Skip to main content

Table 8 Agreement and disagreement among metabolic syndrome definitions in pregnant women with metabolic syndrome and the diagnostic criteria according to each definition

From: Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic, pregnant Angolan women according to four diagnostic criteria and its effects on adverse perinatal outcomes

Definitions

Concordance

Diagnostic accuracy (%)

k-value (95 % CI)

p value

Agreement

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Bartha vs NCEP ATP III

0.0841 (0.0390–0.1293)

<0.0001

Poor

100

72.1

6.1

100

NCEP ATP III vs Bartha

0.0841 (0.0390–0.1293)

<0.0001

Poor

6.1

100

100

72.1

Bartha vs Chatzi

0.2232 (0.1172–0.3292)

<0.0001

Considerable

100

88.9

14.1

100

Chatzi vs Bartha

0.2232 (0.1172–0.3292)

<0.0001

Considerable

14.1

100

100

88.9

Bartha vs JIS

0.0608 (0.0275–0.0941)

<0.0001

Poor

100

64.6

4.9

100

JIS vs Bartha

0.0608 (0.0275–0.0941)

<0.0001

Poor

4.9

100

100

100

NECP ATP III vs JIS

0.8332 (0.7894–0.8771)

<0.0001

Excellent

100

89.5

79.8

100

JIS vs NECP ATP III

0.8332 (0.7894–0.8771)

<0.0001

Excellent

79.8

100

100

89.5

NCEP ATP III vs Chatzi

0.4320 (0.3076–0.5064)

<0.0001

Moderate

38.1

97.9

88.2

79.3

Chatzi vs NCEP ATP III

0.4320 (0.3076–0.5064)

<0.0001

Moderate

88.2

79.3

38.1

97.9

Chatzi vs JIS

0.4036 (0.3389–0.4684)

<0.0001

Considerable

100

72.5

34.4

100

JIS vs Chatzi

0.4036 (0.3389–0.4684)

<0.0001

Considerable

34.4

100

100

72.5