Metformin: an old but still the best treatment for type 2 diabetes
© Rojas and Gomes; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 12 December 2012
Accepted: 5 February 2013
Published: 15 February 2013
The management of T2DM requires aggressive treatment to achieve glycemic and cardiovascular risk factor goals. In this setting, metformin, an old and widely accepted first line agent, stands out not only for its antihyperglycemic properties but also for its effects beyond glycemic control such as improvements in endothelial dysfunction, hemostasis and oxidative stress, insulin resistance, lipid profiles, and fat redistribution. These properties may have contributed to the decrease of adverse cardiovascular outcomes otherwise not attributable to metformin’s mere antihyperglycemic effects. Several other classes of oral antidiabetic agents have been recently launched, introducing the need to evaluate the role of metformin as initial therapy and in combination with these newer drugs. There is increasing evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies supporting its anti-proliferative role in cancer and possibly a neuroprotective effect. Metformin’s negligible risk of hypoglycemia in monotherapy and few drug interactions of clinical relevance give this drug a high safety profile. The tolerability of metformin may be improved by using an appropiate dose titration, starting with low doses, so that side-effects can be minimized or by switching to an extended release form. We reviewed the role of metformin in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and describe the additional benefits beyond its glycemic effect. We also discuss its potential role for a variety of insulin resistant and pre-diabetic states, obesity, metabolic abnormalities associated with HIV disease, gestational diabetes, cancer, and neuroprotection.
KeywordsMetformin Diabetes mellitus Insulin Resistance
The discovery of metformin began with the synthesis of galegine-like compounds derived from Gallega officinalis, a plant traditionally employed in Europe as a drug for diabetes treatment for centuries . In 1950, Stern et al. discovered the clinical usefulness of metformin while working in Paris. They observed that the dose–response of metformin was related to its glucose lowering capacity and that metformin toxicity also displayed a wide security margin .
Metformin acts primarily at the liver by reducing glucose output and, secondarily, by augmenting glucose uptake in the peripheral tissues, chiefly muscle. These effects are mediated by the activation of an upstream kinase, liver kinase B1 (LKB-1), which in turn regulates the downstream kinase adenosine monophosphatase protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK phosphorylates a transcriptional co-activator, transducer of regulated CREB protein 2 (TORC2), resulting in its inactivation which consequently downregulates transcriptional events that promote synthesis of gluconeogenic enzymes . Inhibition of mitochondrial respiration has also been proposed to contribute to the reduction of gluconeogenesis since it reduces the energy supply required for this process .
Metformin’s efficacy, security profile, benefic cardiovascular and metabolic effects, and its capacity to be associated with other antidiabetic agents makes this drug the first glucose lowering agent of choice when treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (TDM2).
Metformin and pre-diabetes
In 2000, an estimated 171 million people in the world had diabetes, and the numbers are projected to double by 2030. Interventions to prevent type 2 diabetes, therefore, have an important role in future health policies. Developing countries are expected to shoulder the majority of the burden of diabetes . One of the main contributing factors to this burden is the Western lifestyle which promotes obesity and sedentarism .
Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) statuses are associated with increased and varying risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. IGT has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and may determine an increased mortality risk. The association of IFG with cardiovascular events, however, has not been well established .
When lifestyle interventions fail or are not feasible, pharmacological therapy may be an important resource to prevent type 2 diabetes. Several different drug classes have been studied for this purpose.
In their systematic review, Gillies et al. found that lifestyle and pharmacological interventions reduced the rate of progression to type 2 diabetes in people with IGT and that these interventions seem to be as effective as pharmacological treatment. Although compliance was high, treatment effect was not sustained after treatment was stopped. According to the results of their meta-analysis, lifestyle interventions may be more important in those with higher mean baseline body mass index BMI .
The best evidence for a potential role for metformin in the prevention of type 2 diabetes comes from The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) trial. Lifestyle intervention and metformin reduced diabetes incidence by 58% and 31%, respectively, when compared with placebo .
Effectiveness of metformin in diabetes prevention of patients with impaired glucose tolerance
Metformin significantly reduced the risk of developing diabetes in an Indian population of subjects with IGT. The relative risk reduction was 28.5% with lifestyle modification (p = 0.018), 26.4% with metformin (p = 0.029), and 28.2% with lifestyle modification plus metformin (p = 0.022), as compared with the control group  (Table 1).
In a Chinese study, subjects with IGT randomly assigned to receive either low-dose metformin (750 mg/day) or acarbose (150 mg/day) in addition to lifestyle intervention were compared to a control group that only received life style intervention. Treatment with metformin or acarbose produced large, significant, and similar risk reductions for new onset of T2DM of 77% and 88%, respectively; these reductions were larger than that of lifestyle intervention alone .
The persistence of the long-term effects obtained through DPP interventions were evaluated at an additional follow-up after a median of 5.7 years. Individuals were divided in 3 groups: lifestyle, metformin, and placebo. Diabetes incidence rates were similar between treatment groups: 5.9 per 100 person-years (5.1–6.8) for lifestyle, 4.9 (4.2–5.7) for metformin, and 5.6 (4.8–6.5) for placebo. Diabetes incidence 10 years since DPP randomization was reduced by 34% and 18% in the lifestyle and metformin group, respectively  (Table 1).
The prevalence of pre-diabetes as well as the progression rate to diabetes may differ between different populations, making the application of results from certain studies of different ethnical groups inappropriate. IGT is highly prevalent in native Asian Indians. This population has several unique features such as a young age of diabetes onset and lower BMI along with high rates of insulin resistance and lower thresholds for diabetic risk factors . Chinese individuals have a lower prevalence of diabetes and are less insulin resistant than Indians, so the results of the Chinese study may not be applicable to Asian Indian individuals .
In a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Salpeter et al. reported a reduction of 40% in the incidence of new-onset diabetes with an absolute risk reduction of 6% (95% CI, 4–8) during a mean trial duration of 1.8 years .
Lily and Godwin reported a decreased rate of conversion from pre-diabetes to diabetes in individuals with IGT or IFG in their systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. This effect was seen at both a higher metformin dosage (850 mg twice daily) and lower metformin dosage (250 mg twice or 3 times daily) in people of varied ethnicity .
Metformin in the management of adult diabetic patients
Current guidelines from the American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ADA/EASD) and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology (AACE/ACE) recommend early initiation of metformin as a first-line drug for monotherapy and combination therapy for patients with T2DM. This recommendation is based primarily on metformin’s glucose-lowering effects, relatively low cost, and generally low level of side effects, including the absence of weight gain [16, 17].
Metformin’s first-line position was strengthened by the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) observation that the metformin-treated group had risk reductions of 32% (p = 0.002) for any diabetes-related endpoint, 42% for diabetes-related death (p = 0.017), and 36% for all-cause mortality (p = 0.011) compared with the control group. The UKPDS demonstrated that metformin is as effective as sulfonylurea in controlling blood glucose levels of obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus . Metformin has been also been shown to be effective in normal weight patients .
Metformin in combination therapy
Although monotherapy with an oral hypoglycemic agent is often initially effective, glycemic control deteriorates in most patients which requires the addition of a second agent. Currently, marketed oral therapies are associated with high secondary failure rates . Combinations of metformin and insulin secretagogue can reduce HbA1c between 1.5% to 2.2% in patients sub-optimally controlled by diet and exercise .
The optimal second-line drug when metformin monotherapy fails is not clear. All noninsulin antidiabetic drugs when added to maximal metformin therapy are associated with similar HbA1c reduction but with varying degrees of weight gain and hypoglycemia risk. A meta-analysis of 27 randomized trials showed that thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, and glinides were associated with weight gain; glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, glucosidase inhibitors, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were associated with weight loss or no weight change. Sulfonylureas and glinides were associated with higher rates of hypoglycemia than with placebo. When combined with metformin, sulfonylureas and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors show a similar efficacy on HbA1c .
Metformin and sulfonylureas
The combination of metformin and sulfonylurea (SU) is one of the most commonly used and can attain a greater reduction in HbA1c (0.8–1.5%) than either drug alone [23, 24]. The glimepiride/metformin combination results in a lower HbA1c concentration and fewer hypoglycemic events when compared to the glibenclamide/metformin combination . The use of metformin was associated with reduced all-cause mortality and reduced cardiovascular mortality. Metformin and sulfonylurea combination therapy was also associated with reduced all-cause mortality .
Epidemiological investigations suggest that patients on SUs have a higher cardiovascular disease event rate than those on metformin. Patients who started SUs first and added metformin also had higher rates of cardiovascular disease events compared with those who started metformin first and added SUs. These investigations are potentially affected by unmeasured confounding variables .
Metformin and insulin
Metformin as added to insulin-based regimens has been shown to improve glycemic control, limit changes in body weight, reduce hypoglycemia incidence, and to reduce insulin requirements (sparing effect), allowing a 15–25% reduction in total insulin dosage [28, 29].
Metformin and thiazolinediones
The addition of rosiglitazone to metformin in a 24-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study significantly decreased HbA1c concentration and improved insulin sensitivity and HOMA ß cell function . However, in spite of preventing diabetes incidence, the natural course of declining insulin resistance may not be modified by a low dose of the metformin-rosiglitazone combination .
The ADOPT study (A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial) assessed the efficacy of rosiglitazone, as compared to metformin or glibenclamide, in maintaining long-term glycemic control in patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Rosiglitazone was associated with more weight gain, edema, and greater durability of glycemic control; metformin was associated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal events and glibenclamide with a higher risk of hypoglycaemia. .
Metformin and glifozins
Dapagliflozin, a highly selective inhibitor of SGLT2, has demonstrated efficacy, alone or in combination with metformin, in reducing hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes [35, 36]. Studies are in development for assessing the safety and efficacy of this combination.
Metformin and α glicosidase inhibitor
Acarbose reduces the bioavailability of metformin . However, it has been reported that the association of acarbose to metformin in sub-optimally controlled patients reduced HbA1c by about 0.8-1.0% .
Metformin and incretin-based therapies
DDPIV prolongs the duration of active glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) by inhibiting DPPIV peptidase, an enzyme which cleaves the active form of the peptide. This action results in an improvement of insulin secretion as a physiological response to feeding. The mechanism of DPPIV inhibitors is complementary to that of metformin which improves insulin sensitivity and reduces hepatic glucose production, making this combination very useful for achieving adequate glycemic control . Metformin has also been found to increase plasma GLP-1 levels, probably by either direct inhibition of DPPIV or by increased secretion, leading to reduced food intake and weight loss .
Saxagliptin added to metformin led to clinically and statistically significant reductions in HbA1c from baseline versus metformin/placebo in a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Saxagliptin at doses of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg plus metformin decreased A1 by 0.59%, 0.69%, and 0.58%, respectively, in comparison to an increase in the metformin plus placebo group (+0.13%); p < 0.0001 for all comparisons .
A meta-analysis of 21 studies examined incretin-based therapy as an add-on to metformin in patients with T2DM for 16–30 weeks; 7 studies used a short-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist (exenatide BID), 7 used longer acting GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide or exenatide LAR), and 14 examined DPP-IV inhibitors. Long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced HbA1c and fasting glucose levels to a greater extent than the other therapies .
Metformin and pregnancy
Metformin is known to cross the placenta and concerns regarding potential adverse effects on both the mother and the fetus have limited its use in pregnancy . The use of metformin during pregnancy is still a matter of controversy.
Two meta-analyses of observational studies, one of women using metformin and/or sulfonylureas and one of women using metformin alone during the first trimester, did not show an increase in congenital malformations or neonatal deaths [44, 45].
The Metformin in Gestational Diabetes (MiG) trial, found no significant difference in the composite fetal outcome (composite of neonatal hypoglycemia, respiratory distress, need for phototherapy, birth trauma, 5-minute Apgar score <7, or prematurity) between metformin and insulin. Women assigned to metformin had more preterm births and less weight gain compared to those in the insulin group . Another randomized trial also found similar results .
Results of the MiG TOFU reported that infants of diabetic mothers exposed to metformin in utero and examined at 2 years of age may present a reduction in insulin resistance, probably related to an increase in subcutaneous fat .
Longer follow-up studies will be required to determine metformin’s impact on the development of obesity and metabolic syndrome in offspring.
Metformin use in childhood and adolescence
Type 2 diabetes mellitus has dramatically increased in children and adolescents worldwide to the extent that has been labeled an epidemic . Before 1990, it was a rare condition in the pediatric population; by 1999, the incidence varied from 8% to 45%, depending on geographic location, and was disproportionally represented among minority groups . There are few studies of metformin use in the pediatric population. Most of them are of short duration and heterogeneous designs.
The beneficial role of metformin in young patients with type 2 diabetes has been demonstrated in a randomized, controlled trial which showed a significant decrease in fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, weight, and total cholesterol. The most frequently reported adverse events were abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and headaches. There were no cases of clinical hypoglycemia, lactic acidosis, or clinically significant changes in physical examinations . When compared to glimepiride (1–8 mg once daily), metformin (500–1000 mg twice daily) lowered HbA1c to <7%, similar to glimepiride, but was associated with significantly less weight gain. A total of 42.4% and 48.1% of subjects in the glimepiride and metformin groups, respectively, in the intent-to-treat population achieved A1C levels of <7.0% at week 24 .
There is some evidence that suggests improvement in metabolic control of poorly controlled adolescents with type 1 diabetes when metformin is added to insulin therapy. Metformin has been shown to reduce insulin dose requirement (5.7–10.1 U/day), HbA1c (0.6–0.9%), weight (1.7–6.0 kg), and total cholesterol (0.3–0.41 mmol/l) . A previous review showed similar results in HbA1 reduction and insulin requirement, however no improvements in insulin sensitivity, body composition, or serum lipids were documented .
Metformin indications for management of obesity, insulin resistance, and non-alcoholic fatty liver in children and adolescents
Insulin resistance in obese children and adolescents should be appropriately and aggressively addressed once it is linked to known cardiovascular risks such as IGT, T2DM, dyslipidemia, and hypertension [53, 54]. Non-alcoholic fatty (NAFLD) disease, a frequent cause of chronic liver disease in obese adults, is also associated with a higher risk of developing diabetes and of progression to fibrosis and cirrhosis  with an increased relative risk of cardiovascular events or death . The true prevalence of NAFLD in children is underestimated. The prevalence of steatosis in obese children was estimated to be 38% in a large retrospective autopsy study .
Currently, the best supported therapy for NAFLD is gradual weight loss through exercise and nutritional support . Metformin is associated with short-term weight loss, improvement of insulin sensitivity, and decreased visceral fat . A reduction in ALT, GGT, and fatty liver incidence and severity has also been described with metformin use .
Metformin has been used increasingly in obese children with hyperinsulinemia although there are no strong evidence-based studies supporting its use for this clinical condition. A moderate improvement in body muscular index (BMI) and insulin sensitivity has been reported with the use of metformin [61, 62]. Heart rate recovery (HRR) may also improve due to improved parasympathetic tone, paralleling improvements in BMI, insulin levels, and insulin sensitivity . HRR has been considered a predictor of mortality and cardiovascular disease in otherwise healthy subjects . A poor HRR has also been linked to insulin resistance  and to a higher risk for developing T2DM .
Metformin may not be as effective as behavioral interventions in reducing BMI and when compared with drugs that are licensed for obesity, its effects are moderate .
Effects of metformin on vascular protection
Effects on cardiovascular mortality
Diabetic patients are at high risk of cardiovascular events, particularly of coronary heart disease by about 3-fold [67, 68]. It has been stated that type 2 diabetic patients without a previous history of myocardial infarction have the same risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) as non-diabetic subjects with a history of myocardial infarction . This has led the National Cholesterol Education Program to consider diabetes as a coronary heart disease risk equivalent . Although there is no doubt that there is an increased risk of CAD events in diabetic patients, there is still some uncertainty as to whether the cardiovascular risk conferred by diabetes is truly equivalent to that of a previous myocardial infarction .
In 1980, Scambato et al. reported that, in a 3-year observational study of 310 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, patients treated with metformin had reduced rates of re-infarction, occurrence of angina pectoris, acute coronary events other than acute myocardial infarction, and death in patients . The largest effect was seen in re-infarction rates; a post hoc analysis showed that this effect was significant (p = 0.003). After this study, the UKPDS, the largest randomized clinical trial in the newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetic population largely free of prior major vascular events, randomly assigned treatment with metformin to a subgroup of overweight individuals (>120% of ideal body weight). In 1990, another subgroup of patients (n = 537), who were receiving the maximum allowed dosage of sulfonylurea, were randomized either to continue sulfonylurea therapy or to allow an early addition of metformin .
Metformin provided greater protection against the development of macrovascular complications than would be expected from its effects upon glycemic control alone. It had statistically significant reductions in the risk of all-cause mortality, diabetes-related mortality (p = 0.017), and any end-point related to diabetes (p = 0.002), but not in myocardial infarction (p = 0.052) . The UKPDS pos-trial reported significant and persistent risk reductions for any diabetes-related end point (21%, p = 0.01), myocardial infarction (33%, p = 0.005), and death from any cause (27%, p = 0.002) .
Metformin effects on vasculoprotection
UKPDS 33 
Significant reduction in all-cause mortality, diabetes related mortality, and any end-point related to diabetes.
Sgambato et al.
Trend towards reduction in angina symptoms (p = 0.051). Significant lower re-infarction rates.
Johnson et al.
Reduction of all-cause mortality and of cardiovascular mortality
Kao et al.
Significant risk reduction for any clinical event, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality
Jadhav et al.
Improved maximal ST depression, Duke score, and chest pain incidence
Kooy et al.
4, 3 yr
Reduction of the risk of developing macrovascular disease
Metformin and heart failure
The risk of developing cardiac heart failure (CHF) in diabetic individuals nearly doubles as the population ages . DM and hyperglycemia are strongly implicated as a cause for the progression from asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction to symptomatic HF, increased hospitalizations for HF, and an overall increased mortality risk in patients with chronic HF . Despite all its benefits, metformin is contraindicated in patients with heart failure due to the potential risk of developing lactic acidosis, a rare but potentially fatal metabolic condition resulting from severe tissue hypoperfusion . The US Food and Drug Administration removed the heart failure contraindication from the packaging of metformin although a strong warning for the cautious use of metformin in this population still exists .
Several retrospective studies in patients with CHF and diabetes reported lower risk of death from any cause [81–83], lower hospital readmissions for CHF , and hospitalizations for any cause [81, 82]. A recent review concluded that CHF could not be considered an absolute contraindication for metformin use and also suggest its protective effect in reducing the incidence of CHF and mortality in T2DM . This protective effect may due to AMPK activation and decrease in cardiac fibrosis .
In a prospective 4-year study, 393 metformin-treated patients with elevated serum creatinine between 1.5–2.5 mg/dL and coronary artery disease, CHF, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were randomized into two groups. One group continued metformin therapy while the other was instructed to discontinue metformin. Patients with CHF had either New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or Class IV CHF and were receiving diuretic and vasodilatation drugs. There were no differences between groups in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, rate of myocardial infarction, or rate of cardiovascular events .
Patients with DM and advanced, systolic HF (n = 401) were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of metformin therapy. The cohort had a mean age of 56 ± 11 years and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 24 ± 7% with 42% and 45% being NYHA III and NYHA IV, respectively. Twenty-five percent (n = 99) were treated with metformin therapy. Metformin-treated patients had a higher BMI, lower creatinine, and were less often on insulin. One-year survival in metformin-treated and non-metformin-treated patients was 91% and 76%, respectively (p = 0.007). After a multivariate adjustment for demographics, cardiac function, renal function, and HF medications, metformin therapy was associated with a non-significant trend of improved survival .
Many different mechanisms, beyond glycemic control, have been implicated in vascular protection induced by metformin such as improvements in the inflammatory pathway , coagulation , oxidative stress and glycation [88–92], endothelial dysfunction [88–90], haemostasis [88, 91–93], insulin resistance improvement , lipid profiles [95, 96], and fat redistribution [97, 98]. Some of these mechanisms are described below.
Beyond glycemic control
The UKPDS recruited patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and demonstrated that tight glycemic control has beneficial effects on microvascular end points. However, it failed to show improvements in macrovascular outcomes. The improved cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in overweight diabetic patients treated with metformin was attributed to its effects extending beyond glycemic control .
Effects on the inflammatory pathway
The benefits of metformin on macrovascular complications of diabetes, separate from its conventional hypoglycemic effects, may be partially explained by actions beyond glycemic control, particularly by actions associated with inflammatory and atherothrombotic processes . Metformin can act as an inhibitor of pro-inflammatory responses through direct inhibition of NF-kB by blocking the PI3K–Akt pathway. This effect may partially explain the apparent clinical reduction of cardiovascular events not fully attributable to metformin’s anti-hyperglycemic action .
Effects on oxidative stress
Oxidative stress is believed to contribute to a wide range of clinical conditions such as inflammation, ischaemia-reperfusion injury, diabetes, atherosclerosis, neurodegeneration, and tumor formation .
Metformin has antioxidant properties which are not fully characterized. It reduces reactive oxygen species (ROS) by inhibiting mitochondrial respiration  and decreases advanced glycosylation end product (AGE) indirectly through reduction of hyperglycemia and directly through an insulin-dependent mechanism .
There is some evidence that metformin also has a beneficial effect on some components of the antioxidant defense system. It can upregulate uncoupled proteins 2 (UCP2) in adipose tissue  and can also cause an increase in reduced glutathione .
Metformin has been proposed to cause a mild and transient inhibition of mitochondrial complex I which decreases ATP levels and activates AMPK-dependent catabolic pathways , increasing lipolysis and ß-oxidation in white adipose tissue  and reducing neoglucogenesis . The resultant reduction in triglycerides and glucose levels could decrease metylglyoxal (MG) production through lipoxidation and glycoxidation, respectively [99, 101].
Recently a study described a putative mechanism relating metformin action and inhibition of oxidative stress, inflammatory, and proapoptotic markers . In this study, treatment of bovine capillary endothelial cells incubated in hyperglycemic medium with metformin was able to decrease the activity of NF-kB and others intracellular proteins related to cellular metabolic memory. The authors suggested that this action could be mediated by histone deacetylase sirtuin 1 (SIRT-1), a multifunctional protein involved in many intracellular pathways related to metabolism, stress response, cell cycle, and aging .
Effects on endothelial function
Type 2 diabetes is associated with a progressive and generalized impairment of endothelial function that affects the regulation of vasomotor tone, leucocyte adhesion, hemostasis, and fibrinolysis. These effects are probably direct and not related to decreases in hyperglycemia .
Contradictory effects of metformin on endothelial function have been described, however [89, 90]. Mather et al. reported that metformin has no effect on endothelium dependent blood flow but has a significant effect on endothelium independent blood flow and insulin resistance reduction . Conversely, Vitale et al. found significant improvement of endothelium dependent flow without a significant effect on endothelium independent response . Further studies are necessary to establish the effect of metformin on endothelial function.
Effects on body weight
Metformin may have a neutral effect on body weight of patients with T2DM when compared to diet  or may limit or decrease the weight gain experienced with sulfonylureas , TDZ , insulin [29, 75], HAART , and antipsychotics drugs .
Modest weight loss with metformin has been observed in subjects with IGT [15, 18]. However, a meta-analysis of overweight and obese non-diabetic subjects, found no significant weight loss as either a primary or as secondary outcome .
The mechanisms by which metformin contributes to weight loss may be explained through the reduction in gastrointestinal absorption of carbohydrates and insulin resistance , reduction of leptin  and ghrelin levels after glucose overload , and by induction of a lipolitic and anoretic effect by acting on glucagon–like peptide 1 .
Effects on lipid profile
Effects on blood pressure
The hypertension associated with diabetes has an unclear pathogenesis that may involve insulin resistance. Insulin resistance is related to hypertension in both diabetic and non-diabetic individuals and may contribute to hypertension by increasing sympathetic activity, peripheral vascular resistance, renal sodium retention , and vascular smooth muscle tone and proliferation [108, 109].
Data of the effects of metformin on BP are variable, with neutral effects or small decreases in SBP and DBP . In the BIGPRO1 trial carried out in upper-body obese non-diabetic subjects with no cardiovascular diseases or contraindications to metformin, blood pressure decreased significantly more in the IFG/IGT subgroup treated with metformin compared to the placebo group (p < 0.03) .
Effects on thyroid function
Metformin decreases serum levels of thyrotropin (TSH) to subnormal levels in hypothyroid patients that use levothyroxin (LT4) on a regular basis . A significant decrease in TSH (P < 0.001) without reciprocal changes in any thyroid function parameter in diabetic patients had also been reported but only in hypothyroid subjects, not in euthyroid ones .
The mechanism of the drop in TSH is unclear at this time. Some of the proposed explanations for this effect are enhanced inhibitory modulation of thyroid hormones on central TSH secretion, improved thyroid reserve in patients with hypothyroidism , changes in the affinity or the number of thyroid hormone receptors, increased dopaminergic tone, or induced constituent activation of the TSH receptor .
Metformin and HIV lypodystrofy
Antiretroviral therapy has been associated with an increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance among HIV-infected patients . Lipodystrophy, characterized by morphological (peripheral lipoatrophy, localized fat accumulation) and metabolic changes (hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance and hyperglycemia), is highly prevalent in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), occurring in 40% to 80% of patients .
Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), particularly thymidine analogues (zidovudine and stavudine), have been associated with morphological changes, particularly extremity fat loss , while protease inhibitors (PIs) have been associated with biochemical derangements of glucose and lipids as well as with localized accumulation of fat .
Lifestyle modifications such as diet and exercise and switching antiretroviral therapies seems to be of limited value in reducing visceral abdominal fat (VAT). Metformin has been shown to reduce VAT [97, 98] but at the expense of accelerating peripheral fat loss . Favorable effects on insulin levels , insulin sensitivity , weight , flow-mediated vasodilation , and lipid profiles [98, 119] have also been described.
Effects on hemostasis
Therapeutic doses of metformin in type 2 diabetic patients lower circulating levels of several coagulation factors such as plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), von Williebrand Factor (vWF), tissue type plasminogen activator , factor VII . It has also direct effects on fibrin structure and function by decreasing factor XIII activity and changing fibrin structure .
Furthermore, plasma levels of PAI-1 and vWF, which are secreted mainly by the impaired endothelium, have been shown to decrease with metformin therapy in non-diabetic subjects .
Metformin and neuroprotection
Alzheimer’s disease (AD), one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases, has been termed type 3 diabetes. It is a brain specific form of diabetes characterized by impaired insulin actions and neuronal insulin resistance  that leads to excessive generation and accumulation of amyloid oligomers, a key factor in the development of AD .
The mechanisms of cerebral metabolism are still unclear. A network of different factors is most likely responsible for its maintenance. The activated protein kinase (AMPK) forms a molecular hub for cellular metabolic control . Recent studies of neuronal models are pointing to possible AMPK roles beyond energy sensing with some reporting protective effects  while others report detrimental effects, particularly under extreme energy depletion .
AMPK is activated in the brain by metabolic stresses that inhibit ATP production such as ischemia, hypoxia, glucose deprivation, metabolic inhibitors (metformin), as well as catabolic and ATP consuming processes .
The human brain is characterized by an elevated oxidative metabolism and low antioxidants enzymes, which increases the brain’s vulnerability to oxidative stress . Oxidative stress has been implicated in a variety of neurological diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease . Mitochondrial dysfunction has a pivotal role in oxidative stress. In this setting, the permeability transition pore (PTP) acts as a regulator of the apoptotic cascade under stress conditions, triggering the release of apoptotic proteins and subsequent cell death . It was reported that metformin prevents PTP opening and subsequent cell death in various endothelial cell types exposed to high glucose levels . Metformin could interrupt the apoptotic cascade in a model of ectoposide-induced cell death by inhibiting PTP opening and blocking the release of cytochrome-c. These events together with other factors from the mitochondrial intermembrane space are critical processes in the apoptotic cascade .
Insulin has been shown to regulate a wide range of processes in the central nervous system such as food intake, energy homeostasis, reproduction, sympathetic activity, learning and memory , as well as neuronal proliferation, apoptosis, and synaptic transmission .
With regard to ß amyloid, a report has shown that metformin increases ß amyloid in cells through an AMPK-dependent mechanism, independent of insulin signaling and glucose metabolism. This effect is mediated by a transcriptional upregulation of ß secretase (BACE 1) which leads to an increase of ß amyloid . However, when insulin is added to metformin, it potentiates insulin’s effects on amyloid reduction, improves neuronal insulin resistance, and impairs glucose uptake and AD-associated neuropathological characteristics by activating the insulin signaling pathway .
Metformin has been shown to promote rodent and human neurogenesis in culture by activating a protein kinase C-CREB binding protein (PKC-CBP) pathway, recruiting neural stem cells and enhancing neural function, particularly spatial memory function. It is noteworthy that neural stem cells can be recruited in an attempt of endogeneously repairing the injured or regenerating brain . In the context of metformin’s potential neuroprotective effect in vivo, the capacity of the drug to cross the blood brain barrier needs to be further elucidated. Provided that this crossing could occur, metformin may become a therapeutic agent not only in peripheral and diabetes-associated vascular neuropathy but also in neurodegenerative diseases.
Metformin and cancer
Reduced incidence and cancer-related mortality in metformin treated patients
Follow up (years)
Confounding adjustment *
Pilot Observational Study
Tayside, Scotland. UK
IMC, smoking, blood pressure, material deprivation
Retrospective Case control
Age, BMI, smoking, estrogen use, diabetes history, HbA1c, renal failure, congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease
Sex, age, smoking, DM-2, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, insulin use, oral antidiabetic medication, IMC, risk factors
Sex, age, BMI, alcohol abuse, HBV and HCV infection, DM-2, ALT level
Retrospective cohort study
Sex, age, BMI, HbA1c, deprivation
Other drug use
The underlying mechanisms of tumorigenesis in T2DM seem to be related to insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, elevated levels of IGF-1 [140–142], and hyperglycemia with the latter driving ATP production in cancer cells through the glycolytic pathway, a mechanism known as the Warburg effect .
Metformin significantly reduces tumorigenesis and cancer cell growth although how it does it is not well understood. It may be due to its effects on insulin reduction and hyperinsulinemia, and consequently on IGF-1 levels, which have mitogenic actions enhancing cellular proliferation,but may also involve specific AMPK-mediated pathways .
Activation of AMPK leads to inhibition of mTOR through phosphorylaton and subsequent activation of the tumor suppressor tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2). The mTOR is a key integrator of growth factor and nutrient signals as well as a critical mediator of the PI3K/PKB/Akt pathway, one of the most frequently disregulated signaling pathways in human cancer . Metformin may have additional anticancer properties independent of AMPK, liver kinase 1 (LKB1), and TSC2. This may be related, in part, to the inhibition of Rag GTPase-mediated activation of mTOR .
Patients with type 2 diabetes who are prescribed metformin had a lower risk of cancer compared to patients who did not take it. The reduced risk of cancer and cancer mortality observed in these studies has been consistently in the range of 25% to 30% [135–139, 145–147]. An observational cohort study with type 2 diabetics who were new metformin users found a significant decrease in cancer incidence among metformin users (7.3%) compared to controls (11.6%). The unadjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for cancer was 0.46 (0.40–0.53). The authors suggested a dose-related response . In an observational study of women with type 2 diabetes, a decreased risk of breast cancer among metformin users was only seen with long-term use .
Metformin use is associated with lower cancer-related mortality. A prospective study (median follow-up time of 9.6 years) found that metformin use at baseline was associated with lower cancer-related mortality and that this association appeared to be dose dependent . Diabetic patients with colorectal cancer who were treated with metformin had lower mortality than those not receiving metformin . Patients with type 2 diabetes exposed to sulfonylureas and exogenous insulin had a significantly increased risk of cancer-related mortality compared with patients exposed to metformin. However, whether this increased risk is related to a deleterious effect of sulfonylurea and insulin or a protective effect of metformin or due to some unmeasured effect related to both choice of therapy and cancer risk is not known .
The proposed mechanisms of metformin anti-cancer properties are not fully understood. Most are mainly mediated through AMPK activation which requires LKB1, a well-known tumor suppressor . Some of these mechanisms may be through inhibition of cell growth , IGF-1 signaling , inhibition of the mTOR pathway , reduction of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER-2) expression (a major driver of proliferation in breast cancer) , inhibition of angiogenesis and inflammation , induction of apoptosis and protein 53 (p53) activation , cell cycle arrest [137, 154], and enhancement of cluster of differenciation 8 (CD8) T cell memory .
Future roles for metformin in cancer therapy
In vitro and in vivo studies strongly suggest that metformin may be a valuable adjuvant in cancer treatment. Some of the proposed future roles yet to be defined through further research are outlined as follows:
Adjunct in chemotherapy
Type 2 diabetic patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer as well as metformin were more likely to have pathologic complete response (pCR) than patients not receiving it. However, despite the increase in pCR, metformin did not significantly improve the estimated 3-year relapse-free survival rate .
Tumor relapse prevention
Cancer stem cells may be resistant to chemotherapeutic drugs, therefore regenerating the various tumor cell types and promoting disease relapse. Low doses of metformin inhibited cellular transformation and selectively killed cancer stem cells in four genetically different types of breast cancer in a mouse xenograft model. The association of metformin and doxorubicin killed both cancer stem cells and non-stem cancer cells in culture. This may reduce tumor mass and prevent relapse more effectively than either drug used as monotherapy .
Metformin is contraindicated in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis or diabetic precoma, renal failure or renal dysfunction, and acute conditions which have the potential for altering renal function such as: dehydration, severe infection, shock or intravascular administration of iodinated contrast agents, acute or chronic disease which may cause tissue hypoxia (cardiac or respiratory failure, recent myocardial infarction or shock), hepatic insufficiency, and acute alcohol intoxication in the case of alcoholism and in lactating women . Several reports in literature related an increased risk of lactic acidosis with biguanides, mostly phenformin, with an event rate of 40–64 per 100,000 patients years  whereas the reported incidence with metformin is 6.3 per 100,000 patients years .
Structural and pharmacokinetic differences in metformin such as poor adherence to the mitochondrial membrane, lack of interference with lactate turnover, unchanged excretion, and inhibition of electron transport and glucose oxidation may account for such differences .
Despite the use of metformin in cases where it is contraindicated, the incidence of lactic acidosis has not increased. Most patients with case reports relating metformin to lactic acidosis had at least one or more predisposing conditions for lactic acidosis .
Renal dysfunction is the most common risk factor associated with lactic acidosis but so far there is no clear evidence indicating at which level of renal dysfunction metformin should be discontinued or contraindicated in order to prevent lactic acidosis. Some authors have suggested discontinuing its use when serum creatinine is above 1.5 mg/dL in men and 1.4 mg/dL in women  while others suggested a cut-off of 2.2 mg/dL and continuous use even in the case of ischaemic cardiopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cardiac failure .
As serum creatinine can underestimate renal dysfunction, particularly in elderly patients and women, the use of estimated GFR (eGFR) has been advocated. The recommended eGFR thresholds are generally consistent with the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines in the U.K. and those endorsed by the Canadian Diabetes Association and the Australian Diabetes Society. Metformin may be continued or initiated with an eGFR of 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 but renal function should be monitored closely (every 3–6 months). The dose of metformin should be reviewed and reduced (e.g. by 50% or to half-maximal dose) in those with an eGFR of 45 mL/min per 1.73 m2, and renal function should be monitored closely (every 3 months). Metformin should not be initiated in patients at this eGFR . The drug should be stopped once eGFR falls to 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Frid et al. supports these recommendations through findings that above 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 metformin levels rarely goes above 20 mmol/l, which seems to be a safe level .
Another clinical condition associated with lactic acidosis in patients using metformin is heart failure .
Gastrointestinal intolerance occurs quite frequently in the form of abdominal pain, flatulence, and diarrhea . Most of these effects are transient and subside once the dose is reduced or when administered with meals. However, as much as 5% of patients do not tolerate even the lowest dose .
About 10–30% of patients who are prescribed metformin have evidence of reduced vitamin B12 absorption due to calcium-dependent ileal membrane antagonism, an effect that can be reversed with supplemental calcium . This vitamin B12 deficiency is rarely associated with megaloblastic anemia .
A multicentric study reported a mean decrease of 19% and 5% in vitamin B12 and folate concentration, respectively . Vitamin B12 deficiency has been related with dose and duration of metformin use and occurs more frequently among patients that use it for more than 3 years and in higher doses .
Clinically significant drug interactions involving metformin are rare. Some cationic agents such as amiloride, digoxin, morphine, procainamide, quinidine, quinine, ranitidine, triamterene, trimethoprim, and vancomycin that are eliminated by renal tubular secretion may compete with metformin for elimination. Concomitant administration of cimetidine, furosemide, or nifedipine may also increase the concentration of metformin. Patients receiving metformin in association with these agents should be monitored for potential toxicity. Metformin should be discontinued at least 48 hours prior to the administration of iodinated contrast media which can produce acute renal failure and should only be restarted if renal function is normal .
Gastrointestinal side-effects are common with the use of metformin of standard release and are usually associated with rapid titration and high-dose initiation of metformin.
These effects are generally transient, arise early in the course of treatment, and tend to subside over time . The gastrointestinal side-effects can be addressed by taking the agent with meals, reducing the rate of dose escalation, or transferring to a prolonged-release formulation .
Some studies point to a dose-related relationship of the incidence of side-effects  whereas other evidence gives no support for a dose-related effect of metformin on the gastrointestinal system .
The metformin XR formulation releases the active drug through hydrated polymers which expand after uptake of fluid, prolonging gastric residence time which leads to slower drug absorption in the upper gastrointestinal tract and allows once-daily administration .
A prospective open label study assessed metformin XR effectiveness on three cardiovascular risk factors: blood glucose (HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and postprandial blood glucose); total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol; and triglycerides and blood pressure. No significant differences were observed by any anthropometric, clinical, or laboratory measures except for plasma triglycerides which were lower in the group switched to metformin XR . Metformin tolerability as well as patient acceptance was greater in the group switched to metformin XR. Other studies have found good to excellent glycemic control with metformin XR in type 2 diabetic patients who did not have well-controlled diet and exercise alone . Metformin XR has been associated with improved tolerability  and increased compliance .
In recent years, metformin has become the first-line therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. Thus far, metformin is the only antidiabetic agent which has shown reduced macrovascular outcomes which is likely explained by its effects beyond glycemic control. It has also been employed as an adjunct to lifestyle modifications in pre-diabetes and insulin-resistant states. A large amount of evidence in literature supports its use even in cases where it would be contra-indicated mainly due to the fear of lactic acidosis which has been over-emphasized as the available data suggest that lactate levels and risk of lactic acidosis do not differ appreciably in patients taking this drug versus other glucose-lowering agents. It has also recently gained attention as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease.
Lilian Beatriz Aguayo Rojas is post graduate student at the State University of Rio de Janeiro, Diabetes Unit, Internal Medicine Department.
Marilia Brito Gomes is an Associate Professor at the State University of Rio de Janeiro, Diabetes Unit, Internal Medicine Department.
Angiotensin converting enzyme
Advanced glycosilation end product
Adenosine monophosfatase protein kinase
- BACE 1:
Beta-amyloid cleaving enzyme- 1
Body muscular index
Coronary artery disease
Cyclin dependent kinase
Cardiac heart failure
Complete pathologic response
cAMP responsive element binding protein
Dipeptidyl peptidase IV
Mitochondrial membrane potential
Fasting plasma glucose
Gestacional diabetes mellitus
Glomerular filtration rate
Estimated glomerular filtration rate
Glucagon like peptide 1
Highly active antiretroviral therapy
HIV associated lipodystrophy syndrome
Human imunodeficiency virus
Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2
Homeostatic model assessment – insulin resistance
Impaired fasting glucose
Impaired glucose tolerance
Liver kinase 1
Mammalian target of rapamycin
Nuclear factor kappa beta
Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
Oral glucose tolerance test
Plasminogen activator inhibitor
Policystic ovary syndrome
Permeability transition pore
Reactive oxigen species
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Tuberous sclerosis complex 2
Transducer of regulated CREB protein 2
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Von Williebrand fator.
- Godarzi MO, Brier-Ash M: Metformin revisited: re-evaluation of its properties and role in the pharmacopoeia of modern antidiabetic agents. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2005, 5: 654-665.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shaw RJ, Lamia KA, Vasquez D: The kinase LKB1 mediates glucose homeostasis in liver and therapeutic effects of metformin. Science. 2005, 310: 1642-1646. 10.1126/science.1120781.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- El-Mir MY, Nogueira V, Fontaine E: Dimethylbiguanide inhibits cell respiration via an indirect effect targeted on the respiratory chain complex I. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 223-228. 10.1074/jbc.275.1.223.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H: Global prevalence of diabetes. Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 1047-1053. 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guillies C, Abram KR, Lambert PC, Cooper NJ, Sutton AJ: Pharmacological and lifestyle interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007, 334: 299-10.1136/bmj.39063.689375.55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petersen J, Mc Guire D: Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose – a review of diagnosis, clinical implications and management. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res. 2005, 2 (1): 9-15. 10.3132/dvdr.2005.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group: Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346: 393-403.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group: Effects of withdrawal from metformin on the development of diabetes in the diabetes prevention program. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26 (4): 977-980.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Mukesh M: Indian diabetes prevention programme (IDPP). the Indian diabetes prevention programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia. 2006, 49: 289-297.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang W, Lin L, Qi J: The preventive effect of acarbose and metformin on the IGT population from becoming diabetes mellitus: a 3-year multicentral prospective study. Chin J Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 17: 131-134.Google Scholar
- Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group: 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet. 2009, 374 (9702): 1677-1686. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61457-4.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Vijay V: Low risk threshold for acquired diabetogenic factors in Asian Indians. Diab Res Clin Pract. 2004, 65: 189-195. 10.1016/j.diabres.2004.03.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH: Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance: The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 1997, 20: 537-544. 10.2337/diacare.20.4.537.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salpeter SR, Buckley NS, Kahn JA: Meta-analysis: metformin treatment in persons at risk for diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 2008, 121: 149-157. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.09.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lily M, Godwin M: Treating prediabetes with metformin systematic review and meta-analysis. Can Fam Physician. 2009, 55: 363-369.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- American Diabetes Association: Summary of revisions to the 2011 clinical practice recommendations. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34 (Suppl 1): S3-Google Scholar
- Rodbard HW, Jellinger PS, Davidson JA: Statement by an American association of clinical endocrinologists/American college of endocrinology consensus panel on type 2 diabetes mellitus. An algorithm for glycemic control. Endocr Pract. 2009, 15 (6): 540-559.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group: Effect of intensive blood glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998, 352 (9131): 854-865.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ito H, Ishida H, Takeuchi Y: Long-term effect of metformin on blood glucose control in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab. 2010, 7: 83-10.1186/1743-7075-7-83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, Holman RR: Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). JAMA. 1999, 281: 2005-2012. 10.1001/jama.281.21.2005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gerich J, Raskin P, Jean-Louis L: PRESERVE-beta: two-year efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with nateglinide or glyburide plus metformin. Diabetes Care. 2005, 28: 2093-2099. 10.2337/diacare.28.9.2093.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Phung OJ, Scholle JM, Talwar M, Coleman CI: Effect of noninsulin Antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2010, 303 (14): 1410-1418. 10.1001/jama.2010.405.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Charbonnel B, Shernthaner G, Brunetti P: Long-term efficacy and tolerability of add-on piogçitazone therapy to faliling monotherapy compared with addition of glicazide or metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2005, 48: 1093-1104. 10.1007/s00125-005-1751-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hanefeld M, Brunetti P, Schhernthaner GH: One year glycemic control with sulphonylurea plus pioglitazone versus sulphonylurea plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 141-147. 10.2337/diacare.27.1.141.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- González-Ortiza M, Guerrero-Romero J, Violante-Ortiz R: Efficacy of glimepiride/metformin combination versus glibenclamide/metformin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 2009, 23: 376-379. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.09.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johnson JA, Majumdar SR, Simpson SH: Decreased mortality associated with the use of metformin compared with sulfonylurea Monotherapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002, 25: 2244-2248. 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2244.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evans JM, Ogston SA, Emslie-Smith A, Morris AD: Risk of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of patients treated with sulfonylureas and metformin. Diabetologia. 2006, 49: 930-936. 10.1007/s00125-006-0176-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Giugliano D, Quatraro A, Consoli G: Metformin for obese, insulin-treated diabetic patients: improvement in glycaemic control and reduction of metabolic risk factors. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993, 44: 107-112. 10.1007/BF00315466.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lund SS, Tarnow L, Frandsen M: Combining insulin with metformin or an insulin secretagogue in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 12 month, randomised, double blind trial. BJ. 2009, 339: b4324-10.1136/bmj.b4324.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vella S, Buetow L, Royle P: The use of metformin in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review of efficacy. Diabetologia. 2010, 53 (5): 809-820. 10.1007/s00125-009-1636-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abdelghaffar S, Attia AM: Metformin added to insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus in adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, CD006691-Issue 1
- Bailey CJ, Bagdonas A, Rubes J: Rosiglitazone-metformin fixed-dose combination compared with uptritrated metformin alone in type diabetes mellitus:a 24 week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Clin Ther. 2005, 27: 1548-1561. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.10.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Harris SB, Hanley AJ, Zinman B: Changes over time in glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function in response to low-dose metformin and thiazolidinedione combination therapy in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34 (7): 1601-1604. 10.2337/dc11-0046.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scheen AJ: ADOPT study: which first-line glucose-lowering oral medication in type 2 diabetes?. Rev Med Liege. 2007, 62 (1): 48-52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Komoroski B, Vachharajani N, Feng Y, Li L, Kornhauser D, Pfister M: Dapagliflozin, a novel, selective SGLT2 inhibitor, improved glycemic control over 2 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009, 85: 513-519. 10.1038/clpt.2008.250.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- List JF, Woo V, Morales E, Tang W, Fiedorek FT: Sodium-glucose cotransport inhibition with dapagliflozin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 650-657. 10.2337/dc08-1863.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scheen AJ, de Magalhanes AC, Salvatore T: Reduction of the acute bioavailability of metformin by the α glycosidase inhibitor acarbose in normal man. Eur J Clin Invest. 1994, 24 (Suppl3): 50-54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenstok J, Brown A, Fischer J: Efficacy and safety of acarbose in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998, 21: 2050-2055. 10.2337/diacare.21.12.2050.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Richter B, Bandeira-Echtler E, Bergerhoff K, Lerch CL: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008, CD006739-2
- Mannucci E, Ognibene A, Cremasco F: Effect of metformin on glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and leptin levels in obese nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes Care. 2001, 24: 489-494. 10.2337/diacare.24.3.489.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DeFronzo RA, Hissa MN, Garber AJ, for Saxagliptin Study Group: The efficacy and safety of saxagliptin when added to metformin therapy in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes with metformin alone. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32 (9): 1649-1655. 10.2337/dc08-1984.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deacon CF, Mannucci E, Ahrén B: Glycaemic efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as add-on therapy to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes-a review and meta analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012, 14 (8): 762-767. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01603.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Charles B, Norris R, Xiao X, Hague W: Population pharmacokinetics of metformin in late pregnancy. Ther Drug Monit. 2006, 28: 67-72. 10.1097/01.ftd.0000184161.52573.0e.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gutzin SJ, Kozer E, Magee LA, Feig DS, Koren G: The safety of oral hypoglycemic agents in the first trimester of pregnancy. a meta-analysis. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2003, 10: 179-183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilbert C, Valois M, Koren G: Pregnancy outcome after first-trimester exposure to metformin: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2006, 86: 658-663. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.098.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, Battin MR, Moore MP: MiG trial investigators. Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008, 358: 2003-2015. 10.1056/NEJMoa0707193.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moore LE, Briery CM, Clokey D: Metformin and insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: preliminary results of a comparison. J Reprod Med. 2007, 52: 1011-1015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rowan JA, Rush EC, Obolonkin V, Battin M, Wouldes T, Hague WM: Metformin in gestational diabetes: the offspring follow-up (MiG TOFU): body composition at 2 years of age. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34: 2279-2284. 10.2337/dc11-0660.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wiegand S, Maikowski U, Blankenstein O, Bierbermann H, Tarnow P, Grutes A: Type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in European children and adolescents with obesity- a problem that is no longer restrited to minority groups. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004, 151: 199-206. 10.1530/eje.0.1510199.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pinhas-Hamiel O, Zeitler P: Clinical presentation and treatment of type 2 diabetes in children. Pediatr Diabetes. 2007, 8 (Suppl. 9): 16-27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jones KL, Arslanian S, Peterokova VA, Park JS, Tomlinson MJ: Effect of metformin in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2002, 25: 89-94. 10.2337/diacare.25.1.89.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gottschalk M, Danne T, Vlajnic A, Cara J: Glimepiride Versus Metformin as Monotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.A randomized, single-blind comparative study. DiabetesCare. 2007, 30: 790-794.Google Scholar
- Gungor N, Thompson T, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Janosky J, Arslanian S: Early signs of cardiovascular disease in youth with obesityand type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005, 28 (5): 1219-1221. 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1219.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Freedman DS, Khan LK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS: Relationship of childhood obesity to coronary heart disease risk factors in adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 2001, 108 (3): 712-718. 10.1542/peds.108.3.712.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rashid M, Roberts EA: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000, 30: 48-53. 10.1097/00005176-200001000-00017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Targher G, Bertolini L, Poli F: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of future cardiovascular events among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2005, 54: 3541-3546. 10.2337/diabetes.54.12.3541.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carnethon MR, Gidding SS, Nehgme R, Sidney S: Cardiorespiratory fitness in young adulthood and the development of cardiovascular disease risk factors. JAMA. 2003, 290: 3092-3100. 10.1001/jama.290.23.3092.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwimmer JB, Deutsch R, Kahen T, Lavine JE, Stanley C, Behling C: Prevalence of fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2006, 118: 1388-1393. 10.1542/peds.2006-1212.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reinehr T, Kiess W, Kappellen T, Andler W: Insulin sensitivity among obese children and adolescents, according to degree of weight loss. Pediatrics. 2004, 114: 1569-1573. 10.1542/peds.2003-0649-F.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tock L, Dˆamaso A, de Piano A, Carnier J: Long-TermEffects of metformin and lifestyle modification on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease obese adolescents. J Obes. 2010, 831901: 6-Article ID 831901Google Scholar
- Burgert TS, Duran EJ, Goldberg-Gell R, Dziura J, Yeckel CW, Katz S, Tamborlane WV, Caprio S: Short-term metabolic and cardiovascular effects of metformin in markedly obese adolescents with normal glucose tolerance. Pediatr Diabetes. 2008, 9: 567-576. 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00434.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park M, Kinra S, Ward K, White B, Viner R: Metformin for obesity in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 1743-1745. 10.2337/dc09-0258.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole CR, Foody JM, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS: Heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise testing asa predictor of mortality in a cardiovascularly healthy cohort. Ann Intern Med. 2000, 132: 552-555.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lind L, Andren B: Heart rate recovery after exercise is related to the insulin resistance syndrome and heart rate variability in elderly men. Am Heart J. 2002, 144: 666-672.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nadeau KJ, Ehlers LB, Zeitler PS, Love-Osborne K: Treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with metformin versus lifestyle intervention in insulin-resistant adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009, 10: 5-13. 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00450.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oude Luttikhuis H, Baur L, Jansen H, Shrewsbury VA, O’Malley C, Stolk RP, Summerbell CD: Interventions for treating obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, CD001872-1
- Kannel WB, McGee DL: Diabetes and glucose tolerance as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. Diabetes Care. 1979, 2: 120-126. 10.2337/diacare.2.2.120.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor E: NationalDiabetes Data Group. Diabetes in America. Heart disease and diabetes. 1995, Washington, D.C: GPO, 429-48. NIH publication no.95-1468, 2Google Scholar
- Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M: Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998, 339: 229-234. 10.1056/NEJM199807233390404.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krempf M, Parhofer KG, Steg G: National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel onDetection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).Third Report of the NationalCholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection. Circulation. 2002, 106: 3143-3421.Google Scholar
- Bulugahapitiya U, Siyambalapitiya S, Sithole J, Idris I: Is diabetes a coronary risk equivalent? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2009, 26: 142-148. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02640.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sgambato S, Varricchio M, Tesauro P, Passariello N, Carbone L: Use of metformin in ischemic cardiopathy. Clin Ther. 1980, 94: 77-85.Google Scholar
- Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA: 10-year follow up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359: 1577-1589. 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kao J, Tobis J, Mc Clelland RL: Relation of metformin treatment to clinical events in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2004, 93: 1347-1350. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.02.028.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kooy A, de Jager J, Lehert P: Long-term effects of metformin on metabolism and microvascular and macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2009, 169: 616-625. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jadhav S, Ferrell W, Greer IA, Petrie JR, Cobbe SM, Sattar N: Effects of metformin on microvascular function and exercise tolerance in women with angina and normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006, 48: 956-963. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.088.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boussageon R, Supper I, Bejan-Angoulvant T: Reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2012, 9 (4): e1001204-10.1371/journal.pmed.1001204.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MacDonald MR, Petrie MC, Hawkins NM: Diabetes, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2008, 10: 1224-1240. 10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.09.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hulisz DT, Bonfiglio MF, Murray RD: Metformin-associated lactic acidosis. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1998, 11: 233-236.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Food and Drug Administration. Product label approval: metformin. 2006,http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/piglucophage.pdf,
- Masoudi FA, Inzucchi SE, Wang Y, Havranek EP, Foody JM, Krumholz HM: Thiazolinediones, metformin, and outcomes in older patients with diabetes and heart failure. Circulation. 2005, 111: 583-590. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154542.13412.B1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eurich DT, Majumdar SR, McAlister FA, Tsuyuki RT, Johnson JA: Improved clinical outcomes associated with metformin in patients with diabetes and heart failure. Diabetes Care. 2005, 28: 2345-2351. 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2345.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Papanas N, Maltezos E, Mikhailidis DP: Metformin and heart failure: never say never again. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012, 1: 1-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rachmani R, Slavachevski I, Levi Z, Zadok B, Kedar Y, Ravid M: Metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: reconsideration of traditional contraindications. Eur J Intern Med. 2002, 13: 428-433. 10.1016/S0953-6205(02)00131-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shah DD, Fonarow GC, Horwich TB: Metformin Therapy and Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Systolic Heart Failure and Diabetes. J Card Fail. 2010, 16 (3): 200-206. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.10.022.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Isoda K, Young J, Zirlik A: Metformin inhibits Proinflammatory Responses and Nuclear Factor ĸß in Human Vascular Wall Cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006, 26: 611-617.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group Intensive: Lifestyle Intervention or Metformin on Inflammation and Coagulation in Participants With Impaired Glucose Tolerance. Diabetes. 2005, 54 (5): 1566-1572.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Jager J, Kooy A, Lehert P: Effects of short-term treatment with metformin on markers of endothelial function and inflammatory activity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Intern Med. 2004, 256: 1-14. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01328.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mather KJ, Verma S, Anderson TJ: Improved endothelial function with metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001, 37 (5): 1344-1350. 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01129-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vitale C, Mercuro G, Cornoldi A, Fini M: Metformin improves endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome. J Intern Med. 2005, 258: 250-256. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01531.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grant PJ: Beneficial effects of metformin on haemostasis and vascular function in man. Diabetes Metab. 2003, 29 (6S): 44-52.Google Scholar
- Standeven KF, Ariens RA, Whitaker P: The effect of dimethylbiguanide on thrombin activity, FXIII activation, fibrin polymerization, and fibrin clot formation. Diabetes. 2002, 51: 189-197.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Charles MA, Morange P, Eschwege E: Effect of weight change and metformin on fibrinolysis and the von Willebrand factor in obese nondiabetic subjects: the BIGPRO1 Study. Biguanides and the Prevention of the Risk of Obesity. Diabetes Care. 1998, 21: 1967-1972. 10.2337/diacare.21.11.1967.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu RR, Zhao JP, Jin H: Lifestyle Intervention and Metformin for Treatment of Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2008, 299 (2): 185-193. 10.1001/jama.2007.56-b.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Glueck CJ, Fontaine RN, Wang P: Metformin reduces weight, centripetalobesity, insulin, leptin, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in nondiabetic, morbidly obese subjects with body mass index greater than 30. Metabolism. 2001, 50: 856-861. 10.1053/meta.2001.24192.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kusaka I, Nagasaka S, Horie H, Ishibashi S: Metformin, but not pioglitazone, decreases postchallenge plasma ghrelin levels in type 2 diabetic patients: a possible role in weight stability?. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008, 10: 1039-1046. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00857.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hadigan C, Corcoran C, Basgoz N: Metformin in the Treatment of HIV Lipodystrophy Syndrome A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2000, 284: 472-477. 10.1001/jama.284.4.472.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sheth S, Larson L: The efficacy and safety of insulin-sensitizing drugs in HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMC Infect Dis. 2010, 10: 183-10.1186/1471-2334-10-183.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bailey CJ, Turner RC: Metformin. N Engl J Med. 1996, 334: 574-579. 10.1056/NEJM199602293340906.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Faure P, Rossini E, Wiernsperger N: An insulin sensitizer improves the free radical defense system potential and insulin sensitivity in high fructose-fed rats. Diabetes. 1999, 48: 353-357. 10.2337/diabetes.48.2.353.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beisswenger P, Rugiero-Lopez D: Metformin inhibition of glycation processes. Diabetes Metab. 2003, 29 (6S): 95-103.Google Scholar
- Anedda A, Rial E, Gonzalez Barroso : Metformin induces oxidative stress in white adipocytes and raises uncoupling proten levels. J Endocrinol. 2008, 199: 33-40. 10.1677/JOE-08-0278.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Z, Chen H, Li J, Li T, Zheng B, Zheng Y, Jin H, He Y, Gu Q, Xun X: Sirtuin 1-mediated cellular metabolic memory of high glucose via the LKB1/AMPK/ROS pathway and therapeutic effects of metformin. Diabetes. 2012, 61 (1): 217-228. 10.2337/db11-0416.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA: Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355: 2427-2443. 10.1056/NEJMoa066224.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Desilets AR, Dhakal-Karki S, Dunican KC: Role of metformin for weight management in patients without type 2 diabetes. Ann Pharmacother. 2008, 42: 817-826. 10.1345/aph.1K656.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eleftheriadou I, Grigoropoulou P, Katsilambros N, Tentolouris N: The effects of medications used for the management of diabetes and obesity on postprandial lipid metabolism. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2008, 4: 340-356. 10.2174/157339908786241133.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wulffelé MG, Kooy A, Lehert P, Bets D, Donker A, Stehouwer C: Does metformin decrease blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes intensively treated with insulin?. Diabet Med. 2005, 22: 907-10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01554.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tack CJ, Smits P, Willemsen JJ, Lenders JW, Thien T, Lutterman JA: Effects of insulin on vascular tone and sympathetic nervous system in NIDDM. Diabetes. 1996, 45: 15-22. 10.2337/diabetes.45.1.15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sechi LA, Bartoli E: Molecular mechanisms of insulin resistance in arterial hypertension. Blood Press Suppl. 1996, 1: 47-54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Granberry MC, Fonseca VA: Cardiovascular risk factors associated with insulin resistance: effects of oral antidiabetic agents. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005, 5: 201-209. 10.2165/00129784-200505030-00006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fontbonne A, Diouf I, Baccara-Dinet M, Eschwege E, Charles A: Effects of 1-year treatment with metformin on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in non-diabetic upper-body obese subjects with mild glucose anomalies: a post-hoc analysis of the BIGPRO1 trial. Diabetes Metab. 2009, 35: 385-391. 10.1016/j.diabet.2009.03.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vigersky R, Filmore-Nassar A, Allan R: Thyrotropin Suppression by Metformin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006, 91: 225-227. 10.1210/jc.2005-1210.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Capelli C, Rotondi M, Pirola I, Agosti B, Gandossi E: TSH-lowering effect of metformin in type 2 diabetic patients differences between euthyroid, untreated hypothyroid, and euthyroid on L-T4 therapy patients. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 1589-1590. 10.2337/dc09-0273.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Triant VA, Lee H, Hadigan C, Grinspoon SK: Increased acute myocardial infarction rates and cardiovascular risk factors among patients with HIV disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007, 92: 2506-2512. 10.1210/jc.2006-2190.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kinlaw WB, Marsh B: Adiponectin and HIV-lipodystrophy:taking HAART. Endocrinology. 2004, 145: 484-486.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moyle GJ, Sabin CA, Cartledge J: A randomized comparative trial of tenofovir DF or abacavir as replacement for a thymidine analogue in persons with lipoatrophy. Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006, 20: 2043-2050.Google Scholar
- Behrens G, Dejam A, Schmidt H: Impaired glucose tolerance, b cell function and lipid metabolism in HIV patients under treatment with protease inhibitors. Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999, 13: F63-F70.Google Scholar
- Kohli R, Shevitz A, Gorbach S, Wanke C: A randomized placebo-controlled trial of metformin for the treatment of HIV lipodystrophy. HIV Med. 2007, 8: 420-426. 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2007.00488.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Wijk , de Koning E, Castro M: Comparison of Rosiglitazone and Metformin for treating HIV Lipodistrophy. Ann Inter Med. 2005, 143: 337-346.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spasic MR, Callaerts P, Norga KK: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) Molecular Crossroad for Metabolic Control and Survival of Neurons. Neuroscientist. 2009, 15 (4): 309-316. 10.1177/1073858408327805.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Culmsee C, Monnig J, Kemp BE, Mattson MP: AMPactivated protein kinase is highly expressed in neurons in the developing rat brain and promotes neuronal survival following glucose deprivation. J Mol Neurosci. 2001, 17: 45-58. 10.1385/JMN:17:1:45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Santomauro Júnior AC, Ugolini MR, Santomauro AT, Souto RP: Metformina e AMPK: Um Antigo Fármaco e Uma Nova Enzima no Contexto da Síndrome Metabólica. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2008, 52 (1): 120-125. 10.1590/S0004-27302008000100017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- El-Mir MY, Detaille D, Villanueva G: Neuroprotective Role of Antidiabetic Drug Metformin Against Apoptotic Cell Death in Primary Cortical Neurons. J Mol Neurosci. 2008, 34 (1): 77-87. 10.1007/s12031-007-9002-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Andersen JK: Oxidative stress in neurodegeneration: Cause or consequence?. Nat Med. 2004, 10: S18-S25. 10.1038/nrn1434.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kroemer G, Reed JC: Mitochondrial control of cell death. Nat Med. 2000, 6: 513-519. 10.1038/74994.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Detaille D, Guigas B, Chauvin C: Metformin prevents high glucose-induced endothelial cell death through a mitochondrial permeability transition-dependent process. Diabetes. 2005, 54: 2179-2187. 10.2337/diabetes.54.7.2179.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plum L, Schubert M, Bruning JC: The role of insulin receptor signaling in the brain. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 16: 59-65. 10.1016/j.tem.2005.01.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van der Heide LP, Ramakers GM, Smidt MP: Insulin signaling in the central nervous system: learning to survive. Prog Neurobiol. 2006, 79: 205-221. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.06.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gupta A, Bisht B, Dey CS: Peripheral insulin-sensitizer drug metformin ameliorates neuronal insulin resistance and Alzheimer’s-like change. Neuropharmacology. 2011, 60: 910-920. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.01.033.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Selkoe DJ: The cell biology of ßamyloid precursor protein and presenilin in Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Cell Biol. 1998, 8: 447-453. 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01363-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y, Zhoua K, Wanga R, Liua Y: Antidiabetic drug metformin (GlucophageR) increases biogenesis of Alzheimer’s amyloid peptides via up-regulating BACE1 transcription. PNAS. 2009, 106 (10): 3907-3912. 10.1073/pnas.0807991106.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Gallagher D, De Vito L: Metformin activates an atypical PKC-CBP pathway to promote neurogenesis and enhance spatial memory formation. Cell Stem Cell. 2012, 11: 23-35. 10.1016/j.stem.2012.03.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Papanas N, Maltezos E, Mikhailidis DP: Metformin and cancer: licence to heal?. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2010, 19: 913-917. 10.1517/13543784.2010.499122.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A: Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Canc Ins. 2005, 97: 1679-1687. 10.1093/jnci/dji375.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li D, Yeung SJ, Hassan MM, Konopleva M, Abbruzzese JL: Anti-diabetic therapies affect risk of pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2009, 137 (2): 482-488. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.013.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Donadon V, Balbi M, Valent F, Avogaro A: Glycated hemoglobin and antidiabetic strategies as risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010, 16 (24): 3025-3032. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i24.3025.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Libby G, Donnelly LA, Donnan PT: New users of metformin area at low risk of incident cancer: a cohort study among people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 1620-1625. 10.2337/dc08-2175.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Landman GW, Kleefstra N, van Hateren KJ: Metformin associated with lower cancer mortality in type 2 diabetes ZODIAC-16. Diabetes Care. 2010, 33: 322-326. 10.2337/dc09-1380.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee JH, Kim TI, Jeon SM: The effects of metformin on the survival of colorectal cancer patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Cancer. 2011, 12: 1-24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inoue M, Iwasaki M, Otami T: Diabetes mellitus and the risk of cancer. Results from a large-scale population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2006, 166: 1871-1877. 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1871.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grimberg A, Cohen P: Role of insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in growth control and carcinogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 2000, 183: 1-9. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200004)183:1<1::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-J.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith U, Gale EAU: Cancer and diabetes: are we ready for prime time?. Diabetologia. 2010, 53: 1541-1544. 10.1007/s00125-010-1815-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Markman B, Atzori F, Perez-Garcia J, Tabernero J, Baselga J: Status of PI3K inhibition and biomarker development in cancer therapeutics. Ann Oncol. 2010, 21: 683-691. 10.1093/annonc/mdp347.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kalender A, Selvaraj A, Kim SY: Metformin, independent of AMPK, inhibits mTORC1 in a rag GTPasedependent manner. Cell Metab. 2010, 11: 390-401. 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.014.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evans J, Donelly L, Emslie A: Metformin and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients. BMJ. 2005, 330 (7503): 1304-1305. 10.1136/bmj.38415.708634.F7.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bodmer M, Meier C, Krähenbühl S: Long-term metformin Use is associated with decreased risk of breast cancer. Diabetes Care. 2010, 33: 1304-1308. 10.2337/dc09-1791.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bowker SL, Majumdar SR, Veugelers P, Johnson JA: Increased cancer-related mortality for patients with type 2 diabetes who usesulfonylureas or insulin. Diabetes Care. 2006, 29: 254-258. 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1558.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ben Sahra I, Laurent K, Loubat A: The antidiabetic drug metformin exerts an antitumoral effect in vitro and in vivo through a decrease of cyclin D1 level. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 3576-3586. 10.1038/sj.onc.1211024.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pollak M: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8: 915-928. 10.1038/nrc2536.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zakikhani M, Dowling R, Fantus IG, Sonenberg N, Pollak M: Metformin is an AMP kinase-dependent growth inhibitor for breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 10269-10273. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1500.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vazquez-Martin A, Oliveras-Ferraros C, Menendez JA: The antidiabetic drug metformin suppresses HER2 (erbB-2) oncoprotein overexpression via inhibition of the mTOR effector p70S6K1 in human breast carcinoma cells. Cell Cycle. 2009, 8: 88-96. 10.4161/cc.8.1.7499.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lund SS, Tarnow L, Stehouwer CD: Impact of metformin versus repaglinide on non-glycaemic cardiovascular risk markers related to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008, 158: 631-641. 10.1530/EJE-07-0815.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thoreen CC, Sabatini DM: AMPK and p53 help cells through lean times. Cell Metab. 2005, 1: 287-288. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.04.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhuang Y, Miskimins W: Cell cycle arrest in Metformin treated breast cancer cells involves activation of AMPK, downregulation of cyclin D1, and requires p27Kip1 or p21Cip1. J Mol Signal. 2008, 3: 18-10.1186/1750-2187-3-18.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pearce EL, Walsh MC, Cejas PJ: Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature. 2009, 460: 103-107. 10.1038/nature08097.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiralerspong S, Palla S, Giordano S: Metformin and Pathologic Complete Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Diabetic Patients With Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 3297-3302. 10.1200/JCO.2009.19.6410.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hirsh H, Iliopoulos D, Tsichlis P, Stuh K: Metformin selectively targets cancer stem cells, and acts together with chemotherapy to block tumor growth and prolong remission. Cancer Res. 2009, 69 (19): 7507-7511. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2994.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scarpello J, Howlett H: Metformin therapy and clinical uses. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res. 2008, 5: 157-167. 10.3132/dvdr.2008.027.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rosand J, Friedberg J, Yang J: Fatal phenformin-associated lactic acidosis. Ann Intern Med. 1997, 127: 170-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salpeter SR, Greyber E, Pasternak GA, Salpeter EE: Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, 1: CD002967-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tahrani AA, Varghese GI, Scarpello JH, Hanna FWF: Metformin, heart failure and lactic acidosis: is Metformin absolutely contraindicated?. BMJ. 2007, 355: 508-512.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lipska KJ, Bailey CJ, Inzucchi SE: Use of metformin in the setting of mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34 (6): 1431-1437. 10.2337/dc10-2361.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frid A, Sterner GN, Londahl M: Novel assay of metformin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and varying levels of renal function. Diabetes Care. 2010, 33: 1291-1293. 10.2337/dc09-1284.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Metformin LS: Metformin: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use. Diabetes Metab. 1979, 5: 233-245.Google Scholar
- Cusi K, DeFronzo RA: Metformin: a review of its metabolic effects. Diabetes Rev. 1998, 6: 89-131.Google Scholar
- Bauman WA, Shaw S, Jayatilleke E: Increased intake of calcium reverses vitamin B12 malabsorption induced by metformin. Diabetes Care. 2000, 23: 1227-1231. 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1227.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Callaghan TS, Hadden DR, Tomkin GH: Megaloblastic anemia due to vitamin B12 malaborsption associated with long-term metformin treatment. Br Med J. 1980, 280: 1214-1215. 10.1136/bmj.280.6225.1214.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jager J, Kooy A, Lehert P, Wulffelé M: Long term treatment with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and risk of vitamin B-12 deficiency: randomized placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 2010, 340: c2181-10.1136/bmj.c2181.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wei Ting RZ, Szeto CC, Chan M, Ma K: Risk Factors of Vitamin B12 Deficiency in Patients Receiving Metformin. Arch Intern Med. 2006, 166: 1975-1979. 10.1001/archinte.166.18.1975.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klapholz L, Leitersdorf E, Weinrauch L: Leucocytoclastic vasculitis and pneumonitis induced by metformin. BMJ. 1986, 293: 483-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Desilets DJ, Shorr AF, Moran KA, Holtzmuller KC: Cholestatic jaundice associated with the use of metformin. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001, 96: 2257-2258. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03972.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kashyap AS, Kashyap S: Haemolytic anaemia due to metformin. Postgrad Med J. 2000, 76: 125-126. 10.1136/pmj.76.892.125.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Giugliano D, De Rosa N, Di Maro G: Metformin improves glucose, lipid metabolism, and reduces blood pressure in hypertensive, obese women. Diabetes Care. 1993, 16: 1387-1390. 10.2337/diacare.16.10.1387.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group: Relative efficacy of randomly allocated diet, sulphonylurea, insulin, or metformin in patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes followed for three years (UKPDS 13). BMJ. 1995, 310: 83-88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Glucophage® and Glucophage XRproduct information. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. 2003, Available at: http://www.drugs.com/pro/glucophage.html
- Haupt E, Knick B, Koschinsky T, Liebermeister H, Schneider J, Hirche H: Oral antidiabetic combination therapy with sulphonylureas and metformin. Diabete Metab. 1991, 17: 224-231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB: Management of hyperglycaemiain type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006, 49: 1711-1721. 10.1007/s00125-006-0316-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grant P: The effects of high- and medium-dose metformin therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1996, 19: 64-66. 10.2337/diacare.19.1.64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garber AJ, Duncan TG, Goodman AM, Millus DJ, Rohlf JL: Efficacy of metformin in type 2 diabetes: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose–response trial. Am J Med. 1997, 103: 491-497. 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00254-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Donahue S, Marathe P, Guld T, Meeker J: The phamacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of extended-release metformin tablets vs immediate-release metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002, 51 (Suppl 2): A468-Google Scholar
- Levy J, Cobas RA, Gomes MB: Assessment of efficacy and tolerability of oncedaily extended release metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2010, 2: 16-10.1186/1758-5996-2-16.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raz I, Delaet I, Goyvaerts H: Safety and efficacy of novel extended-release formulation of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2000, 49 (Suppl 1): A363-Google Scholar
- Donnelly LA, Morris AD, Pearson ER: Adherence in patients transferred from immediate release metformin to a sustained release formulation: a population-based study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009, 11: 338-342. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00973.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.