Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the sample and measures of success in telephone sampling

From: Trends in the prevalence of self-reported diabetes in Brazilian capital cities and the Federal District, 2006–2014

 

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

% or mean (±SD)

Final sample (n)

54,369

54,251

54,353

54,367

54,339

54,144

45,448

52,929

40,853

Response rate (%)a

71.1

71.5

74.6

76.5

76.4

64.9

64.8

71.5

65.2

Refusals (%)

9.1

7.7

5.8

3.0

2.3

2.2

5.9

3.9

3.9

Women (%)

53.9

53.8

53.9

53.9

53.9

53.9

53.9

53.9

53.9

Ageb

42.1 (16.5)

42.3 (16.2)

43.2 (16.5)

43.6 (16.5)

44.2 (16.7)

45.1 (16.9)

46.2 (17.2)

47.9 (17.6)

48.3 (17.6)

Age strata (%), years

 18–24

18.9

18.2

17.9

17.2

17.1

16.7

16.4

15.9

15.6

 24–34

25.4

25.4

25.4

25.5

25.4

25.4

25.3

25.3

25.3

 35–44

20.6

20.5

20.4

20.3

20.1

20.0

19.9

19.7

19.6

 45–54

15.8

15.9

16.1

16.3

16.4

16.6

16.8

16.9

17.1

 55–64

10.0

10.2

10.4

10.7

10.9

11.1

11.4

11.6

11.8

 ≥65

9.4

9.8

9.8

10.0

10.1

10.2

10.4

10.5

10.6

Education, yearsb

10.1 (4.5)

11.0 (5.2)

10.9 (4.9)

11.2 (5.0)

11.2 (5.0)

10.8 (4.9)

11.1 (5.0)

11.2 (5.0)

11.1 (5.1)

Educational attainment (%), years

 0–8

45.5

45.0

43.7

42.0

40.6

38.8

36.8

36.6

35.9

 9–11

33.3

35.1

34.7

35.8

35.8

36.7

38.5

37.5

38.1

 ≥12

21.2

19.8

21.6

22.2

23.5

24.5

24.7

25.9

25.9

BMI (kg/m2)b

24.9 (4.5)

25.0 (4.6)

25.2 (4.6)

25.4 (4.7)

25.6 (4.8)

25.8 (4.9)

25.9 (4.9)

26.0 (4.9)

26.2 (4.9)

BMI categories (%)

 BMI < 25 kg/m2

57.3

56.7

55.1

54.0

51.8

50.9

49.0

49.2

47.5

 25 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2

30.8

30.0

31.2

31.6

33.1

33.3

33.6

33.2

34.6

 ≥30 kg/m2

11.9

13.3

13.7

14.3

15.1

15.8

17.4

17.5

17.9

  1. Vigitel 2006–2014
  2. BMI body mass index
  3. aResponse rate: number of interviews done ÷ number of eligible phone lines selected (×100)
  4. bMean (standard deviation) without weighting