostic value of high neck circumference to predict cardiometabolic risk factors

From: Neck circumference and its association with cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Type of study

Country

Target population

Sam pie size

Sex ratio (M/F)

Age year

Outco me

Diagnostic criteria

Cut-off values for high NC

Age-sex group

SE % (95% CI)

SP % (95% CI)

AUC (95% CI)

Silva, et al [15]

Cross-sectional

Brazil

Healthy

388

169/219

10–19

Insulin resistance

H0MA1-IR ≥ 3.87 and HOMA1-IR ≤4.19 for females.

H0MA1-IR ≥ 3.85 and HOMA1-IR  ≥ 3.77 for males

Prepubertal females:  > 32.0 cm

Prepubertal females

76.92 (46.2-94.7)

77.50 (61.5–89.1)

0.84 (0.72–0.97)

Pubertal females:  > 34.1 cm

Pubertal females

56.41 (39.6–72.2)

84.75 (77.0–90.7)

0.76 (0.68–0.85)

Prepubertal males:  > 30.3 cm

Prepubertal males

100.00 (78.0–100.0)

42.55 (28.3–57.8)

0.72 (0.58–0.86)

Pubertal males:  > 34.8 cm

Pubertal males

92.00 (73.9–98.8)

57.33 (45.4–68.7)

0.81 (0.71–0.91)

Goncalves et al. [12]

Cross sectional

Brazil

Healthy

260

129/131

10–14

BP

High BP:  > 95th percentile

Total:30.2 cm, Male: 30.5 cm. Female: 29.9 cm

Total

80.0

78.4

0.807 (0.754–0.854)

Female

100.0

69.5

0.908 (0.844–0.951)

Male

85.7

71.3

0.747 (0.663–0.819)

TG

Triglycerides  ≥ 100 mg/dL

Male

54.6

86.4

0.70 (0.613–0.777)

HDL-C

HDL-C  < 45 mg/dL

Both sexes

61.9

59.3

0.616 (0.554–0.676)

Female

64.5

64.0

0.645 (0.557–0.727)

Insulin resistance

Fasting insulin  ≥ 15 uU/mL

Both sexes

72.7

57.3

0.703 (0.643–0.757)

Female

95.7

36.1

0.659 (0.571–0.739); p < 0.05

Male

100.0

74.0

0.902 (0.837–0.947); p < 0.001

Diabet es

Fasting glucose  ≥ 100 mg/dL

Total

080.0

67.5

0.682 (0.621–0.738); p < 0.001

Female

100.0

75.8

0.827 (0.751–0.887); p < 0.001

Excess body fat

Body fat 15–25% for females and 10–20% for males

Total

64.0

65.1

67.6 (0.615–0.733); p < 0.001

Female

67.6

66.7

0.711 (0.625–0.786); p < 0.001

Male

75.0

60.7

0.728 (0.643–0.803); p < 0.001

Torriani et al. [37]

Cross-sectiona

USA

Subjects with treated malignancies

303

152/151

18–91

MetS

NCEP Adult Treatment Panel III

43.6 cm in men and 38.6 cm in women

Male

74 (60, 85)

80 (66, 90)

0.79 (0.70, 0.86)

Female

74 (60, 85)

91 (80, 97)

0.85 (0.76, 0.91)

Formisano et al. [23]

Cross-sectiona

Italy, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Spain and Sweden

Healthy

15673

7962/7711

3–10

CMetS

The components used to calculate cMetS score were the same risk factors used in the adult MetS definition. cMetS score > 90th percentile was considered unfavorable

Male 26.25

Male 3–4 years

47.5

89.5

0.713 (0.622–0.804)

26.60

4–5 years

58.5

86.4

0.805 (0.740–0.871)

27.10

5–6 years

82.0

78.6

0.874 (0.820–0.928)

27.60

6–7 years

83.2

79.9

0.895 (0.856–0.934)

28.30

7–8 years

79.6

80.3

0.885 (0.848–0.922)

28.65

8–9 years

88.1

78.0

0.907 (0.872–0.942)

30.90

9–10 years

71.4

88.1

0.881 (0.772–0.991)

Female 24.95

Female 3–4 years

63.6

78.6

0.741 (0.662–0.820)

25.15

4–5 years

81.4

74.4

0.823 (0.764–0.883)

26.15

5–6 years

75.0

81.0

0.839 (0.772–0.906)

26.45

6–7 years

94.7

73.8

0.921 (0.884–0.958)

27.10

7–8 years

88.6

76.3

0.897 (0.862–0.933)

27.80

8–9 years

93.6

79.0

0.924 (0.898–0.950)

29.65

9–10 years

1.00

95.0

0.984 (0.955–1.000)

Pillai et al. [27]

Prospective observational cross-sectional

India

Women with PCOS

121

0/121

12–41

MetS

MetS by IDF

33.35

Female

60.3

70.7

0.7 (0.604–0.794)

MetS by ATP III

33.87

Female

73

69

0.722 (0.631–0.816)

Yan et al. [9]

Cross-sectional

China

Healthy

2092

971/1121

 > 65

MetS

The 2004 CDS criteria

38 cm in men and

Male

80

55

0.76

35 cm in women

Female

75

67

0.73

Obesity

BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2

38 cm in men and 35 cm in women

Male

87

62

NR

Female

80

74

Kurtoglu et al. [24]

Case–control

Turkey

Healthy

581

259/322

5–18

MetS

IDF criteria

36 cm in boys and 35 cm in girls

Male

61.9

85.6

0.766 (0.689–0.882)

Female

60.4

78.15

0.749 (0.683–0.808)

Cizza et al. [38]

Cross-sectional

USA

Obese

120

28/92

18–50

MetS

IDF criteria

NO 38 cm

Female

0.54

0.70

0.63

de LucenaFerretti et al. [20]

Cross-sectional

Brazil

Healthy

1667

751/916

10–17

Overw eight

WHO criteria

 > 34.25 in boys a nd  > 31.25 ingirls

Male

53.3

72.8

0.690 (0.649–0.730)

Female

61.2

83.0

0.775 (0.741–0.809)

Obesity

 > 37.95 in boys and  > 32.65 ingirls

Male

34.2

94.5

0.712 (0.654–0.770)

Female

63.8

90.9

0.815 (0.754–0.877)

Yang et al. [10]

Cross-sectional

China

Type 2 diabetic patient

3182

1294/1888

20–80

MetS

Chinese Diabetes Society criteria

NC 39 cm for men and 35 cm for women

Male

42.8

83.8

0.67 (0.63–0.70); p < 0.001

Female

60.0

66.5

0.66 (0.63–0.70); p < 0.001

Central obesity

WC ≥  85 cm for men and  ≥ 80 cm for women

NC 37 cm for men and 35 cm for women

Male

65.1

73.6

0.77 (0.72–0.82); p < 0.001

Female

64.0

75.9

0.75 (0.72–.078); p < 0.001

Overweight

BMI  ≥ 24 kg/m2

NC 38 cm for men and 35 cm for women

Male

Female

62.0 68.8

74.2 65.4

0.72 (0.69–0.75); p < 0.001

0.73 (0.70–0.75); p < 0.001

Zepeda et al. [39]

Cross-sectional

USA

Healthy

1058

561/497

6–18

High BP

Systolic and/or diastolic BP

 ≥ 95th percentile for age, sex and height

NC > 90,th

Male

Female

NR

NR

0.75 (0.70–0.81)

0.72 (0.63–0.75)

Katz et al. [40]

Cross-sectional

Canada

Healthy

1913

977/936

6–17

Overweight/obesity

BMI > 85th percentile CDC

NC > 50th percentile

Boys: 25.3–35.5 cm Girls: 24.8–30.5 cm

Total

0.970

0.500

0.884

Lou et al. [41]

Cross-sectional

China

Healthy

2847

1475/1372

7–12

Overweight/obesity

BMI ≥ 85th

Boys: 27.4–31.3 cm Girls: 26.3–31.4 cm

Male

Female

Total

0.803

0.847

NR

0.846 0.819

0.843 0.845

Selvan et al. [13]

Cross-sectional

India

Healthy

451

258/193

30–80

MetS

NCEPATP III

 > 34.9 cm for men

 > 31.25 cm for women

Male

Female

78.6

72.3

59.3

64.4

0.753 (0.694–0.813)

0.768 (0.687–0.849

Type 2 DM

NR

Male

Female

NR

NR

0.453 (0.382–0.5324)

0.439 (0.357–0.520)

Hypertension

NR

Male

Female

NR

NR

0.535 (0.465–0.606)

0.501 (0.416–0.586)

High TG

NR

Male

Female

NR

NR

0.670 (0.600–0.739)

0.546 (0.463–0.629)

Low HDL

NR

Male

Female

NR

NR

0.611 (0.537–0.685)

0.622 (0.537–0.707)

Hatipoglu et al. [25]

Case–control

Turkey

Overweight/obese children and healthy ones as control

967

475/492

6–18

Overweight and obesity

BMI ≥ 85th percentile of the BMI reference curve according to local references

Boys: pre-pubertal 29.0 and pubertal 32.5 cm

Girls: pre-pubertal 28.0 and pubertal 31.0 cm

Prepubertal male

86.36 (78.5–92.2)

82.58 (75.0–88.6)

0.889 (0.843–0.926)

Pubertal male

80.85 (71.4–88.2)

76.26 (68.3–83.1)

0.877 (0.828–0.916)

Prepubertal female

78.95 (68.1–87.5)

85.15 (76.7–91.4)

0.884 (0.828–0.927)

Pubertal female

83.33 (75.9–89.2)

81.42 (75.0–86.8)

0.896 (0.857–0.928)

Atwa et al. [42]

Cross-sectional

Egypt

Healthy

2762

1327/1435

12–15

Overweight/obesity

BMI > 85th CDC

Men: 29.3–32.3 cm Women:28.6–30.8 cm

Male

Female

Total

0.927

0.928

0.928

0.806

0.670

0.736

NR

Luo et al. [11]

Cross-sectional

China

Healthy

1943

783/1160

58 ±7

MetS

 ≥ 2 metabolic disorders

But without abdominal obesity

NC > 38.5 cm for men

NC > 34.5 cm for women

Male

Female

50.53 (45.93–55.12)

48.95 (44.37–53.54)

67.74 (62.23–72.92)

74.85 (71.43–78.07)

NR

Abdominal obesity

Visceral fatarea of ≥ 80 cm2

Male

Female

56.1

58.1

83.5

82.5

0.781

0.777

Diabetes

FPG ≥ 6.10 mmol/Land (or) a 2hPG  ≥ 7.80 mmol/L/L, and (or) previously diagnosed diabetes

Male

Female

46.33 (41.33–51.38)

43.64 (39.12–48.25)

59.79 (54.73–64.71)

71.08 (67.53–74.44)

NR

High BP

SBP ≥ 130 mmHg, and (or) DBP ≥ 85 mmHg, and (or) previously diagnosed hypertension serum TG > 1.70 mmol/L

Male

Female

48.88 (44.58–53.20)

42.94 (39.17–46.78)

68.98 (62.78–

74.71)

76.18 (72.14–79.90)

NR

High TG

Serum TG ≥ 1.70 mmol/L

Male

Female

52.82 (47.01–58.58)

50.73 (45.29–56.16)

62.66 (58.17–66.99)

71.67 (68.45–74.74)

NR

Low HDL-C

Serum HDL-C less than 1.04 mmol/L

Male

Female

51.45 (44.95–57.92)

58.56 (48.82–67.83)

60.33 (56.07–64.48)

67.59 (64.66–70.42)

 

Khalangot et al. [14]

Cross-sectional

Ukraine

Healthy (not registered as T2D patients)

196

46/150

 > 44

DM

HbAlc ≥ 6.5%

NO 36.5 cm for women and  >  38.5 cm for men

Female

72.2 (46.5–90.3)

62.3 (53.4–70.7)

0.690 (0.815–0.564)

Male

100 (54.1–100)

38.5 (23.4–55.4)

0.774 (0.682–0.866)

Kumar et al. [26]

Cross-sectional

India

Patients who attended medicine clinic in a tertiary care KMC hospital

431

250/181

Males  >  35 and female s > 40

MetS

ATP 111

Total: 36.5cms

Female: 34

Male: 37

Total

50.0

76.0

70

Female

82

32

NR

Male

68

32

NR

Gomez-Arbelaez et al. [16]

Cross-sectional

Colombia

Healthy

669

351/318

8–14

MetS

Modified NHANES

29 cm in boys and 28.5 cm in girls

Male

100

45.37

0.74 (0.68–0.78)

Female

87.50

53.61

0.73 (0.68 –0.78)

Insulin resistance

HOMA-IR22.6

30 cm in males and 29 cm in females

Male

52.54

61.19

0.54 (0.49–0.59)

Female

50.00

62.35

0.57 (0.51–0.62)

  1. NC neck circumference, HOMA homeostatic model assessment, IR insulin resistance, HOMA-IR Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance, HDL-C high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, NCEP National Cholesterol Education Program criteria, cMetS continuous metabolic syndrome, CDS Chinese Diabetes Society, CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, IDF International Diabetes Federation, MetS metabolic syndrome, BMI body mass index ,WHO World Health Organization, VFA visceral fat area, DM diabetes mellitus, FBS fasting blood glucose, HbAlc hemoglobin Ale, TG triglycerides, LDL low density lipoprotein, TC total cholesterol, WC waist circumference, BP blood pressure, NR not reported