Open Access

Basal hyperinsulinemia beyond a threshold predicts major adverse cardiac events at 1 year after coronary angiogram in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study

  • Mukund Srinivasan1,
  • Padmanabh Kamath2,
  • Narayan Bhat2,
  • Narasimha Pai2,
  • Rajesh Bhat2,
  • Tejas Shah2,
  • Poornima Manjrekar3 and
  • Chakrapani Mahabala1Email author
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome20179:38

DOI: 10.1186/s13098-017-0237-x

Received: 25 February 2017

Accepted: 12 May 2017

Published: 19 May 2017

Abstract

Background

There is a substantial reduction in cardiovascular related morbidity and mortality in the general population attributed to improved treatment of cardiac risk factors and disease, the same magnitude of benefit has not been observed in those with diabetes mellitus. The aim of the present study was to evaluate factors associated with the cardiac outcome at 1 year after coronary angiogram in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and to compare the outcomes with nondiabetics.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was carried out in subjects who underwent coronary angiogram for an evaluation of CAD, with follow-up data available for period of 12 months. The data consisted of 208 type 2 diabetic and 75 non-diabetic patients. Clinical, anthropometric and other biochemical risk factors of the study participants were recorded. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relation between the cardiovascular risk factors and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Results

At 1 year, MACE was observed in 50 (24.04%) type 2 diabetic subjects, which included non-fatal myocardial infarction 24 (11.54%), target vessel revascularization 15 (7.21%) and death 11 (5.29%). The area under the curve for insulin in predicting MACE was found to be 0.81 (95% CI 0.73–0.88) with sensitivity and specificity of 88% (95% CI 0.71–0.96) and 74% (95% CI 0.65–0.81) respectively. After adjustment for potential confounders hyperinsulinemia (>20 µIU/ml) was significantly associated with MACE [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 3.03, 95% CI 1.41–6.54, p = 0.005]. Interestingly, the MACE rate in type 2 diabetics with insulin levels <20 µIU/ml (10.2%) and non-diabetics (12%) (p = 0.676) appears to be same.

Conclusions

In addition to severity of the CAD at the baseline, basal hyperinsulinemia beyond a threshold strongly predicts adverse cardiac events at 1 year in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Those below the threshold, appears to be having a risk equivalent to non-diabetics.

Keywords

Coronary artery disease Hyperinsulinemia Major adverse cardiac events Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background

The risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are two to fourfold higher in type 2 diabetes mellitus even after adjusting for the known conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Several long term trials have shown that diabetics have high rate of adverse cardiac events even after undergoing successful revascularization procedures [14].

However, factors driving this complication are not fully understood. Since individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus have been shown to display more diffuse and calcified disease than non-diabetics, it is assumed that a severe baseline disease is the cause for this excess adverse cardiac events in type 2 diabetic patients. But the role of other clinical and biochemical risk factors on MACE in this patient population is not fully elucidated.

While a few epidemiological studies have shown that hyperinsulinemia has been associated with new adverse cardiac events in non-diabetics, and in general population [58], the same has not been demonstrated in type 2 diabetic patients after undergoing coronary angiogram. Despite the results of these epidemiological studies establish hyperinsulinemia as an independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes, it could not provide the biological explanation between high insulin level and CVD risk. Of importance several molecular mechanism have been proposed which explains the effects of elevated insulin levels on the vasculature leading to an increased atherogenesis [9]. Studies in both men and women have shown that high fasting insulin levels are directly associated with carotid intima thickness and arterial wall stiffness even after adjusting for hypertension, dyslipidemia and obesity. Since in type 2 diabetics preexisting hyperinsulinemia is observed, it appears that these are the subjects who might be at higher risk for acute cardiovascular events [1013].

Considering type 2 diabetes mellitus as a heterogeneous disease, it appears that not all people with type 2 diabetes mellitus are susceptible for adverse cardiac events [14], only a particular subset of individuals appears to be at risk for developing MACE, and the rate of MACE might also differ among diabetic population.

Since hyperinsulinemia/insulin resistance is known to be associated with the cardiac events, we hypothesize that, in addition to severity of the disease, there might be a threshold value for basal insulin/insulin resistance which is strongly associated with future adverse cardiac events and might play a role in prediction of clinical events in individuals with type 2 diabetes after undergoing coronary angiogram. Thus it might further increase the possibility of identifying high risk group and enable us to manage them aggressively to prevent any future adverse cardiac events.

Methods

Study participants and enrollment

The data for this retrospective cohort study consisted of 283 subjects who previously underwent coronary angiogram for an evaluation of clinically suspected coronary artery disease at a tertiary care hospital, from February 2013 to January 2015.

Among 283 subjects enrolled, 208 were found have type 2 diabetes mellitus and remaining 75 were non-diabetics. Type 2 diabetes mellitus was defined in accordance to the diagnostic criteria recommended by American Diabetes Association [15].

From the cohort of 208 type 2 diabetic patients, 128 patients underwent coronary angioplasty, 27 patients were subjected to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and remaining 53 were managed conservatively. Among 75 non-diabetic subjects, 56 underwent angioplasty, 5 were referred for CABG and 14 were considered for conservative management. The choice of different treatment modality was based on patient’s or treating cardiologist’s preference. In all cases of coronary angioplasty, patients were either deployed with Siroliums and Everolimus drug eluting stents (DES) or in some cases bio absorbable stents, none of the patients were subjected to bare metal stenting. The choice of specific type of DES was at the discretion of the operator.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The study included all the participants whose baseline and follow-up records on were available. Patients on steroids, chronic kidney diseases, valvular heart diseases and on insulin were excluded. Ethical clearance to conduct the present study was obtained from Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal University Ethics Committee. An informed consent form was obtained from study participants who were included in the study.

The data on clinical findings, anthropometric measurements and biochemical parameters such as fasting glycemia, fasting insulin, fasting lipid profile, glycated haemoglobin and urine microalbumin were noted. The baseline data was collected from study participants who were recruited for an earlier cross-sectional study [16]. The assessment and calculation of severity of CAD was determined by SYNTAX score, a web-based algorithm consisting of sequential and interactive self-guided questions (www.syntaxscore.com) [17].

Follow-up at 1 year

The data of 208 type 2 diabetic patients who had undergone coronary angiogram for an evaluation of suspected CAD and who completed follow-up for a minimum period of 1 year was noted. 75 non-diabetic subjects full filling the inclusion criteria and who completed 1 year follow-up was also documented in order to compare their MACE rate with diabetic counterpart.

The primary outcome of the study was MACE at 1 year. MACE was defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization [18]. The myocardial infarction was defined as an increase in troponin or creatine kinase-MB >3 times [7–25 U/l], the upper normal limit, and subsequently myocardial infarction was identified by any elevation of troponin or creatine kinase-MB above the upper normal limit. The target lesion revascularization was defined as any repeat intervention (by coronary artery bypass graft or PCI) performed to treat a stenosis inside the implanted stent or within the 5-mm segments adjacent to the stent, including the ostium of the left anterior descending artery and/or left circumflex artery. The primary endpoint of the study was checked for accuracy, consistency, and completeness of follow-up by cardiologists who were blind to the patient’s baseline characters. All subjects received dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) [Clopidogrel 75 and Aspirin 75] for a minimum of 1 year.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SD. Independent sample t test was performed to find out the mean differences between those who had adverse cardiac events and who did not have any cardiovascular events. The categorical variables were analysed by Chi square test. The normality assumption for continuous variables was evaluated by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Receiver operating curve (ROC) was plotted to find out the optimal cut-off value for insulin level. Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess risk factors for adverse events. First, the univariate cox proportional was used to identify potential predictors of adverse cardiac events at 1 year. Then the variables with p value <0.20 in the univariate analysis, were included in the multivariate cox proportional hazard model to identify the potential predictors of adverse events at 1 year. The time to events were summarized and displayed using cumulative incidence curve by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis method. A p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Version 15, Chicago IL).

Results

Table 1 shows clinical characteristics of type 2 diabetic subjects with and without MACE. The mean follow-up of the study was 10.48 ± 3.18 months. At 1 year 50 (24.04%) type 2 diabetic subjects developed a new cardiovascular event. Majority among them had non-fatal myocardial infarction 24 (11.54%), followed by target vessel revascularization 15 (7.21%) and death from cardiac origin 11 (5.29%). There was a significant difference in mean fasting blood insulin (p < 0.01), syntax score (p < 0.01), duration of diabetes (p = 0.007), fasting blood glucose (p = 0.001), body mass index (p = 0.023) and left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.015) in those who suffered MACE when compared who did not have MACE (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of type 2 diabetic study participants with and without MACE

Variables

With MACE (n = 50)

Without MACE (n = 158)

p value

Duration of diabetes (years)

9.91 ± 6.87

6.92 ± 5.72

0.007

Fasting blood sugar (mg/dl)

208.82 ± 56.04

177.54 ± 55.94

0.001

Fasting insulin (IU/µl)

25.09 ± 7.2

18.52 ± 6.08

<0.001

Syntax score

24.14 ± 10.42

11.46 ± 8.97

<0.001

TC/HDL

4.19 ± 1.40

4.25 ± 1.55

0.803

LDL-C (mg/dl)

106.41 ± 40.51

100.69 ± 42.47

0.392

HbA1C

9.07 ± 1.54

8.95 ± 2.03

0.722

Microalbumin (mg/l)

58.55 ± 26.27

34.25 ± 18.29

0.266

Body mass index (kg/m2)

22.55 ± 3.03

23.66 ± 2.68

0.023

Waist circumference (cm)

87.92 ± 10.22

90.02 ± 7.83

0.186

Ejection fraction

46.58 ± 10.93

50.79 ± 8.66

0.015

Presence of hypertension (%)

21 (42%)

77 (48.7%)

0.406

Smoking (%)

8 (16%)

23 (14.6%)

0.803

Females (%)

15 (30%)

51 (32.3%)

Males (%)

35 (70%)

107 (67.7%)

TC/HDL total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein ratio, LDL low density lipoprotein, HbA1c hemoglobin A1C

An area under the ROC curve for insulin predicting MACE was found to be statistically significant [AUC = 0.81 (95% CI 0.73–0.88)] (Fig. 1). A value of insulin >20 µIU/ml had sensitivity and specificity of 88% (95% CI 0.71–0.96) and 74% (95% CI 0.65–0.81) for MACE respectively.
Fig. 1

Receiver operating characteristic curves showing the performance of insulin in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Adjusted hazard ratio for predicting MACE by insulin deciles is shown in Fig. 2. Insulin values in the lowest deciles (8–12) were not associated with a heightened risk for adverse cardiac events. A clear risk of adverse cardiac events increased beyond an insulin level of 20 µIU/ml (Fig. 2). Further, based on this threshold level, 119 (57%) type 2 diabetic subjects were found to have insulin levels <20 µIU/ml and remaining 89 (43%) had insulin levels >20 µIU/ml respectively.
Fig. 2

Hazard ratio for MACE by insulin deciles in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Table 2 shows the clinical characteristics of non-diabetic study population. Among 75 non diabetic subjects, 9 (12%) of them developed new cardiovascular events at 1 year, 4 (5.33%) had non-fatal myocardial infarction, 3 (4%) had target vessel revascularization and 2 (2.67%) death from cardiac origin respectively.
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of non-diabetic study participants

Variables

Mean ± standard deviation (N = 75)

Age (years)

56.07 ± 5.78

Fasting blood sugar (mg/dl)

111.40 ± 37.45

Syntax score

12.43 ± 7.04

TC/HDL

4.41 ± 1.37

LDL-C (mg/dl)

113.92 ± 37.45

HbA1C

5.79 ± 0.79

Microalbumin (mg/l)

42.44 ± 10.74

Body mass index (kg/m2)

23.26 ± 3.66

Waist circumference (cm)

83.78 ± 4.98

Ejection fraction

47.58 ± 9.93

Presence of hypertension (%)

25 (33.33%)

Smoking (%)

33 (44%)

Females (%)

13 (17.33%)

Males (%)

62 (82.67%)

TC/HDL total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein ratio, LDL low density lipoprotein, HbA1c hemoglobin A1C

Type 2 diabetic subjects experienced higher MACE rate (24%) than non-diabetes (12%) (p = 0.028). However, subgroup analysis based on insulin levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus showed, patients with insulin levels beyond >20 µIU/ml had a higher MACE rate 42.4% (38) compared to those with insulin levels <20 µIU/ml [10.2% (12)] (p < 0.001). The MACE rate between those with insulin levels <20 µIU/ml (10.2%) and non-diabetics (12%) were found to be similar (p = 0.676). The cumulative incidence of MACE at 1 year for non-diabetics, insulin levels <20 and >20 µIU/ml is shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3

Cumulative incidence of MACE at 1 year based on insulin levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-diabetes

Table 3 shows the univariate cox-proportional hazard model for prediction of MACE at 1 year in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Those variables with p value <0.20 were included for multivariate cox proportional hazard model.
Table 3

Univariate Cox regression analysis for the relationship between adverse cardiovascular events and other conventional risk factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Variables

B

Hazard ratio

p value

95% CI

Syntax score >22

1.60

4.95

<0.001

2.82–8.68

Insulin >20 IU/µl

1.64

5.18

<0.001

2.70–9.92

Microalbumin >20 mg/l

0.650

1.91

0.029

1.06–3.44

Duration of diabetes >5 years

0.850

2.33

0.007

1.26–4.3

Mode of treatment (PTCA/CABG/medical)

0.792

2.20

0.005

1.26–3.86

TC/HDL >5

−0.424

0.65

0.249

0.32–1.34

LDL >100 mg/dl

0.457

1.57

0.111

0.90–2.76

Body mass index >23 kg/m2

−0.496

0.61

0.086

0.34–1.07

Waist circumference (cm)

−0.229

0.79

0.553

0.37–1.69

Hypertension

−0.225

0.80

0.432

0.45–1.4

Smoking

0.079

1.08

0.837

0.50–2.36

Gender

0.049

1.05

0.874

0.57–1.92

Age

0.032

1.03

0.243

0.98–1.08

TC/HDL total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein ratio, LDL low density lipoprotein

After adjusting for potential confounders in multivariate cox proportional hazard model, the fasting insulin >20 µIU/ml [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 3.03, 95% CI 1.41–6.54, p = 0.005] and severity of CAD [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.32, 95% CI 1.07–5.02, p = 0.032] were significantly associated with MACE at 1 year in type 2 diabetes mellitus (Table 4). The other conventional risk factors of CAD were not statistically significant (Table 4).
Table 4

Multivariate Cox regression analysis showing the independent predictors of adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus: result of a 1 year follow-up

Variables

B

Hazard ratio

p value

95% CI

Insulin >20 IU/µl

1.11

3.03

0.005

1.41–6.54

Syntax score >22

0.84

2.32

0.032

1.07–5.02

Microalbumin >20 mg/l

0.43

1.54

0.153

0.85–2.81

Duration of diabetes >5 years

0.28

1.32

0.415

0.67–2.62

Mode of treatment (PTCA)

0.02

1.02

0.970

0.42–2.48

Mode of treatment (medical)

0.28

1.32

0.508

0.58–3.04

LDL >100 mg/dl

0.14

1.15

0.641

0.64–2.08

Body mass index >23 kg/m2

−0.49

0.61

0.109

0.34–1.11

LDL low density lipoprotein

Discussion

A substantial reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity has been achieved in general population which is attributed to an improvement in treatment for cardiovascular risk factors and disease. However, the same magnitude of benefit has not been demonstrated in type 2 diabetes mellitus [1, 2, 19], and factors that are responsible for these new cardiovascular events have not been fully elucidated in this population.

Our study reveals that, in addition to severity of the disease, a basal insulin level beyond a threshold of 20 µIU/ml is a significant predictor of new adverse cardiac events at 1 year in type 2 diabetic subjects, after adjusting for other potential risk factors.

Several longitudinal studies have shown that, hyperinsulinemia is associated with new cardiac events in general population [58]. In a prospective study, fasting immune reactive insulin levels beyond 20 µIU/ml was independently associated with an incidence of CAD in insulin treated diabetic cohort [20]. Subjects with high insulin levels were at five to sixfold risk for developing CAD [20]. Further, in a cross-sectional study it was observed that an elevated insulin level was independently associated with angiographically determined CAD [21]. The findings derived from our study are in concordance to an earlier studies, and shows that increased insulin is not only associated with incidence of CAD, but also predicts adverse cardiac events at 1 year after coronary angiogram in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

In addition, the present study has identified a basal insulin threshold level. Hyperinsulinemia is a common condition often associated with T2DM in which insulin levels exceed the normal range. However, until the insulin levels reach peak values, there does not appear to be a risk of developing severe vascular complications. In the present study, insulin levels above 20 µIU/mL were potential predictors of MACE and insulin levels below that threshold were associated with risk rates for developing new cardiac events that were comparable risk rates for patients without diabetes.

In Verona diabetes study, insulin resistance was independently predicted cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus [22]. Insulin resistance was measured at a mean time of 9.3 years after diagnosis of diabetes. In this present study basal insulin was measured at a mean duration of 8.6 years of type 2 diabetes mellitus which is in compliance with Verona diabetes study, and thus we were able to establish an association between hyperinsulinemia/insulin resistance with adverse cardiac events in these patient cohort.

Inspite of undergoing successful coronary interventions the chances for developing new adverse cardiac events still remain high in type 2 diabetes mellitus. It has been speculated that, it is the severity of the disease and type of coronary interventions that are mainly associated with an increased adverse cardiac outcomes in this population [19, 23].

The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study (MASS) on multivessel CAD showed that, different treatment strategies did not influence cardiac outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus during the first year follow-up [24]. A 5-year prospective study in type 2 diabetic patients with the single vessel coronary stenting, the risk of adverse event was higher in type 2 diabetes mellitus, which is irrespective of its severity of the disease [25]. Further the risk of repeat revascularization was high only in the first year after single lesion stenting, but they were at increased risk for other clinical events including cardiac death and non-fatal MI over next 4 years [25].

Further, in a subgroup analysis of FREEDOM trial, type 2 diabetes mellitus with multi vessel CAD, the rate of MACE was higher in insulin provisioning treatment group than in those who were restricted for insulin treatment, even after adjusting for clinical demographics, severity of the disease and revascularization treatment [26]. No significant difference was observed in the magnitude of PCI or CABG benefit in type 2 diabetic patients with insulin treatment group [26].

However, majority of these studies did not identify the sub-group who might be at high risk for developing future complications. It appears that these are the individuals who might be having an insulin levels greater than 20 µIU/ml and hence did not derive significant benefit even after successful revascularization procedures.

The complications encountered in type 2 diabetes mellitus seems to be associated with the threshold level of basal insulin. At normal physiological level, insulin upon binding to its receptor initiates the vascular actions with the help of two major pathways. The mitogenic, proliferative and proinflammatory signalling pathway which is mediated by mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and the metabolic (glucose action) signaling pathway mediated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) [27]. To simulate production of the powerful vasodilator nitric oxide (NO), insulin acts on an endothelium via the phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase/Akt/NO pathway which is one of the important vascular actions of insulin. One primary feature during insulin resistance state is that, it is characterized by inhibition of PI3K-dependent signalling pathway while other insulin-signalling pathways combining the Ras/MAPK-dependent pathways remains active [27]. The continuous activation of MAPK pathway results in an increased expression of adhesion molecule (VCAM-I), smooth muscle proliferation and endothelial dysfunction which plays a key role in development of diabetic macrovascular disease [27]. This pathophysiologic implication is based on the reason that, during insulin resistance state, the basal levels of insulin are increased in order to maintain the glucose homeostasis in the vasculature and elsewhere, this compensatory hyperinsulinemia results in inhibition of PI3K and activation MAPK-dependent pathways. However level at which the MAPK pathway gets activated is not clear. We speculate that the MAPK pathway might be activated strongly, beyond threshold level of 20 µIU/ml insulin, which leads to fibrotic and proliferative changes in the vasculature.

We found that, an overall MACE rate in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (24.04%) was higher in comparison to non-diabetes (12%). This concurs well with previous long term trials such as SYNTAX, CARDia, BARI 2D and FREEDOM [14]. In a similar observation by Lourenço et al., the MACE rate in diabetic population following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at 1 year was found to be 20.4%, where blood sugar levels >130.5 mg/dl was an independent predictor for MACE [28].

Interestingly in our study, the subgroup analysis based on threshold level for insulin levels showed that, MACE rate was significantly higher in those with insulin >20 µIU/ml [42.4% (38)] when compared to insulin <20 µIU/ml [10.2% (12)] (p < 0.001). The MACE rate in those with insulin <20 µIU/ml [10.2% (12)] and non-diabetics [12% (9)] (p = 0.676) were found to be almost similar. This finding highlights that the type 2 diabetes is not a homogenous population, not all patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and CAD would be at risk for developing adverse cardiac events, only particular sub-group appears to be at an increased risk for MACE. These are the individuals who are needed to be followed-up meticulously.

Till now hyperinsulinemia was associated with occurrence of CAD, but findings from our study showed that it has a major implications in terms of cardiovascular outcomes. In clinical practice this threshold value is a practical tool. It helps to identify high risk groups and intensify management efforts.

Limitations

The present study has a few limitations. This study is considerably limited by the small number of study patients, and that reduces the power of the statistical analyses.

Conclusions

In this group of patients, insulin threshold of 20 µIU/ml was an adverse outcome predictor at 1 year in type 2 diabetes mellitus with coronary artery disease. Those below the threshold, appears to be behave as non-diabetics.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

PKK, NB, NP, RB, PM was responsible for study design, critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content. CM was responsible for study design, concept, critical revision of the manuscript, data interpretation, reviewed the draft and study supervision. TS acquisition of data. MS initiated the project, acquisition of data, data analysis, and interpretation of the data, wrote the manuscript and had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for integrity of data and the accuracy of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the patients and hospital staffs for their co-operation during the study. We also acknowledge Mohammed Ameen and Ganesh P cath lab technologists for their assistance in angiographic findings.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Data is available on request.

Consent for publication

All authors and study participants have accepted to publish the data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional ethics committee have approved the study and informed consent form was obtained from participating subjects.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Internal Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University
(2)
Department of Cardiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University
(3)
Department of Biochemistry, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University

References

  1. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2375–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Morice MC, et al. Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43:1006–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kapur A, Hall RJ, Malik IS, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (coronary artery revascularization in diabetes) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:432–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks MM, Chaitman BR, Nesto RW, et al. Clinical and angiographic risk stratification and differential impact on treatment outcomes in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation 2 diabetes (BARI 2D) trial. Circulation. 2012;126:2115–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. García RG, Rincón MY, Arenas WD, Silva SY, Reyes LM, Ruiz SL, et al. Hyperinsulinemia is a predictor of new cardiovascular events in Colombian patients with a first myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2011;148:85–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eschwege E, Richard JL, Thibult N, et al. Coronary heart disease mortality in relation with diabetes, blood glucose and plasma insulin levels. The Paris Prospective Study, 10 years later. Horm Metab Res Suppl Ser. 1985;15:41–6.Google Scholar
  7. Després JP, Lamarche B, Mauriège P, et al. Hyperinsulinemia as an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:952–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yanase M, Takatsu F, Tagawa T, et al. Insulin resistance and fasting hyperinsulinemia are risk factors for new cardiovascular events in patients with prior coronary artery disease and normal glucose tolerance. Circ J. 2004;68:47–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nigro J, Osman N, Dart AM, Little PJ. Insulin resistance and atherosclerosis. Endocr Rev. 2006;27:242–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Suzuki M, Shinozaki K, Kanazawa A, et al. Insulin resistance as an independent risk factor for carotid wall thickening. Hypertension. 1996;28:593–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Agewall S, Fagerberg B, Attvall S, Wendelhag I, Urbanavicius V, Wikstrand A. Carotid artery wall intima-media thickness is associated with insulin-mediated glucose disposal in men at high and low coronary risk. Stroke. 1995;26:956–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Folsom AR, Eckfeldt JH, Weitzman S, et al. Relation of carotid artery wall thick-ness to diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose and insulin, body size, and physical activity: atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. Stroke. 1994;25:66–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Salomaa V, Riley W, Kark JD, Nardo C, Folsom AR. Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and fasting glucose and insulin concentrations are associated with arterial stiffness indexes: the ARIC Study. Circulation. 1995;91:1432–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tuomi T, Santoro N, Caprio S, Cai M, Weng J, Groop L. The many faces of diabetes: a disease with increasing heterogeneity. Lancet. 2014;383(9922):1084–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Diabetes DOF. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S62–9.Google Scholar
  16. Srinivasan MP, Kamath PK, Manjrekar PA, Unnikrishnan B, Ullal A, Kotekar MF, et al. Correlation of severity of coronary artery disease with insulin resistance. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5:611–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Sianos G, Morel M-A, Kappetein AP, Morice M-C, Colombo A, Dawkins K, et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. 2005;1:219–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mehran R, Baber U, Steg PG, Ariti C, Weisz G, Witzenbichler B, et al. Cessation of dual antiplatelet treatment and cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PARIS): 2 year results from a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2013;23(382):1714–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Investigators BARI. The final 10-year follow-up results from the bari randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1600–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kronmal RA, Barzilay JI, Tracy RP, Savage PJ, Orchard TJ, Burke GL. The relationship of fasting serum radioimmune insulin levels to incident coronary heart disease in an insulin-treated diabetic cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:2852–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tuttle KR, Puhlman ME, Cooney SK, Short R. Urinary albumin and insulin as predictors of coronary artery disease: an angiographic study. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;34:918–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bonora E, Formentini G, Calcaterra F, Lombardi S, Marini F, Zenari L, et al. HOMA-estimated insulin resistance is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetic subjects: prospective data from the Verona Diabetes Complications Study. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1135–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chaitman BR, Hardison RM, Adler D, Gebhart S, Grogan M, Ocampo S, et al. The bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation 2 diabetes randomized trial of different treatment strategies in type 2 diabetes mellitus with stable ischemic heart disease: impact of treatment strategy on cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2009;120:2529–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Hueb W, Soares PR, Gersh BJ, César LA, Luz PL, Puig LB. The medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study (MASS-II): a randomized, controlled clinical trial of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease: 1-year results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;19(43):1743–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee TT, Feinberg L, Baim DS, Holmes DR, Aroesty JM, Carrozza JP Jr, et al. Effect of diabetes mellitus on 5-year clinical outcomes after single-vessel coronary stenting (a pooled analysis of coronary stent clinical trials). Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:718–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dangas GD, Farkouh ME, Sleeper LA, Yang M, Schoos MM, Macaya C, et al. Long-term outcome of PCI versus CABG in insulin and non-insulin-treated diabetic patients: results from the FREEDOM trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1189–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mather KJ, Steinberg HO, Baron AD. Insulin resistance in the vasculature. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:2013–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lourenço C, António N, Teixeira R, Saraiva F, Jorge E, Baptista R, et al. Predictors of adverse outcome in a diabetic population following acute coronary syndromes. Rev Port Cardiol. 2011;30:263–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement