Open Access

Short-term nutritional counseling reduces body mass index, waist circumference, triceps skinfold and triglycerides in women with metabolic syndrome

  • Gustavo D Pimentel1,
  • Silvia T Arimura2,
  • Bruno M de Moura2,
  • Maria ER Silva3 and
  • Maysa V de Sousa3Email author
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome20102:13

DOI: 10.1186/1758-5996-2-13

Received: 18 November 2009

Accepted: 10 February 2010

Published: 10 February 2010

Abstract

Background

It is recognized that the growing epidemic of metabolic syndrome is related to dietary and lifestyle changes.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate short-term application of nutritional counseling in women with metabolic syndrome.

Methods

This follow-up study was conducted from September to November 2008 with thirty three women ≥35 years old screened clinically for nutritional counseling. Dietary intake was reported, and biochemical and body composition measures were taken at baseline and after three months of follow-up.

Results

Of the 33 women evaluated, 29 patients completed the study. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity was high at 38%, 72.4%, 55.2%, and 75.8%, respectively. At the end of three-months of follow-up, a significant decline in body mass index, waist circumference, triceps skinfold, and triglycerides was observed, as was an increase in calcium and vitamin D intake. The multiple regression analysis showed that changes in body mass index, triceps skinfold, waist circumference and triglyceride levels after nutritional intervention were positively associated with changes in anthropometric (loss of body weight) and biochemical (decrease of TG/HDL-c ratio) parameters. Moreover, waist circumference changes were negatively associated with changes in calcium and vitamin D intake.

Conclusion

Short-term nutritional counseling improved some factors of metabolic syndrome. Moreover, the increases in calcium and vitamin D consumption can be associated with the improvement in markers of metabolic syndrome.

Introduction

Metabolic syndrome was defined in 2001 by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) as the presence of ≥ 3 of the following risk factors: abdominal obesity (high waist circumference), hyperglycemia, hypertriacylglycerolemia, low HDL-c, and hypertension [1].

The high prevalence of metabolic syndrome in developing countries have been demonstrated in countries such as: Morocco, Oman, Turkey, Iran with 33.5%, 16.3%, 33.4%, and 33.7%, respectively. In South America the prevalence is 31.2% in Venezuela and 25.4% in Brazil [2].

It is recognized that the growing epidemic of chronic diseases is related to dietary and lifestyle changes in the post-industrial era. Several studies have demonstrated the association between nutrition and obesity, coronary heart disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and certain cancers (for review see WHO [3]). In this case, the prevention of metabolic syndrome represents an important opportunity to ameliorate the health of these patients. Thus the Dietary Guidelines for Americans [4], the Brazilian Guidelines on Diagnosis and Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome [5], and long-term lifestyle intervention [68] and short-term [9] emphasizes low consumption of hypercaloric food, recommends increased amounts of whole grain, fruit and vegetables, and a limited intake of trans and saturated fatty acids.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of short-term application of nutritional counseling in Brazilian women with metabolic syndrome.

Methods

Subjects and Methods

This follow-up study was conducted from September to November 2008 in patients screened clinically for nutritional counseling. The sample consisted of women attended by the Family Health Program of Mogi das Cruzes, located in the Metropolitan Area of São Paulo, Brazil. The only criterion for inclusion was women with metabolic syndrome (defined by the ATP III), but women with liver, kidney or heart diseases were excluded, as were women with chronic consumption of alcohol. As a whole, 33 women from 35 to 77 years old were evaluated (Figure 1). All the participants signed the prior informed consent designed according to the n° 196/96 on "Research involving human beings, from the Health Board of the Ministry of Health" approved by the Ethics Committee of Mogi das Cruzes University, under number 131/2008.
Figure 1

Flowchart of participation in the study.

Anthropometry and body composition assessments

Body weight was obtained to the nearest 0.01 kg with an electronic scale (Filizola®, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) and height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm without shoes while standing on a level, hard surface using a calibrated stadiometer (Sanny®, Brazil) followed by body mass index (BMI) calculation [10] and according to the norms standard by Heyward & Stolarczyk [11].

The waist circumference was measured 2 cm over the umbilical scar [12] and arm circumference was measured to evaluate the reduction of the muscle or fat mass from reduction of body weight. This was followed by evaluations of triceps and biceps skinfold thickness, measured at the midpoint of the upper arm and was expressed in mm by means of a Lange skinfold caliper in triplicate [13].

Nutritional counseling

Participants received individual and group counseling with a team of nutritionists. The dietary intervention consisted of discussion-format group sessions that took place weekly and individual sessions that took place every two weeks to discuss changes in eating habits, nutrition guidelines, and the importance of compliance with the diet to promote weight loss and to improve the quality of health (Figure 1). In other words, the topics discussed were about the importance of healthy eating (increasing intake of fruits, vegetables, fish and water and reducing consumption of sugar, fat, sodium, and fried foods) to diminish the components of metabolic syndrome.

The intervention included written and oral instructions in the form of lecture, with the aid of a sequence of posters. Patients were also encouraged to increase physical activity, mainly by walking, swimming or aerobic ball games.

Dietary measurements

Initial and follow-up visits included anthropometrical data, biochemical parameters, as well as assessment of current diet.

The 24 h recall questionnaire was performed before and after nutritional counseling and was evaluated for the presence or absence of changes in eating habits. The food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) only was available at the baseline point. Nutritional analysis was carried out with the software NutWin® (Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil). Table of Food Composition-Brazil [14] and TACO version 2-Brazil [15] tables were used to determine the macro and micronutrients content of foods.

Sociodemographic characteristics

The women answered questionnaires (baseline moment) with regard to sociodemographic factors. Subjects also were asked about home conditions, basic sanitation, health-related habits (smoking status, alcohol intake, dieting in the past, and whether they are physically active or not). Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia and obesity were defined by Brazilian Guidelines on Diagnosis and Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome [5].

Biochemical measurements

Blood samples were obtained after a 12-hour fast and analyzed in the Hospital Laboratory of the city of Mogi das Cruzes, São Paulo, Brazil. Labtest® kits were used to assess fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, HDL-c and triglycerides. The samples were analyzed using an enzymatic method. LDL-c was calculated according to the Friedwald equation (LDL-c = total cholesterol-(HDL-c)-(TG/5) [16] and LDL-c subclass by the equation (TG/HDL-c ratio) [17] which is a good predictive factor for oxidized-LDL-c.

Statistical analysis

Implementation of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test revealed that the results of experiments were distributed normally. Thus, the variables were expressed by descriptive analysis (mean and standard deviation) and a t-test was used to check for any possible differences between findings at the baseline and after nutritional counseling.

Linear relationships were estimated using Pearson correlation (crude model) to examine the associations between changes in variables, expressed as percentage of change ((endpoint - baseline value)/baseline value × 100). Moreover, a multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the contribution of changes in body composition, food intake and biochemical measurements to changes in metabolic parameters independent of other factors. Thus, three models of adjustment were performed, first adjusted by age (model 1), adjusted by BMI (model 2) and adjusted by total calories intake (model 3).

The level of statistical significance used was 5% in all tests. For all analyses we used software STATISTICA version 6.0.

Results

Of the 33 women evaluated, 29 patients completed the study. Four participants abandoned the nutritional counseling (Figure 1).

The dietetic, anthropometric, and biochemical characteristics at baseline and after three months of nutritional counseling are shown in Table 1. At the end of three months of follow-up, a significant decline in BMI, waist circumference, triceps skinfold, and triglycerides was observed, as well as an increase in calcium and vitamin D intake. The total calorie and macronutrient intake didn't alter after nutricional counseling (Table 1). Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants (Table 2) demonstrated that most were living in owned houses (96.5%), had basic sanitation (96.5%), didn't smoke or drink alcohol (82.8% and 90.5%), didn't try to lose weight by dieting in the past (65.5%), and were sedentary (79.3%). The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity was high, at 38%, 72.4%, 55.2%, and 75.8%, respectively.
Table 1

Anthropometric, dietetic, and biochemical variables at baseline and after nutritional counseling.

Variables

Baseline

After nutritional counseling

p value

Age (y)

56.7 ± 9.0

-

-

Body mass index (kg/m2)

33.6 ± 6.0

33.1 ± 5.7

0.009*

Waist circumference (cm)

104.8 ± 11.6

101.9 ± 11.0

0.0008*

Biceps skinfold (mm)

35.5 ± 3.8

35.3 ± 4.1

0.41

Triceps skinfold (mm)

36.0 ± 8.5

34.2 ± 8.2

0.031*

Calories (kcal)

1140.0 ± 287.3

1210.7 ± 353.6

0.288

Carbohydrate (%)

55.1 ± 12.2

59.5 ± 12.0

0.178

Protein (%)

20.9 ± 6.0

18.4 ± 4.9

0.084

Lipids (%)

23.9 ± 10.7

22.0 ± 9.8

0.518

Dietary fiber (g)

9.4 ± 4.9

9.5 ± 7.0

0.982

Calcium (mg)

423.3 ± 252.8

587.3 ± 251,3

0.023*

Phosphor (mg)

694.0 ± 271.0

762.6 ± 284.0

0.240

Sodium (mg)

1965.0 ± 892.3

1844.4 ± 639.4

0.541

Magnesium (mg)

193.2 ± 97.7

191.5 ± 66.2

0.940

Potassium (mg)

2241.6 ± 1026.2

2332.8 ± 867.7

0.717

Vitamin D (mg)

1.8 ± 1.0

2.8 ± 1.7

0.013*

Fasting glucose (mg/dL)

120.8 ± 37.0

107.5 ± 34.8

0.133

Total cholesterol (mg/dL)

217.3 ± 54.9

196.8 ± 41.2

0.112

HDL-c (mg/dL)

47.0 ± 9.1

49.9 ± 10.7

0.194

LDL-c (mg/dL)

137.0 ± 52.1

118.8 ± 42.0

0.125

Triglycerides (mg/dL)

168.0 ± 56.2

140.6 ± 65.0

0.045*

TG/HDL-c ratio

3.7 ± 1.5

3.1 ± 2.0

0.155

BMI: body mass index; HDL-c: high density lipoprotein; LDL-c: low density lipoprotein.

*p < 0.05 significative difference versus basal.

Table 2

Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants.

Variables

n (%)

Home

 

   Rented

1 (3.5)

   Own house

28 (96.5)

Basic sanitation

 

   Yes

28 (96.5)

   No

1 (3.5)

Smoke

 

   Yes

5 (17.2)

   No

24 (82.8)

Alcoholic drink

 

   Yes

3 (9.5)

   No

26 (90.5)

Dieting in the past

 

   Yes

10 (34.5)

   No

19 (65.5)

Physical activity

 

   Yes

6 (20.7)

   No

23 (79.3)

Diabetes

 

   Yes

11 (38)

   No

18 (62.0)

Hypertension

 

   Yes

21 (72.4)

   No

8 (27.6)

Dyslipidemia

 

   Yes

16 (55.2)

   No

13 (44.8)

Obesity

 

   Yes

22 (75.8)

   No

7 (24.2)

At the baseline, FFQ showed that all (100%) subjects consumed rice, breads or roots daily, fruits (55% daily, 41.5% weekly, and 3.5% monthly) and vegetables (72.5% daily, 13.8% weekly, 3.5% monthly, and 10.2% never), meat and eggs (79.3% daily and 20.7% weekly), beans (93.0% daily and 7.0% weekly), oil and fats (62.0% daily, 24.0% weekly, 3.5% monthly, and 10.5% never) and sugar and sweets (48.2% daily, 24.0% weekly, 10.3% monthly, and 17.5% never). Furthermore, Pearson's correlation demonstrated that biceps skinfold was associated positively with meat serving (r = 0.56), triceps skinfold with meat serving (r = 0.59) and vegetable oil serving (r = 0.53).

In the studied individuals, BMI, triceps skinfold, waist circumference and triglycerides changes were positively associated with body weight, BMI, waist circumference, and TG/HDL-c ratio (all Pearson correlation coefficients >0.42; all p values ≤ 0.05 or ≤ 0.0001). Besides, waist circumference were negatively associated with calcium (r = -0.37, p ≤ 0.05) and vitamin D (r = -0.39, p ≤ 0.05) intake, suggesting that both increases were linked to the reduction of abdominal fat. The triglycerides changes was also inversely (r = -0.86, p ≤ 0.0001) associated with changes in HDL-c concentrations (Table 3).
Table 3

Partial correlation of changes (Δ percentage) in body mass index, triceps skinfold, waist circumference measurements and triglycerides concentrations after three months related to changes in metabolic parameters adjusted for age, body composition and calories intake.

Variables

Crude

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

 

BMI

TSF

WC

TG

BMI

TSF

WC

TG

TSF

WC

TG

BMI

TSF

WC

TG

Body weight

0.96‡

0.16

0.38

-0.45

0.96‡

-0.13

-0.16

-0.03

0.97‡

0.96‡

0.97‡

-0.12

-0.18

-0.12

-0.03

Body mass index

-

0.19

0.42†

-0.46

-

-0.09

-0.09

0.11

-

-

-

-

-0.18

-0.10

0.11

Waist circumference

0.42†

0.00

-

-0.27

-0.09

-0.20

-0.16

-0.16

0.42

-

0.41

-0.10

-0.03

-

-0.16

Biceps skinfold

0.26

0.11

0.35

-0.27

0.11

-0.11

-0.06

-0.25

0.08

0.34

0.62

-0.20

0.14

0.11

-0.25

Triceps skinfold

0.19

-

0.00

-0.07

0.18

-

-0.20

0.21

-

0.42

-0.03

-0.18

-

-0.03

0.21

Glucose

0.20

0.52

-0.40

-0.46

0.06

0.60

-0.12

-0.27

-0.02

0.45

0.20

0.03

0.32

0.34

-0.27

Cholesterol

0.23

-0.29

0.17

-0.10

0.11

0.21

-0.16

-0.21

-0.05

0.08

0.01

0.03

0.35

0.35

-0.08

HDL-c

0.37

0.13

0.36

-0.86‡

0.43

0.21

-0.16

-0.31

-0.05

0.41

0.38

0.03

0.35

0.35

-0.31

LDL-c

0.25

-0.44

0.18

-0.19

0.11

-0.42

-0.16

-0.17

-0.05

0.41

0.25

-0.01

0.35

0.35

-0.16

Triglycerides

-0.46

-0.07

-0.27

-

0.11

0.21

-0.16

-0.17

-0.03

-0.09

-

-0.01

0.04

0.40

-

TG/HDL-c ratio

-0.46

0.02

-0.24

0.98‡

-0.49

0.21

-0.16

0.13

-0.00

0.41

0.97‡

-0.01

0.35

0.35

0.13

Calories

-0.10

0.32

0.15

0.22

-0.09

0.32

0.15

0.13

0.19

0.42†

-0.46

-

-

-

-

Carbohydrate

0.01

-0.25

-0.20

-0.34

-0.09

-0.05

-0.11

0.13

0.19

-0.23

-0.46

-0.10

0.32

0.15

0.22

Protein

0.06

-0.12

0.17

-0.15

0.10

-0.05

-0.11

0.13

-0.07

0.42†

0.06

-0.10

0.32

0.15

0.22

Lipids

-0.07

0.23

0.11

0.31

-0.09

0.22

-0.11

0.13

0.19

0.42†

-0.46

-0.10

0.32

0.15

0.22

Dietary fiber

-0.13

-0.01

0.12

-0.17

-0.09

-0.05

-0.11

0.13

0.19

0.18

-0.46

-0.10

0.32

0.15

0.22

Calcium

-0.18

-0.22

-0.39†

0.12

-0.17

-0.05

-0.11

0.13

0.19

0.42†

-0.07

-0.10

0.32

0.15

0.22

Phosphoro

-0.08

-0.13

0.01

-0.19

-0.09

-0.12

0.03

0.13

0.19

0.42†

-0.07

-0.10

0.32

0.15

0.22

Sodium

-0.19

0.34

-0.26

0.06

-0.09

-0.05

-0.11

0.13

0.19

0.42†

-0.07

-0.10

0.32

0.15

0.22

Magnesium

-0.22

-0.22

-0.11

0.33

-0,21

-0.05

-0.11

0.13

0.19

0.42†

0.27

-0.10

0.32

0.15

0.22

Potassium

-0.12

-0.30

-0.11

0.24

-0.09

-0.05

-0.11

0.13

0.19

0.42†

-0.46

-0.10

0.32

0.15

0.22

Vitamin D

-0.03

-0.16

-0.37†

0.19

-0.09

-0.05

-0.11

0.13

0.19

0.42†

-0.46

-0.10

0.32

0.15

0.22

Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the contribution of changes in body composition, food intake and biochemical measurements to changes in metabolic parameters independent of other factors. The value were expressed as percentage of change ((endpoint - baseline value)/baseline value × 100). Crude model: withouth adjustment, Model 1: adjusted by age, Model 2: adjusted by BMI and Model 3: adjusted by calories intake. BMI: body mass index, TSF: triceps skinfold, WC: waist circumference, TG: triglycerides.

†p ≤ 0.05, ‡p ≤ 0.0001

The multiple regression analysis adjusted by age (model 1) showed a positive correlation between BMI and body weight (r = 0.96, p ≤ 0.0001). When adjusted by BMI (model 2), we observed a positive correlation between triceps skinfold, waist circumference and triglycerides with body weight, TG/HDL-c ratio, total calories, proteins, lipids, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium and vitamin D intake (all correlations r > 0.42, for all values of p ≤ 0.05 or ≤ 0.0001).

In order to verify whether the caloric intake may interfere with the changes to the anthropometric and triglycerides levels, a multiple regression analysis was performed adjusted by energy intake (model 3). It could be observed that the decrease in triglycerides and anthropometric indicators were influenced by the total caloric intake, because after adjustment by calorie intake (model 3) significant losses were observed in all correlation performed (Table 3).

Discussion

In this study, we tested the hypothesis that a nutritional counseling approach aimed at reducing BMI, waist circumference, triceps skinfold and triglycerides and increasing calcium and vitamin D intake is effective over a short-term (three months) at reducing markers of metabolic syndrome. Regarding the Pearson correlation and multiple regression, we showed that the reduction in BMI, waist circumference, triceps skinfold, and triglycerides can be associated with the decrease in body weight and TG/HDL-c ratio, as well as with the increases in calcium and vitamin D intake.

Several studies have revealed the importance of nutritional education aiming at preventing metabolic syndrome [6, 7, 9]. The present study confirmed this by observing a significant decline in BMI, triceps skinfold and triglycerides and increases in calcium and vitamin D intake. This increase in calcium and vitamin D may have occurred by substitution of milk, cheese and butter for low fat dairy products observed during nutritional counseling (data not published) which is rich in calcium and vitamin D.

Calcium is one major nutritional component in dairy products. Dietary calcium may lower the activity of renin-angiotensin system, improve sodium-potassium balance, and inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell constriction [18]. Moreover, high calcium intake facilitates weight loss and enhances insulin sensitivity, which also contribute to blood pressure reduction [19].

Recently, numerous interventional and epidemiological [2025] studies have shown that the calcium and vitamin D consumption are associated with and effectively reduce abdominal fat and metabolic syndrome risk.

Similar to previous studies [2628] we found that abdominal fat is considered one of the strongest indicators of metabolic syndrome and is associated with TG/HDL-c ratio.

In the present study, we evaluated the predictive factor for oxidized-LDL-c by using the equation (TG/HDL-c ratio) [17], but didn't observe a reduction after nutritional counseling. Obviously, the TG/HDL-c ratio was associated with triglycerides concentrations, suggesting that reductions in triglycerides also diminished TG/HDL-c ratio. In this context, several studies have demonstrated that oxidized-LDL-c activates circulating monocytes, increasing their ability to infiltrate the vascular wall and this increased infiltration is a primary stage for atherogenesis [29, 30] and worsening of metabolic syndrome. The oxidized-LDL-c increases triglycerides production by inducing the accumulation of fatty acids in adipocytes [31]. Moreover, hypertriglyceridemia is associated with higher levels of small dense LDL-c, which is particularly prone to oxidation and has been proven to be more atherogenic than larger LDL-c particles [32, 33]. Fortunately, in the present study we managed to lower the triglyceride levels at the end of study.

As mentioned previously, the women in this study had little change in their BMI but showed a decrease in waist circumference. In fact, the nutritional counseling may have modest effects on decreasing BMI and more effect on abdominal fat loss. It has already been established that the waist circumference is positively associated with all the obesity-related abnormalities, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular diseases, stroke and myocardial infaction [34, 35].

Waist circumference and skinfold measurements can be used to assess body composition and are cheaper than imaging technique such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, air-displacement plethysmography or hydrostatic weighing that may provide a more accurate method for assessing body composition [36, 37] and the metabolic syndrome risk.

Our study has some limitations. First of all, the Brazilian population has a high degree of miscegenation that includes a mix of indigenous people, Afro- and Euro-Brazilians, and a widespread Latin ancestry. Thus, we do not know if this genetic and environmental diversity can modify the relationship between nutritional counseling and diminishing metabolic syndrome factors. Second, the low number of participants included in study. Third, the short-term of the nutritional counseling, lasting only three months. Fourth, the lack of a control group.

The lifestyle modifications that combine energy restriction and healthy eating (increased intake of fruits, vegetables, fish and water and reduced consumption of sugar, fat, sodium, and fried foods) would appear to be a preferred treatment strategy for metabolic syndrome. However, these results are limited to overweight and obese women with metabolic syndrome attended by the Family Health Program in a little city of the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Moreover, the subjects were verbally informed to do physical activity. However, it is not known if everyone started physical activity and whether this could be influencing the results.

Therefore, further research is required to assess the benefits of nutritional counseling in both women and men with metabolic syndrome. Additional studies are also required to evaluate the individual effects of different nutrients and their long-term effects.

In summary, this study shows that the reduction of metabolic syndrome factors can be effectively achieved by short-term nutritional counseling. The lifestyle interventions proposed reduces BMI, waist circumference, triceps skinfold, and triglycerides concentrations. Moreover the reduction in BMI, waist circumference, triceps skinfold and triglycerides was partially associated with the decrease in body weight and TG/HDL-c ratio, as well as with the increases in calcium and vitamin D intake, independent of age and body composition. However, further studies are warranted to confirm the potential benefit of nutritional counseling in mitigating metabolic syndrome.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Maysa VS thanks the School of Medicine Foundation, Sao Paulo University for their assistance provided. Pimentel GD thanks the National Council for Scientific and Technological (CNPq, Brazil) for the scholarship granted.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physiology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP)
(2)
Nutrition Course, Mogi das Cruzes University (UMC)
(3)
Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM 18), Endocrinology, School of Medicine (USP)

References

  1. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP): Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001, 285 (19): 2486-2497. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Misra A, Khurana L: Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in developing countries. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2008, 93 (11 Suppl 1): 9-30. 10.1210/jc.2008-1595.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. World Health Organization (WHO): Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Expert Consultation on diet, nutrition and prevention of chronic diseases. 2003, Geneva: WHO/FAOGoogle Scholar
  4. USDA: Dietary guidelines for Americans. 2005, Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture and Department of Health and Human Services, 6Google Scholar
  5. I Brazilian guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of metabolic syndrome. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2005, 84 (Suppl 1): 1-28.
  6. Bruner B, Chad K, Chizen D: Effects of exercise and nutritional counseling in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2006, 31 (4): 384-391. 10.1139/H06-007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown T, Avenell A, Edmunds LD, Moore H, Whittaker V, Avery L, Summerbell C: Systematic review of long-term lifestyle interventions to prevent weight gain and morbidity in adults. Obes Rev. 2009, 10 (6): 627-638. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00641.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujii H, Haruyama Y, Muto T, Kobayashi E, Ishisaki K, Yamasaki A: High attendance at a lifestyle intervention program is important to reduce risks related to metabolic syndrome in middle-aged Japanese. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009, 219 (2): 155-164. 10.1620/tjem.219.155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wu RR, Zhao JP, Jin H, Shao P, Fang MS, Guo XF, He YQ, Liu YJ, Chen JD, Li LH: Lifestyle intervention and metformin for treatment of antipsychotic-induced weight gain. JAMA. 2008, 299 (2): 185-193. 10.1001/jama.2007.56-b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. World Health Organization (WHO): Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of the WHO Consultation on Obesity. 1998, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  11. Heyward VH, Storlarczyk LM: Avaliação da composição corporal aplicada. 2000, São Paulo: ManoleGoogle Scholar
  12. Callaway CW, Chumlea WC, Bouchard C, Himes JH, Lohman TG, Martin AD et al:: Circunferences, Anthropometric standardizations reference manual. Edited by: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. 1988, Champaign. IL: Human KineticsGoogle Scholar
  13. Frisancho RA: Anthropometric standards for the assesment of growth and nutritional status. 1990, Universith of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Philippi ST: Tabela de composição de alimentos: Suporte para decisão nutricional. Segunda Edição. 2002Google Scholar
  15. TACO: Tabela brasileira de composição de alimentos. 2006, UNICAMP, Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Alimentação. versão 2. Segunda Edição. São PauloGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedewald T, Levy RI, Frederickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972, 18 (6): 499-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsimihodimos V, Gazi I, Kostara C, Tselepis AD, Elisaf M: Plasma lipoproteins and triacylglycerol are predictors of small, dense LDL particles. Lipids. 2007, 42 (5): 403-409. 10.1007/s11745-007-3050-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Resnick LM: The role of dietary calcium in hypertension: a hierarchical overview. Am J Hypertens. 1999, 12 (1 Pt 1): 99-112. 10.1016/S0895-7061(98)00275-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang L, Manson JE, Buring JE, L I-M, Sesso HD: Dietary intake of dairy products, calcium, and vitamin D and the risk of hypertension in middle-aged and older women. Hypertension. 2008, 51 (4): 1073-1079. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.107821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zemel MB, Richards J, Milstead A, Campbell P: Effects of calcium and dairy on body composition and weight loss in African-American adults. Obes Res. 2005, 13 (7): 1218-1225. 10.1038/oby.2005.144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pereira MA, Jacobs DR, Van Horn L, Slattery ML, Kartashov AI, Ludwig DS: Dairy consumption, obesity, and the insulin resistance syndrome in Young adults: the CARDIA Study. JAMA. 2002, 287 (16): 2081-2089. 10.1001/jama.287.16.2081.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cheng S, Massaro JM, Fox CS, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, McCabe EL, Robins SJ, O'Donnell CJ, Hoffmann U, Jacques PF, Booth SL, Vasan RS, Wolf M, Wang TJ: Adiposity, cardiometabolic risk, and vitamin D status: the Framingham Heart Study. Diabetes. 2010, 59 (1): 242-248. 10.2337/db09-1011.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Foss YJ: Vitamin D deficiency is the cause of common obesity. Med Hypotheses. 2009, 72 (3): 314-321. 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.10.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Major GC, Alarie FP, Doré J, Tremblay A: Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and fat mass loss in female very low-calcium consumers: potential link with a calcium-specific appetite control. Br J Nutr. 2009, 101 (5): 659-663. 10.1017/S0007114508030808.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zittermann A, Frisch S, Berthold HK, Götting C, Kuhn J, Kleesiek K, Stehle P, Koertke H, Koerfer R: Vitamin D supplementation enhances the beneficial effects of weight loss on cardiovascular disease risk markers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89 (5): 1321-1327. 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Esposito K, Pontillo A, Palo CD, Giugliano G, Masella M, Marfella R, Giugliano D: Effect of weight loss and lifestyle changes on vascular inflammatory markers in obese women. JAMA. 2003, 289 (14): 1799-1804. 10.1001/jama.289.14.1799.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lemos-Santos MGF, Valente JG, Gonçalves-Silva RMV, Sichieri R: Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of serum concentration of lipids in Brazilian men. Nutrition. 2004, 20 (10): 857-862. 10.1016/j.nut.2004.06.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferreira MG, Valente JG, Gonçalves-Silva RMV, Sichieri : Acurácia da circunferência da cintura e da relação cintura/quadril como preditores de dislipidemias em estudo transversal de doadores de sangue de Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Cad Saúde Públ. 2006, 22 (2): 307-314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Cipolletta C, Ryan KE, Hanna EV, Trimble ER: Activation of peripheral blood CD14+ monocytes occurs in diabetes. Diabetes. 2005, 54 (9): 2779-2786. 10.2337/diabetes.54.9.2779.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Stengel D, Antonucci M, Gaoua W, Dachet C, Lesnik P, Hourton D, Ninio E, Chapman MJ, Griglio S: Inhibition of LPL expression in human monocyte-derived macrophages is dependent on LDL oxidation state: a key role for lysophosphatidylcholine. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998, 18 (7): 1172-80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Knopp RH, Paramsothy P: Oxidized LDL and abdominal obesity: a key to understanding the metabolic syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 83 (1): 1-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Krauss RM, Burke DJ: Identification of multiple subclasses of plasma low density lipoproteins in normal humans. J Lipid Res. 1982, 23 (1): 97-104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ridker PM, Buring JE, Cook NR, Rifai N: C-reactive protein, the metabolic syndrome, and risk of incident cardiovascular events: an 8-year follow-up of 14 719 initially healthy American women. Circulation. 2003, 107 (3): 391-7. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000055014.62083.05.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fezeu L, Balkau B, Sobngwi E, Kengne AP, Vol S, Ducimetiere P, Mbanya JC: Waist circumference and obesity-related abnormalities in French and Cameroonian adults: the role of urbanization and ethnicity. In J Obes. 2010,Google Scholar
  35. Furukawa Y, Kokubo Y, Okamura T, Watanabe M, Higashiyama A, Ono Y, Kawanishi K, Okayama A, Date C: The relationship between waist circumference and the risk of stroke and myocardial infarction in a Japanese urban cohort. The Suita Study. Stroke.
  36. Fuller NJ, Jebb SA, Laskey MA, Coward WA, Elia M: Four-component model for the assessment of body composition in humans: comparison with alternative methods, and evaluation of the density and hydration of fat-free mass. Clin Sci. 1992, 82 (6): 687-693.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Biaggi RR, Vollman MW, Nies MA, Brener CE, Flakoll PJ, Levenhagen DK, Sun M, Karabulut Z, Chen KY: Comparison of air-displacement plethysmography with hydrostatic weighing and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999, 69 (5): 898-903.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pimentel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement