Skip to main content

Table 2 Cut-off points for waist circumference (WC) in the definition of metabolic syndrome as recommended by the Joint Interim Statement criteria (not including WC)

From: Optimal cut-off points for waist circumference in the definition of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults: baseline analyses of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil)

WC

Sens. %

Spec.%

PPV %

NPV %

Youden

Prevalence MetSc (%)

Odds ratiod

Value

95% CI

Men

 90a

77.9

53.3

74.9

57.4

0.3119

54.1

1.26

1.22–1.30

 91

74.8

57.6

76.0

56.0

0.3241

52.9

1.38

1.32–1.44

 92

71.2

61.2

76.7

54.3

0.3245

51.5

1.50

1.42–1.59

 93

67.7

64.5

77.4

52.7

0.3220

50.1

1.64

1.53–1.76

 94b

63.9

67.2

77.7

50.9

0.3110

48.6

1.78

1.64–1.93

 95

59.7

70.8

78.5

49.5

0.3048

47.0

1.93

1.76–2.12

 96

56.0

73.6

79.1

48.3

0.2954

45.7

2.09

1.88–2.32

 97

52.2

76.6

80.0

47.2

0.2884

44.3

2.25

2.01–2.52

 98

48.4

80.0

81.2

46.4

0.2836

43.0

2.42

2.14–2.73

 99

44.8

82.8

82.3

45.5

0.2755

41.8

2.59

2.27–2.94

 100

40.9

85.0

83.0

44.5

0.2593

40.4

2.76

2.41–3.15

 101

37.9

86.5

83.4

43.8

0.2444

39.6

2.93

2.56–3.35

 102

34.3

88.1

83.8

42.8

0.2244

38.4

3.10

2.71–3.55

Women

 80ab

87.4

41.9

55.3

80.2

0.2932

40.5

1.11

1.09–1.12

 81

84.8

46.4

56.5

78.8

0.3122

39.8

1.22

1.19–1.25

 82

82.4

50.3

57.6

77.6

0.3265

39.0

1.34

1.30–1.39

 83

79.4

53.9

58.6

76.0

0.3322

38.1

1.48

1.42–1.54

 84

77.2

57.6

59.9

75.5

0.3478

37.6

1.62

1.55–1.70

 85

74.3

61.4

61.3

74.4

0.3574

36.6

1.77

1.68–1.87

 86

70.8

65.1

62.5

73.0

0.3589

35.6

1.93

1.83–2.05

 87

67.5

68.2

63.5

71.8

0.3566

34.7

2.10

1.98–2.24

 88

64.1

71.1

64.5

70.6

0.3513

33.7

2.28

2.14–2.44

 89

60.5

73.6

65.4

69.4

0.3419

32.6

2.47

2.30–2.66

 90

57.1

76.2

66.4

68.4

0.3333

31.6

2.67

2.47–2.89

  1. Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil), 2008–2010
  2. WC waist circumference, Sens. sensitivity, Spec. specificity, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, MetS metabolic syndrome, 95% CI 95% confidence interval
  3. a Cut-off suggested by the Joint Interim Statement (JIS) for Central and South Americans ethnic groups
  4. b Cut-off suggested by the JIS for white Caucasians/Europids or black Sub-Saharan African origin
  5. c Prevalence in the overall sex-specific sample
  6. d Relative odds of the metabolic syndrome being present above the cut-off point, reference strata being the lowest 25% of WCs