Skip to main content

Table 3 Adjusted prevalence of self-reported diabetes in 2006 and 2014 and trends over this time span overall and in specific strata

From: Trends in the prevalence of self-reported diabetes in Brazilian capital cities and the Federal District, 2006–2014

Strata

2006

2014

Annual increase

% (95 % CI)

% (95 % CI)

%

(95 % CI)

P

R2

Total

5.7 (5.3–6.0)

8.0 (7.6–8.5)

0.25

0.13–0.37

0.002

0.77

Sex

 Men

5.3 (4.6–5.8)

7.8 (7.0–8.6)

0.28

0.21–0.35

<0.001

0.93

 Women

6.0 (5.5–6.5)

8.2 (7.6–8.8)

0.23

0.07–0.39

0.012

0.62

Age

 18–24

1.4 (0.7–2.0)

1.2 (0.5–2.0)

0.02

−0.09 to 0.14

0.708

0.02

 25–34

1.4 (0.8–2.0)

1.8 (1.2–2.4)

0.02

−0.12 to 0.16

0.728

0.02

 35–44

2.9 (2.3–3.4)

3.8 (2.8–4.7)

0.11

0.06–0.16

0.002

0.77

 45–54

6.4 (5.4–7.3)

10.5 (9.1–11.9)

0.33

0.07–0.59

0.020

0.56

 55–64

13.4 (11.6–15.2)

16.1 (14.3–17.9)

0.32

0.23–0.62

0.038

0.48

 ≥65

16.1 (14.3–17.8)

21.3 (19.3–23.3)

0.52

0.28–0.76

0.001

0.79

Educational attainment (years)

 ≥12

4.1 (3.3–4.8)

5.4 (4.6–6.2)

0.16

0.02–0.31

0.033

0.50

 9–11

4.6 (4.1–5.3)

7.1 (6.4–7.9)

0.26

0.08–0.43

0.010

0.63

 0–8

6.4 (5.8–7.0)

9.4 (8.6–10.2)

0.33

0.19–0.47

0.001

0.81

BMI category

 <25 kg/m2

4.1 (3.7–4.5)

6.3 (5.6–6.9)

0.16

0.03–0.29

0.056

0.53

 25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2

6.0 (5.4–6.7)

7.9 (7.0–8.7)

0.24

0.12–0.37

0.003

0.75

 ≥30 kg/m2

9.6 (8.2–11.1)

11.8 (10.6–13.0)

0.25

0.02–0.53

0.063

0.41

  1. Vigitel, Brazilian capital cities and the Federal District
  2. Adjusted through multiple linear regression for changes over time in all other variables in the table
  3. Prevalences are weighted to reflect the sociodemographic distribution of adult population of the sampled cities in each year of the survey
  4. Level of significance: 5 %
  5. BMI body mass index