Skip to main content

Table 2 Adjusted odds ratios (OR) on the association between DMP status and guideline care in 2006 and 2011 with an interaction term DMP status x time

From: The effectiveness of German disease management programs (DMPs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease: results from an observational longitudinal study

 Treatment status

General estimating equation model with logit link

DMP status x time

p-value

Guideline care in 2006a

Guideline care in 2011a

%

OR

(95 % CI)

%

OR

(95 % CI)

DMP (CHD or DM)

 No

45.7

Ref.

 

62.2

Ref.

  

 Yes

67.0

2.27

(1.27–4.03)

60.9

0.80

(0.40–1.58)

0.009

DMP-CHD (only)

 No

54.7

Ref.

 

62.1

Ref.

  

 Yes

69.3

1.91

(1.17–3.14)

60.8

0.92

(0.50–1.70)

0.035

DMP-DM (only)

 No

55.4

Ref.

 

59.0

Ref.

  

 Yes

66.0

1.48

(0.88–2.46)

62.7

0.96

(0.52–1.76)

0.231

  1. Models adjusted for age, sex, education, smoking status, weight status, treatment status, number of reinfarctions, and diabetes duration
  2. DMP disease management program, CHD coronary heart disease, DM diabetes mellitus
  3. aCounseling on two out of the three lifestyle topics (smoking, diet, exercise) and intake of a platelet aggregation inhibitor and a statin and either renin–angiotensin inhibitors or a beta blocker