Skip to main content

Table 2 Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and metabolic score among the studied population stratified by sexual function

From: Association between metabolic syndrome and sexual dysfunction among men with clinically diagnosed diabetes

Variable

Total (n = 274)

NSD (n = 84)

SD (n = 190)

P value

Prevalence of MetS

    

WHO

216(78.8%)

64(76.2%)

152(80.0%)

0.4766

NCEP ATP III

119(43.4%)

35(41.7%)

84(44.2%)

0.6953

IDF

142(51.8%)

43(51.2%)

99(52.1%)

0.8889

Prevalence of clustering of components of MetS

 

WHO

    

0

0(0.0%)

0(0.0%)

0(0.0%)

 

1

11(4.0%)

4(4.8%)

7(3.7%)

0.6752

2

46(16.8%)

16(19.0%)

30(15.8%)

0.5059

≥3

217(79.2%)

64(76.2%)

153(80.5%)

0.4149

NCEP ATP III

    

0

3(1.1%)

0(0.0%)

3(1.6%)

0.2469

1

46(16.8%)

13(15.5%)

33(17.4%)

0.6992

2

107(39.1%)

34(40.5%)

73(38.4%)

0.7478

≥3

118(43.1%)

32(38.1%)

86(45.3%)

0.2692

IDF

    

0

1(0.4%)

0(0.0%)

1(0.5%)

0.5053

1

20(7.2%)

8(9.5%)

12(6.3%)

0.3466

2

87(31.8%)

31(36.9%)

56(29.5%)

0.2231

≥3

166(60.6%)

49(58.3%)

117(61.6%)

0.6122

  1. Data are presented as proportions; P value defines the level of significance when subjects with no sexual dysfunction (NSD) were compared to those with sexual dysfunction (SD) (Fischer’s exact test).