Open Access

Association between insulin resistance and c-reactive protein among Peruvian adults

  • Bizu Gelaye1Email author,
  • Luis Revilla2,
  • Tania Lopez2,
  • Luis Suarez2,
  • Sixto E Sanchez3,
  • Karin Hevner4,
  • Annette L Fitzpatrick1 and
  • Michelle A Williams1, 4
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome20102:30

DOI: 10.1186/1758-5996-2-30

Received: 8 January 2010

Accepted: 18 May 2010

Published: 18 May 2010

Abstract

Objective

Insulin resistance (IR), a reduced physiological response of peripheral tissues to the action of insulin, is one of the major causes of type 2 diabetes. We sought to evaluate the relationship between serum C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of systemic inflammation, and prevalence of IR among Peruvian adults.

Methods

This population based study of 1,525 individuals (569 men and 956 women; mean age 39 years old) was conducted among residents in Lima and Callao, Peru. Fasting plasma glucose, insulin, and CRP concentrations were measured using standard approaches. Insulin resistance was assessed using the homeostasis model (HOMA-IR). Categories of CRP were defined by the following tertiles: <0.81 mg/l, 0.81-2.53 mg/l, and >2.53 mg/l. Logistic regression procedures were employed to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Elevated CRP were significantly associated with increased mean fasting insulin and mean HOMA-IR concentrations (p < 0.001). Women with CRP concentration >2.53 mg/l (upper tertile) had a 2.18-fold increased risk of IR (OR = 2.18 95% CI 1.51-3.16) as compared with those in the lowest tertile (<0.81 mg/l). Among men, those in the upper tertile had a 2.54-fold increased risk of IR (OR = 2.54 95% CI 1.54-4.20) as compared with those in the lowest tertile.

Conclusion

Our observations among Peruvians suggest that chronic systemic inflammation, as evidenced by elevated CRP, may be of etiologic importance in insulin resistance and diabetes.

Background

Insulin resistance (IR), a reduced physiological response of peripheral tissues to the action of insulin, is one of the major causes of type 2 diabetes and plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [1]. Recent studies have shown that the worldwide prevalence of IR and its associated risk factors have increased markedly [2, 3]. IR is believed to be associated with chronic inflammatory response which is characterized by abnormal cytokine production and the activations of pro-inflammatory signaling pathways [4, 5].

The systemic inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP) when measured in the blood with high sensitivity assay has been reported to be a strong and independent predictor of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension [6, 7]. Several studies have provided strong evidence of association between CRP and CVD risk independent of traditional risk factors, such as cholesterol, blood pressure, alcohol consumption, and smoking habit [7, 8]. Accumulating experimental and epidemiologic data now link inflammatory processes to impaired glucose metabolism [9]. It has also been reported that elevated CRP concentrations may reflect not only local inflammation at atherosclerotic lesions but also predict future CVD risk including IR [7, 10].

An emerging body of evidence documents associations of elevated CRP concentrations in individuals with IR [1013]. Few studies, however, have evaluated this association among South Americans. We, therefore, sought to evaluate the relationship between IR and serum CRP among Peruvian adults. Elucidation of the relationship between IR and CRP concentration may lead to an improved recognition of individuals at risk for future diabetes and CVD risk and may help in identification of novel therapeutic targets [9].

Methods

This study is part of a larger population based study among Peruvian men and women who participated in the Prevalencia de Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedades No-Transmissibles (Prevalence of Risk Factors for Non Transmissible Diseases) referred to as the FRENT study. The primary objective of the FRENT study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated to non-transmissible diseases among residents in Lima and Callao, Peru.

Details of the study setting, sampling, and data collection procedures have been described previously [14]. For the study described here, we excluded subjects with diabetes (69), those who were taking lipid lowering drugs (33), and with missing laboratory information (31). The final analyzed sample included 1,525 individuals (569 men and 956 women).

Data Collection and Variable Specification

Briefly, each participant was interviewed by a trained interviewer using a structured questionnaire validated by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) for assessing the prevalence of non transmissible disease (NTD) risk factors [15]. The questionnaire inquired about individuals' age, gender, educational attainment, and medical history via in-person interviews. Height and weight were measured with participants wearing light clothing and no shoes. Waist circumference was measured from the midpoint between the iliac crest and the lower ribs measured at the sides. Hip circumference was measured at the point of the maximum circumference over the buttocks. After participants had been seated for at least 5 minutes, and again after 30 minutes during the interview, a resting blood pressure was measured using a Mercury Desk Sphygmomanometer, these two values were averaged. A follow-up visit to participants' home was made the next morning to collect a blood sample after a 12-hour fast. Aliquots of serum were used to determine participants' fasting glucose concentrations and lipid profiles. Serum triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), glucose, and insulin were measured at the Peruvian National Institute of Health Laboratory in Lima, Peru. TG concentrations were determined by standardized enzymatic procedures using glycerol phosphate oxidase assay. HDL-C was measured by a chemical precipitation technique using dextran sulfate. Participants' fasting serum glucose (FSG) was determined using standardized glucose oxidase method (glucose oxidase GOD-PAP).

As an index of insulin resistance, we determined the Homeostatis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) index by dividing the product of fasting glucose (mg/dl) and fasting insulin (μIU/ml) by 405 [16]. The HOMA IR is widely used in clinical trials and has been shown to be correlated with the results obtained from the "gold standard" euglycemic glucose clamp method [1]. Serum CRP concentrations were measured by an ultra-sensitive competitive immunoassay (Dade Behring, Deerfield, Illinois) with the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation both < 10% [17]. All laboratory assays were completed without knowledge of participants' medical history.

All subjects provided informed consent and all research protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of National Institute of Health in Peru, Dos de Mayo Hospital, Peru and the Human Subjects Division at the University of Washington, USA.

Statistical Analyses

We first explored frequency distributions of socio-demographic, clinical and behavioral characteristics of subjects. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard error of means (SEM). Categorical variables were expressed as number (percent, %). Chi-Square tests were used to evaluate differences in the distribution of categorical variables. Student's t tests were used to evaluate differences in mean distributions. Associations of CRP with HOMA-IR and other continuous covariates (e.g., insulin and glucose) were determined using the Pearson's correlation coefficients. The distribution of fasting insulin, fasting glucose, and HOMA-IR were skewed to the right side, and the values were transformed to the natural logarithms in the analysis. Thus, the presented means were always geometric means. Mean values of fasting insulin, fasting glucose, and HOMA-IR were compared across the different concentrations of CRP using linear regression procedures. Categories of CRP were defined by the following tertiles: <0.81 mg/l, 0.81-2.53 mg/l, and >2.53 mg/l. The group with the lowest tertile of CRP (<0.81) served as the reference group. Confounding variables were considered a priori on the basis of their hypothesized relationship with IR and CRP. Multiple linear regression procedures were used to adjust for covariates of interest: age, BMI, and current smoking status. Presence of IR (yes/no) was defined as being in the highest quartile of HOMA-IR (>5.12). Logistic regression procedures were employed to estimate odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) of IR according to tertiles of CRP. In multivariate analysis, tests for linear trend across increasing categories of CRP were conducted by treating the three-level CRP-concentration variable as an ordinal variable. Since previous studies have noted that the effect of CRP on IR differs among men and women, regression analyses were reported for men and women separately. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 14.0, SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) software. All reported p-values are two tailed and confidence intervals were calculated at the 95% concentration.

Results

Characteristics of study participants according to gender are shown in Table 1. The percentages of current smokers, mean value of waist circumference, triglycerides, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly higher among men than women. Women had significantly higher mean age, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, total cholesterol, and low density lipoprotein-cholesterol. There was no significant gender difference in the values of CRP, fasting insulin and fasting glucose. Values of CRP were positively associated with fasting insulin and HOMA-IR in men (r = 0.190 and 0.166 respectively <0.001) and women (r = 0.157 and 0.153 respectively, p < 0.001).
Table 1

Characteristics of the Study Population, Lima, Peru 2006.

Characteristics

Women (N = 956)

Men (N = 569)

**P-Value

Age

39.9 ± 14.5

38.3 ± 15.9

 

Ever smoking (%)

16.0

44.5

<0.001

Current smoking (%)

9.6

32.0

<0.001

BMI (kg/m2)

26.6 ± 4.8

26.1 ± 4.0

0.042

Waist Circumference (cm)

88.3 ± 11.5

92.0 ± 10.6

<0.001

Hip circumference (cm)

99.6 ± 10.7

98.8 ± 8.4

0.111

Total cholesterol (mg/dl)

186.0 ± 42.0

179.6 ± 39.1

0.003

HDL cholesterol (mg/dl)

48.5 ± 0.4

42.6 ± 0.4

<0.001

LDL cholesterol (mg/dl)

114 (94-138)

110 (92-135)

0.042

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

104(69.0-156.0)

124(84.0-188.5)

<0.001

Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

113.4 ± 16.1

119.9 ± 13.8

<0.001

Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

71.5 ± 10.4

75.5 ± 10.6

<0.001

CRP (mg/l)

1.5 (0.6-3.4)

1.5 (0.6-3.8)

0.252

Fasting insulin(μU/ml)

15.0 (10.2-22.8)

16.0 (10.6-23.9)

0.319

Fasting glucose(mmol/l)

4.8 ± 1.0

4.9 ± 1.1

0.180

HOMA-IR

3.1 (2.1-4.9)

3.4 (2.2-5.3)

0.167

* Data are mean ± SD, percentages or median (interquartile range) for variables with skewed distributions Test of significance was based on log-transformed values

** P-value from Chi-Square test for categorical variables or from Student's t-test for continuous variables

Table 2 shows the adjusted (age, BMI, current smoking status) mean values of fasting insulin, fasting glucose, and HOMA-IR according to categories of serum CRP and gender. Elevated CRP concentrations were significantly associated with increased fasting insulin and HOMA-IR concentrations (trend test p < 0.001). Among women, there was no observed difference in mean fasting glucose whereas men had significantly lower fasting glucose with increased CRP concentrations (trend test p = 0.005).
Table 2

*Adjusted Geometric Mean Values of Fasting Insulin, Fasting Glucose, and HOMA-IR, According to C-Reactive Protein Concentration and Gender.

C-Reactive Protein (mg/l)

n

Geometric Mean of fasting insulin (μU/ml) (95% CI)

Geometric Mean of fasting glucose (mmol/l) (95% CI)

Geometric Mean of HOMA-IR(95% CI)

Women

   

<0.81

325

2.63 (2.56-2.69)

1.56 (1.55-1.58)

1.08 (1.01-1.15)

0.81-2.53

320

2.76 (2.72-2.81)

1.56 (1.55-1.57)

1.21 (1.17-1.26)

>2.53

310

2.90 (2.83-2.97)

1.56 (1.54-1.57)

1.35 (1.27-1.43)

Trend p-value

<0.001

0.593

<0.001

Men

   

<0.81

183

2.59 (2.50-2.68)

1.60 (1.58-1.62)

1.08 (0.99-1.17)

0.81-2.53

189

2.77 (2.71-2.82)

1.58 (1.56-1.59)

1.23 (1.17-1.29)

>2.53

197

2.94 (2.85-3.02)

1.55 (1.54-1.58)

1.38(1.29-1.47)

Trend p-value

<0.001

0.005

<0.001

HOMA-IR-Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance.

*Mean values were adjusted for age, current cigarette smoking status, and body mass index. Separate models were estimated for women and men.

Serum CRP concentrations were statistically significantly and positively associated with prevalent IR in both women and men in our population (trend test p-values < 0.001) (Table 3). After adjusting for age, smoking status and body mass index the ORs and 95% confidence intervals across increasing tertiles for women were:, 1.35 (95% CI 0.91-1.99), and 2.18 (95% CI 1.50-3.17). The corresponding ORs and 95% confidence intervals for men we as follows: 2.67 (95% CI 1.61-4.44), and 2.58 (95% CI 1.55-4.28).
Table 3

Adjusted Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI) of Insulin Resistance among Peruvian Women and Men According to Tertiles of Serum CRP Concentrations.

 

Insulin Resistance

 

C-Reactive Protein (mg/l)

No n (%)

Yes n (%)

*Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)

All

   

<0.81

422 (36.9)

86 (22.6)

1.00 (Reference)

0.81-2.53

376 (32.9)

133 (34.9)

1.75 (1.28-2.35)

>2.53

346 (30.2)

162 (42.5)

2.29 (1.70-3.09)

 

Trend p-value

<0.001

Women

   

<0.81

267 (36.7)

58 (25.3)

1.00 (Reference)

0.81-2.53

249 (34.3)

71 (31.0)

1.35 (0.91-1.99)

>2.53

211 (29.0)

100 (43.7)

2.18 (1.50-3.17)

 

Trend p-value

<0.001

Men

   

<0.81

155 (37.2)

28 (18.4)

1.00 (Reference)

0.81-2.53

127 (30.5)

62 (40.8)

2.67 (1.61-4.44)

>2.53

135 (32.4)

62 (40.8)

2.58 (1.55-4.28)

 

Trend p-value

0.001

*Adjusted for age, current cigarette smoking status, and body mass index. Separate models were estimated for women and men.

Discussion

The present study has shown that IR was associated with CRP, a marker of systemic inflammation, in the Peruvian adult population. After adjusting for BMI, age, and current smoking status, those in the upper tertile (CRP concentration >2.53 mg/l) had more than 2-fold increased risk of IR, compared with those in lowest tertile (CRP concentration <0.81 mg/l) in both men and women. Our observations among Peruvians are in agreement with reports from cross sectional and prospective studies of other populations that showed associations between IR and CRP [1013]. These associations are explained by different possible mechanisms.

A number of studies have reported that low-grade inflammation is a novel risk factor in all stages of atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndrome [18, 19]. It appears that adipose tissue in general; visceral adipose tissue in particular, plays a key role in regulating inflammation [10]. Notably, CRP is primary synthesized in the liver and regulated by the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [20] in adiposities. This in part suggests that the associations of CRP concentrations with fasting insulin, fasting glucose, and HOMA-IR could be due to the presence of a chronic systemic sub-clinical inflammation [10].

It has also been shown that CRP, in addition to providing downstream integration to overall cytokine activation, is bound to the membranes of damaged vascular cells where it activates complement proteins or enhances the production of thrombogenic agents [21, 22] depending on conventional risk factors and other markers of inflammation [23]. These instances of vascular inflammation may contribute to the development of insulin resistance [21, 22] although the mechanisms are not fully known [23].

Some important study limitations must be considered when interpreting the results of our study. First, because of this cross-sectional data collection design, we cannot be certain of the temporal relation between elevated CRP concentration and risk of insulin resistance. Inferences concerning the risk for incident insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, however, will be enhanced with data from prospective studies among Peruvians. Second, a single measurement of serum CRP is not likely to provide a time-integrated measure of inflammation status. However, several investigators have noted that CRP concentrations are stable over a long period of time [7, 24]. Third, direct measures of central adiposity were not used. Studies have shown that among middle-aged adults, BMI is strongly correlated with more invasive direct measures of central adiposity [25, 26]. Fourth, HOMA-IR was used for assessing insulin resistance in our population-based epidemiological study. The euglycemic glucose clamp has been reported to be the gold standard method for evaluating insulin resistance [16]. Because of its invasiveness, complexity and expense, the euglycemic glucose clamp method is of limited use for clinical screening exams and population-based epidemiological studies. The results from HOMA-IR have been correlated with the results obtained from the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique [1, 16].

Our understanding of CRP over the last decade has increased markedly. CRP has been shown to be a useful marker and mediator of inflammation and a powerful predictor of future CVD event [9]. This increased recognition has led for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association to publish guidelines that endorse the use of CRP as the only inflammatory biomarker currently available with adequate standardization and predictive value that is suitable as an adjunct to traditional risk factor screening [27]. Collectively, available evidence suggests that systemic inflammation, as evidenced by elevated CRP, may be of etiologic importance in insulin resistance and diabetes. Our observation among Peruvians raise the possibility that inflammatory markers, like CRP, might provide an adjunctive method for early detection of type 2 diabetes although further investigation is needed to confirm this observation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Direccion General de Epidemiologia Ministerio de Salud Peru, by an award from the National Institutes of Health, National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities (T37-MD001449), and by the Instituto Nacional de Salud Peru.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Washington, Multidisciplinary International Research Training Program
(2)
Direccion General de Epidemiologia, Ministerio de Salud
(3)
Dos de Mayo Hospital
(4)
Center for Perinatal Studies, Swedish Medical Center

References

  1. Deveci E, Yesil M, Akinci B, Yesil S, Postaci N, Arikan E, Koseoglu M: Evaluation of insulin resistance in normoglycemic patients with coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol. 2009, 32: 32-36. 10.1002/clc.20379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. WHO: World Health Report. Prevention Chronic Disease: A vital Investment. Geneva, Switzerland 2008. Accessed Apirl 2, 2010, [http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/contents/part1.pdf]
  3. Borch-Johnsen K: The metabolic syndrome in a global perspective. The public health impact--secondary publication. Dan Med Bull. 2007, 54: 157-159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wellen KE, Hotamisligil GS: Obesity-induced inflammatory changes in adipose tissue. J Clin Invest. 2003, 112: 1785-1788.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ryu SY, Kim KS, Park J, Kang MG, Han MA: The association between circulating inflammatory markers and metabolic syndrome in Korean rural adults. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008, 41: 413-418. 10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.6.413.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lindgarde F, Ercilla MB, Correa LR, Ahren B: Body adiposity, insulin, and leptin in subgroups of Peruvian Amerindians. High Alt Med Biol. 2004, 5: 27-31. 10.1089/152702904322963663.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ridker PM: C-reactive protein and the prediction of cardiovascular events among those at intermediate risk: moving an inflammatory hypothesis toward consensus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 49: 2129-2138. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeppesen J, Hansen TW, Olsen MH, Rasmussen S, Ibsen H, Torp-Pedersen C, Hildebrandt PR, Madsbad S: C-reactive protein, insulin resistance and risk of cardiovascular disease: a population-based study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008, 15: 594-598. 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328308bb8b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ndumele CE, Pradhan AD, Ridker PM: Interrelationships between inflammation, C-reactive protein, and insulin resistance. J Cardiometab Syndr. 2006, 1: 190-196. 10.1111/j.1559-4564.2006.05538.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nakanishi N, Shiraishi T, Wada M: Association between C-reactive protein and insulin resistance in a Japanese population: the Minoh Study. Intern Med. 2005, 44: 542-547. 10.2169/internalmedicine.44.542.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yudkin JS, Stehouwer CD, Emeis JJ, Coppack SW: C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: associations with obesity, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction: a potential role for cytokines originating from adipose tissue?. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999, 19: 972-978.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM: C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001, 286: 327-334. 10.1001/jama.286.3.327.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Barzilay JI, Abraham L, Heckbert SR, Cushman M, Kuller LH, Resnick HE, Tracy RP: The relation of markers of inflammation to the development of glucose disorders in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Diabetes. 2001, 50: 2384-2389. 10.2337/diabetes.50.10.2384.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gelaye B, Revilla L, Lopez T, Sanchez S, Williams MA: Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its relationship with leisure time physical activity among Peruvian adults. Eur J Clin Invest. 2009, 39: 891-898. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02191.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. PAHO: PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Countrywide Integrated Noncommunicable Diseases Intervention (CINDI) Programme. Accessed November 27, 2009, [http://www.paho.org/english/ad/dpc/nc/hcncindi.pdf]
  16. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC: Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985, 28: 412-419. 10.1007/BF00280883.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Roberts WL, Moulton L, Law TC, Farrow G, Cooper-Anderson M, Savory J, Rifai N: Evaluation of nine automated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein methods: implications for clinical and epidemiological applications. Part 2. Clin Chem. 2001, 47: 418-425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanyu O, Yoshida J, Abe E, Hirayama S, Miyake K, Aizawa Y, Miida T: High- sensitivity CRP reflects insulin resistance in smokers. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2009, 16: 560-567.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A: Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002, 105: 1135-1143. 10.1161/hc0902.104353.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gabay C, Kushner I: Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340: 448-454. 10.1056/NEJM199902113400607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarva H, Jokiranta TS, Hellwage J, Zipfel PF, Meri S: Regulation of complement activation by C-reactive protein: targeting the complement inhibitory activity of factor H by an interaction with short consensus repeat domains 7 and 8-11. J Immunol. 1999, 163: 3957-3962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fukuchi Y, Miura Y, Nabeno Y, Kato Y, Osawa T, Naito M: Immunohistochemical detection of oxidative stress biomarkers, dityrosine and N(epsilon)- (hexanoyl)lysine, and C-reactive protein in rabbit atherosclerotic lesions. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2008, 15: 185-192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Lowe G, Pepys MB, Thompson SG, Collins R, Danesh J: C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010, 375: 132-140. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61717-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ockene IS, Matthews CE, Rifai N, Ridker PM, Reed G, Stanek E: Variability and classification accuracy of serial high-sensitivity C-reactive protein measurements in healthy adults. Clin Chem. 2001, 47: 444-450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Willett WC, Dietz WH, Colditz GA: Guidelines for healthy weight. N Engl J Med. 1999, 341: 427-434. 10.1056/NEJM199908053410607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bray GA, Jablonski KA, Fujimoto WY, Barrett-Connor E, Haffner S, Hanson RL, Hill JO, Hubbard V, Kriska A, Stamm E, Pi-Sunyer FX: Relation of central adiposity and body mass index to the development of diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 1212-1218.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, Anderson JL, Cannon RO, Criqui M, Fadl YY, Fortmann SP, Hong Y, Myers GL, et al: Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2003, 107: 499-511. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000052939.59093.45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gelaye et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement